hmm. I suppose a conspiracy is possible, but I would think there are more likely possibilities. lol. Is editing a Wiki article a taboo subject or were certain individuals that were just misbehaving and the thread got caught in the cross-fire? I obviously didn't get banned and no one sent me a pm about my posts, so I assume my posts weren't the problem.
I didn't always agree with you, but I thought I our discourse was civil and fruitfull to some extent. The goal of making the wiki article more accurate and complete seems to me to be a legitimate one, even if the result casts SOE/SWG in a more negative light.
Because we're so mean and evil that MMORPG.com forum mods needs a separate forum for the noobs and fanbois, our less than objective threads are more likely to be deleted than those of other, less hostile groups - we get differentially high forum cop patrols/locks/deletions. See the NGE kiddie forum for a plethora of examples. Hell, see almost any other forum for a plethora of examples.
SWG Veteran and Refugee, Intrepid server NGE free as of Nov. 22, 2005 Now Playing: World of Warcrack Forum Terrorist
It seems to have disappeared? I don't see where it was even locked?
Someone probably shat their pants when the news articles being listed were all agreeing with the majority of the negative feedback from the Pre-Combat Dumb-down community.
Isn't it funny that even after MMORPG provides a "Veteran SWG" area that we are still not to speak openly as a community or debate certain core issues that define our existence?
It is even funnier that people who completely disagree with majority Veteran views are allowed to come to the Veteran area and hound us while this area was created to keep us out of the current SWG community area so that we don't get in the way of positive feedback, if such exists.
"SWG was a world, now it's just a game" -adamrk-
"When the game was good, you didn't have to ask where the population was, because it was everywhere. When the game was good you didn't have to ask which server had population, because they all did. When the game was good you didn't have to beg friends to give it a try, because they were already playing. " - Salty Pete
My first set of changes to the SWG article on Wiki just completed. I even used MMORPG.com as a source on a couple of things. Over the course of this week, I'll also be adding more stuff on reviews and controversies of SWG and improving the attribution/sourcing. Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars_Galaxies.
After I'm done, I'll then work on SOE, Smedley and Vanguard.
My first set of changes to the SWG article on Wiki just completed. I even used MMORPG.com as a source on a couple of things. Over the course of this week, I'll also be adding more stuff on reviews and controversies of SWG and improving the attribution/sourcing. Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars_Galaxies. After I'm done, I'll then work on SOE, Smedley and Vanguard.
Make sure you expose the emu team as much as possible with complete references.
This way, LEC and SOE will have easier way suing them since their track record will already be completely documented. While your at it, you could also list all the copyright and trademark infringements they already commited.
After all, what bad can come from that, they're the good guys, right?
My first set of changes to the SWG article on Wiki just completed. I even used MMORPG.com as a source on a couple of things. Over the course of this week, I'll also be adding more stuff on reviews and controversies of SWG and improving the attribution/sourcing. Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars_Galaxies. After I'm done, I'll then work on SOE, Smedley and Vanguard.
Make sure you expose the emu team as much as possible with complete references.
This way, LEC and SOE will have easier way suing them since their track record will already be completely documented. While your at it, you could also list all the copyright and trademark infringements they already commited.
After all, what bad can come from that, they're the good guys, right?
Rekul you made your point several threads ago. You keep hounding Jonawiki and trolling him almost as if you are trying to bait people into an argument with you and for what? So you don't agree with him, you said it, move on. Obviously Jonawiki is posting information to people who care, you don't, so everything you are posting, have been posting, or will likely post in responce to Jonawiki has an element of sarcasm and condescending snobbishness.
Your flames and your trolling will in no way change the fact that you just simply don't see things the way he does so why don't you post in an area where your views are better recieved or let it go and let him enjoy the forum area.
"SWG was a world, now it's just a game" -adamrk-
"When the game was good, you didn't have to ask where the population was, because it was everywhere. When the game was good you didn't have to ask which server had population, because they all did. When the game was good you didn't have to beg friends to give it a try, because they were already playing. " - Salty Pete
My first set of changes to the SWG article on Wiki just completed. I even used MMORPG.com as a source on a couple of things. Over the course of this week, I'll also be adding more stuff on reviews and controversies of SWG and improving the attribution/sourcing. Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars_Galaxies. After I'm done, I'll then work on SOE, Smedley and Vanguard.
