Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

POLL: How well does SWTOR run on your rig?

2»

Comments

  • Hopscotch73Hopscotch73 Member UncommonPosts: 971

    i7 2.8 (stock speed, not o/ced)

    8 gb RAM (1333hz DDR3)

    Nvidia GeForce GT 240 (Golden Sample 1gb) -> spot the bottleneck

    HP w2216 24" monitor @ 1680x1050

    Cable internet (zoomtastic)

     

    I'm getting a new video card in the new year. It's the only part I carried over from my old rig when I built the new one and I swore I wouldn't upgrade anything in it for a year. Year is nearly up now, so new card and faster (and more) RAM are on the shopping list. 

    But for now, as long as I turn off shadows, I can run it very smoothly. With shadows it hiccups every now and then.

  • ThorqemadaThorqemada Member UncommonPosts: 1,282

    Smooth on max settings but max settings in SWTOR is at best medium.

    Screen Resolution 1920x1200
    Win7 x64
    GA-990XA-UD3 (F9)
    AMD x4 975 3,6 GHz
    2x4 GB Kingston DDR3 1600
    X-Fi Titanium
    Club3D ATI HD 6950 2 GB - Driver 11.11 (cooler not smooth - i will change as soon as possible)
    2x1 TB Samsung Spinpoint F3R

    Even when all the folk was in the cantina at the end of the Beta-Weekend it was very smooth after the initial loading of all data, despite all the lightshow and emoting going on.

    "Torquemada... do not implore him for compassion. Torquemada... do not beg him for forgiveness. Torquemada... do not ask him for mercy. Let's face it, you can't Torquemada anything!"

    MWO Music Video - What does the Mech say: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FF6HYNqCDLI
    Johnny Cash - The Man Comes Around: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0x2iwK0BKM

  • chopgrchopgr Member Posts: 179

    Core2Duo 2.8

    4GB ram

    gtx580

     

     

    The game runs so-and-so. At crowded areas i get under 30fps and its stutters.

     

    But it averages "good"

    http://www.youtube.com/user/chopgr?feature=mhee

    "The Heavens burned, the stars
    cried out
    And under the ashes of infinity,
    Hope, scarred and bleeding,
    breathed its last."

  • DerrosDerros Member UncommonPosts: 1,216

    It runs well.  I only have a 4870, so If I run things at max/high, I have to turn the shadows off, or at least I really should.

    Phenom 2 x4 @ 3.0

    8gb ddr2 pc6400

    win 7 64bit

     

    I only have a 1680 x 1050 monitor though.

  • LorgarnLorgarn Member UncommonPosts: 417

    I had to run SWTOR on the lowest settings possible in order to get a decent framerate. Somewhat disappointed.

     

    Intel Core2 Quad Q6700 2,7Ghz

    8GB DDR2

    GTX 560Ti

    P5K-E

  • chopgrchopgr Member Posts: 179

    That is wierd.

     

    We have more or less the same system, but mine was all maxed out - granted i was getting smooth FPS always (crowded areas).

     

    But low?

     

     

    There is something wrong with the optimazation of the game, will have to wait and see how the end product acts like.

    http://www.youtube.com/user/chopgr?feature=mhee

    "The Heavens burned, the stars
    cried out
    And under the ashes of infinity,
    Hope, scarred and bleeding,
    breathed its last."

  • kadepsysonkadepsyson Member UncommonPosts: 1,919

    Maxed out everything.  Though "maximum settings" for this kind of graphics in a game isn't much.

    Got around 80 to 110 FPS usually.

     

    This is at 5120 x 1600 resolution.  Not some low 1080p.

  • grunt187grunt187 Member CommonPosts: 956

    Ran on 2 computers

    q6600-1920x1200 27"-5850

    qx9650-1920x1080 32"-590

    Both ran on high settings the first setup shadows off,but both were smooth as silk.

    The following statement is false
    The previous statement is true

  • brindleburnbrindleburn Member UncommonPosts: 65

    Originally posted by grunt187

    Ran on 2 computers

    q6600-1920x1200 27"-5850

    qx9650-1920x1080 32"-590

    Both ran on high settings the first setup shadows off,but both were smooth as silk.

    I have a q6700 - 4 mb ram - win 64

    nvidia 8800gtx at 1920 x 1200 27"

    Everything was on low.

    i couldnt even change the setting as it was greyed out and stuck on low.

    Mind you I thought it looked really good for low settings.

  • demarc01demarc01 Member UncommonPosts: 429

    As other posters have mentioned, this thread is kinda moot since the beta's had alot of the options turned off and I would imgagine some debugging apps still running.

    Your better off waiting for the actual release build before asking a question like this since no one can answer you as to how the final build will run come Dec 15th.

