I haven't seen a lot of thief pvp, but elementalist look very fast and fluid in pvp combat- so may of to go with that. And a char warrior, because of the badass factor.
My first character will definately be human.... If i make a seccond character then it'll be a different race.
I love to play a full in your face class when soling or in small groups... very durable and survivable.....
When grouped i prefer a mix of support Crowd controll/healing...
I love pets and micromanaging them... (or cast and forget ones)...
On top of that i just love being flexible and do different roles with a character (which goes for all GW2 professions)
I don't have much use for true DPS.... DPS isn't a goal on itselves its a process that happens while i am trying to survive my fights... I love challenging fights and will actively search these challenges while playing.
I really hate kiting things......
Curerntly i am considering both Necromancer and guardian.... Where Guardian can be played tanklike and up in your face.... The necromancer has the pet playstyle but still seems very durable and has more options to be played as a backline caster then the Guardian...
Any advise is welcome......
Best MMO experiences : EQ(PvE), DAoC(PvP), WoW(total package) LOTRO (worldfeel) GW2 (Artstyle and animations and worlddesign) SWTOR (Story immersion) TSW (story) ESO (character advancement)
At the moment, I plan to start out with a Norn Guardian, but I am going to fill up my alts pretty quickly, I think, and my plan is to not repeat either a profession or a race in any of them.
You mean like the Vah Shir in EQ? I mean, yeah not every aspect of the two are the same but that can be said of any of the races, even Arenanet's take on Humans.
Sigh. Yes, there are similar examples. Nothing is completely original. And I didn't think we really needed to get into Captain Obvious territory over that. But the Vah Shir are clearly very different if you're comparing them to the Charr (and much more typical of fantasy tropes). Perhaps not on the surface of it if you like to generalise, but overall the two are not at all alike. Not to mention that hte Vah Shir valued shamanic spirit magicks, not technology. And independence over order. I could create a wall of text to explain all the bloody differences between the Vah Shir and the Charr, and why the Charr are far more original (and I am tempted), but I'll let people research for themselves.
Really, if you want to make a direct correlation, the Vah Shir are more like the Norn than the Charr. This just shows a lack of understanding of both the Vah Shir and the Charr. You're talking with someone who's an absolute authority on this subject, which I'm certain that you are not. And really, I'll just leave it at that.
I'm getting too old for these arguments, and for dealing with people whom are objectively wrong on the Internet. :P
--- EDIT ---
The reason I'm annoyed at this post and why I didn't want to dignify it with a response further than that was due to the gross generalisation, basically saying that all independent cat people are the same. Then the Kzinti are the same as Caitians, the Caitians are the same as Kilrathi, the Kilrathi are the same as the Khajiit, the Khajiit are hte same as the Charr, and so on, and so on. When obviously, this is patently ridiculous.
It just annoys me when people don't think before posting. I mean, gosh, we're all bipeds with noses, therefore all humans must be the same, too! No depth at all!
Gamers... yeesh. Basic thinkers to the extreme, sometimes. And sometimes I think I should be an alcoholic in order to deal with that basic thinking. Not everything is skin deep.
You mean like the Vah Shir in EQ? I mean, yeah not every aspect of the two are the same but that can be said of any of the races, even Arenanet's take on Humans.
Sigh. Yes, there are similar examples. Nothing is completely original. And I didn't think we really needed to get into Captain Obvious territory over that. But the Vah Shir are clearly very different if you're comparing them to the Charr (and much more typical of fantasy tropes). Perhaps not on the surface of it if you like to generalise, but overall the two are not at all alike. Not to mention that hte Vah Shir valued shamanic spirit magicks, not technology. And independence over order. I could create a wall of text to explain all the bloody differences between the Vah Shir and the Charr, and why the Charr are far more original (and I am tempted), but I'll let people research for themselves.
Really, if you want to make a direct correlation, the Vah Shir are more like the Norn than the Charr. This just shows a lack of understanding of both the Vah Shir and the Charr. You're talking with someone who's an absolute authority on this subject, which I'm certain that you are not. And really, I'll just leave it at that.
