Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Which side?

just wanted to create a little poll on here to see what side everyone was playing on, as i have not seen this (though i have seen which class ect.) thanks

 

sorry i said chaos, when i ment destruction (wont post a new thread when its this late again LOL) thanks

Comments

  • MithrandixMithrandix Member Posts: 76
    It's Destruction fyi,...



    I'll be playing Warrior Priest (so Order its is). For The Empire!

    "It's no good coming to our game if you are trying to grow weed, It's no good coming to our game if you want to make pants. It's only worth coming to our game if you want to burn things to the ground."
    -Paul Barnett, WAR is coming

  • KaalinnKaalinn Member UncommonPosts: 121

    Bright Wizard... thus empire


    If it says Wizard somewhere in the name ive either played it or am going to.

  • adders666adders666 Member Posts: 259
    ahh whoops, well i belive everyone knows what i mean (its late here and i should be asleep :p) i will post a edit on the 1st post
  • BawlssBawlss Member Posts: 55

    i belive this is just a more organic form of the what race topics that have been posted previously. however its a good question none the less.

     

    i for one have learned my lesson from wow, and no im  not referencing to wow it just is extreamly relevant to what i have to say. on wow it seemed that horde was more mature and alliance was more immature, which is not 100% true there were some deviations to the rule but for the masses it was either cool i wana be horde (15-40+) or you were alliance (8-14) and you were like omg those horde guys are ugly night elf for me. with the release of TBC that rule changed, BElfs were the new Nelfs and well you got just as much immaturity on both sides.

     

    now for my point, destruction it is, no little kids

     

     

    AGE LIMIT REQUIRED?????

  • MithrandixMithrandix Member Posts: 76
    Originally posted by Bawlss


    i belive this is just a more organic form of the what race topics that have been posted previously. however its a good question none the less.
     
    i for one have learned my lesson from wow, and no im  not referencing to wow it just is extreamly relevant to what i have to say. on wow it seemed that horde was more mature and alliance was more immature, which is not 100% true there were some deviations to the rule but for the masses it was either cool i wana be horde (15-40+) or you were alliance (8-14) and you were like omg those horde guys are ugly night elf for me. with the release of TBC that rule changed, BElfs were the new Nelfs and well you got just as much immaturity on both sides.
     
    now for my point, destruction it is, no little kids
     
     
    AGE LIMIT REQUIRED?????
    SEXY DARK ELFS?

    "It's no good coming to our game if you are trying to grow weed, It's no good coming to our game if you want to make pants. It's only worth coming to our game if you want to burn things to the ground."
    -Paul Barnett, WAR is coming

  • Nerdkill789Nerdkill789 Member Posts: 27
    lol
  • gozzgullgozzgull Member Posts: 71
    I plan on being on the Caturday faction, because their copy pasta is always the best.  Plus, Tzeentch sucks, so I'd rather wait for a Nurgle or Slaanesh expansion, so untill then, copypasta + madcap mushrooms ftw.
  • adders666adders666 Member Posts: 259
    nice and imbalanced so far, lets not keep it up  would love this to come back after 1000 votes as being as close to 50 - 50 as possible
  • AlienovrlordAlienovrlord Member Posts: 1,525

    I'm going to be playing both sides, Order on one server, Destruction on another.

    And roll up as many classes as I possibly can on each (Non-recovered alt-aholic here :) )

  • AreelAreel Member Posts: 285

    Current polling trands always lean heavily to the Destruction side.  Dwarfs and the Empire are cool, but Greenskins and Chaos are just badass.

    Once average gamers (gamers that don't watch games in development) are added to the mix, though, it should even out.  A lot of people like being the good guys, even when the good guys are flawed.

    Seriously.
    It's Are'el. This forum doesn't allow apostrophes in usernames.

  • adders666adders666 Member Posts: 259
    well in only 30 votes we have a 66% advantage to destruction, i do hope that it does level out, because i hate playing on imbalanced servers in pvp games because u get the same old rubbish where people migrate away from underpopulated servers/factions which then even further under populates the server which then makes the higher popped side gain massive advantages, i prey to the gods of chaos that this dosent happen!!
  • broundingbrounding Member Posts: 63
    I voted for Chaos (which I'm assuming you meant Destruction).