    Its possible (although doubtful) that the final build will be horrible at max settings and poorly optomized, its also possible that it will run awesome once the debugging tools are removed and the final options are in. No one can really know at this point (Except the in-house team) so I'd just wait for now.

    As long as you meet the spec's *on-the-box* you should be fine. After all its a DX9 game atm (God I hope they upgrade to DX11 soon!) so there really should'ent be any issues unless your PC is 3-4 years old.




  • demarc01demarc01 Member UncommonPosts: 429

    Originally posted by armodeus

    Windows 9 X256 UltraXtreme Alien Edition

    Intel 32xCores i9 2900K Ultimate Edition OC at 9Ghz.

    512GB RAM @4.5Ghz

    360 TB SSD2 Hard Drive

    dual Nvidia GTX 860Ti SLI, 256GB DDR8 supermegaoc edition.

    1Gbs Connection (faster than 94.7% of US grey aliens)

    60" Holographic Multidimensional spherical Monitor

    only 240FPS on superultramax settings at 5760x3240 res (with hi-rez hack).

    The f****ing game crashed my system 3 times, and only runs in 3 dimensions.

    That must have been an awesome dream ....




  • kadepsysonkadepsyson Member UncommonPosts: 1,919

    Originally posted by demarc01

    As other posters have mentioned, this thread is kinda moot since the beta's had alot of the options turned off and I would imgagine some debugging apps still running.

    Your better off waiting for the actual release build before asking a question like this since no one can answer you as to how the final build will run come Dec 15th.

    Its possible (although doubtful) that the final build will be horrible at max settings and poorly optomized, its also possible that it will run awesome once the debugging tools are removed and the final options are in. No one can really know at this point (Except the in-house team) so I'd just wait for now.

    As long as you meet the spec's *on-the-box* you should be fine. After all its a DX9 game atm (God I hope they upgrade to DX11 soon!) so there really should'ent be any issues unless your PC is 3-4 years old.

    This thread seems perfectly fine to me, since we're comparing beta performance to beta performance :P

    If the thread was "How well will your rig perform come release" then it might be a different story

  • grunt187grunt187 Member CommonPosts: 956

    Originally posted by brindleburn

    Originally posted by grunt187

    Ran on 2 computers

    q6600-1920x1200 27"-5850

    qx9650-1920x1080 32"-590

    Both ran on high settings the first setup shadows off,but both were smooth as silk.

    I have a q6700 - 4 mb ram - win 64

    nvidia 8800gtx at 1920 x 1200 27"

    Everything was on low.

    i couldnt even change the setting as it was greyed out and stuck on low.

    Mind you I thought it looked really good for low settings.

    Ya the big difference between my first setup and yours is the graphics a 5850 is miles ahead of a 8800gtx.upgrade your card and you will see a major difference.(fist setup win7-32,4g ddr2)

    The following statement is false
    The previous statement is true

  • brindleburnbrindleburn Member UncommonPosts: 65

    Originally posted by grunt187

    Originally posted by brindleburn


    Originally posted by grunt187

    Ran on 2 computers

    q6600-1920x1200 27"-5850

    qx9650-1920x1080 32"-590

    Both ran on high settings the first setup shadows off,but both were smooth as silk.

    I have a q6700 - 4 mb ram - win 64

    nvidia 8800gtx at 1920 x 1200 27"

    Everything was on low.

    i couldnt even change the setting as it was greyed out and stuck on low.

    Mind you I thought it looked really good for low settings.

    Ya the big difference between my first setup and yours is the graphics a 5850 is miles ahead of a 8800gtx.upgrade your card and you will see a major difference.(fist setup win7-32,4g ddr2)

    Yeh I thought it might be the card.

    I'm gonna wait until the next set of graphics cards are out (hoping it will drop price of the rest of the range). May even upgrade to i5 system.

  • jmcdermottukjmcdermottuk Member RarePosts: 1,571

    Beta weekend starting 25/11 I was on high settings.

    Beta weekend starting 2/12 it was forced to high then forced to low after the maintenance on Saturday, no option to change video settings.

    I had vsync ticked so I never saw greater than 65 fps but I also never dropped below 35 fps at any time over the two weekends.

     

    PC is getting on in years now. Bought it in 2006:

    AMD 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ @ 2.21GHz

    XP Pro 32 bit, SP 3

    Nvidia GT9800 512k

    3Gb RAM (4 Gb in the PC but 32 bit XP can only address 3Gb)

     

    Game ran fine for me, saw no problems at all once I had Vsync checked. Was a bit jerky without it and I had some screen tear but once I checked Vsync all was well. Good news for anyone running older hardware.

     

    Edited to add Video RAM.

