It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
http://massively.joystiq.com/2011/10/01/the-daily-grind-do-you-complain-about-games-you-dont-play/
does it mean a lot here dont know whats going on and spend wasting their time for nothing?
Comments
I would say mosr people are correct about MO though.
I just resubbed and wish I had not, still a buggy game, servers are down for hours at a time and mounts
float when they run ><
I can see what there trying to do, but the game needs another year or so of paid beta.
I only write about games I've played although I will admit that some of my views may be outdated. Other than speculation of course.
U resubbed when there is a trial ? ^.^ brillant.
It's spelt genius
The reason there are so many complaining about MO is more about the company (SV) and its unethical, shady tactics and its CEO (Henrick) who lies, hypes and rips off anyone he can. Its about false promises. Its about a game which has gone gold for over a year now and still has its basic systems bugged and unfinished.
-There is a reason MO has more hate towards it than any game i've ever seen. There is a reason that this is one of the most active forums on mmorpg.com whilst the game itself barely has a population.
I see what you are trying to do here though. Its the same thing as the fanboys/bots who come here and say "every MMO has some bugs" when people are listing the bugs which have remained or resurfaces from beta.
Nice try though
I don't care about games I don't play so I don't comment on them. I've got better things to do!
Mission in life: Vanquish all MMORPG.com trolls - especially TESO, WOW and GW2 trolls.
cant say i ever comented on a game i dont play, unless i have an interest in it in a positive way. take darkfall for example i comment on it but thats becuase im excited for 2.0 and not because i have had a bad experience with it. Games i dont like or do have bad experiences with i just try to forget about them.
there are 2 types of mmo, imitators and innovaters.
I overflow with pleasure reading slap, herc, pickle, pockets and raff. They usually express the problems with this game more coherently and factually than the people trying to defend it ever could. So indirectly I complain about games I (no longer) play.
Yes, I complain about games I don't play.
Just like I complain about previous employers I didn't enjoy working for, restaurants that let me down, previous cars that didn't live up to acceptable standards, businesses that I no longer frequent, and I'm sure I have more.
Why wouldn't I complain about games I don't currently play? Obviously, I have complaints or I would still be playing it.
The truth is I have never played MO but I have heard it is horrible. I also have never sung "The Music of the Night" but then Lloyd Webber is a tart.
I complain about and praise a game as objectively as possible based on whatever experience I've had playing it, regardless of how little. Even if you just beta test something, you are entitled to forming opinions about all the content you experienced in the beta test. That's half the purpose of betas today. While you can use content experienced in a beta to extrapolate an idea of what the rest of the game may be like, you can generally only form a concrete opinion about the content you've actually experienced. That doesn't make your perceptions about other content completely fallacous, just not firmly established.
For me, no, I wouldn't complain about games I haven't played. And I form my own opinions, based on my experience. I rarely if ever listen to others opinions as they are just that. I may like it. So, I try it for myself. In the case of Mortal Online, I played the trial, not for 10 minutes but for the duration of said trial, and in the end, to me, it's quite terrible. The worst MMO I've played since WW2 Online.
Being a fan of sandbox games myself, it's sad to see people have to play Mortal Online/Darkfall, hoping they get better because the options are limited. Can they get better? Sure. Should sandbox fans be paying to beta test games which should have never been launched? No.
I've never run for political office, yet I regularly complain about the people who hold one.
I've never fixed an automobile in my life, yet complain about mechanics who do a bad job of it.
I've never had to bear a child, but I think I speak with authority when I say it hurts like a bitch.
See, people can read, watch, think, and reflect about things they've never done and form an opinion on them, and yes, even share that opinion with others.
Same thing with MMO's, I've never played STO, but know enough about it to believe Cryptic really screwed the pooch in building it.
I've never played MO yet I know it's a half baked Indie title that's run by a company with questionable business practices.
See what I did there?
"True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde
"I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant
Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm
Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV
Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™
"This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon
good read, thanks for the link.
It's a very good point, some people just like to complain. They justify it to themselves of course, by making believe they're a warrior for truth and goodness against xyz Evil Empire (read: misc. indy devs) , saying that "it's the principle of the thing", etc... but yeah, it's always the same thing.
Yeah you are right SV and or MO have not warranted any crtic at all.
Sure, I see. You compared apples and oranges.
On that last sentence, that's just poor research skills. There's plenty of current stuff to criticize and poke with a stick.
I can not remember winning or losing a single debate on the internet.