Make sure you expose the emu team as much as possible with complete references.
This way, LEC and SOE will have easier way suing them since their track record will already be completely documented. While your at it, you could also list all the copyright and trademark infringements they already commited.
After all, what bad can come from that, they're the good guys, right?
Rekul you made your point several threads ago. You keep hounding Jonawiki and trolling him almost as if you are trying to bait people into an argument with you and for what? So you don't agree with him, you said it, move on. Obviously Jonawiki is posting information to people who care, you don't, so everything you are posting, have been posting, or will likely post in responce to Jonawiki has an element of sarcasm and condescending snobbishness.
Your flames and your trolling will in no way change the fact that you just simply don't see things the way he does so why don't you post in an area where your views are better recieved or let it go and let him enjoy the forum area.
Oh please
Jonawiki is not posting information for the "people who care" he is on a pure smear campaign and trying to garner support for his silly efforts through these forums. They took his precious preCU away and now he's gonna talk smack, smear names and throw out BS as "fact" as revenge.
Rekul has just as much right to post on this than anyone else. Don't like it? Don't read it.
"If we don't attack them, they will attack us first. So we'd better retaliate before they have a chance to strike"
Rekul you made your point several threads ago. You keep hounding Jonawiki and trolling him almost as if you are trying to bait people into an argument with you and for what? So you don't agree with him, you said it, move on. Obviously Jonawiki is posting information to people who care, you don't, so everything you are posting, have been posting, or will likely post in responce to Jonawiki has an element of sarcasm and condescending snobbishness.
Your flames and your trolling will in no way change the fact that you just simply don't see things the way he does so why don't you post in an area where your views are better recieved or let it go and let him enjoy the forum area.
Hipocrisy is such a wonderful thing.
In your pursuit for unbiased truth, my voice is no longer desirable and should be silenced.
Pathetic.
Simply pathetic.
Where is all that free speech now? Where is everyone's opinon now?
Rekul you made your point several threads ago. You keep hounding Jonawiki and trolling him almost as if you are trying to bait people into an argument with you and for what? So you don't agree with him, you said it, move on. Obviously Jonawiki is posting information to people who care, you don't, so everything you are posting, have been posting, or will likely post in responce to Jonawiki has an element of sarcasm and condescending snobbishness.
Your flames and your trolling will in no way change the fact that you just simply don't see things the way he does so why don't you post in an area where your views are better recieved or let it go and let him enjoy the forum area.
Hipocrisy is such a wonderful thing.
In your pursuit for unbiased truth, my voice is no longer desirable and should be silenced.
Pathetic.
Simply pathetic.
Where is all that free speech now? Where is everyone's opinon now?
I don't want you silenced Rekul, just like I don't want Obraik silenced or anyone else who has an opinion but you already know this. If it makes you feel better, chase him from thread to thread and troll. The fact remains that he believes something that you do not and for that reason you think his ideas suck. Your point is made.
As for myself, I believe we have a right to voice our opinions as much as you do. The Pre-CU community is big, very big. We have been ripped off, we have been mistreated, we have been lied to, and yes a lot of places (including news articles) document a backlash that maybe you don't believe huge, but that Smedley himself said they will never want to face again and so they plan to never do sweeping revamps again. I would say that makes the backlash pretty big and our opinions worth enough to effect the people behind the backlash to some degree. So you don't agree with us or with pre-CU people, who cares?
"SWG was a world, now it's just a game" -adamrk-
"When the game was good, you didn't have to ask where the population was, because it was everywhere. When the game was good you didn't have to ask which server had population, because they all did. When the game was good you didn't have to beg friends to give it a try, because they were already playing. " - Salty Pete
My first set of changes to the SWG article on Wiki just completed. I even used MMORPG.com as a source on a couple of things. Over the course of this week, I'll also be adding more stuff on reviews and controversies of SWG and improving the attribution/sourcing. Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars_Galaxies. After I'm done, I'll then work on SOE, Smedley and Vanguard.
Make sure you expose the emu team as much as possible with complete references.
This way, LEC and SOE will have easier way suing them since their track record will already be completely documented. While your at it, you could also list all the copyright and trademark infringements they already commited.
