Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

no way a new player will do all this to play this game

erinyserinys Member UncommonPosts: 395

it took me half a day of tweaking settings, chaning ini files, downgrading drivers, upgrading directx etc etc to even play this game smoothly

and i must say, it DOES look ok.. but its OK nothing more with all the tweaking i did.

EQ2 still looks WAY better and nothing i had to tweak for that.

i had to jump on the pvp servers to even get a glimps of the game, because its still completely unplayable on normal servers

 

no way a normal user will do all this, they will expect their "normal" directx, videodrivers and the basic installation game settings to be more then enough to play

they should adres performance fast, its a gamekiller atm

«13

Comments

  • Regal_SDRegal_SD Member Posts: 83
    Very true.  It is a turn off for many, many potential players.

    Regal

  • desnowdesnow Member Posts: 390

    I do believe this is what developers call "beta testing" which is when they work out finalizing utility setups and other end details before prepping for a release.

    If you want a release ready game then get one off a shelf and don't play a beta. I am not saying it is in amazingly great shape at its current stage, but you picked up on issues that are on the end of the priority list in a testing phase.

  • Deathstrike2Deathstrike2 Member UncommonPosts: 1,777
    Originally posted by desnow


    I do believe this is what developers call "beta testing" which is when they work out finalizing utility setups and other end details before prepping for a release.
    If you want a release ready game then get one off a shelf and don't play a beta. I am not saying it is in amazingly great shape at its current stage, but you picked up on issues that are on the end of the priority list in a testing phase.
    I do believe that these issues should be mostly worked out before "open beta" testing.  Open beta is usually for stress testing and such, and it usually indicates that a game is just a chicken bone away from being released retail.  Do you think this game is close to retail?  God, I hope not.
  • FrozenBaconFrozenBacon Member Posts: 6
    One thing that I am 100% positive of is that you will not have to update your DirectX to play the retail version of the game. Just like every other game they will package the latest version of DirectX into the insallation disc.



    As for the other ones, they will probably be fixed to some degree before the game is released. Heck, for all we know the current build that Sigil has could be running smooth as butter, just that they havent released it yet because they want to add more bugfixes to that build. I am not stressing too much about all the problems experienced during beta simply because the fact it is a beta. I dont expect a game to be squeaky clean when it still has a beta title attached to it. I know the game is close to release but no one (except for the folk at Sigil) knows how many bugs they will fixed in the final version.
  • gatherisgatheris Member UncommonPosts: 1,016
    Originally posted by desnow


    I do believe this is what developers call "beta testing" which is when they work out finalizing utility setups and other end details before prepping for a release.
    If you want a release ready game then get one off a shelf and don't play a beta. I am not saying it is in amazingly great shape at its current stage, but you picked up on issues that are on the end of the priority list in a testing phase.
    Brad stated yesterday in the Vanguard forums that upon release performance would most likely not be increased by more than 10%

    image

  • matisenmatisen Member UncommonPosts: 31

    3 generation game, guys you have to pay to play

    All i can say is that my old computer intel 3.0 nvidia 7800 gt and 1.5 giga ram could not run vsoh

    but i really want to play this diamond so i made a litte pc upgrade

    My new pc is Intel dual core 6700 4giga ram and Nvidia 8800

    Now its the most butiful mmog game i have ever seen average framrate 25-50 outside towns 35-60 and all settings on max

    Before average was 15

    Great game but needs a very highend computer

    See you ingame

     

  • HossiHossi Member Posts: 2
    Dont feed the troll. Dont feed the troll. Dont feed the troll. Dont feed the troll. Dont feed the troll. Dont feed the troll. Dont feed the troll. Dont feed the troll. Dont feed the troll. Dont feed the troll. Dont feed the troll. Dont feed the troll. Dont feed the troll. Dont feed the troll. Dont feed the troll. Dont feed the troll.



    That is all.
  • AvraAvra Member UncommonPosts: 100
    Its BETA. THat is what BETA is.
  • njdevi66njdevi66 Member UncommonPosts: 216
    Originally posted by matisen


    3 generation game, guys you have to pay to play
    All i can say is that my old computer intel 3.0 nvidia 7800 gt and 1.5 giga ram could not run vsoh
    but i really want to play this diamond so i made a litte pc upgrade
    My new pc is Intel dual core 6700 4giga ram and Nvidia 8800
    Now its the most butiful mmog game i have ever seen average framrate 25-50 outside towns 35-60 and all settings on max
    Before average was 15
    Great game but needs a very highend computer
    See you ingame
     
