Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
Such a true statement
Shadowhand
Member Posts: 100
Found this off the AoC official forums,
This was someones response to LordOrion ( Project Manager of AoC ) After he stated the AoC has more content then WoW did at release....The following statement is true to ALL new MMORPGs I believe.
LordOrion,
Here is what you and others in the industry miss:
You aren't competing with WoW in 2004. You're competing against WoW in 2008 (and forward). Many new MMO players don't care that AoC may have launched with more content than WoW did at launch - they only know WoW as it is now - not what it was (or rather, wasn't). You aren't competing with WoW polish circa '04, you're competing against WoW circa '08.
If you build a game for 2008, you have to compete with games as they stand in 2008. Not as they stood in 2004.
What happened then does not matter; it's only what happens now and moving forward. However, if you don't learn from the past, you're doomed to repeat it in the future.
I 100% agree that new mmorpg's "should" have as much content as any game on the market. But...is it possible?
S H A D O W H A N D
Which Final Fantasy Character Are You?
Final Fantasy 7
Played - All mainstream MMORPGS/Many others.
Favorites- Dark Age of Camelot/mordred,Shadowbane , Old school Ultima Online
Comments
I don't agree at all that new games should have as much content as older games. Why? Because they'd never be released. While game B struggles to put in as much content as game A, game A still has four years of development time on them and will continue to develop new things while game B struggles to catch up (which it won't).
MMOs aren't books where you can slap some words down on a page and publish it. They require a LOT of time and effort from a large group of people, and you simply can't include as much content as an older game because there isn't the time for it.
Plus, if a player goes "OMG why don't you have as much content as WoW?!" all you can say to them is "then go play WoW, because it will take us more time to get that much content included."
What I do agree with though is that it doesn't matter that AoC had more content at release than WoW did, but not for the reason your quoted poster stated. AoC and WoW are two different games that focus on different things. So who cares if one has more than the other? It's the quality that matters.
I'll use the same reply I did in another thread about this.
He's got a good point but I don't fully agree with it . Yes it's irrelevant whether WOW had less content at launch , however it's unfair to compare the state of a game with 4 years of added content and polish to a recently released game.
A better comparison to make would be the quality of patches both games have received since their launch . Which company has the more stable releases and which company truly uses feedback and quality assurance to please their fans.
Saying their game should be as good as wow in 08 is just as irrelevant as saying wow had less at launch , Given 4 years of live development it very well may be , We'll know in about 4 years.
For every minute you are angry , you lose 60 seconds of happiness."-Emerson
I don't agree DAoC had many many years of polish with literally dozens of features that were pretty new to MMOs, that others didn't even have yet, and it still got overlooked and left behind.
Darkfall Travelogues!
And crappy clones never being released is bad because?
It is certainly a good point but still, I'm on the fence a bit on this one.
I think players are willing to concede that a game needn't match game content of established titles such as WoW, EQ2, Lineage2 and so one.
What I do think players want, and rightfully deserve, is at the very least a game that is [somewhat] complete, has some measure of clarity, has decent amount of content throughout all levels and keep them occupied as new features/content rolls in.
Naturally all needs to be paired with a relatively stable client and if the feature sets, story and game itself are decent, you're pretty much good to go.
Unfortunately, from what I've seen and experienced, AoC has some fundamental flaws throughout and as much as they would like to tout that they have more content than WoW at Launch (by and by numbers that may be so) they simply don't have the pace and range that WoW had at Launch and this is what Blizzard did so well.
Covering your ears and singning "lalalalalalalalalala", "we're better, we're better, we're better" simply does not take away the facts.
Important Information regarding Posting and You
I agree with the OP
I was one of the many dissapointed with AoC's release and moved on back to CoH shortly, the reason because it didn't stack up to it for me. And it didn't stack up for alot of people compared to other games that are out right now.
People aren't gonna play something they don't enjoy because "it could get better" thats just a waste of time and money.
Comparing AoC's release to WoW's release rather than its present state doesnt prove anything, cept that WoW has come a long way. AoC could do the same, but then again maybe not.
