Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

McAfee and Norton's??

MistorwinkyMistorwinky Member Posts: 5

Hey, i wus just wondering if ur supposed to have both these installed on ur computer? I have Norton's 360 but my comp already has McAfee's on it.

 

So does 1 suffice or should i install both??

Comments

  • Lord_ElrosLord_Elros Member Posts: 45

    One is all you need. In fact you can not install both as they will conflicts and cause problems on you system. You can only have one anti virus on you at a time.

     

  • IndoIndo Member Posts: 252

    You can install more than one but yeah, more than one and they start fighting with each other and you have all sorts of problems. Just pick one and uninstall the other.

  • maskedweaselmaskedweasel Member LegendaryPosts: 12,197

    Originally posted by Lord_Elros


    One is all you need. In fact you can not install both as they will conflicts and cause problems on you system. You can only have one anti virus on you at a time.
     
    Not entirely true in all cases.  It's not a good idea to have more then one on-access or real-time anti virus programs running at the same time.  It can be counterproductive. 

    You can install more then one, sometimes you may get an error when two version detect eachother, but having mcafee and Norton.. ESPECIALLY 360 will use up alot of resources.  Remove one and keep it updated.



  • AwesominityAwesominity Member UncommonPosts: 93

    You'll be lucky to boot up if both are running. You could leave one dormant and only turn it on when you wanna scan though. I can't really remember my time with McAfee, but Norton was just horrible for me.

  • CleffyIICleffyII Member, Newbie CommonPosts: 3,440

    Where is the niether option.  Both programs run like shit and don't really offer very good protection.  Mcafee was good in like 2000, but they ran into the same path as Norton.  Norton really has never been good and more like malware then an anti-virus.  Its too bad its the main consumer anti-virus.  In the paid options, NOD32 is Excellent.  There are also some free versions that are popular.

    image

  • HozloffHozloff Member Posts: 193

    I would not recommend Norton. Its all pure marketing and it uses loads of system resources, whilst being just as good, if not worse, than any other anti-virus out there. Likewise with McAfee.

    If you want a good anti-virus which is light on your system, does not bug you with notifications and such, go with either AVG or Avira. Both have a free version as well.

  • maskedweaselmaskedweasel Member LegendaryPosts: 12,197

    Originally posted by CleffyII


    Where is the niether option.  Both programs run like shit and don't really offer very good protection.  Mcafee was good in like 2000, but they ran into the same path as Norton.  Norton really has never been good and more like malware then an anti-virus.  Its too bad its the main consumer anti-virus.  In the paid options, NOD32 is Excellent.  There are also some free versions that are popular.
    I've got to disagree with you there. Norton and Mcafee are both very good programs.  They've both just gone the way of SOE and decided for the customer what the customer wants.  They think customers want flashy programs, with a bunch of features that they have to rely on Norton/Symantec to support them on. 

    They programs do have some of the best detection rates, but a 90 - 100 percent detection rate is nothing new in the anti-virus field.  CA and TrendMicro have the same detection statistics as well.

    Norton is one of the best known, and is usually disabled first and foremost when a virus gets on your PC.  Not to mention if you have internet security on a mid ranged PC you might as well throw your system out the window.  Symantecs corporate editions used to be awesome until 11C came out.

    Norton and Mcafee are also guilty of using alot of system resources.  AVG (free) uses less, but the new 8.0 is getting up there... its exactly how Norton started when they first got big. Now AVG is becoming big because it's free and more companies and users are trusting it.. so now they want to bring in the flash.

    When it comes to antivirus programs, it's good to stay with something small, swift, and easy to use and support.  Ca is what I'll be switching to when our corporate license of Symantec runs out.  GOODBYE 11C!



  • AznmaskAznmask Member Posts: 178

    Why have to pay for anti-virus program? I connect thru a router, and i didn't install any antivirus.

    If you really need one i recommend AVG (it is FREE)

  • maskedweaselmaskedweasel Member LegendaryPosts: 12,197

    Originally posted by Aznmask


    Why have to pay for anti-virus program? I connect thru a router, and i didn't install any antivirus.
    If you really need one i recommend AVG (it is FREE)

    I don't see what one has to do with the other.  Connecting through a router doesn't protect you from viruses.

    There are some routers that allow for antivirus protection built in such as a sonicwall router and some cisco routers.  I doubt anyone on these forums purchases these types of router/firewalls for their homes as they are extremely expensive and are primarily used to setup DMZs for corporations or basic front end protection.  Even still it is recommended to have an anti-virus.

    Personally, if he's already paid for Norton or Mcafee, I would stick with one until the support runs out and then go to AVG unless the new Norton upgrades are just too awesome to pass up. (that'll be the day)



Sign In or Register to comment.