Yeah that wall is just the start. Divide and conquer strategy, same ole same ole. Also keeps both sides from being able to come together for anything cooperative. Besides the 14 u.s. military bases that are being built the u.s. embassy there is going to be like some super duper heavy duty billion dollar project that kicks arse over all our other embassies. Got to have a place where our politico's and oil company exec's can chill out while they steal oil and misspend tax payer dollars.
A wall is not the answer. Just enforce public nudity-it'd be a lot harder to hide a suicide bomb if no one wore any clothes....
The Berlin wall was built to prevent people living under a communist government from fleeing to a democratic government.
This wall is designed to stop opposing religious groups from killing each other. it doesn't even go through the whole city, just between neighborhoods, from what I read in the article.
You know what else? Bush Administration has leaked that they are going to try and stay in office even longer than the lawful 8 years. They argue that they were not truely elected into office in 2000 because Congress allowed him in after numerous recounts and him actually LOSING according to the tally. Therefore, he'd be allowed to run another 4 years. He can also try to say that the law of only 8 years doesn't apply during times of extreme national emergency. This would allow him to continue being president until the war in just about over. Know who else was leader until a war was almost over and created camps for specific individuals, from whom he stripped rights? Hitler.
Hey smit90... You should probably do a little more research before making posts like this. There was a page here which made statements which resemble your claim, but it says down bottom:
The story above is a satire or parody. It is entirely fictitious.
In addition to this, the NY Times article was a hoax as well because the site, while looking like the New York Times, was actually NewYourkeTimes (Notice the additional 'u' and 'e') and was a hoax as well. It used to be posted HERE however, you can read the letter from the NY Times Lawyers HERE to see why it was removed.
Originally posted by smit90
I'm not saying Bush is Hitler, but he sure as heck as done many things that Americans should disapprove of.
As an American, one thing I disapprove of is people trying to rally communities for a cause under false pretenses. I'm not saying I agree with everything Bush does, but if you're going to point out flaws in his administration, use real ones. Posting things like this just hurts your cause.
Actually, the source you provide isn't the source I used. I believe I got it off of CNN, but I need to check, where they were also bringing up the point of 4 other laws he and his advisors have worked around.
I'm looking for the source right now. I'll edit this reply once I find it.
Edit: Haven't found the source yet, but I did find this interesting: http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/04/20/662/ Turns out that Vermont is trying to impeach Bush/Cheney, and Wisconsin and Washington are pushing for it as well. The non-binding resolution was approved 16-9 with no debate. Their reasoning is that, and I quote, " Bush and Cheney’s actions in the U.S. and abroad, including in Iraq, 'raise serious questions of constitutionality, statutory legality, and abuse of the public trust.'"
I'll be back on in a couple hours to continue my search for the source. I assure you it was not that source you provided, because there were no pictures, but many links to sources within the article.
Obviously the legality of many actions taken by the Bush administration are illegal, but they probably won't impeach him. Even if they moved to impeach, the Democrats dont control Congress as much as some people seem to think and they wouldnt be able to get the vote.
But that he is planning to run for a third term (which he wouldnt win anyway) because he didnt really win the first election (even though he legally did) is NONSENSE. You're nuts and you are just alienating moderates from your cause by being so stupid.
Honestly, if you want to attack Bush for his illegal methods, go for things like the wiretapping, prisoner treatment, unconstitutional detainment of American citizens, and an immense amount of corruption... but please, PLEASE stop it with this made up crap that makes no sense.
Obviously the legality of many actions taken by the Bush administration are illegal, but they probably won't impeach him. Even if they moved to impeach, the Democrats dont control Congress as much as some people seem to think and they wouldnt be able to get the vote. But that he is planning to run for a third term (which he wouldnt win anyway) because he didnt really win the first election (even though he legally did) is NONSENSE. You're nuts and you are just alienating moderates from your cause by being so stupid. Honestly, if you want to attack Bush for his illegal methods, go for things like the wiretapping, prisoner treatment, unconstitutional detainment of American citizens, and an immense amount of corruption... but please, PLEASE stop it with this made up crap that makes no sense.