After all, what bad can come from that, they're the good guys, right?
Rekul you made your point several threads ago. You keep hounding Jonawiki and trolling him almost as if you are trying to bait people into an argument with you and for what? So you don't agree with him, you said it, move on. Obviously Jonawiki is posting information to people who care, you don't, so everything you are posting, have been posting, or will likely post in responce to Jonawiki has an element of sarcasm and condescending snobbishness.
Your flames and your trolling will in no way change the fact that you just simply don't see things the way he does so why don't you post in an area where your views are better recieved or let it go and let him enjoy the forum area.
Oh please
Jonawiki is not posting information for the "people who care" he is on a pure smear campaign and trying to garner support for his silly efforts through these forums. They took his precious preCU away and now he's gonna talk smack, smear names and throw out BS as "fact" as revenge.
Rekul has just as much right to post on this than anyone else. Don't like it? Don't read it.
#1 Try to remember, the Pre-CU was precious to many of us.
#3 Why don't you apply your own logic, if you don't like it, don't read it.
"SWG was a world, now it's just a game" -adamrk-
"When the game was good, you didn't have to ask where the population was, because it was everywhere. When the game was good you didn't have to ask which server had population, because they all did. When the game was good you didn't have to beg friends to give it a try, because they were already playing. " - Salty Pete
My first set of changes to the SWG article on Wiki just completed. I even used MMORPG.com as a source on a couple of things. Over the course of this week, I'll also be adding more stuff on reviews and controversies of SWG and improving the attribution/sourcing. Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars_Galaxies. After I'm done, I'll then work on SOE, Smedley and Vanguard.
Make sure you expose the emu team as much as possible with complete references.
This way, LEC and SOE will have easier way suing them since their track record will already be completely documented. While your at it, you could also list all the copyright and trademark infringements they already commited.
After all, what bad can come from that, they're the good guys, right?
Rekul you made your point several threads ago. You keep hounding Jonawiki and trolling him almost as if you are trying to bait people into an argument with you and for what? So you don't agree with him, you said it, move on. Obviously Jonawiki is posting information to people who care, you don't, so everything you are posting, have been posting, or will likely post in responce to Jonawiki has an element of sarcasm and condescending snobbishness.
Your flames and your trolling will in no way change the fact that you just simply don't see things the way he does so why don't you post in an area where your views are better recieved or let it go and let him enjoy the forum area.
Oh please
Jonawiki is not posting information for the "people who care" he is on a pure smear campaign and trying to garner support for his silly efforts through these forums. They took his precious preCU away and now he's gonna talk smack, smear names and throw out BS as "fact" as revenge.
Rekul has just as much right to post on this than anyone else. Don't like it? Don't read it.
#1 Try to remember, the Pre-CU was precious to many of us.
#3 Why don't you apply your own logic, if you don't like it, don't read it.
1. I loved preCU just as much as anyone
2. Fact eh? I see he posted about the "Anti-SWG Cabal" on wiki. Give me a break. Remember just because it's on the net doesn't make it true.
Fact - this child is on nothing more than a smear campaign over the decision to change a game to something he doesn't like.
3. I don't like it and I will continue to voice my opinion as such on here. Again, if you cannot take the fact that other folks don't share the same view and voice it as such then maybe these forums are a bit too much for you. Because as you can see, there are many different views on the Vet forum.
"If we don't attack them, they will attack us first. So we'd better retaliate before they have a chance to strike"
My first set of changes to the SWG article on Wiki just completed. I even used MMORPG.com as a source on a couple of things. Over the course of this week, I'll also be adding more stuff on reviews and controversies of SWG and improving the attribution/sourcing. Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars_Galaxies. After I'm done, I'll then work on SOE, Smedley and Vanguard.
Make sure you expose the emu team as much as possible with complete references.
This way, LEC and SOE will have easier way suing them since their track record will already be completely documented. While your at it, you could also list all the copyright and trademark infringements they already commited.
After all, what bad can come from that, they're the good guys, right?
Rekul you made your point several threads ago. You keep hounding Jonawiki and trolling him almost as if you are trying to bait people into an argument with you and for what? So you don't agree with him, you said it, move on. Obviously Jonawiki is posting information to people who care, you don't, so everything you are posting, have been posting, or will likely post in responce to Jonawiki has an element of sarcasm and condescending snobbishness.
