› ›

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links

open broadcaster software and sparse fast fourier transform (mit)

drbaltazardrbaltazar Member UncommonPosts: 7,856
in Hardware
ok I saw that a lot of nerd have been playing and tweaking mit version of fast fourier transform ! since it was released in 2012 anybody know if open broadcaster software plan to make use of it ? since this would up their performance by a lot ?

Comments

  • QuizzicalQuizzical Member LegendaryPosts: 25,531
    Unless you're familiar with the internal details of how the program works, what makes you so certain that some particular other algorithm could speed it up so much?
  • drbaltazardrbaltazar Member UncommonPosts: 7,856

    because it was released in 2012 and lot of maniac nerd had a lot of time to benchmark and tweak , and from what I understand another team released a new version this month . it doesn't relate to everything true . but mit guys said that image had a lot that could be optimized by this ! the newest is supposed to be a few order of magnitude better  then fast fourier transform but getting accurate result is probably a case by case scenario . but I suspect anything  with huge amount of data would gain by it .since sound doesn't take a lot of space , its safe to assume the gain would be , oh never mind lol !

     

  • QuizzicalQuizzical Member LegendaryPosts: 25,531
    The Fourier transform is named after Fourier (surprise!), who died in 1830.  It's been around for a while.  Optimizing it to run well on computers wasn't done until the 20th century, but that's still decades old.  You can make various optimizations that will work better on particular types of tightly restricted data, which is what you're probably looking for, but an optimization that won't work on your data is useless to you.
  • RidelynnRidelynn Member EpicPosts: 7,383

    Originally posted by drbaltazar
    oh never mind lol ! 

    Touchdown

  • sacredfoolsacredfool Member UncommonPosts: 849
    This thread has lived up to my expectations. Baltazar and Quizzical never cease to amuse me. Thanks guys, made my morning better!

    Originally posted by nethaniah

    Seriously Farmville? Yeah I think it's great. In a World where half our population is dying of hunger the more fortunate half is spending their time harvesting food that doesn't exist.

  • drbaltazardrbaltazar Member UncommonPosts: 7,856
    The fast Fourier transform you guys talk about is not the new one from MIT.the optimization I talk about is on the one MIT released last year 10 order of magnitude better is unheard of .I caught that on so.cl since the vast majority of our electronic use normal (pre-mit 2012)fast Fourier transformer .i was expecting obs to recode obs
Sign In or Register to comment.