What's your Wu Name? Donovan --> Wu Name = Violent Knight Methane47 --> Wu Name = Thunderous Leader "Some people call me the walking plank, 'cuz any where you go... Death is right behind you.." <i>ME<i>
The picture is broken , so i would'nt really know if it made it any more humorous. I guess it made me giggle a little
============================== He's not dead... he's electroencephalographically challenged. ============================== Currently waiting For: 1st.WAR 2nd.AoC 3rd.GnH's 4th. Sword of the New world: Granado Espada
And what will it be called if Hillary gets elected? No need for a word, it aint happening.
If we have a repeat of last fall in a few months we don't know what will happen. The republicans better keep those scandals under tight lock until at least eary next year.
Don't be terrorized! You're more likely to die of a car accident, drowning, fire, or murder! More people die every year from prescription drugs than terrorism LOL!
And what will it be called if Hillary gets elected? No need for a word, it aint happening.
If we have a repeat of last fall in a few months we don't know what will happen. The republicans better keep those scandals under tight lock until at least eary next year.That all depends on when the democrats decide to release the juicy info that they have been looking for since the last election...same goes for republicans of course.
Your argument is like a two legged dog with an eating disorder...weak and unbalanced.
For you stereotyped people ( not directing it at you) you don't have to keep woring about his skin color and him being president . Obama lost many followers after his chicago commercial , LOL. I found it histerical , just because he's a baseball fan and likes chicago he loses 20 % of his followers.
============================== He's not dead... he's electroencephalographically challenged. ============================== Currently waiting For: 1st.WAR 2nd.AoC 3rd.GnH's 4th. Sword of the New world: Granado Espada
And what will it be called if Hillary gets elected? No need for a word, it aint happening.
If we have a repeat of last fall in a few months we don't know what will happen. The republicans better keep those scandals under tight lock until at least eary next year.That all depends on when the democrats decide to release the juicy info that they have been looking for since the last election...same goes for republicans of course.
You should replace democrats with media, same things...
Don't be terrorized! You're more likely to die of a car accident, drowning, fire, or murder! More people die every year from prescription drugs than terrorism LOL!
I am rooting for Obama for the Democratic ticket right now...
Never been a fan of Hitlery...erm Hillary, sorry.
The rest of the Democrats on the ticket seem to be more of the same we've had for the past 50 years, rich, white, anglo-saxon, protestant/evangelical christians. More of the same...yawn.
As for the Repubies, it will definitely be a race between McCain and Guiliani. I don't know who I prefer. On purely a political basis I'd go with Guiliani, however he lacks any real government experience (mayor of New York City doesnt really count). McCain on the other hand has a lot of government experience, but I don't agree with his political views. We will see...the coming months will tell all.
And what will it be called if Hillary gets elected? No need for a word, it aint happening.
If we have a repeat of last fall in a few months we don't know what will happen. The republicans better keep those scandals under tight lock until at least eary next year.That all depends on when the democrats decide to release the juicy info that they have been looking for since the last election...same goes for republicans of course.
You should replace democrats with media, same things...
oh my god, you're not supposed to point out the obvious! DAMAGE CONTROL: FOX NEWS is biased in favor of republicans!!! ignore the ten liberal slanted news channels in this country...FOX IS BIASED
Your argument is like a two legged dog with an eating disorder...weak and unbalanced.
I am rooting for Obama for the Democratic ticket right now...
Never been a fan of Hitlery...erm Hillary, sorry.
The rest of the Democrats on the ticket seem to be more of the same we've had for the past 50 years, rich, white, anglo-saxon, protestant/evangelical christians. More of the same...yawn.
As for the Repubies, it will definitely be a race between McCain and Guiliani. I don't know who I prefer. On purely a political basis I'd go with Guiliani, however he lacks any real government experience (mayor of New York City doesnt really count). McCain on the other hand has a lot of government experience, but I don't agree with his political views. We will see...the coming months will tell all.
Show me a liberal democrat politician who claims to be a follower of Christ and I will show you a big fat friggen liar.
Show me just about any politician and I'll show you a liar...but you get the idea.
And yes, I'm serious.