    My first intention is to play an Orc Choppa but I am drawn to the Dwarves as well, and who knows what the elves may have so I'm not sure yet.  A warpriest would be fun too, im torn!
  • DIVDIIDIVDII Member UncommonPosts: 6
    I plan on playing an Orc Choppa unless the Chaos side is overpopulated then i will be a Dwarf hammerer.  Just depends on how the population balances out.
  • tapeworm00tapeworm00 Member Posts: 549
    My Tzeentch flying disc will eat you all for dinner! WWAAAAAA... erm... nevermind
  • GakummGakumm Member Posts: 2
    Greenskin all the way, with maybe a stopover in Chaos

    No matter where you go there you are

  • GalupaGalupa Member Posts: 203
    i want to have a high elf. so order.

    "The new age is upon us, yet the past refuses to rest in its shallow grave."

  • dolearondolearon Member Posts: 89
    I will be playing order because of Dwarfs and the Empire but this appears ratehr one-sided.... never a good thing IMO
  • CelestianCelestian Member UncommonPosts: 1,136


    Originally posted by Bawlss
    i belive this is just a more organic form of the what race topics that have been posted previously. however its a good question none the less.

    i for one have learned my lesson from wow, and no im not referencing to wow it just is extreamly relevant to what i have to say. on wow it seemed that horde was more mature and alliance was more immature, which is not 100% true there were some deviations to the rule but for the masses it was either cool i wana be horde (15-40+) or you were alliance (8-14) and you were like omg those horde guys are ugly night elf for me. with the release of TBC that rule changed, BElfs were the new Nelfs and well you got just as much immaturity on both sides.

    now for my point, destruction it is, no little kids


    AGE LIMIT REQUIRED?????

    There was a gaming survey that was performed and it turned out younger people tended towards Horde (12-17) and the older folks played Alliance. They also found that women tend to play elves and healers.

    So, your theory seems a bit off compared to that. You can see the stuff they came up with:
    http://www.nickyee.com/daedalus/

  • ArathArath Member Posts: 119
    Originally posted by dolearon

    I will be playing order because of Dwarfs and the Empire but this appears ratehr one-sided.... never a good thing IMO

    I think that most people who follow the early development of games will err towards the darker or evil side of this game. On that note I would have enjoyed if they had gone for a mature rating or at least not worried about not fitting into the Teen rating I think that could have resulted in some very interesting results in terms of character design for Destruction & Order.

    Concerning the poll as it stands I am leaning towards Order. The Empire and a Warrior-Priest though who knows how things will turn out I do want to play a Greenskin at sometime in the future. Its hard to say anything with any certainty at this time though.

  • killerwigkillerwig Member UncommonPosts: 236

    I like the imbalance towards destruction, it sort of fits with the whole Warhammer lore concept - the world being on the brink of destruction . With the Dogs of War making up the numbers, the imbalance shouldn't be game breaking I think. Odds are that on release, most people will be going for the destruction side, but as Areel and others mention, it should even out after everyone settles in to become altaholics.

    But yep - more destruction players will keep it interesting for the Order players. I really want to fight Chaos, so I'll probably roll Empire first, but also because I am really familiar with the Empire side of things and I'm really looking forward to running around Altdorf and Middenheim (If they include that city). A knight of the burning sun looks appealing, especially if they go ahead with mounted combat, like Paul Barnett hinted at in an interview when he said they "fight pretty high off the ground". I'm just imagining the full armoured knightly charge into the tides of chaos now.... I can't wait.

  • kraidenkraiden Staff WriterMember UncommonPosts: 638

    Many of us come from DAoC. And before that a portion came from UO. We have learned through trial and error its better to play the underdog than to play the favored. I had tons of fun being an outsider in UO and a Mid in daoc. All you need is to hook up with a few good players and playing against superior numbers you will always have fun running into the underskilled players on the other side.

    My guild is chosing destruction because they want to be underdog. I myself so far only like 2 classes in the game thus far. Warriorpriest is by a long shot my favorite and brightmage would make a good alt. I hated the runepriest (found it very unrewarding and a 1 trick pony) and wasnt overly impressed with the lack of pure healing power the shaman had. If EAmythic comes out with a way to ballance population which I know they will, I will want to play Order. If not, I will join a low population server and play underdog.

Sign In or Register to comment.