Pally's V.S. Hunter's?!

Maedris · November 2006

Hey, ok I think Blizzard has some major problems against Hunters. It's like they hate them or something... Like their talents start costing alot almosting hitting lvl 30 and same with pet, it just costs you more in the long run.

Now with pally's they give a free mount at lvl 40 and partially free at lvl 60. How can Blizzard love pally's so much? I dont just quite understand that concept. What abour Warlocks though, why do they get a free mount at lvl 40? It doesn't make any sense, they are like evil and crap. It should either be Pally's and Warriors, Pally's and Priests, those classes. But I understand the Pally and their free mount, because they are for the Alliance, like they are fighting for good and have these special powers to fight evil yet stay safe with healing and shit, so thats cool, but, why do they hate Hunter's so much?

If someone out there has an answer for it, please send me an email or something, anything!

~Maedris~

neuronomad · November 2006

Originally posted by Maedris
Hey, ok I think Blizzard has some major problems against Hunters. It's like they hate them or something... Like their talents start costing alot almosting hitting lvl 30 and same with pet, it just costs you more in the long run.

Now with pally's they give a free mount at lvl 40 and partially free at lvl 60. How can Blizzard love pally's so much? I dont just quite understand that concept. What abour Warlocks though, why do they get a free mount at lvl 40? It doesn't make any sense, they are like evil and crap. It should either be Pally's and Warriors, Pally's and Priests, those classes. But I understand the Pally and their free mount, because they are for the Alliance, like they are fighting for good and have these special powers to fight evil yet stay safe with healing and shit, so thats cool, but, why do they hate Hunter's so much?

If someone out there has an answer for it, please send me an email or something, anything!

~Maedris~

Maedris,

Let me start off by saying that I can't stand Paladins. I have tried to play the class and found it boring. And in battlegrounds when I go up against one I can't stand it beause they take forever to kill. That said I really don't have a clue though what in the world you are trying to say, first it sounds like you dislike that they get free mount at forty (and trust me they don't get a free mount at 60). Blizzard doesn't hate Hunters. They are one of the best if not best solo classes in the game. They get a speed buff very early in the game, they have nearly the best DPS in the game. So on.

As far as Warlocks, I can speak in depth on that topic as my main is a Warlock. The reason they get free mount at 40 is because of the huge amounts of money we spend on our spells and our pet's spells. We spend way more money training our minions than Hunters do training their pets. And as with Paladins the mount at 60 is anything but free.

Might I ask why you say Blizzard hates Hunters, you didn't even list a reason. You only listed why you don't like what Blizzard has given to Pally and Locks.

hercules · November 2006

Originally posted by Maedris
Hey, ok I think Blizzard has some major problems against Hunters. It's like they hate them or something... Like their talents start costing alot almosting hitting lvl 30 and same with pet, it just costs you more in the long run.

Now with pally's they give a free mount at lvl 40 and partially free at lvl 60. How can Blizzard love pally's so much? I dont just quite understand that concept. What abour Warlocks though, why do they get a free mount at lvl 40? It doesn't make any sense, they are like evil and crap. It should either be Pally's and Warriors, Pally's and Priests, those classes. But I understand the Pally and their free mount, because they are for the Alliance, like they are fighting for good and have these special powers to fight evil yet stay safe with healing and shit, so thats cool, but, why do they hate Hunter's so much?

If someone out there has an answer for it, please send me an email or something, anything!

~Maedris~

explain to me why warlocks should not have mounts because they are "evil"?

That makes no sense at all in that argument.So if tomorrow blizzard adds shadowknights and gives them quest mounts are you going to say thats bad because they are evil ?

Also whats wrong with hunters?After the revamp they actually pvp quite well.They are the best soloers in the game period.Why do you think all the chinese bots rolled out hunters?

Also the hunter is an excellent dps even without the pet.Try going to a raid and notice this.They don't have to worry about melee dps like rogues who have to run out everytime the raid mob is about to do an aoe .They don't have to worry about resists like caster dps who rely on a certain type of dmg ie like nature or fire etc.

Add to fact that some raid mobs are not even doable without a hunter .Sorry but blizzard did more then enough for hunters and most hunters agree on this.If ever i seen a proper complaint from a hunter its because so many bots are now hunters and gives them a bad name.

Squall15 · November 2006

If Blizzard hated Hunters so much, then why do they lvl up so fast, can solo pretty much anything, known for being "too good" and so on. IMO, pally should get a mount. At least theres something to look forward to on a broing trip to 40.

neuronomad · November 2006

The more I think about this posting I think the OP is either trolling or just doesn't know how to play his class, therefore feels that Blizzard needs to nerf every other class to make up for his lack of abilitiy.

