Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
closed
luckypotato
Member Posts: 251
thread closed
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
luckypotato
Member Posts: 251
thread closed
Comments
Original was better...
2 Is a clunky and poorly optimized.
Where am i and who am i?
Epic fail? pretty sure its 50 people multiplayer at least ......... less than battlefield 2
Ugh, except it's "realistic" which means boring and slow gameplay. Sounds like a modern version of WW2O...
Epic fail? pretty sure its 50 people multiplayer at least ......... less than battlefield 2
50 players + AI squads + mods that allow for even more players.. j'ck'ss
To the guy who said:
Original was better...
2 Is a clunky and poorly optimized.
2 is not clunky, neither poorly optimized, runs fine on my rig. Arma 1 is poorly optimized, clunky and looks like crap aswell it only uses 1 core..... ONE.. CORE.. 3 cores down the can.
Played operation flashpoint?
Arma aint slow, its slow if youre used to Unreal 2k4 and boring call of bunnyhoppers.
Btw watch the video on youtube with 1700 AI in a single battle.
Epic fail? pretty sure its 50 people multiplayer at least ......... less than battlefield 2
50 players + AI squads + mods that allow for even more players.. j'ck'ss
To the guy who said:
Original was better...
2 Is a clunky and poorly optimized.
2 is not clunky, neither poorly optimized, runs fine on my rig. Arma 1 is poorly optimized, clunky and looks like crap aswell it only uses 1 core..... ONE.. CORE.. 3 cores down the can.
still its only 50 real players, Im not sure why you would count AI
You fail. True there is only one MMOFPS, but that isn't it...
http://planetside.station.sony.com/ <- that is
Funny how people allways ignore Neocron. THAT was a MMOFPS.
The title of your thread is very deceiving.
Epic fail? pretty sure its 50 people multiplayer at least ......... less than battlefield 2
50 players + AI squads + mods that allow for even more players.. j'ck'ss
To the guy who said:
Original was better...
2 Is a clunky and poorly optimized.
2 is not clunky, neither poorly optimized, runs fine on my rig. Arma 1 is poorly optimized, clunky and looks like crap aswell it only uses 1 core..... ONE.. CORE.. 3 cores down the can.
still its only 50 real players, Im not sure why you would count AI
50 real players, so? There are mods that change that, and considering how huge the landscape is, its kinda hard to make it available for alot more players, meaning it has to be super synced which requires some high speed broadband incl processors. Battlefield is an arcade and has 64 players, omg 14 more!! but on tiny maps, short draw distance, well overall a crap arcade game where people take 10 sniper shots in their belly before they die.
Epic fail? pretty sure its 50 people multiplayer at least ......... less than battlefield 2
50 players + AI squads + mods that allow for even more players.. j'ck'ss
To the guy who said:
Original was better...
2 Is a clunky and poorly optimized.
2 is not clunky, neither poorly optimized, runs fine on my rig. Arma 1 is poorly optimized, clunky and looks like crap aswell it only uses 1 core..... ONE.. CORE.. 3 cores down the can.
still its only 50 real players, Im not sure why you would count AI
50 real players, so? There are mods that change that, and considering how huge the landscape is, its kinda hard to make it available for alot more players, meaning it has to be super synced which requires some high speed broadband incl processors. Battlefield is an arcade and has 64 players, omg 14 more!! but on tiny maps, short draw distance, well overall a crap arcade game where people take 10 sniper shots in their belly before they die.
,"and considering how huge the landscape is, its kinda hard to make it available for alot more players"
What? and its 7 more people on each team which is an entire squad more for each team, and its 2 sniper shots in the belly
ugh noobs
Epic fail? pretty sure its 50 people multiplayer at least ......... less than battlefield 2
50 players + AI squads + mods that allow for even more players.. j'ck'ss
To the guy who said:
Original was better...
2 Is a clunky and poorly optimized.
2 is not clunky, neither poorly optimized, runs fine on my rig. Arma 1 is poorly optimized, clunky and looks like crap aswell it only uses 1 core..... ONE.. CORE.. 3 cores down the can.
still its only 50 real players, Im not sure why you would count AI
50 real players, so? There are mods that change that, and considering how huge the landscape is, its kinda hard to make it available for alot more players, meaning it has to be super synced which requires some high speed broadband incl processors. Battlefield is an arcade and has 64 players, omg 14 more!! but on tiny maps, short draw distance, well overall a crap arcade game where people take 10 sniper shots in their belly before they die.
as this is a MMORPG forum the point your trying to make is moot since the game can only sustain 50 players. MMORPGs main draw is alot of players not npcs, this game isnt a mmorpg and neither is battlefield (which yes can hold 14 more people)
Playing: EVE Online
Favorite MMOs: WoW, SWG Pre-cu, Lineage 2, UO, EQ, EVE online
Looking forward to: Archeage, Kingdom Under Fire 2
KUF2's Official Website - http://www.kufii.com/ENG/ -
1000 people, ........mods and AI are not people so you fail.
Trolls = Hardcore
Fanbois = Carebears
The only posts I read in threads are my own.
So its final the guy who posted this fails, Lock this please
So its final the guy who posted this fails, Lock this please
Hey why do I fail, I agree with you ???
Trolls = Hardcore
Fanbois = Carebears
The only posts I read in threads are my own.
Exactly.
Heavy system requirements and bugs galore won't attract many players. Not to mention that it's a military sim and not very creative. It's fine for its own genre. It's just not what an mmo player is looking for.
So its final the guy who posted this fails, Lock this please
Hey why do I fail, I agree with you ???
Meant the thread starter lol, I can see how it looks that way
yawn
.
I'm sure it's a good sim, but most people hate that type of gameplay. I never even thought about that, making things realistic takes all the creativity out of a game. All you have to do is mimic real life and it all becomes about the coding and damage models, not on creating fun gameplay.
I actually run a clan for ArmA 2 called The 386th Air Cavalry and i gota say it's a ton of fun. Battles are HUGE, and even when they're small they're extremely immersive and intense.
Here's a video of it. Only 20-30 people involved in this counting both sides and the town they were heading to had probably 200 more infantry with mixed armor.