Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

American forces storm Iranian government offices in northern Iraq

outfctrloutfctrl Member UncommonPosts: 3,619

American forces stormed Iranian government offices in northern Iraq, hours after President George Bush issued a warning to Tehran that was described as a "declaration of war".

The soldiers detained six people, including diplomats, according to the Iranians, and seized documents and computers in the pre-dawn raid which was condemned by Iran. A leading UK-based Iran specialist, Ali Ansari, said the incident was an "extreme provocation". Dr Ansari said that Mr Bush's speech on future Iraq strategy amounted to "a declaration of war" on Iran.

We all knew this was coming.

 

image

Comments

  • bryanAbryanA Member Posts: 62
    *sigh* I guess now my brother and I don't need to enlist. WW3 is almost here and with troops dying in Iraq a draft is unavoidable.
  • ZykeZyke Member Posts: 335

    Yeah, we did know. I have mixed feelings. It's only a matter of time until war with Iran IMO. On the one hand, they need to be slapped around and disarmed. They're a danger to the entire region, and it's already bad off as it is.

    On the other hand, we really don't need another war, and I have sympathy for our soldiers. They've been through a lot, many of them. If it does go to war, an occupation would be a disaster. If all we plan on is wiping out the military and the nuclear facilities, I could see it working. But another Iraq, not a good idea.

  • bryanAbryanA Member Posts: 62
    I might be immature still being 20 but I seriously think nuking the middle east would be the best for everyone.  Even if we do change the leadership it will only be a matter of time before some other crazy muslim takes power and starts this bs all over again. The world will be a better place without the middle east. And maybe africa will shape up with that action on the middle east.  I dont know how things get this out of control....
  • TertiusTertius Member UncommonPosts: 62
    Originally posted by bryanA

    I might be immature still being 20 but I seriously think nuking the middle east would be the best for everyone.  Even if we do change the leadership it will only be a matter of time before some other crazy muslim takes power and starts this bs all over again. The world will be a better place without the middle east. And maybe africa will shape up with that action on the middle east.  I dont know how things get this out of control....
    You are correct. You are immature.



    There are a ton of reasons why nuking the Middle East is profoundly stupid, but I'll list a few just to start you off.



    1) Nuking anyone anywhere  causes unforeseeable collateral damage. Nuclear fallout does not stay in one place.



    2) Use of nuclear weapons anywhere is likely to spark a world war. In the Middle East region alone there are 3 separate countries who have nukes themselves. You think they'll not use them if we do?



    3) Do you really want a large chunk of the worlds oil fields to be radioactive for decades to come? I hope you like riding your bike because gasoline will be more valuable than gold.



    Actual real world affairs are not Age of Empires 3. It just doesn't work that way.



    Bonus pop quiz. What character in a movie, referring to global thermonuclear war, said: "Strange game. The only way to win is not to play" ?
  • MeonMeon Member Posts: 993


    Originally posted by Tertius
    Originally posted by bryanA
    I might be immature still being 20 but I seriously think nuking the middle east would be the best for everyone. Even if we do change the leadership it will only be a matter of time before some other crazy muslim takes power and starts this bs all over again. The world will be a better place without the middle east. And maybe africa will shape up with that action on the middle east. I dont know how things get this out of control....
    You are correct. You are immature.

    There are a ton of reasons why nuking the Middle East is profoundly stupid, but I'll list a few just to start you off.

    1) Nuking anyone anywhere causes unforeseeable collateral damage. Nuclear fallout does not stay in one place.

    2) Use of nuclear weapons anywhere is likely to spark a world war. In the Middle East region alone there are 3 separate countries who have nukes themselves. You think they'll not use them if we do?

    3) Do you really want a large chunk of the worlds oil fields to be radioactive for decades to come? I hope you like riding your bike because gasoline will be more valuable than gold.

    Actual real world affairs are not Age of Empires 3. It just doesn't work that way.

    Bonus pop quiz. What character in a movie, referring to global thermonuclear war, said: "Strange game. The only way to win is not to play" ?


    heres a few more.

    1- All Christians, Jews and Muslims will kill you for destroying Jerusalem
    2- You are basically giving a declaration of war to the entire world
    3- Climate will change because of all radioactivity.
    4- Humans might not be able to live in certain regions for another 2000 years.

  • iLikeMoneyiLikeMoney Member Posts: 46
    Originally posted by bryanA

    I might be immature still being 20 but I seriously think nuking the middle east would be the best for everyone. 

    as you get older you understand that killing an enemy is last action you should take because of several reasons. first of all, it's on your conscience, regardless wether you or people surrounding you will remember it.  Second, the idea that violence breeds violence is not just words.  If you nuke middle east, surely many will survive, but then don't expect to live an easy lifefor another 10-200 years.
  • SlickinfinitSlickinfinit Member UncommonPosts: 1,094

    Its times like this I wish the CIA never lifted their policy on political assasination, one good team of special forces sent to PWN Irans leader (I dont even wanna try to spell his name). Yes I know that idea might cause alot of chaos but if the US could make it look like an inside coup it would probably go alot better than a major war.

    If the USA does decide to invade Iran then most prbably it will be a bloodbath of the most extreme, for one I think American soldiers will act alot more aggressive and kill alot of people. Iran will be so devastated by airstrikes and bombardment but still wont be totaly defeated til there is American "boots on the ground" to secure the areas and help install a puppet government that will do what the USA says. Alot of Iranian youth hate their current leader which might help the USA a bit but still alot will feel national pride to take up arms against the invaders and you will get another insurgency will high American casualties. Iran is the one who exported alot of tech and supplies to the Iraqi insurgents which are making the Iraq campaign very difficult.

