Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

So I see someone has put the pressure on here.

2»

Comments

  • Die_ScreamDie_Scream Member Posts: 1,785

    Originally posted by MikeB

    Just to be clear the designated thread is not to roll in any subject that is negative about STO. It is for the "STO is bad/ dissapointment" type threads. We don't need 100 of those.

    If something like the recent STO Council thing comes up again and you want to create a new thread about it to discuss it that is more than appropriate.

    However having 8 threads stating that STO is bad or a disappointment just clutters the forum and you can express your general dissatisfaction with the game (thus the thread title) in the designated thread.

    Well, that's good to hear. I was going to comment that the forum wouldn't move much if every negative post was in this thread.

    It's ok, Friday is coming, I'd wager Cryptic is cooking up something good to drop before they leave the office.

  • commando991commando991 Member Posts: 20

    this cause OB is done with on STo and the reales was started and more new patches addon.

    the new patches made so fed gamers are every every weak in pve and also in pvp against klingons.

    and 60% of our skills we get from LT.commander on are either disabled or dont work at all.

    and its all cause klingon pvper gamers cried about it duren pvp matches on CBT !!!

    and most of them was 3 year sub.

    so they made the startrek game unfair and unblanced allot in the game for feds period.

    and made our leveling harder as well, and allot of our skills dont work cause of klingon cry babies in CBT.

    so all the major fed fans either turned klinong or left the game and canceled their subs.

    just like i did I canceled after 1 month sub and got to end game before Release or OB.

    cause the gms messed with our skills for feds and made us weaker compare to klingons durne pvp or pve.

    I used to be able to go around on a Lt.commander ship fed and kick butt duren pve and with my engineer officer and his BOs.

    and do pve missions with easy and now I get blow away with 5 hits on pve and pvp 1 hit.

    so all fed skills and buffs now does not work worth crap.

    and startrek name is a federation movie and game on all plateforms.

    not a klingon base tv show or movie or game or plateform.

    but the Uk gms that run the game and made it turnj it to a klingon plateform game and making as a klingon tv show or movie game.

    cause of none startrek fan gamers and pvpers and klingon unfair base gamers.

    so 90% of the CBT gamers that are feds and Ob gamers fed and so on left.

    so its harder now to find missions budies and parties cause of it.

    and when u do pvp missions to level up and get pionts to get new gear as a fed kilngon gamers out number us and makes it hard for feds to level in pvp cause they ruined our side of the skills and buffs by crying duren cbt pvp.

    when every thing before they cried about it was even and blanced then.

    so all fed fan gamers left and moved on to either old startrek games and connected with each other there or done other games.

    cause we refuse to play a unbalanced mmorpg startrek game where fed skills and buffs dont work.

    and other side of the game board skills do and cry evenb durne the first disable patch gms did to fed before OB to weaken feds more.

    on the patch after CBt and OB was gonna get released we feds still beat them cause even with disabled skills we use group team work and other ideas to win.

    and klingon pvpers still cried more and got more of the fed side crippled and more of their skills disabled as well.

    so after that all the fed gamers canceled their subs and left.

    NOTE:

    dont believe me ?

    buy the game and enter it !.. you see how many gamers there truely are.

    there is NO 10000 gamers or even 1000 gamers the most you see if you count them all is max 500 if  that by now.

  • Maverz290Maverz290 Member Posts: 447

    To be rather blunt about it.

    I'm glad theres less ships. I got sick of seeing a fleet of Sovereign class starships flying around everywhere lol.

    It is a game I play casually with a few trek fan friends of mine. We log on at set times, do mission A, proceed to mission B, log for the night.

    God help anyone who wants to do more in this game.

    Longing for Skyrim, The Old Republic and Mass Effect 3

  • GinazGinaz Member RarePosts: 2,571

    Originally posted by MikeB

    Just to be clear the designated thread is not to roll in any subject that is negative about STO. It is for the "STO is bad/ dissapointment" type threads. We don't need 100 of those.

    If something like the recent STO Council thing comes up again and you want to create a new thread about it to discuss it that is more than appropriate.

    However having 8 threads stating that STO is bad or a disappointment just clutters the forum and you can express your general dissatisfaction with the game (thus the thread title) in the designated thread.

    Not that I have a dog in this fight because I quit STO after the first month and haven't looked back, but I have a bit of a problem with your line of thinking.  If its ok to consolidate all the "STO sucks" to one thread then shouldn't all "STO ROCKS!1!1!" posts all be consolidated too?  Why is it that only negative posts and topics (see SWG Refuge forum as well) seem to be relegated to their own little ghettos?  Serious question because your policy seems to be favouring the "fanboys" over the "haters" and thats not healthy either.

    Is a man not entitled to the herp of his derp?

    Remember, I live in a world where juggalos and yugioh players are real things.

  • Die_ScreamDie_Scream Member Posts: 1,785

    Originally posted by Ginaz

    Originally posted by MikeB

    Just to be clear the designated thread is not to roll in any subject that is negative about STO. It is for the "STO is bad/ dissapointment" type threads. We don't need 100 of those.

    If something like the recent STO Council thing comes up again and you want to create a new thread about it to discuss it that is more than appropriate.

    However having 8 threads stating that STO is bad or a disappointment just clutters the forum and you can express your general dissatisfaction with the game (thus the thread title) in the designated thread.

    Not that I have a dog in this fight because I quit STO after the first month and haven't looked back, but I have a bit of a problem with your line of thinking.  If its ok to consolidate all the "STO sucks" to one thread then shouldn't all "STO ROCKS!1!1!" posts all be consolidated too?  Why is it that only negative posts and topics (see SWG Refuge forum as well) seem to be relegated to their own little ghettos?  Serious question because your policy seems to be favouring the "fanboys" over the "haters" and thats not healthy either.

    I'm sure if they see "STO rocks!" threads cluttering the page one day (lol), they will consolidate them as well.

    Protip: Never gonna happen.

  • ktanner3ktanner3 Member UncommonPosts: 4,063

    Originally posted by Die_Scream

    Originally posted by Ginaz

    Originally posted by MikeB

    Just to be clear the designated thread is not to roll in any subject that is negative about STO. It is for the "STO is bad/ dissapointment" type threads. We don't need 100 of those.

    If something like the recent STO Council thing comes up again and you want to create a new thread about it to discuss it that is more than appropriate.

    However having 8 threads stating that STO is bad or a disappointment just clutters the forum and you can express your general dissatisfaction with the game (thus the thread title) in the designated thread.

    Not that I have a dog in this fight because I quit STO after the first month and haven't looked back, but I have a bit of a problem with your line of thinking.  If its ok to consolidate all the "STO sucks" to one thread then shouldn't all "STO ROCKS!1!1!" posts all be consolidated too?  Why is it that only negative posts and topics (see SWG Refuge forum as well) seem to be relegated to their own little ghettos?  Serious question because your policy seems to be favouring the "fanboys" over the "haters" and thats not healthy either.

    I'm sure if they see "STO rocks!" threads cluttering the page one day (lol), they will consolidate them as well.

    Protip: Never gonna happen.

     Yeah, seriously how many STO Rocks threads do you see here on a weekly basis? Maybe one every couple of weeks? There is nothing wrong with putting all similiar threads into one so that the forum doesn't get cluttered with them. There was nothing wrong with doing it on the SWG forums either because the " SOE has destroyed my game" threads got to be insane.

    Currently Playing: World of Warcraft

Sign In or Register to comment.