Originally posted by Instago Nope Gideon, I don't mind at all. In fact, I'm glad you did- we need to get the word out that EverQuest is like crack :P.
haha... Well im not mad but I am kind of annoyed by him having the same avatar as me. Have you seen any of his posts. Once you read them you will understand why I dont want him to have the same avatar as me.
Originally posted by Gideon Originally posted by Instago Nope Gideon, I don't mind at all. In fact, I'm glad you did- we need to get the word out that EverQuest is like crack :P.
haha... Well im not mad but I am kind of annoyed by him having the same avatar as me. Have you seen any of his posts. Once you read them you will understand why I dont want him to have the same avatar as me.
yeah I feel sorry for you gideon . With his attitude though I don't see him lasting too much longer on these forums before the admins unleash their wraith upon him.
---------------------------------- MMOs Retired From: Earth and Beyond, Project Entropia, There, A Tale in the Desert, Star Wars Galaxies, World of Warcraft, Eve Online, City of Heroes/Villains.
Originally posted by remyburke Originally posted by swiftan Blah! Why compare 2 products from a same company? isnt it a joke? My comment.. both still the best. Because they are 2 different games? who cares if the same company made both?...oh ya it's because Blizzard can do no wrong....lol riiiiight.
hmmmmm blizzard is still one of the best companies imo :b, I've got FAR more pleasure and fun out of games from this company then any other. All the way back since WCII and SC days ;b.
Originally posted by swiftan Blah! Why compare 2 products from a same company? isnt it a joke? My comment.. both still the best.
Because they are 2 different games? who cares if the same company made both?...oh ya it's because Blizzard can do no wrong....lol riiiiight.
hmmmmm blizzard is still one of the best companies imo :b, I've got FAR more pleasure and fun out of games from this company then any other. All the way back since WCII and SC days ;b.
Don't get me wrong, Blizzard is a great game maker, but some people walk around preaching the word of Blizzard as if it's the all-mighty gospel. It's just a company with a good track record...they can still f*ck up just like anyone else.
Joined 2004 - I can't believe I've been a MMORPG.com member for 20 years! Get off my lawn!
Originally posted by remyburke Don't get me wrong, Blizzard is a great game maker, but some people walk around preaching the word of Blizzard as if it's the all-mighty gospel. It's just a company with a good track record...they can still f*ck up just like anyone else.
I agree :O
I do think that wow has improved much since release though, and continues to get better as the add more content.
/shrug
Just another 2 cents of mine on the topic, wow may not have been the best, but I think its improved more then any other game when you compare its current form to its release form :b.
I think as they add more level 60 content it will get funner~
Originally posted by Johnark Well you're entitled to your own opinion, cause I personally found WC3 pretty crappy for a RTS compared to Age of Mythology. WoW FTW!!!
You wish. Age of Mythology was one of the worst RTS of all time. The only RTS that has a chance of being better than WC3 is AOE3, and thats just because Ragdoll Physics are the sh!t
I actually revoke this statement. I just finished playing the AoE 3 Trial, and I have to say, im extremely disappointed.
I enjoyed the new exp system, where everything you did rewarded you with some bonuses in exp, and once you get enough exp, you can get shipments from your home land. I think that definately adds new bonuses and strategic elements to the game.
But I hated how they made each and every unit so complex now. I mean, the game is nice, and flashy, and the physics are fun to mess with... but unit formations and everything just made the game too complex to actually enjoy. Sure, if you feel like playing an extremely in depth RTS, this is your game. But if you want to play a casual RTS game this game is just annoying.
I am unfortunately not going to buy this installment in the AoE series, and it hurts me to say it
Originally posted by juice_pops Starcraft online has everything battlenet has.
sorry to bash... but that made... no sense at all
starcraft IS on battlenet. StarCraft, Warcraft II B.net edition, Warcraft III, Diablo, and Diablo II all use battlenet... so umm of course it has all that battlenet has because it USES battle.net
its been a while since i have played warcraftIII but when i did it was hacked out just like every other blizzard game. me personally i cannot stand games where people cheat, wow is the only blizzard game that is "somewhat" hack free.
people love to bash wow for whatever reason, i think its a great game other than the fact that theres no way to progress past 60 atm. i realize everyone is different but the game isnt as bad as alot of people claim it is.... this is my honest opinion
Originally posted by theanimedude Originally posted by juice_pops Starcraft online has everything battlenet has. sorry to bash... but that made... no sense at all starcraft IS on battlenet. StarCraft, Warcraft II B.net edition, Warcraft III, Diablo, and Diablo II all use battlenet... so umm of course it has all that battlenet has because it USES battle.net
Oops, sorry, I f*cked up, I meant that Starcraft has everything WC3 has.