    {(RIP)} SWG

  • DraenorDraenor Member UncommonPosts: 7,918

    It's called a splinter cell...there are ways around that pesky "no assasination" thing =)

    This message will self destruct.

    Your argument is like a two legged dog with an eating disorder...weak and unbalanced.

  • baffbaff Member Posts: 9,457
    Originally posted by iLikeMoney

    Originally posted by bryanA

    I might be immature still being 20 but I seriously think nuking the middle east would be the best for everyone. 

    as you get older you understand that killing an enemy is last action you should take because of several reasons. first of all, it's on your conscience, regardless wether you or people surrounding you will remember it.  Second, the idea that violence breeds violence is not just words. 

    Unpleasantly true.
  • AnkuaAnkua Member Posts: 64

    Another fact about war and violence is the innocent are the ones who mainly pay with their lives. If you look at the statistics you will find that the civilian death toll is over a hundred times that of the forces fighting. Most people even in the middle east want peace its the few who ruin it for the masses that normally get away with their lives.

    As for nuking in the middle east it will happen only question is when and how far the destruction spreads around the world.

  • HifructoseHifructose Member Posts: 308
    ooo ooo I win, the one who said "the only way to win is not to play" is ummm. that computer from that movie. errrr. I'll share the prize with whoever can actually remember the name of the movie or the computer or the actor that played Ferris Bueller
  • LordSlaterLordSlater Member Posts: 2,087
    Originally posted by Hifructose

    ooo ooo I win, the one who said "the only way to win is not to play" is ummm. that computer from that movie. errrr. I'll share the prize with whoever can actually remember the name of the movie or the computer or the actor that played Ferris Bueller
    War Games - Computers name was Joshua.

    image

  • BlazinBladesBlazinBlades Member Posts: 1,214
    Yippeeee more money to be made yippeeeeeee. Bring it on down now.

    Damn byotch dat aint no friggn moon fool, dat be a friggn space station byotch.

  • shamallshamall Member CommonPosts: 516

    "And you can bet your ass that we are going to war with Iran in the near future. Bush didn't pull out a general and put an admiral incharge and move another aircraft carrier to the region for nothing. I see mass bombing runs in Irans and possibly Syrias future. How do you think they are going to react when we start preventing them from supplying and training insurgents? "

    Thats the last paragraph I posted yesterday in the "The Bush Speech Review" thread. So yeah, I pretty much saw this comming.

    The Brave Do Not Fear The Grave

  • BlazinBladesBlazinBlades Member Posts: 1,214
    Originally posted by shamall


    "And you can bet your ass that we are going to war with Iran in the near future. Bush didn't pull out a general and put an admiral incharge and move another aircraft carrier to the region for nothing. I see mass bombing runs in Irans and possibly Syrias future. How do you think they are going to react when we start preventing them from supplying and training insurgents? "
    Thats the last paragraph I posted yesterday in the "The Bush Speech Review" thread. So yeah, I pretty much saw this comming.
     

    I would hate to give you some bad news but we already are training insurgents in Iraq, out of the groups we trained we are very certain that at least 71 percent of the present Iraqi Army consists of insurgents and militiamen. The Iraqi police forces are even higher. There are all sorts of reasons given out for the Iraqi Army not stepping up to do its part, the real problem is not that the Iraqi Army is not stepping up to do its part, the problem is the very real possibility that the Iraqi Army will turn against us and start fighting us instead. The good news out of this is that the war in Iraq right now is not focused against the US forces in country, well not yet at least LOL.  If you think for one second that your idea of a conflict with Iran and Syria will be as easy you seem to portray in your post, you will be in for a little surprise. Bring it on down now.

    Damn byotch dat aint no friggn moon fool, dat be a friggn space station byotch.

  • fulmanfufulmanfu Member Posts: 1,523


    2) Use of nuclear weapons anywhere is likely to spark a world war. In the Middle East region alone there are 3 separate countries who have nukes themselves. You think they'll not use them if we do?


    i agree with most of what you say, but this. there is a big difference, we can hit them with ours, they cant hit us with theirs.
  • Keebs1984Keebs1984 Member Posts: 1,356
    People can't tolerate one war...



    If Bush tried to start another there will be dire consequences.

    Eternally mine,
    Keebs


    image

    The MMO gaming blog I write for.

  • baffbaff Member Posts: 9,457
    Originally posted by fulmanfu


     


     
    2) Use of nuclear weapons anywhere is likely to spark a world war. In the Middle East region alone there are 3 separate countries who have nukes themselves. You think they'll not use them if we do?





    i agree with most of what you say, but this. there is a big difference, we can hit them with ours, they cant hit us with theirs.

     

    They might be able to hit your aircraft carriers, and certainly your primary oils supplies.
  • baffbaff Member Posts: 9,457
    Originally posted by Keebs1984

    People can't tolerate one war...



    If Bush tried to start another there will be dire consequences.

     

    But not for him.

  • MW2KMW2K Member UncommonPosts: 1,036

    Dare I say it, but America and her coalition mates can't even get Iraq under control, despite valiant and well-meaning efforts to get all of the locals on-side. Yet some of you guys think the US is just going to invade Iran like that. And beat them, just like that. The second-most powerful nation in the region after Turkey, just like that. Despite troops being thinly spread and deployed now and the US military straining to meet recruitment numbers.

    Time to pull a Goebbels and declare a "total war" and mobilise everyone.

    All right.

Sign In or Register to comment.