Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
F2P Model heading for disaster an "apocalypse" in 3-5 years
gylnne
Member UncommonPosts: 322
This warning coming from Mark Jacobs in a recent article he did which included his opinion on the unsustainable f2p model so many games are using.
"Camelot Unchained creator and long-time MMO veteran Mark Jacobs has warned of an impending free-to-play “apocalypse” in three to five years time, thanks to a rush towards unsustainable free-to-play models. He predicted to VG247 that developers will close and publishers stand to lose a lot of money.
“The whole free-to-play thing isn’t going away tomorrow,” Jacobs stressed, “but let’s just see what happens in three to five years – and I’m betting closer to three – where free-to-play will become just another model. Right now you’ve got everybody chasing it, going ‘Isn’t this great? Free to play, we’re going to make so much money’”.
Jacobs felt that many developers and publishers are chasing the free-to-play market in the hope that a small percentage of players will actually lay down money on micro-payment items. He doesn’t see it as an economically viable strategy."
Continue reading here: f2p heading for disaster
Comments
good times ,educating times,people learned their lesson.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gk_UG7p428c
Let's internet
Good. I like F2P like Lotr and DDO, but the weak, cheap, crappy games that come out with publishers that just want to make a quick buck should die off. It is evolution the creatures with weak attributes dies off if there is anything good about them then it will carry on in a new form.
F2P is not bad per se. It is the current form many take that is bad. Development and progress take time and unfortunately a lot of corpses along the way in the form of bankruptcies, failed games, and disgruntled players. Hopefully some kind of stimulus will not come in to artificially prop up games that should fail.
Great interview. Really convinced me. Put 110$ “Young Her” most I’ve ever spent on a game.
I’ve played pretty much every MMO to date, excluding ones not in English(and some that aren’t), and nothing beats Pay 2 play quality.
GW2 disappointed me…GW1 was one of my favorite games ever…GW2 I regret buying.
Help get Camelot Unchained made, a old-school MMORPG, with no hand holding!
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/13861848/camelot-unchained
Thats where the problem lies,there is companies building free to play game,what kind of goal is that.
Let's internet
I did when Lotro first started but now it is all about a money grab, especially since Warner Bros. owns it now.
I genuinely hope F2P goes away soon. It's not a good fit for community driven games like MMO's. Sure it brings a few players back to a failing game for a month or two but other than that it's not really helping to advance the genre.
LOTRO is a good F2P.
Except that, to get all the content you'd normally get with buying the game...it costs more than release...so you have to spend about 200$ to get all the actual content in LOTRO.
Skills, are in the cash shop. Yes, skills, such as a weapon skill, abilitiy, or mount.
In GW2, you can buy "Gems" and convert them directly to gold, or buy dyes or something else and re-sell them for money. So in essense, you can buy gold straight from the developers. F2P Man...not being handled well.
Help get Camelot Unchained made, a old-school MMORPG, with no hand holding!
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/13861848/camelot-unchained
People/players like to use this word "fun" alot ,what is funny cash shop,i would like to see a video when someone is having fun at cash shop.
Let's internet
are you also tired of all the crappy quality P2P MMO's that continue to release?
I use to think so when they first started it. But soon it wasn't just selling cosmetics, it was skills, and instant travel, etc. The money temptation is to great to not start adding pay to win items, every cash shop eventually goes this way. So instead of having a major focus on providing content their focus is divided with the idea of always interweaving the new content with store items.
Is it possible Rthuth434 that crappy quality is because they make a pve game with pvp tacked on to it?
thats why the B2P model is the best of both worlds. In a free to play mmo, you play for free but have to pay for things that are needed in the game(which isnt that bad) but then theres a high risk of being p2w or hardcore nickle n dime. In a sub based mmo you purchase the game but you have to keep paying to even log in, which sucks, i already payed for your game
B2P is the most balanced and make the most sense. You purchase the game, and have the entire game. Theres absolutely zero chance to even look at p2w because the company sells boxes and expansions, so the cash shop can be very decent and greed-free.
This are times where subscription only wont cut it. We are not getting enough content to justify a sub, not even the gameplay quality is there anymore (grind to endgame then do mindless "endgame" grind for 15 a month? no thanks, thats not quality game for my money, and certainly not AAA as they claim).
I think GW2 has the best b2p model (and still need more cool stuff in the cash shop). And i think TERA does the best job mixing all three models together succesfully.
DAoC - Excalibur & Camlann
But you can get all that stuff by playing the game and getting the points to buy them. To me that makes the difference. Those with more time than money can get what those with more money than time can get. Old games catered more to those that had more time than money...and frankly that is a not a way to make money.
The goal is for those making crappy games to fail horrible and someone behind them to say "Stop...we are going to make a F2P game, but we are going to make one worth playing not just a one year money grab game."
I frankly have fun with the system. *shrug* It is a difference of opinion I guess. I would play more games like Lotro where you can get points to buy all the benefits in the shop if you play the game. Expecting to play a game and it cost you $0 for everything the game has to offer is a pipe dream.
Am I allowed to laugh if Camelot Unchained at some point turns into F2P?
Bioware for a long time almost denied that SWTOR would ever turn into F2P.
which began as a quite shitty P2P game.
Tera is a pretty bad game overall, I had my fun with it, and made some money even.
However, Tera did do F2P Right.
Help get Camelot Unchained made, a old-school MMORPG, with no hand holding!
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/13861848/camelot-unchained
Yes and Bioware answers to it's share holders, CU answers to it's kickstarter backers.
you may have been disappointed but you're a little kid if you let it paint your world view that far. Guild Wars, and yes its sequel too are better than almost(gotta bold the almost) every P2P game that came out from the time GW was released.
there will be P2P releases this yea, they will have the same chance of being bad as always. same for the f2p ones. these games just have so little room for error but so much probability of error.
correction, they answer to no one. such is the beauty in kickstarter(from the company/creator point of view).