    That is why the game will fail. One of the main reasons why  WOW was a huge success was b/c it wasnt hard on your system and most could get by with average PC's. If you think people are going to spend a lot of money to upgrade or buy a mega system just to play it and have SOE name next to it... your crazy.

    image

  • Enforcer71Enforcer71 Member UncommonPosts: 780
    Originally posted by njdevi66

    Originally posted by matisen


    3 generation game, guys you have to pay to play
    All i can say is that my old computer intel 3.0 nvidia 7800 gt and 1.5 giga ram could not run vsoh
    but i really want to play this diamond so i made a litte pc upgrade
    My new pc is Intel dual core 6700 4giga ram and Nvidia 8800
    Now its the most butiful mmog game i have ever seen average framrate 25-50 outside towns 35-60 and all settings on max
    Before average was 15
    Great game but needs a very highend computer
    See you ingame
     
    That is why the game will fail. One of the main reasons why  WOW was a huge success was b/c it wasnt hard on your system and most could get by with average PC's. If you think people are going to spend a lot of money to upgrade or buy a mega system just to play it and have SOE name next to it... your crazy.

    The minimum requirements for this game arent bad at all I mean come on people its 2007 and games are going to increase along with the technology. People griped about 20 gig hard space...?? If this is an issue then you are way out of date to begin with. I myself cant understand someone who thinks a 2.4 ghz computer is too much to ask for a minimum requirement for a new game, hell I was using a 2.4 playing SWG and thats how many years old now? If you really play MMO's then you know the better the machine the better the game and most of us try to keep up with the times.

    Out of every 100 men, 10 should not be there,
    80 are nothing but targets, 9 are the real fighters.
    Ah, but one, ONE of them is a warrior,
    and he will bring the others home.
    -Heraclitus 500BC

  • LanmoragonLanmoragon Member Posts: 994
    Originally posted by Enforcer71

    Originally posted by njdevi66

    Originally posted by matisen


    3 generation game, guys you have to pay to play
    All i can say is that my old computer intel 3.0 nvidia 7800 gt and 1.5 giga ram could not run vsoh
    but i really want to play this diamond so i made a litte pc upgrade
    My new pc is Intel dual core 6700 4giga ram and Nvidia 8800
    Now its the most butiful mmog game i have ever seen average framrate 25-50 outside towns 35-60 and all settings on max
    Before average was 15
    Great game but needs a very highend computer
    See you ingame
     
    That is why the game will fail. One of the main reasons why  WOW was a huge success was b/c it wasnt hard on your system and most could get by with average PC's. If you think people are going to spend a lot of money to upgrade or buy a mega system just to play it and have SOE name next to it... your crazy.

    The minimum requirements for this game arent bad at all I mean come on people its 2007 and games are going to increase along with the technology. People griped about 20 gig hard space...?? If this is an issue then you are way out of date to begin with. I myself cant understand someone who thinks a 2.4 ghz computer is too much to ask for a minimum requirement for a new game, hell I was using a 2.4 playing SWG and thats how many years old now? If you really play MMO's then you know the better the machine the better the game and most of us try to keep up with the times.



    Its not the fact that its 2007 and people should have updated computers.  Its the fact that soooo many people are having problems running this game, even on say an Nvida 7950 GT with 2+ gigs of RAM and a high end processor.  THATS the problem.  Its not the people with the 2.4 Ghz who are complaining the most, its those with one the newest high end intel processors that get horrible game play.



    I can run the game well on balanced settings with my 7600 GT, but I know if (and when I do) upgrade to say something on the 8800 level and the game still runs like crap, thats when I would get upset.
  • SharkypalSharkypal Member Posts: 1,137
    Originally posted by Lanmoragon

    Originally posted by Enforcer71

    Originally posted by njdevi66

    Originally posted by matisen


    3 generation game, guys you have to pay to play
    All i can say is that my old computer intel 3.0 nvidia 7800 gt and 1.5 giga ram could not run vsoh
    but i really want to play this diamond so i made a litte pc upgrade
    My new pc is Intel dual core 6700 4giga ram and Nvidia 8800
    Now its the most butiful mmog game i have ever seen average framrate 25-50 outside towns 35-60 and all settings on max
    Before average was 15
    Great game but needs a very highend computer
    See you ingame
     
    That is why the game will fail. One of the main reasons why  WOW was a huge success was b/c it wasnt hard on your system and most could get by with average PC's. If you think people are going to spend a lot of money to upgrade or buy a mega system just to play it and have SOE name next to it... your crazy.

