Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Saddam Executed.

24

Comments

  • ArremusArremus Member Posts: 656
    Originally posted by pastafariani

    Originally posted by qotsa

    Yay, baby Bush finally got his revenge on the man that tried and kilt his pa.



    Ok Saddam was a bad, bad man.



    But seriously, he was executed for killing 148 shiites in 1982. He probably killed them we crap we gave him, since we were backing them around the time of the Iran-Iraq war.



    After the Gulf  War, he tries putting a hit out on Bush Sr.  Bush Jr. becomes president. He puts a "hit" out on Saddam. He carpet bombs middle east and finally gets his man. He gets his revenge at the cost of the lives of  2,993 members of the U.S. military. That number will only get higher. Yeah, it was worth it. The things the Bush family has done to this world is disgusting.
    Is this your honest opinion? If so, you're confabulated theories are disgusting... not the Bush family. Feel free to read around of course.

    Such as:



    "July, 1991 The Financial Times of London reveals that a Florida chemical company had produced and shipped cyanide to Iraq during the 80's using a special CIA courier. Cyanide was used extensively against the Iranians"

    found at the very interesting www.iranchamber.com/history/articles/arming_iraq.php



    Saddam's death is much more of a benefit to the continued strength of the USA (ala silence) than it is for the betterment of the nation of Iraq.



    Live in the clouds if you want to.

    image
    "(The) Iraqi people owe the American people a huge debt of gratitude." - George W Bush.
    Oh. My. God.

  • PunkMonkPunkMonk Member Posts: 483
    Originally posted by qotsa

    Yay, baby Bush finally got his revenge on the man that tried and kilt his pa.



    Ok Saddam was a bad, bad man.



    But seriously, he was executed for killing 148 shiites in 1982. He probably killed them we crap we gave him, since we were backing them around the time of the Iran-Iraq war.



    After the Gulf  War, he tries putting a hit out on Bush Sr.  Bush Jr. becomes president. He puts a "hit" out on Saddam. He carpet bombs middle east and finally gets his man. He gets his revenge at the cost of the lives of  2,993 members of the U.S. military. That number will only get higher. Yeah, it was worth it. The things the Bush family has done to this world is disgusting.
    Hah, I agree with every word you said.

    image

    image

  • keltic1701keltic1701 Member Posts: 1,162
    Now that George Bush has finally gotted his pound of flesh, can all the troops come home now??
  • MMO_ManMMO_Man Member Posts: 666
    Wow it amazes me how many Sadam fans there are around here. I'm glad that SOB is burning in hell right now, can't wait until Osama joins him. I wish I could've been there to see him kicking his legs while the noose tightend around his neck. Burn in hell Sadam!

    image
    I sleep with a pillow under my gun.

  • keltic1701keltic1701 Member Posts: 1,162
    Originally posted by MMO_Man

    Wow it amazes me how many Sadam fans there are around here. I'm glad that SOB is burning in hell right now, can't wait until Osama joins him. I wish I could've been there to see him kicking his legs while the noose tightend around his neck. Burn in hell Sadam!
    Saddam was a monster of our own making. That monster had some use to us up until it finally turned on us. I was never in favor of Saddam, the man was murderous pig, but I'm not  a fan of hypocracy either. Bush, jr invaded Iraq for 2 reasons, to get back at Saddam for putting a hit on his dad and to help line the pockets of his keepers. The whole "bringing democracy to the Middle East" and the "Frontline of the war on Terror' was nothing more than a little sweetener to help the voters swollow it all down better.
  • baffbaff Member Posts: 9,457

    So many people celebrating someones death.

    Disgusting.

    Makes for some very grim T.V.

    It's a poor day do be a coalition member.

  • BlazinBladesBlazinBlades Member Posts: 1,214
    Originally posted by WantsumBier

    Originally posted by BlazinBlades

    Originally posted by SnaKey


    yep yep.
    And I'm going over next year. YAY!
    **sigh**
    Really, it's not too bad though. Those guys couldn't fight their way out of a paper bag.
     

    Is it your first visit to wonderland??? Bring it on down now.

    Blazin, are you over there, or have you been over there? If so give the kid some advise... if not shut the F-up.  If you have been or are over there you know how it can be.  Help the dude out, the kind of advise you wish you had when ou showed up.