Your flames and your trolling will in no way change the fact that you just simply don't see things the way he does so why don't you post in an area where your views are better recieved or let it go and let him enjoy the forum area.
Oh please
Jonawiki is not posting information for the "people who care" he is on a pure smear campaign and trying to garner support for his silly efforts through these forums. They took his precious preCU away and now he's gonna talk smack, smear names and throw out BS as "fact" as revenge.
Rekul has just as much right to post on this than anyone else. Don't like it? Don't read it.
#1 Try to remember, the Pre-CU was precious to many of us.
#3 Why don't you apply your own logic, if you don't like it, don't read it.
1. I loved preCU just as much as anyone
2. Fact eh? I see he posted about the "Anti-SWG Cabal" on wiki. Give me a break. Remember just because it's on the net doesn't make it true.
Fact - this child is on nothing more than a smear campaign over the decision to change a game to something he doesn't like.
3. I don't like it and I will continue to voice my opinion as such on here. Again, if you cannot take the fact that other folks don't share the same view and voice it as such then maybe these forums are a bit too much for you. Because as you can see, there are many different views on the Vet forum.
To Rekrul and Baron Juju:
Say what you will. I bear you no ill will and respect your right to your opinion. Please feel free to register your objections. I will not make any criticisms of you personally or your opinions. To the degree that you make logical counter-arguments or factual corrections to what I have written on Wiki, I will be more than happy to incorporate them. Thanks.
As for myself, I believe we have a right to voice our opinions as much as you do. The Pre-CU community is big, very big. We have been ripped off, we have been mistreated, we have been lied to, and yes a lot of places (including news articles) document a backlash that maybe you don't believe huge, but that Smedley himself said they will never want to face again and so they plan to never do sweeping revamps again. I would say that makes the backlash pretty big and our opinions worth enough to effect the people behind the backlash to some degree. So you don't agree with us or with pre-CU people, who cares?
Do you realize that in your quest for truth, you are setting up to hurt others. Seriously hurt.
I mention swgemu, because they don't need publicity, all someone needs to sneeze and they go down in court. They don't even need to bring SW IP into this, DMCA is enough.
Singling out indivudals when you just as everyone else knows that leaders changed on SWG every 6 months is also pointless.
In quest for truth it's too easy to forget what the bigger picture is. There are some things which are better forgotten. That doesn't mean you should let all memory of what happened get wiped, but do consider *how* you do it, or you'll do more damage than benefit.
But I would strongly advise you to leave the emu things out of there. After all, it would be better to let the greatest fans of pre-cu continue unopposed, rather than suffer from some random third-party flak brought on them by some unrelated publicity.
To Rekrul and Baron Juju: Say what you will. I bear you no ill will and respect your right to your opinion. Please feel free to register your objections. I will not make any criticisms of you personally or your opinions. To the degree that you make logical counter-arguments or factual corrections to what I have written on Wiki, I will be more than happy to incorporate them. Thanks.
You have done nothing more on Wiki than to make yourself look like the fool everyone on Wiki thought you were, bravo. As things go you probably will be banned and have the SWG wiki locked after they edit all the crazy garbage (and I do mean garbage) off.
Well done
"If we don't attack them, they will attack us first. So we'd better retaliate before they have a chance to strike"
It probably has more to do with the Wikipedia people then it does MMORPG.com. Basically, you were organising an assault on the Wikipedia site to deface their articles, which is something they don't take too kindly too. They probably saw where all the referals were coming from and got the thread shutdown.
It seems to have disappeared? I don't see where it was even locked?
Someone probably shat their pants when the news articles being listed were all agreeing with the majority of the negative feedback from the Pre-Combat Dumb-down community.
Isn't it funny that even after MMORPG provides a "Veteran SWG" area that we are still not to speak openly as a community or debate certain core issues that define our existence?
It is even funnier that people who completely disagree with majority Veteran views are allowed to come to the Veteran area and hound us while this area was created to keep us out of the current SWG community area so that we don't get in the way of positive feedback, if such exists.
Actually it's probably because I sort of Godwined the thread after Jonawiki compared the NGE to the WorldCom scandal.
It's weird the mods do stuff like that with no explanation.