    The minimum requirements for this game arent bad at all I mean come on people its 2007 and games are going to increase along with the technology. People griped about 20 gig hard space...?? If this is an issue then you are way out of date to begin with. I myself cant understand someone who thinks a 2.4 ghz computer is too much to ask for a minimum requirement for a new game, hell I was using a 2.4 playing SWG and thats how many years old now? If you really play MMO's then you know the better the machine the better the game and most of us try to keep up with the times.


    Its not the fact that its 2007 and people should have updated computers.  Its the fact that soooo many people are having problems running this game, even on say an Nvida 7950 GT with 2+ gigs of RAM and a high end processor.  THATS the problem.  Its not the people with the 2.4 Ghz who are complaining the most, its those with one the newest high end intel processors that get horrible game play.



    I can run the game well on balanced settings with my 7600 GT, but I know if (and when I do) upgrade to say something on the 8800 level and the game still runs like crap, thats when I would get upset.

    Not true, many of the whiners around here have atrocious rigs. Simply stated, if you have a 7900/8800 and a Core 2, you should be able to max the game out. If you can't, there is something wrong with your box (Drivers, DX, bad connection). Too many people expect next gen games to run on their four year old hardware and its a completely unreasonable expectation. There is no rationale that justifies this. Technology moves forward and newer games (in very many cases) are using technologies that were not around when older cards debuted. I'm not an elitest and I'm not unsympathetic either. As I and other posters here have reiterated time and time again, you have to pay to play. This doesn't mean a $10,000 PC, it means relatively current hardware. Things are so cheap these days there is no excuse for not having an up to date rig.
  • KeldrosKeldros Member Posts: 17
    I would like to add that my computer will be 3 years old this April. I'm running a P4 3.2 Ghz proc with AGP Nvidia 6600 GT , 2 Gig Ram on balanced and the game runs pretty damned smooth for me, and still looks great too even on highest resolution. I'm totally stumped how people with 8800's are having problems myself, but hopefully, between now and launch, tech support will figure it all out. Either way, I wish everyone wanting to play the best of luck gettig things sorted out.
  • LanmoragonLanmoragon Member Posts: 994
    Pay to play?  People have to pay $450 plus for an 8800 to play?  I totally get what you are saying, and I am sure that some of those with top of the line rigs who can't play the game do have something wrong with their rigs...but do you really think ALL of those people, or even the majority of them, who have a top of the line rig and can't max the game out have problems with their rigs?  That pages and pages full of people with complaints about performance are simply full of posters with bad drivers, connections, etc?  I highly doubt thats the case.  Not in the volume of complaints that can be seen on the various forums.



    I do sympathize in a way with developers as it becomes harder and harder to optimize a games coding for all of the hardware combinations out there, but when a game goes into open beta and the forums are immediately filled with pages of complaints about bad performance, there is something wrong, and not with everybodies gaming rig.



    Sorta similar to Gothic 3.  The game has horrible performance and the forums are filled with complaints about it, even from those with very high end computers.



    As seen in some other posts I have made, I am in no way complaining on my part about the graphics.  I enjoy them for the most part, but I really do think there is something wrong with the way the game runs if so many people have problems.
  • SharkypalSharkypal Member Posts: 1,137
    Originally posted by Lanmoragon

    Pay to play?  People have to pay $450 plus for an 8800 to play?  I totally get what you are saying, and I am sure that some of those with top of the line rigs who can't play the game do have something wrong with their rigs...but do you really think ALL of those people, or even the majority of them, who have a top of the line rig and can't max the game out have problems with their rigs?  That pages and pages full of people with complaints about performance are simply full of posters with bad drivers, connections, etc?  I highly doubt thats the case.  Not in the volume of complaints that can be seen on the various forums.



    I do sympathize in a way with developers as it becomes harder and harder to optimize a games coding for all of the hardware combinations out there, but when a game goes into open beta and the forums are immediately filled with pages of complaints about bad performance, there is something wrong, and not with everybodies gaming rig.



    Sorta similar to Gothic 3.  The game has horrible performance and the forums are filled with complaints about it, even from those with very high end computers.



    As seen in some other posts I have made, I am in no way complaining on my part about the graphics.  I enjoy them for the most part, but I really do think there is something wrong with the way the game runs if so many people have problems.
    Im not suggesting you buy an 8800, there are plenty of solutions that are nowhere near that pricey. Things like the 8800 are for people who want to run at high resolutions and max all the graphics details. You certainly dont have to buy one to enjoy the game. My point is that you'll see a lot of people with things like 9800XTs and X800s etc. This is dated, it might well run the game, albeit rather badly, but there are compromises! Grab yourself an X1900 for example. Great card at a super price. Core 2 Duo 6300 is $150.00 and can be easily overclocked to 6700 speeds with no hassles on air. Like I said, you can have a nice rig for very little money. That was my ultimate point. If you can afford an 8800 then I can't recomend it enough, its a worthwhile investment if you're serious about gaming and run at over 1280 x 1024.
  • erinyserinys Member UncommonPosts: 395

    and my point was proven more then once by the many replies :)

    right now the game is only good IF you can tweak, overclock, know how to get the most out of your "gaming rig" ect etc etc.

