It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Score | Source | Link | Adj Score | |
1. | 9/10 | Game Reactor .no | Link | 9 |
2. | A/A | Sci Fi | Link | 10 |
3. | 6/6 | Nettavisen | Link | 10 |
4. | 9,4/10 | GameZone | Link | 9,4 |
5. | 86/100 | Game-Basis DE | Link | 8,6 |
6. | 6/6 | VG Nett | Link | 10 |
7. | 6/6 | Adressa | Link | 10 |
8. | 5/6 | Aftenposten | Link | 8,3 |
9. | 6/6 | Dagbladet | Link | 10 |
10. | 9/10 | GamersNet NL | Link | 9 |
11. | 92/100 | Atomic Gamer | Link | 9,2 |
12. | 9/10 | Gameplayer.se | Link | 9 |
13. | 8,5/10 | Dreamstation CC | Link | 8,5 |
14. | 5/6 | IT Avisen | Link | 8,3 |
15. | 94/100 | WarCry | Link | 9,4 |
16. | 4/5 | Game Spy | Link | 8 |
17. | 4/5 | G4tv X-Play | Link | 8 |
18. | 9/10 | Gamer 2.0 | Link | 9 |
19. | 8/10 | Hooked Gamers | Link | 8 |
20. | 84/100 | Ferrago | Link | 8,4 |
21. | 8,5/10 | GameSpot | Link | 8,5 |
22. | 85/100 | Fragland | Link | 8,5 |
Last update: 2008-06-10
Comments
Not bad scores
first impressions, Pros and Cons
www.yougamers.com/previews/18859_age_of_conan_first_impressions/
AOC 1st impressions at level 40+ to go along with those "under level 40" reviews
IGN: Impressions beyond level 40
http://pc.ign.com/articles/878/878496p1.html
From zero to level 52: our pre-review
www.1up.com/do/previewPage
EQ2 fan sites
good scores... well the game is fun so its no wonder.. no matter what the haters say here..
game has alot of upside but for me the CONSTANT hitting a Key for each and every attack is wearing on my fingers.they need to add a auto attack button of somekind,otherwise ill get carpel tunnel!
Try the combat rose
So they were paid for their good reviews? They should all be ashamed.
that would explain why my AoC guild has tripled in size this week eh?
roll a necro, or a demo....problem solved.
more reviews listed here
conanvault.ign.com/View.php
2 reviews give AOC a 70 / 100
but they still recommend the game
EQ2 fan sites
This infuriates me.
How the HELL can people fully review a game 2-3 weeks after it's been launched? Especially a MMO. Most of the player base still isn't near the level cap. I know that two of the Norwegian reviews came out, literally, the -day- after AoC was released.
So, let's see. A review. Based on. Half the content in the game? Or. Open/Closed beta and EA? I'm rather confused.
i dont like playing squishy toons, especially in pvp
Fist honest review I've found so far.
Its detailed 8 pages
Recomend to read for all
http://www.yougamers.com/reviews/19142_age_of_conan_hyborian_adventures/
besides that yougamers... isnt really known..
IGN just reviewed the game and i consider that honest (7.8)
MMOs currently playing: -
About to play: Lord of the Rings Online
Played: Anarchy Online (alltime favorite) and lots of f2p titles (honorable mentions: 9Dragons, Martial Heroes, Dekaron, Atlantica Online)
Good or bad, I still think reviewing MMOs should be done a whole lot later than only a couple of weeks after release.
You think anyone would read a tabula rasa review now?
Just like some others said, the yougamers review is probably the only honest one out there. The rest never played past lv 20.
I wonder if the earliest reviews that had nothing but good things to say about AOC upset the fanbois. Nope it didn t now some later reviews showing alot of it s downfalls are giving it around a 7 upsets them. Lol this is what happens when the real game is being reviewed not just a little bit. The problew is alot of people can hit max quickly , so to review a game a few weeks old that has proven to be easy leveling, can have fair reviews of near to end game.