#1, I realise that it would be very hard to impeach him. And agree that although the November elections changed numbers, things in Congress are still quite shaky.
#2, I don't report on things that are made up. it is possible that the article I read was false, HOWEVER, it addressed multiple issues and isn't the article noted for being fake. The article I read came from a reputable news source I often read. It is possible my news source may have ripped quotes from the fake article and re-written it, thinking they got a scoop. I don't know. I also misinterpretted the map I posted in my second comment due to seeing it in a passing glance after seeing a very similar map on the news that was being reffered to by a US military representative.
Also, if this topic was about the other illegal things, I would talk about them. However, I was simply trying to talk about the wall in this topic. If you really wish for me to continue writing "crap", then I'll write a topic about all the things Bush has done. I really don't feel like it.
Please don't insult me and my intelligence because of one thing. If you were bright enough to read what all has been posted so far, you would see that I am working to find the source that I read certain theories from (either CNN or MSNBC). I am NOT some guy off the streets that hates Bush because its cool. I try to do research and read up on topics before determining my own opinion.
To the OP (sorry didnt have time to read all coz Im at work).
You remeber the old nursery rhyme, "There was on old woman who swalowed a fly ?"
Well right now the US is up to the part where they swallow the killer whale to catch the leopard seal. We all know they will just end up choking..... but that logic seems to elude them anyway....
Pure history alone would tell you what chance it has of success, let alone your very pertinent observation that "by what right do they do this in somoene elses country ?"
But if there is one thing this adminsitration is NOT.... its students of history.
+-+-+-+-+-+ "MMOs, for people that like think chatting is like a skill or something, rotflol" http://purepwnage.com -+-+-+-+-+-+ "Far away across the field, the tolling of the iron bell, calls the faithful to their knees. To hear the softly spoken magic spell" Pink Floyd-Dark Side of the Moon
To the OP (sorry didnt have time to read all coz Im at work). You remeber the old nursery rhyme, "There was on old woman who swalowed a fly ?" Well right now the US is up to the part where they swallow the killer whale to catch the leopard seal. We all know they will just end up choking..... but that logic seems to elude them anyway.... Pure history alone would tell you what chance it has of success, let alone your very pertinent observation that "by what right do they do this in somoene elses country ?" But if there is one thing this adminsitration is NOT.... its students of history.
Bah! Congress was busy drafting tax hikes to enlarge the national throat for that killer whale until the Democrats took over. They're still going to hike taxes for it, but also funnel some cash to fund research that isn't deemed offensive enough to lose them votes.
Obviously the legality of many actions taken by the Bush administration are illegal, but they probably won't impeach him. Even if they moved to impeach, the Democrats dont control Congress as much as some people seem to think and they wouldnt be able to get the vote. But that he is planning to run for a third term (which he wouldnt win anyway) because he didnt really win the first election (even though he legally did) is NONSENSE. You're nuts and you are just alienating moderates from your cause by being so stupid. Honestly, if you want to attack Bush for his illegal methods, go for things like the wiretapping, prisoner treatment, unconstitutional detainment of American citizens, and an immense amount of corruption... but please, PLEASE stop it with this made up crap that makes no sense.
#1, I realise that it would be very hard to impeach him. And agree that although the November elections changed numbers, things in Congress are still quite shaky.
#2, I don't report on things that are made up. it is possible that the article I read was false, HOWEVER, it addressed multiple issues and isn't the article noted for being fake. The article I read came from a reputable news source I often read. It is possible my news source may have ripped quotes from the fake article and re-written it, thinking they got a scoop. I don't know. I also misinterpretted the map I posted in my second comment due to seeing it in a passing glance after seeing a very similar map on the news that was being reffered to by a US military representative.
Also, if this topic was about the other illegal things, I would talk about them. However, I was simply trying to talk about the wall in this topic. If you really wish for me to continue writing "crap", then I'll write a topic about all the things Bush has done. I really don't feel like it.
Please don't insult me and my intelligence because of one thing. If you were bright enough to read what all has been posted so far, you would see that I am working to find the source that I read certain theories from (either CNN or MSNBC). I am NOT some guy off the streets that hates Bush because its cool. I try to do research and read up on topics before determining my own opinion.