    Sorry to break your balls, but many people don't, and it IS like many have said before, the reason why (for example) WoW does so good, because it doesnt need all that but can be played by many.

    Right now the performance of the game is very bad for people with "mediocre" hardware (1-2 year old pc's)

    I can run EQ2 fine @ 1600 high quality on raids, i can run neverwinter night2, oblivion and many other high quality games PERFECT and smooth.

    But this game run CRAP

    call it what you want fanbois, blame it on my and everyone else their hardware blablabla

    but all i hear ingame is "how the hell do i get the framerate up?" and its true... it IS an issue atm because at low settings the game looks more crap then DaoC and still runs shitty as hell

  • LanmoragonLanmoragon Member Posts: 994
    Exactly Erynis.  I thought the same thing of Gothic 3 when I first bought.  Edit my own game files???  Isnt that what the development team is for?  Why should we the gamers have to change game coding when we are the ones paying for the game.



    Sure its very nice to know how to tweak files to play the game better, but it should never be necessary IMO.
  • SalvatorisSalvatoris Member Posts: 1,360

    A 10 percent increase in fps would raise my frames per second by 1 or 2.... It was reading that comment on the beta forums that helped me decide i wouldn't be playing at launch. Ill get the game in 6 months, when it should have launched.... assuming it survives releasing in such a poor state.

  • ArremusArremus Member Posts: 656
    Originally posted by matisen


    3 generation game, guys you have to pay to play
    All i can say is that my old computer intel 3.0 nvidia 7800 gt and 1.5 giga ram could not run vsoh
    but i really want to play this diamond so i made a litte pc upgrade
    My new pc is Intel dual core 6700 4giga ram and Nvidia 8800
    Now its the most butiful mmog game i have ever seen average framrate 25-50 outside towns 35-60 and all settings on max
    Before average was 15
    Great game but needs a very highend computer
    See you ingame
     
    You want to post exactly the same thing for a FIFTH time on another thread?



    No matter how bad system performances may look this close to release, looking like you're doing paid advertising is 10x worse.

    Hmmmm... it was SoE who got busted for that fake PSP 'blog' site too wasn't it...

    Makes one wonder.





    But yeah, no way I play an MMO now without reading forums etc for info, and if I see five different "Sticky: How to get your FPS up by 10-20!!!" threads on the official forums or something, that will scream "Try me in six months!" to me.



    A shame really. Am so hanging for something new. Something that's a step up though.

    image
    "(The) Iraqi people owe the American people a huge debt of gratitude." - George W Bush.
    Oh. My. God.

  • SharkypalSharkypal Member Posts: 1,137
    Originally posted by erinys


    and my point was proven more then once by the many replies :)
    right now the game is only good IF you can tweak, overclock, know how to get the most out of your "gaming rig" ect etc etc.
    Sorry to break your balls, but many people don't, and it IS like many have said before, the reason why (for example) WoW does so good, because it doesnt need all that but can be played by many.
    Right now the performance of the game is very bad for people with "mediocre" hardware (1-2 year old pc's)
    I can run EQ2 fine @ 1600 high quality on raids, i can run neverwinter night2, oblivion and many other high quality games PERFECT and smooth.
    But this game run CRAP
    call it what you want fanbois, blame it on my and everyone else their hardware blablabla
    but all i hear ingame is "how the hell do i get the framerate up?" and its true... it IS an issue atm because at low settings the game looks more crap then DaoC and still runs shitty as hell
    EQ2 is a two year old game. I honestly can't take what you are saying seriously. Comments like "looks more crap than DAoC" are proof that you either haven't played it or you are trying to run it on what amounts to a calculator. There is absolutely no comparison. I played DAoC and loved it for 4 years, and say what you like about Vanguard, but it is graphically superior to any MMO in every way.
  • TrubadurenTrubaduren Member Posts: 575
    If you dont have the latest direct x, you should be ashemd!

    Starwars Galaxies, An Empier Diveded, That's what it says on my box anyway.

  • coffeecoffee Member Posts: 2,007
    Games have to make people upgrade, Doom3 and Half-life 2 did this... but VG.. no.