Thorhall · November 2006

Somehow I also agree the OP has no clue what he's talking about. I used to have a 60 pally, and yes that free horse at 40 was very useful, but the class is broken. Why the hell do they have plate if they can't tank at all? Now according to blizz, Warriors are the true tanks, follow by the druids[wtf?], then pally. I, like alot of pallys have been begging blizz for some controllable damage but blizz ignores us. We're not asking for more damage, just controllable. For that reason, and the fact that I was reduced to a buffbot in raids, I quit my pally, and rolled a warrior. To the OP, you really must be insane if you think blizz loves the pally. Who cares about that stupid bubble, we can't kill jack! SoC is our only savior, but that's base on what weapon you got and luck for it's proc.

I don't know if it's true or not but I've heard rumors that the creators of WoW came from EQ, and they hate pallys, and love rogues. I just know that pallys were nerf hard after beta because they were simply too powerful. I wonder if my 2hander pally in DAoC can destroy WoW's pally, hmmmm I wonder. Hunters on the other hand to me, are a bit overpower, well to me anyways, cus I hate fighting them, they always own my warrior, lol.

Maedris · November 2006

im sorry neuron, did you mistake me for playing a high lvl hunter, or even playing one? No, i dont have a high lvl char, and I do know how to play it, i just had the topic on my mind for a long time because of what people said IN GAME! Im not trying to dis blizzard or anything or give anything a bad name. I pretty much know how to play any class to the ability im good enough with it to do wat i want. I dont have a lack of ability, and if im lacking the particlar day, then its because im depressed or angry or some shit like that!

neuronomad · November 2006

Originally posted by Maedris
im sorry neuron, did you mistake me for playing a high lvl hunter, or even playing one? No, i dont have a high lvl char, and I do know how to play it, i just had the topic on my mind for a long time because of what people said IN GAME! Im not trying to dis blizzard or anything or give anything a bad name. I pretty much know how to play any class to the ability im good enough with it to do wat i want. I dont have a lack of ability, and if im lacking the particlar day, then its because im depressed or angry or some shit like that!

Dude I haven't a clue WTF you are trying to say in that posting. All I know is your posted a QQ thread on how Blizzard hates Hunters and tried to prove this by saying your proof was because Pallies and Warlocks get free mounts or something to that nature.

I could care less if you diss on Blizz, I am not a fanboi of Blizzard by any shape of the matter. But I do dislike when people start trashing on stuff and don't have a clue what they are even talking about. Hunters are one of the best classes in the game, yet you think that they are hated by Blizzard, yet you give no examples of why you think this.

neuronomad · November 2006

Let me dissect your OP.

Originally posted by Maedris
Hey, ok I think Blizzard has some major problems against Hunters. It's like they hate them or something... Like their talents start costing alot almosting hitting lvl 30 and same with pet, it just costs you more in the long run.

Now with pally's they give a free mount at lvl 40 and partially free at lvl 60.
If you think that the Paladin or Warlock's epic mount is partially free by any means of the word free then you really need to do some research as they are anything but.
How can Blizzard love pally's so much? I dont just quite understand that concept.
WTF is your defintion of love? The fact that they have very little DPS, the worst heals in the game, can't tank yet still have Plate repair cost, and their buffs while good only last a few minutes. Yeah that is really Blizzard showing their love for the class.
What abour Warlocks though, why do they get a free mount at lvl 40? It doesn't make any sense, they are like evil and crap.
What does them being evil have to do with anything? And if you ever played a Warlock you would know that their spells drastically go up in price per each rank, have huge bag space issues due to shards and other regeants, and their minion spells cost a whole heck of a lot more than a hunter's pets talents do.
It should either be Pally's and Warriors, Pally's and Priests, those classes. But I understand the Pally and their free mount, because they are for the Alliance, like they are fighting for good and have these special powers to fight evil yet stay safe with healing and shit, so thats cool, but, why do they hate Hunter's so much?

So you think that A) just because Paladins are Alliance that is the reason that they get a free mount? Uh, nope and becauses soon Horde will have Pallies too. And you never one time made any attempt to explain why you think Hunters are so bad off. It just sounds like you lost with your Horde hunter one too many times to a Paladin. How you could lose to a Paladin when you are Hunter I have no clue though. If you are crazy enough to get in a melee fight with one you deserve to get pwned. Other than that I can't figure out how in the world that you think Blizz favors Pallies and hates Hunters.