I'm getting too old for these arguments, and for dealing with people whom are objectively wrong on the Internet. :P
--- EDIT ---
The reason I'm annoyed at this post and why I didn't want to dignify it with a response further than that was due to the gross generalisation, basically saying that all independent cat people are the same. Then the Kzinti are the same as Caitians, the Caitians are the same as Kilrathi, the Kilrathi are the same as the Khajiit, the Khajiit are hte same as the Charr, and so on, and so on. When obviously, this is patently ridiculous.
It just annoys me when people don't think before posting. I mean, gosh, we're all bipeds with noses, therefore all humans must be the same, too! No depth at all!
Gamers... yeesh. Basic thinkers to the extreme, sometimes. And sometimes I think I should be an alcoholic in order to deal with that basic thinking. Not everything is skin deep.
And the reason why I made such a captain obvious post is because so quickly swept aside all the other races for "lacking" originality when it was simply because "gnomes, humans, dryads and druids" have been done before. Yes, but so have cat-like humanoids. " . . . Tthe gross genralisation, basically saying that all independent cant people are the same." You mean like saying that all gnomes, humans, dryads, and druids are the same? It is funny how quickly you dismiss my point when I use the same basis for my comparison that you did in your argument. I guess I'm not surprised by your failure in applying logic to your attempt at argument. Be consistent with yoour point. When someone uses a counterexample to point a whole in your argument, should be less dismissive that the argument is childish and make a better point from the get go. Thank you Sir "Authority".
Playing: GW2 Waiting on: TESO Next Flop: Planetside 2 Best MMO of all time: Asheron's Call - The first company to recreate AC will be the next greatest MMO.
You mean like the Vah Shir in EQ? I mean, yeah not every aspect of the two are the same but that can be said of any of the races, even Arenanet's take on Humans.
Sigh. Yes, there are similar examples. Nothing is completely original. And I didn't think we really needed to get into Captain Obvious territory over that. But the Vah Shir are clearly very different if you're comparing them to the Charr (and much more typical of fantasy tropes). Perhaps not on the surface of it if you like to generalise, but overall the two are not at all alike. Not to mention that hte Vah Shir valued shamanic spirit magicks, not technology. And independence over order. I could create a wall of text to explain all the bloody differences between the Vah Shir and the Charr, and why the Charr are far more original (and I am tempted), but I'll let people research for themselves.
Really, if you want to make a direct correlation, the Vah Shir are more like the Norn than the Charr. This just shows a lack of understanding of both the Vah Shir and the Charr. You're talking with someone who's an absolute authority on this subject, which I'm certain that you are not. And really, I'll just leave it at that.
I'm getting too old for these arguments, and for dealing with people whom are objectively wrong on the Internet. :P
--- EDIT ---
The reason I'm annoyed at this post and why I didn't want to dignify it with a response further than that was due to the gross generalisation, basically saying that all independent cat people are the same. Then the Kzinti are the same as Caitians, the Caitians are the same as Kilrathi, the Kilrathi are the same as the Khajiit, the Khajiit are hte same as the Charr, and so on, and so on. When obviously, this is patently ridiculous.
It just annoys me when people don't think before posting. I mean, gosh, we're all bipeds with noses, therefore all humans must be the same, too! No depth at all!
Gamers... yeesh. Basic thinkers to the extreme, sometimes. And sometimes I think I should be an alcoholic in order to deal with that basic thinking. Not everything is skin deep.
You invited it by the way you presented your choice and the reasons why. When you utilize a combative and dismissive line of reasoning, when none was actually needed, you shouldn't be surprised if someone challenges your point of view.
Why would anyone feel the need to denigrate other choices in order to justify their own? The races aren't divided into factions, so it becomes even more pointless to couch the choice in an "us vs. them", "my choice is superior to others" sort of arguement.