    I upgraded to a 6800 to play Company of heroes (top class game), I consider this a medium spec, but in VG I have to play at High performced.. i can just get Balanced but the framerate goes up and down like a yoyo.



    I cant imagine any 1 upgrade their systems to play Vanguard.  So im sry but VG:DEV's shot themselves in the foot setting requirments so high for a game/company with no history and just  a handful of fans, if VG ever wanted to ninja some of the WoW crowed they failed cus you dont need a 8800 or 1950 to play WoW, WoW can happly run on 9600 (i play on a minimac in work sometimes) and it still looks great with bloom effects, pixel shaders on water etc.  They might have a better time taking some of the EQ2 guys cus EQ2 also needs a beefy rig also.



    Yes VG graphics are TECHNICALY more impressive then WoW more polygons/special effects etc, but what good are flashy gfx if 90% of player have to play with Balanced setting or below and anything thing below Balanced makes VG look worse than runescape, trees look like cardboard cutouts utill your within 5 yards of them.



    VG spec'd themselves out of a large playbase, all reviews will talk about the high requirments and many will not play becuase the game looks awful on their systems... as we all know, we all make choices based on gfx as much as gameplay.



    From what ive played, VG requirments (gfx card) should be set to: Minimun requirments 9800/5900 recommended 7800/1950



    I just hope the VG:Dev's will show some of these threads to SOE to convince them to give VG:Dev's a bit more time to work on gfx engine.



    And saying upgrade or shutup dont help, the performance of the game is the 1# issue people have so I cant be ignored.

    image

  • SharkypalSharkypal Member Posts: 1,137
    Originally posted by coffee

    Games have to make people upgrade, Doom3 and Half-life 2 did this... but VG.. no.



    I upgraded to a 6800 to play Company of heroes (top class game), I consider this a medium spec, but in VG I have to play at High performced.. i can just get Balanced but the framerate goes up and down like a yoyo.



    I cant imagine any 1 upgrade their systems to play Vanguard.  So im sry but VG:DEV's shot themselves in the foot setting requirments so high for a game/company with no history and just  a handful of fans, if VG ever wanted to ninja some of the WoW crowed they failed cus you dont need a 8800 or 1950 to play WoW, WoW can happly run on 9600 (i play on a minimac in work sometimes) and it still looks great with bloom effects, pixel shaders on water etc.  They might have a better time taking some of the EQ2 guys cus EQ2 also needs a beefy rig also.



    Yes VG graphics are TECHNICALY more impressive then WoW more polygons/special effects etc, but what good are flashy gfx if 90% of player have to play with Balanced setting or below and anything thing below Balanced makes VG look worse than runescape, trees look like cardboard cutouts utill your within 5 yards of them.



    VG spec'd themselves out of a large playbase, all reviews will talk about the high requirments and many will not play becuase the game looks awful on their systems... as we all know, we all make choices based on gfx as much as gameplay.



    From what ive played, VG requirments (gfx card) should be set to: Minimun requirments 9800/5900 recommended 7800/1950



    I just hope the VG:Dev's will show some of these threads to SOE to convince them to give VG:Dev's a bit more time to work on gfx engine.



    And saying upgrade or shutup dont help, the performance of the game is the 1# issue people have so I cant be ignored.

     

    And believeing that a game released in the year 2007 should work at all on an adapter from 2002 is absolutely ridiculous. People do upgrade to play games, otherwise there would be no need for new technology. You're in for a short sharp shock if you think a 6800 will cut it for most of this years games. It's almost 3 years old now. I'd suggest that some of you go buy a 360 or a PS3. You will not be happy with PC gaming with the expectations you have.

  • ET3DET3D Member UncommonPosts: 330
    Originally posted by Sharkypal

    say what you like about Vanguard, but it is graphically superior to any MMO in every way.
    Well, that's your opinion. I tried the beta, and deleted it. It looked pretty drab and gameplay was likewise drab. It took 20GB on my disk, and I needed some space, which is why I deleted it.. (Otherwise I'd have kept it and just not played it.)
  • SharkypalSharkypal Member Posts: 1,137
    Originally posted by ET3D

    Originally posted by Sharkypal

    say what you like about Vanguard, but it is graphically superior to any MMO in every way.
    Well, that's your opinion. I tried the beta, and deleted it. It looked pretty drab and gameplay was likewise drab. It took 20GB on my disk, and I needed some space, which is why I deleted it.. (Otherwise I'd have kept it and just not played it.)



    Technically its superior is actually what I meant. What you find appealing is entirely subjective.

     

Sign In or Register to comment.