Thank you
You just did report on a thing that was made up. Bush is not planning on running in 2008, nor could he if he wanted to. I am wondering what "reputable" news source you read that in, but it certainly doesnt sound reputable to me. If you possessed rational thought and knowledge of how our election system works you would've known this. They teach you this information very early in your academic career, my friend.
You say that this topic isnt about Bush's other illegal activities, yet you bring up an alleged illegal activity that had nothing to do with the original post (i.e. the wall in Baghdad) for seemingly no reason. I merely questioned why you would bring this up out of all the possibilities you really do have? It just makes you seem ridiculous.
I didnt question why you hated Bush, nor did I allege that you hate him because its cool. I simply questioned your methods of deriding him based on entirely ficticious information. What people like you do is lend weight to pro-Bush arguments, because your statements are based on false information, making you easy to argue against and moderates who are perhaps unswayed will look at your statements and go "Wow, the Bushites have a point! Bush haters really are all morons!" and they'll venture into the part of the political spectrum we dont want them going to.
I'm sorry for hurting your feelings, but honestly posting "Bush wants to run for prez in 2008 becuz he didnt really win in 2000!"... you have to be smoking something to think thats real.
Comments
Yeah that wall is just the start. Divide and conquer strategy, same ole same ole. Also keeps both sides from being able to come together for anything cooperative. Besides the 14 u.s. military bases that are being built the u.s. embassy there is going to be like some super duper heavy duty billion dollar project that kicks arse over all our other embassies. Got to have a place where our politico's and oil company exec's can chill out while they steal oil and misspend tax payer dollars.
A wall is not the answer. Just enforce public nudity-it'd be a lot harder to hide a suicide bomb if no one wore any clothes....
They should just let them kill each other off and come build a wall at the Mexico/America border.
.... I was just going to reply with the same.... lol !!
QFMFT
This is a sequence of characters intended to produce some profound mental effect, but it has failed.
This wall is designed to stop opposing religious groups from killing each other. it doesn't even go through the whole city, just between neighborhoods, from what I read in the article.
Big difference, no?
Hey smit90... You should probably do a little more research before making posts like this. There was a page here which made statements which resemble your claim, but it says down bottom:
In addition to this, the NY Times article was a hoax as well because the site, while looking like the New York Times, was actually NewYourkeTimes (Notice the additional 'u' and 'e') and was a hoax as well. It used to be posted HERE however, you can read the letter from the NY Times Lawyers HERE to see why it was removed.
As an American, one thing I disapprove of is people trying to rally communities for a cause under false pretenses. I'm not saying I agree with everything Bush does, but if you're going to point out flaws in his administration, use real ones. Posting things like this just hurts your cause.
Actually, the source you provide isn't the source I used. I believe I got it off of CNN, but I need to check, where they were also bringing up the point of 4 other laws he and his advisors have worked around.I'm looking for the source right now. I'll edit this reply once I find it.
Edit: Haven't found the source yet, but I did find this interesting: http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/04/20/662/ Turns out that Vermont is trying to impeach Bush/Cheney, and Wisconsin and Washington are pushing for it as well. The non-binding resolution was approved 16-9 with no debate. Their reasoning is that, and I quote, " Bush and Cheney’s actions in the U.S. and abroad, including in Iraq, 'raise serious questions of constitutionality, statutory legality, and abuse of the public trust.'"
I'll be back on in a couple hours to continue my search for the source. I assure you it was not that source you provided, because there were no pictures, but many links to sources within the article.
Obviously the legality of many actions taken by the Bush administration are illegal, but they probably won't impeach him. Even if they moved to impeach, the Democrats dont control Congress as much as some people seem to think and they wouldnt be able to get the vote.
But that he is planning to run for a third term (which he wouldnt win anyway) because he didnt really win the first election (even though he legally did) is NONSENSE. You're nuts and you are just alienating moderates from your cause by being so stupid.
Honestly, if you want to attack Bush for his illegal methods, go for things like the wiretapping, prisoner treatment, unconstitutional detainment of American citizens, and an immense amount of corruption... but please, PLEASE stop it with this made up crap that makes no sense.
