Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
System requierement question.
Lexite
Member UncommonPosts: 165
in Fallen Earth
Hello guys, maybe many people asked for this already but I really wanetd some opinions directly on my wares.
I know its really old and i should change it, im asking if i can play the game with my spec because technically.. i can run the minimum but not the maximum.. but i find that theres too much of a differencebetween the 2 to really gage myself.
my spec are..
window xp family.
2.5 gig of ram
Nvidia AGP 7800GS
core 2 duo 2.2GHz
maybe some of you tested the game (beta) already with that kind of ware.
thanks
I7 920 @ 2.7ghz (8 cpu total)
12 gig DDR3 ram
Nvidia Geforce 560 GTX TI
window 7 64bit
Comments
Get a better video card if you can.
This is probably your best bet for an upgrade.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814103080
Core i7 920 @ 3.8GHz
MSI X58 Platinum SLI
G.Skill PI Black 3x2GB DDR3-1600
Western Digital CB 500GBx3 Riad-5
VisionTek HD 4870 X2
Corsair 1000HX
I know everything is shitty... i would change the whole thing.. i only want to know if the performance will be completely disgusting or if it will be playable and enjoyable.
I7 920 @ 2.7ghz (8 cpu total)
12 gig DDR3 ram
Nvidia Geforce 560 GTX TI
window 7 64bit
Hmm, depends on your screen rez and such...
I ran vista-64, 8800gts and 4gb ram and rarely had issues, except near major Sector 1 towns.
I hear that it's gotten better though.
I'm not sure if its a graphics heavy or cpu heavy game but...a 7800GS is pretty weak.
It'll be playable, I don't know if it'll be enjoyable though
Cause like right now in towns, with everyone only like level 2-4 right now, my HD 4870 X2 can't put out decent FPS. I have to put everything on minimum to not CRASH in towns.
Core i7 920 @ 3.8GHz
MSI X58 Platinum SLI
G.Skill PI Black 3x2GB DDR3-1600
Western Digital CB 500GBx3 Riad-5
VisionTek HD 4870 X2
Corsair 1000HX
I have a 4890, 30-40 fps in towns. I was thinking if there may be something that you can do to sort things out, as you should be having better then me?
I don't know how that will affect your view on the OPs hardware though as I'm not familiar with it. Was thinking that if there is something that you can fix your guesstimate on the the perfomance would change.
I'm so broke. I can't even pay attention.
"You have the right not to be killed"
Hey guys, Now the game has been release for about what? 2 week with preorder thing. At the top of my post you can see my spec.. anyone tried with a similar spec? anyone know if I could be enjoying this game? I am really just about to buy it but im very wondering if it will be an extreme lagfest. Also, i really dont mind lowering my graphic.. graphic are not that important for me.
I7 920 @ 2.7ghz (8 cpu total)
12 gig DDR3 ram
Nvidia Geforce 560 GTX TI
window 7 64bit
Bump guys. Sorry but im waiting for answer to buy it right now
I7 920 @ 2.7ghz (8 cpu total)
12 gig DDR3 ram
Nvidia Geforce 560 GTX TI
window 7 64bit
Those two first benchmarks is something that I have done. The first could be somewhat comparable to yours, I hope, but look at the third result and compare to your system.
The second benchmark is taken on a laptop, not default test and I can't really remember what setting I changed. It could be the resolution changed to 1280x800. On that computer I have to turned graphics to medium textures/no shadows/all sliders set at 70% and get 30-35 fps in a populated place, the bank outside Kingman. I would expect a high populated place like Embry would make it lower. If I turn down all settings I get 50-55 fps. No AA.
The reason I brought in the first test is because Vanguard ran better on the laptop then it did on that one. Even if the 3dscores is worse, but the resulotion that I ran Vanguard was lower 1280x800 vs 1680x1050.
I shouldn't really recommend you anything as I don't know how well a AGP card compared to its PCI-E brother, sorry. But maybe you get closer to making a descicion, togheter with others input. It feels a 50/50 chance that you could run it if you're not going for a to high resolution. The laptop is using 1280x800.
---------
5620
3DMarks
Untitled
Dec 03, 2006 00:21 CST
CPU:
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+
GPU:
ATI Radeon X1900
OS:
Microsoft Windows XP
Benchmark Settings: Default
----------
4000
3DMarks
Untitled
Jul 27, 2008 09:10 CDT
CPU:
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T9300 @ 2.50GHz
GPU:
NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
OS:
Microsoft Windows Vista
Benchmark Settings: Not default
-----------
4339
3DMarks
NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GS
Feb 24, 2007 15:47 CST
CPU:
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13GHz
GPU:
NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GS
OS:
Microsoft Windows XP
Benchmark Settings: Default
I'm so broke. I can't even pay attention.
"You have the right not to be killed"
You can run the game at 1024X768 with your settings turned down without much of a problem with that system. I have similar, except I have a FX-60. It ran on it though not really great.
All of this is very interresting, as ive called it... i really dont mind lowering the texture and graphic.. but if im putting everything on low and still get extreme slutthering and hitching it wont be nice.
I7 920 @ 2.7ghz (8 cpu total)
12 gig DDR3 ram
Nvidia Geforce 560 GTX TI
window 7 64bit
Just to let you know guys.. i took the chance and bough the game... so for people in the same situation as me... well the game run pretty fine on med/high setting right now and im having a blast.
I7 920 @ 2.7ghz (8 cpu total)
12 gig DDR3 ram
Nvidia Geforce 560 GTX TI
window 7 64bit