They have pretty much the same games, just starcraft is futuristic with......crappy graphics and WC3 is fantasy with good graphics.
this comment may sound like little off topic, but i had opportunity to observe wc3 offline gaming community since i am from the country that has bad internet access and high level of pirated games. so, since i worked in a kind of internet/gaming caffe i looked how people reacted to wc3 LAN gameplay only because we didn't have original games to play online. The number of players increased at stunning rate. Some minor competitions were held and the maddness rose... After a while no other games were played including Counter Strike, CoD, Q3 etc (i'm counting FPSs on purpose just to point out, because no other RTS was played either). And that situation lasted for believe it or not couple years (by the way it still lasts), so i'm not wonderstruck by your disscussion even if it's passed so long from game release.
My opinion is that wc3 has increadibly adictive gameplay, i've seen it in affect, but to be honest it never had me as a fan. I tryed wow too, using some shallow cracked gameserver just to look at landscape, and it kinda left some impression, but still not breathtaking. so concearning the wow gameplay i don't have anything to say.
and to continue in the manner of "market research" storyline i recently discovered that some internet caffe in my town has original wow that can be played online. so i went to ask them about the people coming to play it. And the expected and dissapionting truth was that even the wow was at their hand people still played wc3 and it's various mods, not even thinking about wow, so the owners discontinued it.
and to point out my personal oppinion: i don't like either game. i don't play rtss and for mmorpg, there are far better titles than wow.
that much from me, i hope this was in the manner of you discussion.
Originally posted by juice_pops Originally posted by theanimedude Originally posted by juice_pops Starcraft online has everything battlenet has. sorry to bash... but that made... no sense at all starcraft IS on battlenet. StarCraft, Warcraft II B.net edition, Warcraft III, Diablo, and Diablo II all use battlenet... so umm of course it has all that battlenet has because it USES battle.net
Oops, sorry, I f*cked up, I meant that Starcraft has everything WC3 has.
They have pretty much the same games, just starcraft is futuristic with......crappy graphics and WC3 is fantasy with good graphics.
Once again, sorry.
Um, I think if you asked anybody who's actually played both games they'd tell you the gameplay for each is a lot different. BTW, Starcraft was released seven years ago and the graphics weren't bad for it's time.
Comments
APPLES FTW
RF Online|LostGrace-3x Cora Caster-Spirit Server-Active
Lineage 2|LostGrace-4x Elemental Summoner-Gustin Server-Deactivated, Kiltor-3x Elven Oracle-Gustin Server-Baned T_T
haha... Well im not mad but I am kind of annoyed by him having the same avatar as me. Have you seen any of his posts. Once you read them you will understand why I dont want him to have the same avatar as me.
haha... Well im not mad but I am kind of annoyed by him having the same avatar as me. Have you seen any of his posts. Once you read them you will understand why I dont want him to have the same avatar as me.
yeah I feel sorry for you gideon
----------------------------------
MMOs Retired From: Earth and Beyond, Project Entropia, There, A Tale in the Desert, Star Wars Galaxies, World of Warcraft, Eve Online, City of Heroes/Villains.
MMOs Currently (worth) Playing: None.
MMO hopefuls: Age of Conan.
I guess it coems down too you can't make NE dance in WCIII but you can in wow :b
Because they are 2 different games? who cares if the same company made both?...oh ya it's because Blizzard can do no wrong....lol riiiiight.
Joined 2004 - I can't believe I've been a MMORPG.com member for 20 years! Get off my lawn!
hmmmmm blizzard is still one of the best companies imo :b, I've got FAR more pleasure and fun out of games from this company then any other. All the way back since WCII and SC days ;b.
hmmmmm blizzard is still one of the best companies imo :b, I've got FAR more pleasure and fun out of games from this company then any other. All the way back since WCII and SC days ;b.