Your argument is like a two legged dog with an eating disorder...weak and unbalanced.
Show me a liberal democrat politician who claims to be a follower of Christ and I will show you a big fat friggen liar.
Show me just about any politician and I'll show you a liar...but you get the idea.
And yes, I'm serious.
So you are saying there is no such thing as a Liberal Democrat who is Christian? Wow, bold statement. Highly untrue, but bold.
Regardless, religion plays no hand in the election other than to garner votes. Ignorant people will only elect people of Christian faith. Its rediculous, and more than a bit biased, but what can ya do? The American public are sheeple, not people.
Show me a liberal democrat politician who claims to be a follower of Christ and I will show you a big fat friggen liar.
Show me just about any politician and I'll show you a liar...but you get the idea.
And yes, I'm serious.
So you are saying there is no such thing as a Liberal Democrat who is Christian? Wow, bold statement. Highly untrue, but bold.
Regardless, religion plays no hand in the election other than to garner votes. Ignorant people will only elect people of Christian faith. Its rediculous, and more than a bit biased, but what can ya do? The American public are sheeple, not people.
That's exactly what I am saying...You cannot be a liberal democrat as well as a practicing Christian. Celebrating Christmas does not make you a Christian. The views of a liberal democrat are in such stark contrast to what Christianity preaches that I don't see how you can even think to disagree.
Ignorant people vote based purely on what a candidate will say they will do. Ignorant people vote based purely on party lines. Ignorant people vote based purely on religion.
Ignorant people vote based purely on any one topic...It's not just religion my friend.
Your argument is like a two legged dog with an eating disorder...weak and unbalanced.
Assuming that I'm not evilly trying to corrupt the world with facetious banter, but I'd consider the reported views (the ones I know of, at ny rate) of the figure Jesus Christ as those of a liberal democrat. Not that the New Testament portrays him as a politician, of course. What do you think Drae? And don't say Jesus was a Jew.
Assuming that I'm not evilly trying to corrupt the world with facetious banter, but I'd consider the reported views (the ones I know of, at ny rate) of the figure Jesus Christ as those of a liberal democrat. Not that the New Testament portrays him as a politician, of course. What do you think Drae? And don't say Jesus was a Jew.
Moral relativitiy
debate over.
Your argument is like a two legged dog with an eating disorder...weak and unbalanced.
Show me a liberal democrat politician who claims to be a follower of Christ and I will show you a big fat friggen liar. Show me just about any politician and I'll show you a liar...but you get the idea. And yes, I'm serious This is absolutely true and I would like to have a liberal attempt to debate it..using scripture of course.
Well first someone would have to figure out what the hell a liberal is exactly, because to me it seems to be whoever disagrees with you.
I am rooting for Obama for the Democratic ticket right now...
Obama hasn't even served a single term as U.S. senator, and before that he had no major political position ever. The fact that he's talking about the presidency already makes me think less of him as a person. He's letting his ambition get in the way of his ability to learn and grow by exploring where he is.
It is always possible to answer any argument about being unqualified by referring to Bush or even Kennedy. But Kennedy had more national political experience than Obama (he served in the House before the Senate). Not only that, but Kennedy's political inexperience let him get rolled by the military bureaucracy on all kinds of important decisions early in his term.
If you are looking for an articulate African-American from Chicago who has an amazing backstory, a pleasant speaking style, who can emapthize with everyone and has a degree of success why settle on Obama when you could have Oprah.
I am rooting for Obama for the Democratic ticket right now...
If you are looking for an articulate African-American from Chicago who has an amazing backstory, a pleasant speaking style, who can emapthize with everyone and has a degree of success why settle on Obama when you could have Oprah.
Gore/Winfrey would kick Clinton/Obama's ass.
Democrats want Obama to win because he is charismatic and get probably get a lot of votes, and the American people spoke last election. Nobody really wants Republicans in power anymore..
I am rooting for Obama for the Democratic ticket right now...
If you are looking for an articulate African-American from Chicago who has an amazing backstory, a pleasant speaking style, who can emapthize with everyone and has a degree of success why settle on Obama when you could have Oprah.