     

    Well if he has been over there before and been in the field then he understands the meaning of Wonderland. If he has never been there before then he will learn soon enough the understanding of Wonderland. As for advice, he may not like the type I would give him. Bring it on down now.

    Damn byotch dat aint no friggn moon fool, dat be a friggn space station byotch.

  • hazmatshazmats Member Posts: 1,081


    Originally posted by baff
    So many people celebrating someones death.
    Disgusting.
    Makes for some very grim T.V.
    It's a poor day do be a coalition member.

    the only people who should not be happy that justice was carried out are those that are completly against the death penalty. THAT i can understand. But if anyone on earth deserved what he got, it's Saddam.

  • BlazinBladesBlazinBlades Member Posts: 1,214
    Originally posted by hazmats


     

    Originally posted by baff

    So many people celebrating someones death.

    Disgusting.

    Makes for some very grim T.V.

    It's a poor day do be a coalition member.

     

    the only people who should not be happy that justice was carried out are those that are completly against the death penalty. THAT i can understand. But if anyone on earth deserved what he got, it's Saddam.


     

    Of course it is justice, but what I have always found humorous about these things is how one set of rules applies to certain individuals (supposed to be the bad guys in black hats) but the exact same set of rules do not apply to others (the so called good guys in white hats) LMAO. Bring it on down now.

    Damn byotch dat aint no friggn moon fool, dat be a friggn space station byotch.

  • baffbaff Member Posts: 9,457

    I'm in full agreement with Bring It On Down Now, the execution of captured enemy leaders sets a poor president for own.

    If you think it's a clear case of good vs evil, you are nothing short of being niave.

    I'm no fan of the death penalty but no big derider of it also. I believe in killing those that stand in my way. I don't believe in gloating over it. It's a very unpleasant side of human nature. There is a difference between a necessary evil and taking pleasure in it.

    So if you are one of those people whose loved ones suffered at Saddam's hands I understand your rejoicing. But if you are just some bloke on the other side of the planet, whom Saddam has never given any personal grievance, I find it very ugly indeed.

     

    As for justice? There has been no justice I recognise served here.

    A mock trial, he has been condemned by the world. Not so much trial by kangaroo court, not even trial by media, trial by propaganda. If I was consumed by hate for this man, it would satisfy me as fair. But I would need to be. 

  • dekroken2dekroken2 Member Posts: 21
    When my country got involved in that war i was saying to my tv and tony blair what tha fucatchia are you doing! And since then i have hated it... all those poor fellas dying over a war not ours....

    The evil mouse - take over the world evil - is in the house...

  • Dragon4SaleDragon4Sale Member Posts: 1
    To those of you who think he should be in prision instead of dead, is his life really worth the thousands of dollars it would cost to keep him there.
  • keltic1701keltic1701 Member Posts: 1,162
    Originally posted by Dragon4Sale

    To those of you who think he should be in prision instead of dead, is his life really worth the thousands of dollars it would cost to keep him there.
    As much as I despised Saddam, his execution make him a martyr and martyers are dangerous figures. The few thousand dollars (or how ever much it would have cost  to keep him in prison) would be worth in not creating such a high profile rallying point of the Baathish or the insurgents. Neither option is a particularly good one so it boils down to the lesser of two evils. However it now seems that the point is moot since he has been executed.
  • MadAceMadAce Member Posts: 2,461
    Originally posted by Dragon4Sale

    To those of you who think he should be in prision instead of dead, is his life really worth the thousands of dollars it would cost to keep him there.
    Yes. And keeping him alive would actually be cheaper.
  • Rayx0rRayx0r Member, Newbie CommonPosts: 2,902

    nobody is going to think of saddam as a martyr. most of his once insurgent supporters are now sunni and not even considering themselves as iraqis.  if you really think he still has a lot of supporters floating around, you should know theyve moved well beyond the old iraq regime.

    right now, theyre carrying his body all over iraq.  not parading it around but displaying it, and cursing it, defiling his corpse.  he lost all his supporters when the US invaded iraq.  and it has more to do with him being a weak leader than a murdering dictator.  in other words, people who did support him now look at him as a failure. anything but a martyr

    image

    “"If you want a picture of the future, imagine a robot foot stomping on a human face -- forever."
  • JackcoltJackcolt Member UncommonPosts: 2,170
    What some of you should remember is: "Guns don't kill people... people do"



    Just because USA sold weapons to Saddam, doesn't mean they helped him kill people.

    image
    image

  • baffbaff Member Posts: 9,457

    Of course it does. What utter nonsense.