There are a lot of positive reasons to like the Charr with out putting down the other races, even something as simple as "I think they look cool" is valid, since people are just being asked a personal preference. Would you take the same tack if someone asked what your favorite color was? Or your favorite flavor of ice cream?
There are no invalid choices to be made here and no one asked for an argurement as to why one race was obviously superior to the others. Why would anyone feel the need to turn a thread encouraging people to share their preferences into a "my choice is better than yours" sort of arguement?
Im torn between a Norn Warrior or a Human Ranger (depends if ranger can be a viable melee).
I know they are working on improving Ranger and making the pet experience better. From what I've seen of game footage and also looking at the skills tool, it looks like Rangers will be profficient at melee, which is a big plus for me as well.
There are no invalid choices to be made here and no one asked for an argurement as to why one race was obviously superior to the others. Why would anyone feel the need to turn a thread encouraging people to share their preferences into a "my choice is better than yours" sort of arguement?
Baffled...
You might have missed the huge 'Dream Chaser thinks the asura are the worst race ever' thing when they did the race week for them.
My personal theory is that suddenly the asura looked a lot cooler, and it isn't cool for another race to even BEGIN to look as awesome as the charr.
Oh well. I like all the races, because I'm friendly that way. Which is why I'll make one of each, then fork over money to Arenanet so I can make at least 1 of each profession too (I'm guessing that's the way the cash shop will work out).
Comments
Human Guardian- Judge
Sylvari Engineer- Medicine peddler
Charr Ranger- Beastmaster
Norn Elementalist- Shaman
Asuran Warrior- Artillery Warrior
I haven't seen a lot of thief pvp, but elementalist look very fast and fluid in pvp combat- so may of to go with that. And a char warrior, because of the badass factor.
My first character will definately be human.... If i make a seccond character then it'll be a different race.
I love to play a full in your face class when soling or in small groups... very durable and survivable.....
When grouped i prefer a mix of support Crowd controll/healing...
I love pets and micromanaging them... (or cast and forget ones)...
On top of that i just love being flexible and do different roles with a character (which goes for all GW2 professions)
I don't have much use for true DPS.... DPS isn't a goal on itselves its a process that happens while i am trying to survive my fights... I love challenging fights and will actively search these challenges while playing.
I really hate kiting things......
Curerntly i am considering both Necromancer and guardian.... Where Guardian can be played tanklike and up in your face.... The necromancer has the pet playstyle but still seems very durable and has more options to be played as a backline caster then the Guardian...
Any advise is welcome......
Best MMO experiences : EQ(PvE), DAoC(PvP), WoW(total package) LOTRO (worldfeel) GW2 (Artstyle and animations and worlddesign) SWTOR (Story immersion) TSW (story) ESO (character advancement)
At the moment, I plan to start out with a Norn Guardian, but I am going to fill up my alts pretty quickly, I think, and my plan is to not repeat either a profession or a race in any of them.
Sigh. Yes, there are similar examples. Nothing is completely original. And I didn't think we really needed to get into Captain Obvious territory over that. But the Vah Shir are clearly very different if you're comparing them to the Charr (and much more typical of fantasy tropes). Perhaps not on the surface of it if you like to generalise, but overall the two are not at all alike. Not to mention that hte Vah Shir valued shamanic spirit magicks, not technology. And independence over order. I could create a wall of text to explain all the bloody differences between the Vah Shir and the Charr, and why the Charr are far more original (and I am tempted), but I'll let people research for themselves.
Really, if you want to make a direct correlation, the Vah Shir are more like the Norn than the Charr. This just shows a lack of understanding of both the Vah Shir and the Charr. You're talking with someone who's an absolute authority on this subject, which I'm certain that you are not. And really, I'll just leave it at that.
I'm getting too old for these arguments, and for dealing with people whom are objectively wrong on the Internet. :P
--- EDIT ---
The reason I'm annoyed at this post and why I didn't want to dignify it with a response further than that was due to the gross generalisation, basically saying that all independent cat people are the same. Then the Kzinti are the same as Caitians, the Caitians are the same as Kilrathi, the Kilrathi are the same as the Khajiit, the Khajiit are hte same as the Charr, and so on, and so on. When obviously, this is patently ridiculous.