Gore/Winfrey would kick Clinton/Obama's ass.
Democrats want Obama to win because he is charismatic and get probably get a lot of votes, and the American people spoke last election. Nobody really wants Republicans in power anymore..
That's exactly what I am saying...You cannot be a liberal democrat as well as a practicing Christian. Celebrating Christmas does not make you a Christian. The views of a liberal democrat are in such stark contrast to what Christianity preaches that I don't see how you can even think to disagree.
Ignorant people vote based purely on what a candidate will say they will do. Ignorant people vote based purely on party lines. Ignorant people vote based purely on religion. Ignorant people vote based purely on any one topic...It's not just religion my friend.
Wow, so only you're chosen political scheme can be housed under your very own religion? Sounds pretty biased and biggoted to me.
Political parties do not draw ones own religious faiths, what you are saying is wrong, and your belief that there is no such thing as a Christian liberal democrat is wrong.
That being said, you do realize the ENTIRE basis of what your profit's, Jesus, teachings were about is highly based on socialism and communism right? He did not go around preaching for the corporations, he went around preaching for the common welfare of man, and the people, something that socialism also preaches (how it is carried out can be quite different mind you).
So where as Repubbies generally preach for the multi-million dollar corporations, and its true, they do. Democrats are generally preaching more for social welfare. So tell me, which one sounds more aligned with the Christian profit's teachings?
P.S. People won't vote for a President who is not Christian. Its not gonna happen in the next century, provided there still is a U.S..
When you say no liberal democratic is a Christian, do you mean: no liberal democrat believes in what you do, or no liberal democrat accepts Christianity as his/her religion?
Comments
The picture is broken , so i would'nt really know if it made it any more humorous. I guess it made me giggle a little
==============================
He's not dead... he's electroencephalographically challenged.
==============================
Currently waiting For:
1st.WAR
2nd.AoC
3rd.GnH's
4th. Sword of the New world: Granado Espada
teehee.
And what will it be called if Hillary gets elected?
No need for a word, it aint happening.
Your argument is like a two legged dog with an eating disorder...weak and unbalanced.
Don't be terrorized! You're more likely to die of a car accident, drowning, fire, or murder! More people die every year from prescription drugs than terrorism LOL!
Your argument is like a two legged dog with an eating disorder...weak and unbalanced.
Modjoe86- Gambling is a sin.
Laserwolf- Only if you lose.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Waiting for= PSU, WAR
==============================
He's not dead... he's electroencephalographically challenged.
==============================
Currently waiting For:
1st.WAR
2nd.AoC
3rd.GnH's
4th. Sword of the New world: Granado Espada
You should replace democrats with media, same things...
Don't be terrorized! You're more likely to die of a car accident, drowning, fire, or murder! More people die every year from prescription drugs than terrorism LOL!
Never been a fan of Hitlery...erm Hillary, sorry.
The rest of the Democrats on the ticket seem to be more of the same we've had for the past 50 years, rich, white, anglo-saxon, protestant/evangelical christians. More of the same...yawn.
As for the Repubies, it will definitely be a race between McCain and Guiliani. I don't know who I prefer. On purely a political basis I'd go with Guiliani, however he lacks any real government experience (mayor of New York City doesnt really count). McCain on the other hand has a lot of government experience, but I don't agree with his political views. We will see...the coming months will tell all.
Eternally mine,
Keebs
The MMO gaming blog I write for.
You should replace democrats with media, same things...
oh my god, you're not supposed to point out the obvious! DAMAGE CONTROL: FOX NEWS is biased in favor of republicans!!! ignore the ten liberal slanted news channels in this country...FOX IS BIASED
Your argument is like a two legged dog with an eating disorder...weak and unbalanced.
Show me a liberal democrat politician who claims to be a follower of Christ and I will show you a big fat friggen liar.
Show me just about any politician and I'll show you a liar...but you get the idea.
And yes, I'm serious.
Your argument is like a two legged dog with an eating disorder...weak and unbalanced.
Regardless, religion plays no hand in the election other than to garner votes. Ignorant people will only elect people of Christian faith. Its rediculous, and more than a bit biased, but what can ya do? The American public are sheeple, not people.
