I've been getting reports that stores in the UK, Germany and France are removing copies. Not just one outlet, but multiple stores. In addition, the statement made by EB Games seems to fool a lot of people. It is a part of the Holiday returns, but the real story of the matter is that ESO is the only one where every copy is being sent back, whereas Destiny and others -- who are also a part of such -- still have a presence. This is where people are coming from and starting rumors as if they are fact (which they are not until an announcement is made).
We'll likely hear something by Pax or nothing at all. Either way, the gaming world moves on.
Given the user name, post number / account creation date and the contents of the thread...
I can't tell if this is satire or not.
Good to read the thoughts of another article and it's comment section, though.
Why is it an issue only when posts are against and not in favor of MMOS?
Nope. It's an issue with that too.
Don't know. ,I have been lurking long enough to hardly see anyone question the account date as long as the topic is in 'favor' and 'all praise' for MMOS with huge fanbase around here.
Given the user name, post number / account creation date and the contents of the thread...
I can't tell if this is satire or not.
Good to read the thoughts of another article and it's comment section, though.
Why is it an issue only when posts are against and not in favor of MMOS?
Nope. It's an issue with that too.
Don't know. ,I have been lurking long enough to hardly see anyone question the account date as long as the topic is in 'favor' and 'all praise' for MMOS with huge fanbase around here.
Because you haven't been here long enough to see people make additional "alt" accounts to stir the pot and troll in general... it happens frequently.
"Social media gives legions of idiots the right to speak when they once only spoke at a bar after a glass of wine, without harming the community ... but now they have the same right to speak as a Nobel Prize winner. It's the invasion of the idiots”
― Umberto Eco
“Microtransactions? In a single player role-playing game? Are you nuts?” ― CD PROJEKT RED
Given the user name, post number / account creation date and the contents of the thread...
I can't tell if this is satire or not.
Good to read the thoughts of another article and it's comment section, though.
Why is it an issue only when posts are against and not in favor of MMOS?
I don't know what you're getting at with that. Mere observations followed by a statement and appreciation of a linked article.
There would be no use in wondering if it's satire if the reasons for the thought aren't presented. That is, the user name, post count and account creation followed by a highly controversial topic. Given the nature of the situation, a username essentially calling him/herself clueless followed then by implying support for something that is controversial is funny at best, inciteful at worst.
I've not said a good or bad thing about the game since it's beta. Where I said it was garbage. The moment they released their first patch I've not talked about it since it was no longer the game I tried out and many improvements were likely made that had little knowledge of as a whole.
Due to frequent travel in my youth, English isn't something I consider my primary language (and thus I obtained quirky ways of writing). German and French were always easier for me despite my family being U.S. citizens for over a century. Spanish I learned as a requirement in school, Japanese and Korean I acquired for my youthful desire of anime and gaming (and also work now). I only debate in English to help me work with it (and limit things). In addition, I'm not smart enough to remain fluent in everything and typically need exposure to get in the groove of things again if I haven't heard it in a while. If you understand Mandarin, I know a little, but it has actually been a challenge and could use some help.
Also, I thoroughly enjoy debates and have accounts on over a dozen sites for this. If you wish to engage in such, please put effort in a post and provide sources -- I will then do the same with what I already wrote (if I didn't) as well as with my responses to your own. Expanding my information on a subject makes my stance either change or strengthen the next time I speak of it or write a thesis. Allow me to thank you sincerely for your time.
Given the user name, post number / account creation date and the contents of the thread...
I can't tell if this is satire or not.
Good to read the thoughts of another article and it's comment section, though.
Why is it an issue only when posts are against and not in favor of MMOS?
I don't know what you're getting at with that. Mere observations followed by a statement and appreciation of a linked article.
There would be no use in wondering if it's satire if the reasons for the thought are presented. That is, the user name, post count and account creation followed by a highly controversial topic. Given the nature of the situation, a username essentially calling him/herself clueless followed then by implying support for something that is controversial is funny at best, inciteful at worst.
I've not said a good or bad thing about the game since it's beta. Where I said it was garbage. The moment they released their first patch, I've not talked about it since it was no longer the game I tried out and many of improvements were likely made that had little knowledge of as a whole.
