Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Rust: Over 4,000 Accounts Banned for Cheating

SBFordSBFord Former Associate EditorMember LegendaryPosts: 33,129

The Rust site has been updated with a new developer blog that lets players know that over four thousand game accounts have been banned for cheating. The team has developed its own anti-cheat package called CheatPunch and it has, apparently, worked quite well. Rust's alpha has been plagued with hacks and cheats since going live late last year for early access players.

We don’t know how stable it’s going to be, so we’re testing it out on our official servers to make sure it all works before forcing it on everyone else. If you get kicked from the official servers with the message that you’ve been banned then you have been caught. You’re a naughty boy. You know what you have done. You won’t get unbanned. We know it was your 9 year old cousin. We know your computer got hijacked. We know that the CIA is getting you banned from all your games on Steam so you will join them in the hunt for aliens. We’re aiming to get a site set up for people that have been banned so they can go and see proof that they’ve been caught.

CheatPunch isn’t the answer to all of our prayers. It’s a stop gap solution. It’s going to get rid of a bunch of cheaters, but it’s not hard to get around (by design). We fully expect cheats to be touted as ‘CheatPunch proof’ quite soon. That’s cool. We’re never going to be finished fighting.

If server owners want to run it on their servers they can do by updating to the latest version and running with “-cheatpunch” on the command line.

Source: Rust site




¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 


Comments

  • Squeak69Squeak69 Member UncommonPosts: 959

    imageimageimageimageimage

     

     

    image

    F2P may be the way of the future, but ya know they dont make them like they used toimage
    Proper Grammer & spelling are extra, corrections will be LOL at.

  • JakdstripperJakdstripper Member RarePosts: 2,410

    so they have sold a million copies, and they have banned 0.4 % of the player base?   .....almost every thread you read about Rust complains about hackers and cheaters and they ban  0.4% of the player base....really?...really?...wake me up when that number reaches 10% or more.

    PS: i guess at least they are taking some pride in the fact that they do have a working ban hammer. if they are smart they will use it mercilessly. it's the only thing that will save a survival pvp game like this. 

     
  • crysentcrysent Member UncommonPosts: 841

    This highlights the biggest issue I have with the 'hardcore' playerbase.  

    Players always claim they want a hardcore MMO, and can't stand the carebear stuff that currently exist.  As soon as a fairly hardcore MMO comes out, everyone hurries up to cheat, hack and exploit.

    Exact same thing that happened in Darkfall, all these players claimed to be hardcore, but when given the chance to play a hardcore game, the first thing they all did was try to find ways to get ahead of all the other players so they could have insta-win in PvP.  There is nothing hardcore about having to hack and cheat in order to get ahead.

  • skyline385skyline385 Member Posts: 564
    Lol all the people crying in the comments with their entitled shit is glorious.

    image
  • OzmodanOzmodan Member EpicPosts: 9,726
    You really could not even play the game there were so many cheaters in the game.  If they only banned 4000 of them, then they have missed a lot of them.
  • SeelinnikoiSeelinnikoi Member RarePosts: 1,360
    Im surprised that with half a dozen people working in the game, that they found time to ban that number...
    If you are a Star Wars fan, why not try the Star Wars The Old Republic?
    New players can get a welcome package and old/returning players can also get a welcome back package and 7 days free subscription time! Just click here to use my referral invitation
  • PhryPhry Member LegendaryPosts: 11,004
    Originally posted by Seelinnikoi
    Im surprised that with half a dozen people working in the game, that they found time to ban that number...

    By the sound of it, its an automated process, if they continue to work on it then they will probably be able to increase that figure exponentially. Not a bad thing imo, people who cheat have no rights. image

  • saohcsaohc Member Posts: 41
    At least they are trying.
  • Nickhead420Nickhead420 Member UncommonPosts: 251
    Isn't Rust still in Alpha?  A paid Alpha at that?  Permanent bans before release, especially when the person already paid for it,  completely turns my back to a company.
  • DakeruDakeru Member EpicPosts: 3,803
    Originally posted by Nickhead420
    Isn't Rust still in Alpha?  A paid Alpha at that?  Permanent bans before release, especially when the person already paid for it,  completely turns my back to a company.

    Are you saying the game being in alpha means that people should be allowed to cheat?

    Harbinger of Fools
  • jaycorulesjaycorules Member Posts: 12
    Originally posted by Nickhead420
    Isn't Rust still in Alpha?  A paid Alpha at that?  Permanent bans before release, especially when the person already paid for it,  completely turns my back to a company.

    Your logic.......

