Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sk v Pally

Pixi-StixPixi-Stix Member Posts: 27

okay, I know the spells they have, i was just wandering Sk v Pally who has better damage, and who can tank better?

lso can people give there advice for whatever, and how easy lfg is...

ok thx alot and im currently looking for a guild on my char name Splinntter(give me an in game tell, im a half elf predator)

Current game-Eq2
proud member of*Imperium Arcanum*

Retired-eq,CoH,FF11,Eqoa

Comments

  • 92165449216544 Member Posts: 1,904

    Neither, they both suck!! Too many people play them, their horses make me jealous. I would say pally for tanking, and SK for damage.

  • herculeshercules Member UncommonPosts: 4,925

    SK does more damage then a paladin.

    Paladins tank better.

    But if you really wanna be a tank go guardian after mid 30s the guardian is the ultimate tank with his self/group buffs .Only bad side of been a guardian is you are constantly buffing.

  • NihilanthNihilanth Member Posts: 1,357

    yay for paladins! ::::02:: lol ::::08::::::08::::::08::

    anyways ya SKs have life taps and more dark magic generally damage stuff while us pallies get group buffs, heals, and some divine damage.

    Schutzbar - Human Warrior - Windrunner Alliance - World of Warcraft
    Nihilanth - Kerra Paladin - Blackburrow - EverQuest II
    XBL Gamertag - Eagle15GT

  • SerienSerien Member CommonPosts: 8,460

    I'm a SK, and I can personally say that I usually get group invites before the pally sitting next to me lfg.

    They do more damage and have more debuffs (lifetap, draw strength, etc.)

    Pally's...well...if you're looking for just a tank, then a guardian would be a better choice. Pally's don't really deal anymore damage than their sword puts out.

    I'm gonna have to say go for sk on this one. I did.

Sign In or Register to comment.