I am getting at a simple question..'would you still be so observant about account creation date and post count if his post was in favor of ESO and nothing but all praise for the game? would you still be more bothered about 'who' is posting it rather than 'what' he is posting?
It depends on what version of the game is being sold.
I bought it on launch day. After installing the game from the dvd's I still had to download around 20GB of updates. How many GB of updates will it be when 1.6 releases?
Did Zenimax issue new box versions with each new update to retailers, or was it version 1?
I'm sure a lot of people don't expect to buy a game and then install 20GB+ of updates. A recall probably makes sence in that regard.
I just can't see Zenimax releasing the game as a F2P product on console. 80%+ of Skyrim sales were on console alone so launching as F2P is not an option.
Given the user name, post number / account creation date and the contents of the thread...
I can't tell if this is satire or not.
Good to read the thoughts of another article and it's comment section, though.
Why is it an issue only when posts are against and not in favor of MMOS?
I don't know what you're getting at with that. Mere observations followed by a statement and appreciation of a linked article.
There would be no use in wondering if it's satire if the reasons for the thought are presented. That is, the user name, post count and account creation followed by a highly controversial topic. Given the nature of the situation, a username essentially calling him/herself clueless followed then by implying support for something that is controversial is funny at best, inciteful at worst.
I've not said a good or bad thing about the game since it's beta. Where I said it was garbage. The moment they released their first patch, I've not talked about it since it was no longer the game I tried out and many of improvements were likely made that had little knowledge of as a whole.
I am getting at a simple question..'would you still be so observant about account creation date and post count if his post was in favor of ESO and nothing but all praise for the game? would you still be more bothered about 'who' is posting it rather than 'what' he is posting?
No, because positive trolling is an unheard of phenomenom.
"Social media gives legions of idiots the right to speak when they once only spoke at a bar after a glass of wine, without harming the community ... but now they have the same right to speak as a Nobel Prize winner. It's the invasion of the idiots”
― Umberto Eco
“Microtransactions? In a single player role-playing game? Are you nuts?” ― CD PROJEKT RED
Given the user name, post number / account creation date and the contents of the thread...
I can't tell if this is satire or not.
Good to read the thoughts of another article and it's comment section, though.
Why is it an issue only when posts are against and not in favor of MMOS?
I don't know what you're getting at with that. Mere observations followed by a statement and appreciation of a linked article.
There would be no use in wondering if it's satire if the reasons for the thought are presented. That is, the user name, post count and account creation followed by a highly controversial topic. Given the nature of the situation, a username essentially calling him/herself clueless followed then by implying support for something that is controversial is funny at best, inciteful at worst.
I've not said a good or bad thing about the game since it's beta. Where I said it was garbage. The moment they released their first patch, I've not talked about it since it was no longer the game I tried out and many of improvements were likely made that had little knowledge of as a whole.
I am getting at a simple question..'would you still be so observant about account creation date and post count if his post was in favor of ESO and nothing but all praise for the game? would you still be more bothered about 'who' is posting it rather than 'what' he is posting?
No, because positive trolling is an unheard of phenomenom.
Since when posting news articles is considered trolling?
Given the user name, post number / account creation date and the contents of the thread...
I can't tell if this is satire or not.
Good to read the thoughts of another article and it's comment section, though.
Why is it an issue only when posts are against and not in favor of MMOS?
I don't know what you're getting at with that. Mere observations followed by a statement and appreciation of a linked article.
There would be no use in wondering if it's satire if the reasons for the thought are presented. That is, the user name, post count and account creation followed by a highly controversial topic. Given the nature of the situation, a username essentially calling him/herself clueless followed then by implying support for something that is controversial is funny at best, inciteful at worst.
I've not said a good or bad thing about the game since it's beta. Where I said it was garbage. The moment they released their first patch, I've not talked about it since it was no longer the game I tried out and many of improvements were likely made that had little knowledge of as a whole.
I am getting at a simple question..'would you still be so observant about account creation date and post count if his post was in favor of ESO and nothing but all praise for the game? would you still be more bothered about 'who' is posting it rather than 'what' he is posting?
New accounts created by people who troll or promote a game is not a rare occurrence. If a topic is currently hot -- or beaten to death -- I do in fact always look at their post count. Most of the time it means nothing, even if it is their first. Though when sufficient evidence presents itself -- such as the account name, contents, post count, etc. -- and adds up, the mind becomes inquisitive as to the nature of the post.