  • AriesTigerAriesTiger Member UncommonPosts: 444
    Originally posted by Jakdstripper

    so they have sold a million copies, and they have banned 0.4 % of the player base?   .....almost every thread you read about Rust complains about hackers and cheaters and they ban  0.4% of the player base....really?...really?...wake me up when that number reaches 10% or more.

    PS: i guess at least they are taking some pride in the fact that they do have a working ban hammer. if they are smart they will use it mercilessly. it's the only thing that will save a survival pvp game like this. 

     

     

    They've probably implemented a memory seeker and an anti-memory seeker.

     

    Most likely idiots are using auto-it.

     

    I laugh at them grovelling for bits.

     

    See, what the hackers don't realize is that Microsoft is putting any spying tool you would need directly into .NET. You want to monitor every service or PID on the person's PC? Just include a single .DLL or .NET app and you have full access while they're running your game. Since .NET is windows core also, it can hide itself from being seen. win-win. Then, it's only up to the companies themselves: do they sit and monitor these guys and gather data from them or cut them loose. (Sound like other people in society we know?)

  • free2playfree2play Member UncommonPosts: 2,043

    4000 cheaters can impact millions.

     

    Gratz to Rust for cutting the poison out.

  • BrokenSilenceBrokenSilence Member UncommonPosts: 321
    Originally posted by Nickhead420
    Isn't Rust still in Alpha?  A paid Alpha at that?  Permanent bans before release, especially when the person already paid for it,  completely turns my back to a company.

    When I saw your comment I felt the need to address it. What part aren't you getting here? The players used hacks and cheats and gets permabanned and you turn your back on a company for doing so?? They cheated.. do you not get that? They earned the ban.

    Just curious do you support the behavior of cheaters or have engaged in this activity yourself? 

  • BrokenSilenceBrokenSilence Member UncommonPosts: 321

    This right here is the best part of it LOL   -- "If you get kicked from the official servers with the message that you’ve been banned then you have been caught. You’re a naughty boy. You know what you have done. You won’t get unbanned. We know it was your 9 year old cousin. We know your computer got hijacked. We know that the CIA is getting you banned from all your games on Steam so you will join them in the hunt for aliens."

     

  • PhoebesPhoebes Member UncommonPosts: 190
    I don't like cheaters either, but isn't alpha meant to be a phase of testing where people are supposed to try to break the system so the software can fixed to not allow that when it goes into production phase? Or were they told to stop while it gets worked on?
  • flizzerflizzer Member RarePosts: 2,455

    Don't plan on playing the game, but I have to applaud any game that is doing something active about getting rid of the cheaters and hackers .  Yayyy!!!!

    image

  • Kevyne-ShandrisKevyne-Shandris Member UncommonPosts: 2,077
    Originally posted by crysent

    Exact same thing that happened in Darkfall, all these players claimed to be hardcore, but when given the chance to play a hardcore game, the first thing they all did was try to find ways to get ahead of all the other players so they could have insta-win in PvP.  There is nothing hardcore about having to hack and cheat in order to get ahead.

    That's the norm. For every honest "hard-core" player there's at least 10 who cheat (and that maybe even on the low side). Because there's no bragging rights if they can't score high enough. FPS/PvP games are especially prone to stat padding and worse, win-trading to simply being carried through content.

     

    I see what goes on and just turn off the game or parts of it when I see it being exploited with little publisher followup. The Dream Paragon exploit, and Blizzard's slow response to the excuses for cheating (e.g., if we didn't do it, the next guild would, and we'd not win -- all found out on the PTR, which they're suppose to report to Blizzard in the first place, but didn't), is but another reason I haven't stepped in a normal raid in WoW since. If folks have to cheat to win, especially PROFESSIONAL gamers, that's the end of that venue. WotLK raid cheaters were permanently banned. Now, it's but a 10 day suspension and didn't even lose the exploited gear. They're still sponsored. And it's "business as usual".

     

    Who wants to play a game with cheaters BUT other cheaters? What real challenge is there? What feeling of achievement?

     

    But this won't be the last time it's seen, but at least they're making an effort, hopefully the most apparent cheaters. Hopefully it's finer tuned to pick out the below the radar cheaters, too.

  • free2playfree2play Member UncommonPosts: 2,043
    Originally posted by Phoebes
    I don't like cheaters either, but isn't alpha meant to be a phase of testing where people are supposed to try to break the system so the software can fixed to not allow that when it goes into production phase? Or were they told to stop while it gets worked on?

    This is true.

    If this is an alpha or beta phase, you patch accordingly.

     

    Alpha phases should be wiped in any case and it is no doubt free so losing your alpha account means very little if they never fix the cheat sploits.

Sign In or Register to comment.