› ›

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links

How to cry

TacanTacan Member Posts: 93
in Mortal Online

http://www.mortalonline.com/forums/72686-conclusion-gk-siege.html

Now we know

AQ not use yellow  character to crash ppl)

AQ not use GM account)

How to do it?

in each messege written about   71 unsubben accounts

Comments

  • koira1koira1 Member UncommonPosts: 264

     this makes me wonder, if their tools are flawed to give such bad information, as in resulting wrongful bans, are their other tools (if they have em) and methods and decisions based on it trustworthy?

  • TacanTacan Member Posts: 93

    Originally posted by koira1

     this makes me wonder, if their tools are flawed to give such bad information, as in resulting wrongful bans, are their other tools (if they have em) and methods and decisions based on it trustworthy?

    Nothing 

  • amadmanamadman Member Posts: 19

    Originally posted by Tacan

    http://www.mortalonline.com/forums/72686-conclusion-gk-siege.html

    Now we know

    AQ not use yellow  character to crash ppl)

    AQ not use GM account)

    How to do it?

    in each messege written about   71 unsubben accounts

    Actually AQ did do the yellow crash thing and even appologized for it.

    The bans where actually about the player carrying things while being dead. This is what was proven to be false.

    This also has nothing to do with the GM account thing that happened after. It states that it is being handled in a different investigation.

    "In MO, even the haters are hardcore!" - ltank

  • ToferioToferio Member UncommonPosts: 1,411
    And the road goes on forever and the party never ends... So much for all the accusations, aq are innocent after all. I am however baffled at how long it took them to figure such a simple matter out. Not to mention what happened to using logic when banning, instead of relying on tools which proved to be flawed on several occasions.
  • TacanTacan Member Posts: 93

    Originally posted by amadman

    This also has nothing to do with the GM account thing that happened after. It states that it is being handled in a different investigation.

    Starvault official statement 

    Sorry but our GM gave details of his account to the AQ player

    )

     

  • listnngstonelistnngstone Member Posts: 14

    Originally posted by Tacan

    Starvault official statement 

    Sorry but our GM gave details of his account to the AQ player

    )

     

    Really? You know that for a FACT? I mean, you have physical proof? Please don't get me started.

     

    Edit your post and all will be forgiven. Leave it, and feel my wrath. You won't be the first on these forums in my meager 14 posts to make admit they don't know anything.

  • psykobillypsykobilly Member Posts: 338

    Originally posted by listnngstone

    Originally posted by Tacan

    Starvault official statement 

    Sorry but our GM gave details of his account to the AQ player

    )

     

    Really? You know that for a FACT? I mean, you have physical proof? Please don't get me started.

     

    Edit your post and all will be forgiven. Leave it, and feel my wrath. You won't be the first on these forums in my meager 14 posts to make admit they don't know anything.

    And what does he mean 'our gm'?  I thought GM's were neutral?

  • argiropargirop Member UncommonPosts: 300

    Originally posted by psykobilly

    Originally posted by listnngstone

    Originally posted by Tacan

    Starvault official statement 

    Sorry but our GM gave details of his account to the AQ player

    )

     

    Really? You know that for a FACT? I mean, you have physical proof? Please don't get me started.

     

    Edit your post and all will be forgiven. Leave it, and feel my wrath. You won't be the first on these forums in my meager 14 posts to make admit they don't know anything.

    And what does he mean 'our gm'?  I thought GM's were neutral?

    I hope you being ironic here...

This discussion has been closed.