Don't get me wrong, Blizzard is a great game maker, but some people walk around preaching the word of Blizzard as if it's the all-mighty gospel. It's just a company with a good track record...they can still f*ck up just like anyone else.
Joined 2004 - I can't believe I've been a MMORPG.com member for 20 years! Get off my lawn!
I agree :O
I do think that wow has improved much since release though, and continues to get better as the add more content.
/shrug
Just another 2 cents of mine on the topic, wow may not have been the best, but I think its improved more then any other game when you compare its current form to its release form :b.
I think as they add more level 60 content it will get funner~
You wish. Age of Mythology was one of the worst RTS of all time. The only RTS that has a chance of being better than WC3 is AOE3, and thats just because Ragdoll Physics are the sh!t
I actually revoke this statement. I just finished playing the AoE 3 Trial, and I have to say, im extremely disappointed.
I enjoyed the new exp system, where everything you did rewarded you with some bonuses in exp, and once you get enough exp, you can get shipments from your home land. I think that definately adds new bonuses and strategic elements to the game.
But I hated how they made each and every unit so complex now. I mean, the game is nice, and flashy, and the physics are fun to mess with... but unit formations and everything just made the game too complex to actually enjoy. Sure, if you feel like playing an extremely in depth RTS, this is your game. But if you want to play a casual RTS game this game is just annoying.
I am unfortunately not going to buy this installment in the AoE series, and it hurts me to say it
Starcraft online has everything battlenet has.
Blorg
sorry to bash... but that made... no sense at all
starcraft IS on battlenet. StarCraft, Warcraft II B.net edition, Warcraft III, Diablo, and Diablo II all use battlenet... so umm of course it has all that battlenet has because it USES battle.net
BANANAS 4 LIFE BIOTCH!@!!!!
ROFLMAO!!!!!!
i do have to agree that bananas r wayyyyy better
randy
its been a while since i have played warcraftIII but when i did it was hacked out just like every other blizzard game. me personally i cannot stand games where people cheat, wow is the only blizzard game that is "somewhat" hack free.
people love to bash wow for whatever reason, i think its a great game other than the fact that theres no way to progress past 60 atm. i realize everyone is different but the game isnt as bad as alot of people claim it is.... this is my honest opinion
read this http://www.vanguardsoh.com/forums/showthread.php?p=1044304#post1044304 then come back and talk to me about the vanguard/soe fiasco.....
Oops, sorry, I f*cked up, I meant that Starcraft has everything WC3 has.
They have pretty much the same games, just starcraft is futuristic with......crappy graphics and WC3 is fantasy with good graphics.
Once again, sorry.
Blorg
this comment may sound like little off topic, but i had opportunity to observe wc3 offline gaming community since i am from the country that has bad internet access and high level of pirated games. so, since i worked in a kind of internet/gaming caffe i looked how people reacted to wc3 LAN gameplay only because we didn't have original games to play online. The number of players increased at stunning rate. Some minor competitions were held and the maddness rose... After a while no other games were played including Counter Strike, CoD, Q3 etc (i'm counting FPSs on purpose just to point out, because no other RTS was played either). And that situation lasted for believe it or not couple years (by the way it still lasts), so i'm not wonderstruck by your disscussion even if it's passed so long from game release.
My opinion is that wc3 has increadibly adictive gameplay, i've seen it in affect, but to be honest it never had me as a fan. I tryed wow too, using some shallow cracked gameserver just to look at landscape, and it kinda left some impression, but still not breathtaking. so concearning the wow gameplay i don't have anything to say.
and to continue in the manner of "market research" storyline i recently discovered that some internet caffe in my town has original wow that can be played online. so i went to ask them about the people coming to play it. And the expected and dissapionting truth was that even the wow was at their hand people still played wc3 and it's various mods, not even thinking about wow, so the owners discontinued it.
and to point out my personal oppinion: i don't like either game. i don't play rtss and for mmorpg, there are far better titles than wow.
that much from me, i hope this was in the manner of you discussion.
Cheers!!!
Oops, sorry, I f*cked up, I meant that Starcraft has everything WC3 has.
They have pretty much the same games, just starcraft is futuristic with......crappy graphics and WC3 is fantasy with good graphics.
Once again, sorry.
Um, I think if you asked anybody who's actually played both games they'd tell you the gameplay for each is a lot different. BTW, Starcraft was released seven years ago and the graphics weren't bad for it's time.