#1, I realise that it would be very hard to impeach him. And agree that although the November elections changed numbers, things in Congress are still quite shaky.
#2, I don't report on things that are made up. it is possible that the article I read was false, HOWEVER, it addressed multiple issues and isn't the article noted for being fake. The article I read came from a reputable news source I often read. It is possible my news source may have ripped quotes from the fake article and re-written it, thinking they got a scoop. I don't know. I also misinterpretted the map I posted in my second comment due to seeing it in a passing glance after seeing a very similar map on the news that was being reffered to by a US military representative.
Also, if this topic was about the other illegal things, I would talk about them. However, I was simply trying to talk about the wall in this topic. If you really wish for me to continue writing "crap", then I'll write a topic about all the things Bush has done. I really don't feel like it.
Please don't insult me and my intelligence because of one thing. If you were bright enough to read what all has been posted so far, you would see that I am working to find the source that I read certain theories from (either CNN or MSNBC). I am NOT some guy off the streets that hates Bush because its cool. I try to do research and read up on topics before determining my own opinion.
Thank you
To the OP (sorry didnt have time to read all coz Im at work).
You remeber the old nursery rhyme, "There was on old woman who swalowed a fly ?"
Well right now the US is up to the part where they swallow the killer whale to catch the leopard seal. We all know they will just end up choking..... but that logic seems to elude them anyway....
Pure history alone would tell you what chance it has of success, let alone your very pertinent observation that "by what right do they do this in somoene elses country ?"
But if there is one thing this adminsitration is NOT.... its students of history.
+-+-+-+-+-+
"MMOs, for people that like think chatting is like a skill or something, rotflol"
http://purepwnage.com
-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Far away across the field, the tolling of the iron bell, calls the faithful to their knees. To hear the softly spoken magic spell" Pink Floyd-Dark Side of the Moon
I definately lol'd at that XD
That's too hilarious of an analogy for something so true.
#1, I realise that it would be very hard to impeach him. And agree that although the November elections changed numbers, things in Congress are still quite shaky.
#2, I don't report on things that are made up. it is possible that the article I read was false, HOWEVER, it addressed multiple issues and isn't the article noted for being fake. The article I read came from a reputable news source I often read. It is possible my news source may have ripped quotes from the fake article and re-written it, thinking they got a scoop. I don't know. I also misinterpretted the map I posted in my second comment due to seeing it in a passing glance after seeing a very similar map on the news that was being reffered to by a US military representative.
Also, if this topic was about the other illegal things, I would talk about them. However, I was simply trying to talk about the wall in this topic. If you really wish for me to continue writing "crap", then I'll write a topic about all the things Bush has done. I really don't feel like it.
Please don't insult me and my intelligence because of one thing. If you were bright enough to read what all has been posted so far, you would see that I am working to find the source that I read certain theories from (either CNN or MSNBC). I am NOT some guy off the streets that hates Bush because its cool. I try to do research and read up on topics before determining my own opinion.
Thank you
You just did report on a thing that was made up. Bush is not planning on running in 2008, nor could he if he wanted to. I am wondering what "reputable" news source you read that in, but it certainly doesnt sound reputable to me. If you possessed rational thought and knowledge of how our election system works you would've known this. They teach you this information very early in your academic career, my friend.
You say that this topic isnt about Bush's other illegal activities, yet you bring up an alleged illegal activity that had nothing to do with the original post (i.e. the wall in Baghdad) for seemingly no reason. I merely questioned why you would bring this up out of all the possibilities you really do have? It just makes you seem ridiculous.
I didnt question why you hated Bush, nor did I allege that you hate him because its cool. I simply questioned your methods of deriding him based on entirely ficticious information. What people like you do is lend weight to pro-Bush arguments, because your statements are based on false information, making you easy to argue against and moderates who are perhaps unswayed will look at your statements and go "Wow, the Bushites have a point! Bush haters really are all morons!" and they'll venture into the part of the political spectrum we dont want them going to.
I'm sorry for hurting your feelings, but honestly posting "Bush wants to run for prez in 2008 becuz he didnt really win in 2000!"... you have to be smoking something to think thats real.