It just annoys me when people don't think before posting. I mean, gosh, we're all bipeds with noses, therefore all humans must be the same, too! No depth at all!
Gamers... yeesh. Basic thinkers to the extreme, sometimes. And sometimes I think I should be an alcoholic in order to deal with that basic thinking. Not everything is skin deep.
And the reason why I made such a captain obvious post is because so quickly swept aside all the other races for "lacking" originality when it was simply because "gnomes, humans, dryads and druids" have been done before. Yes, but so have cat-like humanoids. " . . . Tthe gross genralisation, basically saying that all independent cant people are the same." You mean like saying that all gnomes, humans, dryads, and druids are the same? It is funny how quickly you dismiss my point when I use the same basis for my comparison that you did in your argument. I guess I'm not surprised by your failure in applying logic to your attempt at argument. Be consistent with yoour point. When someone uses a counterexample to point a whole in your argument, should be less dismissive that the argument is childish and make a better point from the get go. Thank you Sir "Authority".
Asura - engineer
Silvary - ranger
Charr - necromancer
Human - elementalist
Norn - guardian
? - thief (probably another human or asura)
sure i´ll fill up my slots fast....i wanna try them all
Asura I think, alwas had a thing for elves! But they made them tree people. Just as fine.
Guild Wars 2's 50 minutes game play video:
http://n4g.com/news/592585/guild-wars-2-50-minutes-of-pure-gameplay
Everything We Know about GW2:
http://www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/thread/287180/page/1
Im torn between a Norn Warrior or a Human Ranger (depends if ranger can be a viable melee).
Everything you need to know about Elder Scrolls Online
Playing: GW2
Waiting on: TESO
Next Flop: Planetside 2
Best MMO of all time: Asheron's Call - The first company to recreate AC will be the next greatest MMO.
You invited it by the way you presented your choice and the reasons why. When you utilize a combative and dismissive line of reasoning, when none was actually needed, you shouldn't be surprised if someone challenges your point of view.
Why would anyone feel the need to denigrate other choices in order to justify their own? The races aren't divided into factions, so it becomes even more pointless to couch the choice in an "us vs. them", "my choice is superior to others" sort of arguement.
There are a lot of positive reasons to like the Charr with out putting down the other races, even something as simple as "I think they look cool" is valid, since people are just being asked a personal preference. Would you take the same tack if someone asked what your favorite color was? Or your favorite flavor of ice cream?
There are no invalid choices to be made here and no one asked for an argurement as to why one race was obviously superior to the others. Why would anyone feel the need to turn a thread encouraging people to share their preferences into a "my choice is better than yours" sort of arguement?
Baffled...
Want to know more about GW2 and why there is so much buzz? Start here: Guild Wars 2 Mass Info for the Uninitiated
Made me think of this for some reason.
The following statement is false
The previous statement is true
I know they are working on improving Ranger and making the pet experience better. From what I've seen of game footage and also looking at the skills tool, it looks like Rangers will be profficient at melee, which is a big plus for me as well.
Want to know more about GW2 and why there is so much buzz? Start here: Guild Wars 2 Mass Info for the Uninitiated
You might have missed the huge 'Dream Chaser thinks the asura are the worst race ever' thing when they did the race week for them.
My personal theory is that suddenly the asura looked a lot cooler, and it isn't cool for another race to even BEGIN to look as awesome as the charr.
Oh well. I like all the races, because I'm friendly that way. Which is why I'll make one of each, then fork over money to Arenanet so I can make at least 1 of each profession too (I'm guessing that's the way the cash shop will work out).
I will eventually have an alt of every class and race
Sylvari for sure. I'm a dirty, tree-hugging hippie IRL, so it's a good fit.
Warrior most likely as my main class. I like rushing in and bashing people in the face. Especially with a shield.
Engineer something dwarfish. Sick to death of swords and magic.