Well, let's be honest...the NGE didn't exactly do wonders for the SW brand and/or SOE/LA. It will go down in history as a colossal fuck up though. Kudos to that. Not everyone make their mark in history.....
******************************** SWG pre cu - never forgotten.
Well, I think the article has improved substantially now. More sourcing and more editorial balance. But it's fascinating the extent to which SWG fanbois and ex-employees (like Jeff Freeman) will go in order to quash any ugly truth at every turn. It's truly an unfortunate propaganda war.
Well, I think the article has improved substantially now. More sourcing and more editorial balance. But it's fascinating the extent to which SWG fanbois and ex-employees (like Jeff Freeman) will go in order to quash any ugly truth at every turn. It's truly an unfortunate propaganda war. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars_Galaxies
Truth? What truth would that be? The articles labeled Rumor, the conspiracy theories, or the constant barrage of personal attacks on developers you keep adding that keeps getting deleted?
LOL, remember jona, just because its on the net doesn't make it true.
That and the NYPost is a laughable reference for "facts"
"If we don't attack them, they will attack us first. So we'd better retaliate before they have a chance to strike"
Well, I think the article has improved substantially now. More sourcing and more editorial balance. But it's fascinating the extent to which SWG fanbois and ex-employees (like Jeff Freeman) will go in order to quash any ugly truth at every turn. It's truly an unfortunate propaganda war. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars_Galaxies
Those "fanbois" are just people trying to keep you honest, IMO. Some of your references are poor, some of your edits include your own bias. They're right to put you to task there - there's no need to resort to name-calling and the like.
Overall, I do think you've quite improved the entry, and I don't think that would be the case without them.
Comments
It got deleted. Some people perhaps even got banned.
Now we enter the "mmorpg.com is paid by SOE to mute negative feedback" conspiracy theory mode.
hmm. I suppose a conspiracy is possible, but I would think there are more likely possibilities. lol. Is editing a Wiki article a taboo subject or were certain individuals that were just misbehaving and the thread got caught in the cross-fire? I obviously didn't get banned and no one sent me a pm about my posts, so I assume my posts weren't the problem.
I didn't always agree with you, but I thought I our discourse was civil and fruitfull to some extent. The goal of making the wiki article more accurate and complete seems to me to be a legitimate one, even if the result casts SOE/SWG in a more negative light.
For every minute you are angry , you lose 60 seconds of happiness."-Emerson
oh noes....
"If we don't attack them, they will attack us first. So we'd better retaliate before they have a chance to strike"
I think the mods felt uncomfortable with the SOE/SWG criticism so they deleted the thread hoping it would go away. That's my best guess. Oh well.
SWG Veteran and Refugee, Intrepid server
NGE free as of Nov. 22, 2005
Now Playing: World of Warcrack
Forum Terrorist
Someone probably shat their pants when the news articles being listed were all agreeing with the majority of the negative feedback from the Pre-Combat Dumb-down community.
Isn't it funny that even after MMORPG provides a "Veteran SWG" area that we are still not to speak openly as a community or debate certain core issues that define our existence?
It is even funnier that people who completely disagree with majority Veteran views are allowed to come to the Veteran area and hound us while this area was created to keep us out of the current SWG community area so that we don't get in the way of positive feedback, if such exists.
"SWG was a world, now it's just a game" -adamrk-
"When the game was good, you didn't have to ask where the population was, because it was everywhere. When the game was good you didn't have to ask which server had population, because they all did. When the game was good you didn't have to beg friends to give it a try, because they were already playing. " - Salty Pete
My first set of changes to the SWG article on Wiki just completed. I even used MMORPG.com as a source on a couple of things. Over the course of this week, I'll also be adding more stuff on reviews and controversies of SWG and improving the attribution/sourcing. Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars_Galaxies.
After I'm done, I'll then work on SOE, Smedley and Vanguard.
This way, LEC and SOE will have easier way suing them since their track record will already be completely documented. While your at it, you could also list all the copyright and trademark infringements they already commited.
After all, what bad can come from that, they're the good guys, right?
This way, LEC and SOE will have easier way suing them since their track record will already be completely documented. While your at it, you could also list all the copyright and trademark infringements they already commited.
After all, what bad can come from that, they're the good guys, right?