    Guns kill people. And people who sell guns to killers are helping them kill. A killer armed only with a teapot won't kill as many as a killer with a gun. The very purpose of a gun is to kill.

    Guns do kill people and people with guns are more able to kill people than people without guns.

     

    Is Osama Bin Laden not responsable for buying the air tickets for 9/11? Air tickets don't kill people, people kill people?

    Utter nonsense.

    We sold them guns but we never once thought they might actually use them......... Please, spare me.

  • reavoreavo Member Posts: 2,173
    I am against the death penalty in all cases.
  • outfctrloutfctrl Member UncommonPosts: 3,619
    Originally posted by reavo

    I am against the death penalty in all cases.
    Right....he should of gone into "Timeout"



    ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!    Wake up

    image

  • GameloadingGameloading Member UncommonPosts: 14,182
    Originally posted by outfctrl

    Originally posted by reavo

    I am against the death penalty in all cases.
    Right....he should of gone into "Timeout"



    ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!    Wake up

    I honnestly fail to see what is so funny about it? There is no reason to laugh at someone else's morals, and I doubt that "waking up" has anything to do for it.



    I am for the death penalty myself, and for a lot less then what Sadam has done.
  • JackcoltJackcolt Member UncommonPosts: 2,170
    Originally posted by baff


    Of course it does. What utter nonsense.
    Guns kill people. And people who sell guns to killers are helping them kill. A killer armed only with a teapot won't kill as many as a killer with a gun. The very purpose of a gun is to kill.
    Guns do kill people and people with guns are more able to kill people than people without guns.
     
    Is Osama Bin Laden not responsable for buying the air tickets for 9/11? Air tickets don't kill people, people kill people?
    Utter nonsense.
    We sold them guns but we never once thought they might actually use them......... Please, spare me.
    Hindsight is 20/20. While it was stupid to sell guns to him, they didn't know he was a killer. If I arm a known killer, I help him kill. If I arm a man using guns to defend himself, then I'm not helping to kill. They thought Saddam would only use them in defense.



    A gun makes the process of killing easier. A gun DOESN'T kill for you. You still have to squeeze the trigger.



    You analogy with Osama Bin Laden is the thing that is Utter Nonsense.



    And of course you sell guns thinking they are actually going to use them. There is more purposes of the gun than actually commiting genocide.

    image
    image

  • MadAceMadAce Member Posts: 2,461
    If you kill someone in defense then you will still have killed someone.
  • reavoreavo Member Posts: 2,173
    Originally posted by outfctrl

    Originally posted by reavo

    I am against the death penalty in all cases.
    Right....he should of gone into "Timeout"



    ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!    Wake up

    Did I say anything about sending anyone to "time out"?  Life imprisonment is not "time out". 



    Countries who practice the death penalty have found that it is not an effective deterrent of crime.  It is instead a reflection of the violence that a society uses as an ineffective and unproven method of deterrence.  I don't believe in killing a restrained person as a societal message not to kill.  It goes against what I believe is moral or effective.
  • PlanoMMPlanoMM Member Posts: 1,267
    Originally posted by reavo

    Originally posted by outfctrl

    Originally posted by reavo

    I am against the death penalty in all cases.
    Right....he should of gone into "Timeout"



    ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!    Wake up

    Did I say anything about sending anyone to "time out"?  Life imprisonment is not "time out". 



    Countries who practice the death penalty have found that it is not an effective deterrent of crime.  It is instead a reflection of the violence that a society uses as an ineffective and unproven method of deterrence.  I don't believe in killing a restrained person as a societal message not to kill.  It goes against what I believe is moral or effective./agrees

    ______________________________
    image

  • MMO_ManMMO_Man Member Posts: 666
    Originally posted by reavo

    I am against the death penalty in all cases.
    I'll bet if someone killed one of your family members you'd change your mind.

    image
    I sleep with a pillow under my gun.

Sign In or Register to comment.