Maedris · November 2006

please stfu dude

neuronomad · November 2006

Originally posted by Maedris
please stfu dude

LMAO, the truth hurting you a little too much? Either actually defend your posting or you STFU idiot.

Maedris · November 2006

i dont need to defend it, the other can defend it on WoW who were really talking about it and what they said. dont think im typing out what IM thinking

neuronomad · November 2006

Originally posted by Maedris
i dont need to defend it, the other can defend it on WoW who were really talking about it and what they said. dont think im typing out what IM thinking

Wow man, you really need to take some English classes. You make absolutely no sense.

Takata5 · November 2006

Originally posted by Maedris
i dont need to defend it, the other can defend it on WoW who were really talking about it and what they said. dont think im typing out what IM thinking

So what did they say exactly? I'm still wondering also even after reading the whole thread. All I see is that you think Blizzard likes palys so much just because they get a free mount. And in most duels that I've watched between palys vs hunters, the hunters mostly won. So the most I can see from this thread is that you just want a free mount.

Squall15 · November 2006

Originally posted by Maedris
im sorry neuron, did you mistake me for playing a high lvl hunter, or even playing one? No, i dont have a high lvl char, and I do know how to play it, i just had the topic on my mind for a long time because of what people said IN GAME! Im not trying to dis blizzard or anything or give anything a bad name. I pretty much know how to play any class to the ability im good enough with it to do wat i want. I dont have a lack of ability, and if im lacking the particlar day, then its because im depressed or angry or some shit like that!

So, you ALWAYS listen to people in game? So if someone said "Blizzard is changing their name to Tornado!" you would believe that? Oh, also, it says you are depressed or angry, which sounds to me your emo. Maybe since your so depressed, you have to come here and try and convince us that hunters are "teh suck" and pallys are amazing godly.

I really dont know what your trying to prove here.

xpowderx · November 2006

Originally posted by Maedris
please stfu dude

Wow sounds like someone got his feelings hurt. How do you get killed by a Paladin unless meleeing? That is a good question..

neuronomad · November 2006

Originally posted by xpowderx

Originally posted by Maedris
please stfu dude

Wow sounds like someone got his feelings hurt. How do you get killed by a Paladin unless meleeing? That is a good question..

QFT, if a Hunter allows a Paladin to get within Melee range, he deserves to be killed. While a Paladin isn't the direct paper to the Hunter's scissors it is pretty close as such. The only thing a Paladin can hope to do against a hunter is either A) melee the hunter, or flee. Sounds like Maedris doesn't understand the strengths and weaknesses each class has.

CaptainRPG · November 2006

The Hunters were and still are the most overpower class except
Warlocks. They are still technologically better than most classes.

Paladin, on the other hand, have it harder than everyone else because
they can't really kill anything and cost a lot money to play because
they have to play for high priced weapons and armor. Not to mention,
most crafted armors don't support their status. One of the reasons why
Paladins are the least played class in the game is because don't have
as many items as the other class that work for him. The same goes with
Shaman.

I know because I use to play WoW and I use to talk on the forums just
like the poster. It wasn't until I stopped playing WoW that I
understood what made the game imbalanced.

NeonShadow · November 2006

Paladins and Warlocks get free mounts at lvl 40 because they A) Pay loads more for their abilities as they have lots more of them than any other class (so in essence they are paying the same amount of gold as you are) and They both lack any kind of snares and movement increasing skills (except for the Paladins talent Pursuit of Justice wich is crap anyways).

Oh, I also call for troll tropic. Nothing else.

zethcarn · November 2006

Originally posted by neuronomad

Maedris,

Blizzard doesn't hate Hunters. , they have nearly the best DPS in the game. So on.

ROFL!!!!! They are outdpsed by rogues, mages, and even warriors. Also they are screwed in the buff department. For example a shamans windfury totem and strength of earth totem doesn't help them in any way.

CaptainRPG · November 2006

Originally posted by zethcarn
Originally posted by neuronomad

Maedris,

Blizzard doesn't hate Hunters. , they have nearly the best DPS in
the game. So on.

ROFL!!!!!
They are outdpsed by rogues, mages, and even
warriors. Also they are screwed in the buff
department. For example a shamans windfury totem and strength of
earth totem doesn't help them in any way.

Warrior,
Rouges and Hunters can only do up to 1k damage and Mage can only do up
to 1.5k damage unless they relics, which allow them 3k, but that's only
a one shot deal. A shaman however, can do up to 1.9 to 3k and this
still hasn't been fix since the game started.

Howdy, Stranger!

Pally's V.S. Hunter's?!

Comments

Howdy, Stranger!

Quick Links

Pally's V.S. Hunter's?!

Comments