Rekul you made your point several threads ago. You keep hounding Jonawiki and trolling him almost as if you are trying to bait people into an argument with you and for what? So you don't agree with him, you said it, move on. Obviously Jonawiki is posting information to people who care, you don't, so everything you are posting, have been posting, or will likely post in responce to Jonawiki has an element of sarcasm and condescending snobbishness.
Your flames and your trolling will in no way change the fact that you just simply don't see things the way he does so why don't you post in an area where your views are better recieved or let it go and let him enjoy the forum area.
"SWG was a world, now it's just a game" -adamrk-
"When the game was good, you didn't have to ask where the population was, because it was everywhere. When the game was good you didn't have to ask which server had population, because they all did. When the game was good you didn't have to beg friends to give it a try, because they were already playing. " - Salty Pete
This way, LEC and SOE will have easier way suing them since their track record will already be completely documented. While your at it, you could also list all the copyright and trademark infringements they already commited.
After all, what bad can come from that, they're the good guys, right?
Rekul you made your point several threads ago. You keep hounding Jonawiki and trolling him almost as if you are trying to bait people into an argument with you and for what? So you don't agree with him, you said it, move on. Obviously Jonawiki is posting information to people who care, you don't, so everything you are posting, have been posting, or will likely post in responce to Jonawiki has an element of sarcasm and condescending snobbishness.
Your flames and your trolling will in no way change the fact that you just simply don't see things the way he does so why don't you post in an area where your views are better recieved or let it go and let him enjoy the forum area.
Oh please
Jonawiki is not posting information for the "people who care" he is on a pure smear campaign and trying to garner support for his silly efforts through these forums. They took his precious preCU away and now he's gonna talk smack, smear names and throw out BS as "fact" as revenge.
Rekul has just as much right to post on this than anyone else. Don't like it? Don't read it.
"If we don't attack them, they will attack us first. So we'd better retaliate before they have a chance to strike"
Rekul you made your point several threads ago. You keep hounding Jonawiki and trolling him almost as if you are trying to bait people into an argument with you and for what? So you don't agree with him, you said it, move on. Obviously Jonawiki is posting information to people who care, you don't, so everything you are posting, have been posting, or will likely post in responce to Jonawiki has an element of sarcasm and condescending snobbishness.
Your flames and your trolling will in no way change the fact that you just simply don't see things the way he does so why don't you post in an area where your views are better recieved or let it go and let him enjoy the forum area.
Hipocrisy is such a wonderful thing.
In your pursuit for unbiased truth, my voice is no longer desirable and should be silenced.
Pathetic.
Simply pathetic.
Where is all that free speech now? Where is everyone's opinon now?
Rekul you made your point several threads ago. You keep hounding Jonawiki and trolling him almost as if you are trying to bait people into an argument with you and for what? So you don't agree with him, you said it, move on. Obviously Jonawiki is posting information to people who care, you don't, so everything you are posting, have been posting, or will likely post in responce to Jonawiki has an element of sarcasm and condescending snobbishness.
Your flames and your trolling will in no way change the fact that you just simply don't see things the way he does so why don't you post in an area where your views are better recieved or let it go and let him enjoy the forum area.
Hipocrisy is such a wonderful thing.
In your pursuit for unbiased truth, my voice is no longer desirable and should be silenced.
Pathetic.
Simply pathetic.
Where is all that free speech now? Where is everyone's opinon now?
I don't want you silenced Rekul, just like I don't want Obraik silenced or anyone else who has an opinion but you already know this. If it makes you feel better, chase him from thread to thread and troll. The fact remains that he believes something that you do not and for that reason you think his ideas suck. Your point is made.
As for myself, I believe we have a right to voice our opinions as much as you do. The Pre-CU community is big, very big. We have been ripped off, we have been mistreated, we have been lied to, and yes a lot of places (including news articles) document a backlash that maybe you don't believe huge, but that Smedley himself said they will never want to face again and so they plan to never do sweeping revamps again. I would say that makes the backlash pretty big and our opinions worth enough to effect the people behind the backlash to some degree. So you don't agree with us or with pre-CU people, who cares?