It is hard to release a new game when their are more polished ones out there like WoW, but thats just the way it is. It is not impossible though if they can get the ball rolling and start fixing up and adding new stuff to the game.
It is not really possible for a new game to have the content that older games have. EQ1 has been out for almost 9 years, and while much of the content is now outdated and empty, it is still "content".
I think it is more important to deliver a polished product that can be rapidly expanded (at least in the 3-9 month future).
But the point still remains as the OP pointed out that new games are not competing with other games when they launched - it is competing with what they are NOW.
So though they will probably have more content than say EQ2 (or any other mmo) did at launch, that is not really the point. If they don't have the "content", then they have to have something else, such as gameplay - and judging from the feedback on AoC, that game had neither.
IMO, Conan spent far too much of it's hype and development on it's (mostly failed) "unique combat system" (which even in early alpha was proven not to work due to lag/ping issues). Far too much of the hype centered around "boobs and gore", so not enough people were paying attention to the actual gameplay and content. The whole fiasco reminds me a lot of the first launch of VG - too many fanboi's, not enough critics (or the critics were drowned out).
People who dont agree with the original poster need to seriously look at the state of MMO today. Trying to rationalize why New MMOs dont have what old mmo have is ridiculous. There is no reason why New MMOs arent coming fully updated to match the existing content.
I thought the goal for new games was to improve and surpass, not match and mock. Why is it, that new MMOs are coming out missing key features introduced in past MMOs, why dont all instances games have scaling dungeons yet, or highly customizable character creation like CoX, or RvR like DAoC, Free range skill training like Oblivion, and so much more.
Its like devolopers have their head in the sand when they are creating their title, they should always be watching other games and improving, that is why WoW is so vicious right now, everytime a game announces a feature that sounds cool, they find a way to bring it into their game. IF at the bare minium we arent demanding that new games are at least equal to the games we are currently playing, not at release, but how they are after patches and expansions have polished them, then what the hell are we doing?
Quotations Those Who make peaceful resolutions impossible, make violent resolutions inevitable. John F. Kennedy
Life... is the shit that happens while you wait for moments that never come - Lester Freeman
Lie to no one. If there 's somebody close to you, you'll ruin it with a lie. If they're a stranger, who the fuck are they you gotta lie to them? - Willy Nelson
Really quite simple in my opinion...You cannot compare AoC with WoW is true. Because WoW has had years to build up to where it is today. However AoC being new should have been prepared to compete with a 4 year old game. The bugs, missing content, broken things should not have been so major in AoC. AoC called itself 'Next-Gen' , and quite frankly if games as AoC are the 'Next-gen' then I guess online gaming as we know it is over...=P
Well the easiest way to not compete with the games that are out, is to make a UNIQUE game....
If you plan to make a clone game you MUST add something truely unique and innovative that players wont get bored of in five minutes. Players dont care about the number of quests or the number of classes they want to have fun and they want to have fun now.
Own, Mine, Defend, Attack, 24/7
Ever wonder why all the Final Fantasy games after Final Fantasy VII weren't clones of that praised system?
In my opinion, if your going to make a better chess game then anyones seen before, you have to be prepared to be better then the other chess games/competition. Like battle chess,
Otherwise, you should attack it from a different angel. Any game that plays like WoW is going to have to be better then WoW to truly compete.
Doesn't mean there is not a crap load of other options to make a new unique experience that side steps directly competing with WoW.
Just an example off the top of my head, Why not have an MMO where people don't play 1 character but they play a Whole Party? You roll a tank, dps, and healer. Or any variation of the classes available you want. Use a gambit system like in final fantasy, but make the character your controlling at the time as detailed as the mechanics in WoW.
See what happens? All of a sudden you arn't competing with WoW because your game isn't trying to be a better clone of the standard hack and slash leveling MMO the market is flooded with.
Blizzard does hack and slash better then the rest thus far, To be successful you have to be different in todays market. Otherwise expect to be mediocre.
"The public is wonderfully tolerant. It forgives everything except genius."
-Oscar Wilde