Reasons why I don't care whether you play this game or not

Comments

• Slaggg Member Posts: 221

  October 2005

  Surely you're not flame-baiting.  Right?

  Or did you mean to hit 'reply' instead of 'start new topic'?  Or did your brother get onto your account and post this?

  "First you wanna kill me, now you wanna kiss me...Blow."--Ash, "Army of Darkness"
• anarchyart Member Posts: 5,378

  October 2005

  Just get sick of all the threads entitled "Why I won't be playing (insert gamename here)" Know what? I don't give a rats ass whether you will be playing it or not.

  That's what I meant by it.

  
• gargantroo Member Posts: 1,477

  October 2005

  ---

  Originally posted by anarchyart
  1) It's Lord of the Rings Online.
  2) You're an unskilled n00b killing griefer who needs to seek psychiatric help
  3) It has no PVP and I'm glad because people who refuse to play games without PVP are, by and large, pre-pubescent, unskilled, n00b killing griefers.
  I only hope they make the graphics scalable for super high-end systems and I'll be in.

  ---

  What is a better test of skills than to fight your own peers?

  I am not arguing your topic (just so much your comment about PVP), I dont think people should rate a game before it comes out either. Final Fantasy XI was a great game without PVP, I thought it added a nice twist to World of Warcraft though.
  Im not saying this game sucks without PVP but I think it would make it alot more interesting.

  ---

  i play on australian servers because racism is acceptable there

  ---
• Darktania Member Posts: 805

  October 2005

  
  

  ---

  
  Originally posted by anarchyart
  
  1) It's Lord of the Rings Online.
  2) You're an unskilled n00b killing griefer who needs to seek psychiatric help
  3) It has no PVP and I'm glad because people who refuse to play games without PVP are, by and large, pre-pubescent, unskilled, n00b killing griefers.
  I only hope they make the graphics scalable for super high-end systems and I'll be in.
  

  ---

  
  

    'Nuff said.
  

  
• Devoraan Member Posts: 23

  October 2005

  
  

  ---

  
  Originally posted by gargantroo
  
  
  
  
  Originally posted by anarchyart
  1) It's Lord of the Rings Online.
  2) You're an unskilled n00b killing griefer who needs to seek psychiatric help
  3) It has no PVP and I'm glad because people who refuse to play games without PVP are, by and large, pre-pubescent, unskilled, n00b killing griefers.
  I only hope they make the graphics scalable for super high-end systems and I'll be in.
  
  

  What is a better test of skills than to fight your own peers?

  I am not arguing your topic (just so much your comment about PVP), I dont think people should rate a game before it comes out either. Final Fantasy XI was a great game without PVP, I thought it added a nice twist to World of Warcraft though.
  Im not saying this game sucks without PVP but I think it would make it alot more interesting.

  ---

  I completly agree with this, there is no better way to test youre skills then against another member of the online comunity! 

  although i hate people who say stuff like "goin to wildy come" in runescape.

  and i hate the dark jedi who say "ill brb!" and they go into the starport in SWG and own some unready rebel

  i believe people should have the option to get owned, but tolkein said nothing about a nice little hobbit that was goin to visit Bree from Hobbiton, and was stabbed to death buy an elf... maybe a human, but a dwarf would have cleaved that lil bugger. . . 

  but yeah, as long as this game has good graphics, good character customisation, questing and roleplaying, then like that guy above said, i dont give a rats ass about a PKer that is whining like that.