"SWG was a world, now it's just a game" -adamrk-
"When the game was good, you didn't have to ask where the population was, because it was everywhere. When the game was good you didn't have to ask which server had population, because they all did. When the game was good you didn't have to beg friends to give it a try, because they were already playing. " - Salty Pete
This way, LEC and SOE will have easier way suing them since their track record will already be completely documented. While your at it, you could also list all the copyright and trademark infringements they already commited.
After all, what bad can come from that, they're the good guys, right?
Rekul you made your point several threads ago. You keep hounding Jonawiki and trolling him almost as if you are trying to bait people into an argument with you and for what? So you don't agree with him, you said it, move on. Obviously Jonawiki is posting information to people who care, you don't, so everything you are posting, have been posting, or will likely post in responce to Jonawiki has an element of sarcasm and condescending snobbishness.
Your flames and your trolling will in no way change the fact that you just simply don't see things the way he does so why don't you post in an area where your views are better recieved or let it go and let him enjoy the forum area.
Oh please
Jonawiki is not posting information for the "people who care" he is on a pure smear campaign and trying to garner support for his silly efforts through these forums. They took his precious preCU away and now he's gonna talk smack, smear names and throw out BS as "fact" as revenge.
Rekul has just as much right to post on this than anyone else. Don't like it? Don't read it.
#1 Try to remember, the Pre-CU was precious to many of us.
#2 A lot of what has been stated as fact is fact.
#3 Why don't you apply your own logic, if you don't like it, don't read it.
"SWG was a world, now it's just a game" -adamrk-
"When the game was good, you didn't have to ask where the population was, because it was everywhere. When the game was good you didn't have to ask which server had population, because they all did. When the game was good you didn't have to beg friends to give it a try, because they were already playing. " - Salty Pete
This way, LEC and SOE will have easier way suing them since their track record will already be completely documented. While your at it, you could also list all the copyright and trademark infringements they already commited.
After all, what bad can come from that, they're the good guys, right?
Rekul you made your point several threads ago. You keep hounding Jonawiki and trolling him almost as if you are trying to bait people into an argument with you and for what? So you don't agree with him, you said it, move on. Obviously Jonawiki is posting information to people who care, you don't, so everything you are posting, have been posting, or will likely post in responce to Jonawiki has an element of sarcasm and condescending snobbishness.
Your flames and your trolling will in no way change the fact that you just simply don't see things the way he does so why don't you post in an area where your views are better recieved or let it go and let him enjoy the forum area.
Oh please
Jonawiki is not posting information for the "people who care" he is on a pure smear campaign and trying to garner support for his silly efforts through these forums. They took his precious preCU away and now he's gonna talk smack, smear names and throw out BS as "fact" as revenge.
Rekul has just as much right to post on this than anyone else. Don't like it? Don't read it.
#1 Try to remember, the Pre-CU was precious to many of us.
#2 A lot of what has been stated as fact is fact.
#3 Why don't you apply your own logic, if you don't like it, don't read it.
1. I loved preCU just as much as anyone
2. Fact eh? I see he posted about the "Anti-SWG Cabal" on wiki. Give me a break. Remember just because it's on the net doesn't make it true.
Fact - this child is on nothing more than a smear campaign over the decision to change a game to something he doesn't like.
3. I don't like it and I will continue to voice my opinion as such on here. Again, if you cannot take the fact that other folks don't share the same view and voice it as such then maybe these forums are a bit too much for you. Because as you can see, there are many different views on the Vet forum.
"If we don't attack them, they will attack us first. So we'd better retaliate before they have a chance to strike"
This way, LEC and SOE will have easier way suing them since their track record will already be completely documented. While your at it, you could also list all the copyright and trademark infringements they already commited.
After all, what bad can come from that, they're the good guys, right?
Rekul you made your point several threads ago. You keep hounding Jonawiki and trolling him almost as if you are trying to bait people into an argument with you and for what? So you don't agree with him, you said it, move on. Obviously Jonawiki is posting information to people who care, you don't, so everything you are posting, have been posting, or will likely post in responce to Jonawiki has an element of sarcasm and condescending snobbishness.
Your flames and your trolling will in no way change the fact that you just simply don't see things the way he does so why don't you post in an area where your views are better recieved or let it go and let him enjoy the forum area.
Oh please
Jonawiki is not posting information for the "people who care" he is on a pure smear campaign and trying to garner support for his silly efforts through these forums. They took his precious preCU away and now he's gonna talk smack, smear names and throw out BS as "fact" as revenge.