  • demarc01demarc01 Member UncommonPosts: 429

    Originally posted by Creatorzim

    I had little to no problems. I could tell at some times that there were way to many people on the game and was getting sluggish, but i would relog and be fine. You should look at upgrading your memory 2gb is pretty low, make sure you have a 64 bit OS though or your computer wont regonize it anyways. Im thinking about buying another 6GB so i can fill up the last 3 spots i have. Connection might help as well. i just upgraded to fios and getting amazing speeds usually 3-5MBS.

     

    Just to be clear, a 32-bit OS will handle 4G of ram (well actually 3.2'ish is usable Ram) just fine. If you go past 4G you want a 64-bit OS that will use upto 16G of ram.

    So if you just wanted to up your ram by a couple of Gig your current OS would be fine.

    Its well worth getting the 64-bit OS upgrade though, I went from Win-XP straight to Win7 (Win xp is the lowest upgrade path) and its a world of difference. Vista is a turd and should be avoided at all costs.




  • demarc01demarc01 Member UncommonPosts: 429

    Originally posted by kadepsyson

    Originally posted by demarc01

    As other posters have mentioned, this thread is kinda moot since the beta's had alot of the options turned off and I would imgagine some debugging apps still running.

    Your better off waiting for the actual release build before asking a question like this since no one can answer you as to how the final build will run come Dec 15th.

    Its possible (although doubtful) that the final build will be horrible at max settings and poorly optomized, its also possible that it will run awesome once the debugging tools are removed and the final options are in. No one can really know at this point (Except the in-house team) so I'd just wait for now.

    As long as you meet the spec's *on-the-box* you should be fine. After all its a DX9 game atm (God I hope they upgrade to DX11 soon!) so there really should'ent be any issues unless your PC is 3-4 years old.

    This thread seems perfectly fine to me, since we're comparing beta performance to beta performance :P

    If the thread was "How well will your rig perform come release" then it might be a different story

    The thread title is *How well does SWTOR run on your rig"

    The Answer is = I dont know its not released yet.

    You'll see there is no quantifier in his post (Ie "How well did (<-- past tense b/c beta is closed now) SWTOR beta run on your rig?")

    Pedantic I know, but I'm answering his question as best I can :p




  • grunt187grunt187 Member CommonPosts: 956

    Originally posted by demarc01

    Originally posted by kadepsyson


    Originally posted by demarc01

    As other posters have mentioned, this thread is kinda moot since the beta's had alot of the options turned off and I would imgagine some debugging apps still running.

    Your better off waiting for the actual release build before asking a question like this since no one can answer you as to how the final build will run come Dec 15th.

    Its possible (although doubtful) that the final build will be horrible at max settings and poorly optomized, its also possible that it will run awesome once the debugging tools are removed and the final options are in. No one can really know at this point (Except the in-house team) so I'd just wait for now.

    As long as you meet the spec's *on-the-box* you should be fine. After all its a DX9 game atm (God I hope they upgrade to DX11 soon!) so there really should'ent be any issues unless your PC is 3-4 years old.

    This thread seems perfectly fine to me, since we're comparing beta performance to beta performance :P

    If the thread was "How well will your rig perform come release" then it might be a different story

    The thread title is *How well does SWTOR run on your rig"

    The Answer is = I dont know its not released yet.

    You'll see there is no quantifier in his post (Ie "How well did (<-- past tense b/c beta is closed now) SWTOR beta run on your rig?")

    Pedantic I know, but I'm answering his question as best I can :p

    Sorry couldnt resist http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctf260qnDeU image

    The following statement is false
    The previous statement is true

  • i_dragonx_ii_dragonx_i Member Posts: 20

    In Bootcamp it ran great during Beta. Will be following many of the tips seen on variuos fansites to improve the overall appearance though. BT Infinity at about 37Mbps

    Edit: Tried to upload with spec sheet.

    MacBook Pro 15" Mid 2010

    2.8 GHz Core i7

    8GB 1067 DDR3

    NVIDIA GeForce GT 330m 512MB

    OSX Lion 10.7.2

    Windows 7 Ultmate on Bootcamp

  • HamrtimeHamrtime Member Posts: 200

    Ran perfect on high settings on an Imac5 running bootcamp. Had to download a cooling fan app due to the imac getting very very hot after an hour of playing.

  • Leonidas33Leonidas33 Member Posts: 2

    How well do you guys think ill be able to run it?  I cant test my system on canurunit yet cuz i have a mac and havent yet gotten my windows install disc.  But here's my specs:

    OS:  Windows XP Pro with SP3

    Computer:  2011 13" Macbook Pro 

    Processor:  2.7GHz Intel Core i7

    Memory:  4 GB RAM

    Graphics:  Intel HD Graphics 3000 GPU

    VRAM:  384MB

    Screen Rez:  1280 x 800

Sign In or Register to comment.