Eternally mine,
Keebs
The MMO gaming blog I write for.
Regardless, religion plays no hand in the election other than to garner votes. Ignorant people will only elect people of Christian faith. Its rediculous, and more than a bit biased, but what can ya do? The American public are sheeple, not people.
That's exactly what I am saying...You cannot be a liberal democrat as well as a practicing Christian. Celebrating Christmas does not make you a Christian. The views of a liberal democrat are in such stark contrast to what Christianity preaches that I don't see how you can even think to disagree.
Ignorant people vote based purely on what a candidate will say they will do. Ignorant people vote based purely on party lines. Ignorant people vote based purely on religion.
Ignorant people vote based purely on any one topic...It's not just religion my friend.
Your argument is like a two legged dog with an eating disorder...weak and unbalanced.
Not that the New Testament portrays him as a politician, of course. What do you think Drae?
And don't say Jesus was a Jew.
www.draftgore.com
Gore '08
Moral relativitiy
debate over.
Your argument is like a two legged dog with an eating disorder...weak and unbalanced.
Show me a liberal democrat politician who claims to be a follower of Christ and I will show you a big fat friggen liar.
Show me just about any politician and I'll show you a liar...but you get the idea.
And yes, I'm serious
This is absolutely true and I would like to have a liberal attempt to debate it..using scripture of course.
Hilarious! (or was that just too obvious?)
I'd be interested to hear your main points as to why a Democrat's views are, by nature, opposed to Christian views?
Obama hasn't even served a single term as U.S. senator, and before that he had no major political position ever. The fact that he's talking about the presidency already makes me think less of him as a person. He's letting his ambition get in the way of his ability to learn and grow by exploring where he is.
It is always possible to answer any argument about being unqualified by referring to Bush or even Kennedy. But Kennedy had more national political experience than Obama (he served in the House before the Senate). Not only that, but Kennedy's political inexperience let him get rolled by the military bureaucracy on all kinds of important decisions early in his term.
If you are looking for an articulate African-American from Chicago who has an amazing backstory, a pleasant speaking style, who can emapthize with everyone and has a degree of success why settle on Obama when you could have Oprah.
Gore/Winfrey would kick Clinton/Obama's ass.
If you are looking for an articulate African-American from Chicago who has an amazing backstory, a pleasant speaking style, who can emapthize with everyone and has a degree of success why settle on Obama when you could have Oprah.
Gore/Winfrey would kick Clinton/Obama's ass.
Democrats want Obama to win because he is charismatic and get probably get a lot of votes, and the American people spoke last election. Nobody really wants Republicans in power anymore..
IF blacks in ameria call themselves african americans.. does that mean we should call people in liberia american africans..?
anyways. I think Obama has a greater chance of being elected, just because he is a man.
Oh your God!!!
If you are looking for an articulate African-American from Chicago who has an amazing backstory, a pleasant speaking style, who can emapthize with everyone and has a degree of success why settle on Obama when you could have Oprah.
Gore/Winfrey would kick Clinton/Obama's ass.
Democrats want Obama to win because he is charismatic and get probably get a lot of votes, and the American people spoke last election. Nobody really wants Republicans in power anymore..
Until.........................
Political parties do not draw ones own religious faiths, what you are saying is wrong, and your belief that there is no such thing as a Christian liberal democrat is wrong.
That being said, you do realize the ENTIRE basis of what your profit's, Jesus, teachings were about is highly based on socialism and communism right? He did not go around preaching for the corporations, he went around preaching for the common welfare of man, and the people, something that socialism also preaches (how it is carried out can be quite different mind you).
So where as Repubbies generally preach for the multi-million dollar corporations, and its true, they do. Democrats are generally preaching more for social welfare. So tell me, which one sounds more aligned with the Christian profit's teachings?
P.S. People won't vote for a President who is not Christian. Its not gonna happen in the next century, provided there still is a U.S..
Eternally mine,
Keebs
The MMO gaming blog I write for.
www.draftgore.com
Gore '08
Let me straighten things out. If God had been a Liberal, we wouldn't have had the ten commandments. We'd have had the ten suggestions.
nuff said