Rekul has just as much right to post on this than anyone else. Don't like it? Don't read it.
#1 Try to remember, the Pre-CU was precious to many of us.
#2 A lot of what has been stated as fact is fact.
#3 Why don't you apply your own logic, if you don't like it, don't read it.
1. I loved preCU just as much as anyone
2. Fact eh? I see he posted about the "Anti-SWG Cabal" on wiki. Give me a break. Remember just because it's on the net doesn't make it true.
Fact - this child is on nothing more than a smear campaign over the decision to change a game to something he doesn't like.
3. I don't like it and I will continue to voice my opinion as such on here. Again, if you cannot take the fact that other folks don't share the same view and voice it as such then maybe these forums are a bit too much for you. Because as you can see, there are many different views on the Vet forum.
To Rekrul and Baron Juju:
Say what you will. I bear you no ill will and respect your right to your opinion. Please feel free to register your objections. I will not make any criticisms of you personally or your opinions. To the degree that you make logical counter-arguments or factual corrections to what I have written on Wiki, I will be more than happy to incorporate them. Thanks.
As for myself, I believe we have a right to voice our opinions as much as you do. The Pre-CU community is big, very big. We have been ripped off, we have been mistreated, we have been lied to, and yes a lot of places (including news articles) document a backlash that maybe you don't believe huge, but that Smedley himself said they will never want to face again and so they plan to never do sweeping revamps again. I would say that makes the backlash pretty big and our opinions worth enough to effect the people behind the backlash to some degree. So you don't agree with us or with pre-CU people, who cares?
I mention swgemu, because they don't need publicity, all someone needs to sneeze and they go down in court. They don't even need to bring SW IP into this, DMCA is enough.
Singling out indivudals when you just as everyone else knows that leaders changed on SWG every 6 months is also pointless.
In quest for truth it's too easy to forget what the bigger picture is. There are some things which are better forgotten. That doesn't mean you should let all memory of what happened get wiped, but do consider *how* you do it, or you'll do more damage than benefit.
But I would strongly advise you to leave the emu things out of there. After all, it would be better to let the greatest fans of pre-cu continue unopposed, rather than suffer from some random third-party flak brought on them by some unrelated publicity.
You have done nothing more on Wiki than to make yourself look like the fool everyone on Wiki thought you were, bravo. As things go you probably will be banned and have the SWG wiki locked after they edit all the crazy garbage (and I do mean garbage) off.
Well done
"If we don't attack them, they will attack us first. So we'd better retaliate before they have a chance to strike"
Someone probably shat their pants when the news articles being listed were all agreeing with the majority of the negative feedback from the Pre-Combat Dumb-down community.
Isn't it funny that even after MMORPG provides a "Veteran SWG" area that we are still not to speak openly as a community or debate certain core issues that define our existence?
It is even funnier that people who completely disagree with majority Veteran views are allowed to come to the Veteran area and hound us while this area was created to keep us out of the current SWG community area so that we don't get in the way of positive feedback, if such exists.
Actually it's probably because I sort of Godwined the thread after Jonawiki compared the NGE to the WorldCom scandal.
It's weird the mods do stuff like that with no explanation.
Jeff Freeman
It will go down in history as a colossal fuck up though.
Kudos to that. Not everyone make their mark in history.....
********************************
SWG pre cu - never forgotten.
Well, I think the article has improved substantially now. More sourcing and more editorial balance. But it's fascinating the extent to which SWG fanbois and ex-employees (like Jeff Freeman) will go in order to quash any ugly truth at every turn. It's truly an unfortunate propaganda war.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars_Galaxies
Truth? What truth would that be? The articles labeled Rumor, the conspiracy theories, or the constant barrage of personal attacks on developers you keep adding that keeps getting deleted?
LOL, remember jona, just because its on the net doesn't make it true.
That and the NYPost is a laughable reference for "facts"
"If we don't attack them, they will attack us first. So we'd better retaliate before they have a chance to strike"
Overall, I do think you've quite improved the entry, and I don't think that would be the case without them.
Jeff Freeman
oh noes....
lol it was that pic that gave me the idea for my sigTin Foil hats dont work.. its all a conspiracy