In short, yes. I don't care if it's for or against the game. He could have made fun of people putting fingers in their ears and saying it will never change subscription plans with the same username and I'd wonder if it were a joke.
Both extremes are equally tiresome.
Due to frequent travel in my youth, English isn't something I consider my primary language (and thus I obtained quirky ways of writing). German and French were always easier for me despite my family being U.S. citizens for over a century. Spanish I learned as a requirement in school, Japanese and Korean I acquired for my youthful desire of anime and gaming (and also work now). I only debate in English to help me work with it (and limit things). In addition, I'm not smart enough to remain fluent in everything and typically need exposure to get in the groove of things again if I haven't heard it in a while. If you understand Mandarin, I know a little, but it has actually been a challenge and could use some help.
Also, I thoroughly enjoy debates and have accounts on over a dozen sites for this. If you wish to engage in such, please put effort in a post and provide sources -- I will then do the same with what I already wrote (if I didn't) as well as with my responses to your own. Expanding my information on a subject makes my stance either change or strengthen the next time I speak of it or write a thesis. Allow me to thank you sincerely for your time.
Given the user name, post number / account creation date and the contents of the thread...
I can't tell if this is satire or not.
Good to read the thoughts of another article and it's comment section, though.
Why is it an issue only when posts are against and not in favor of MMOS?
I don't know what you're getting at with that. Mere observations followed by a statement and appreciation of a linked article.
There would be no use in wondering if it's satire if the reasons for the thought are presented. That is, the user name, post count and account creation followed by a highly controversial topic. Given the nature of the situation, a username essentially calling him/herself clueless followed then by implying support for something that is controversial is funny at best, inciteful at worst.
I've not said a good or bad thing about the game since it's beta. Where I said it was garbage. The moment they released their first patch, I've not talked about it since it was no longer the game I tried out and many of improvements were likely made that had little knowledge of as a whole.
I am getting at a simple question..'would you still be so observant about account creation date and post count if his post was in favor of ESO and nothing but all praise for the game? would you still be more bothered about 'who' is posting it rather than 'what' he is posting?
No, because positive trolling is an unheard of phenomenom.
I don't know criteria you use to out those people who post 'positivly' about the game as a troll. But i am talking about your normal every day positive topics not exaggerated ones.
Given the user name, post number / account creation date and the contents of the thread...
I can't tell if this is satire or not.
Good to read the thoughts of another article and it's comment section, though.
Why is it an issue only when posts are against and not in favor of MMOS?
I don't know what you're getting at with that. Mere observations followed by a statement and appreciation of a linked article.
There would be no use in wondering if it's satire if the reasons for the thought are presented. That is, the user name, post count and account creation followed by a highly controversial topic. Given the nature of the situation, a username essentially calling him/herself clueless followed then by implying support for something that is controversial is funny at best, inciteful at worst.
I've not said a good or bad thing about the game since it's beta. Where I said it was garbage. The moment they released their first patch, I've not talked about it since it was no longer the game I tried out and many of improvements were likely made that had little knowledge of as a whole.
I am getting at a simple question..'would you still be so observant about account creation date and post count if his post was in favor of ESO and nothing but all praise for the game? would you still be more bothered about 'who' is posting it rather than 'what' he is posting?
No, because positive trolling is an unheard of phenomenom.
Since when posting news articles is considered trolling?
Silly, silly fanboy.
And you explanation of how you made your screen name and "silly, silly fanboy" isn't? You must have some spectacularly stupid friends if they fall for that kind of shit.
"Social media gives legions of idiots the right to speak when they once only spoke at a bar after a glass of wine, without harming the community ... but now they have the same right to speak as a Nobel Prize winner. It's the invasion of the idiots”
― Umberto Eco
“Microtransactions? In a single player role-playing game? Are you nuts?” ― CD PROJEKT RED
Given the user name, post number / account creation date and the contents of the thread...
I can't tell if this is satire or not.
Good to read the thoughts of another article and it's comment section, though.
Why is it an issue only when posts are against and not in favor of MMOS?
I don't know what you're getting at with that. Mere observations followed by a statement and appreciation of a linked article.
There would be no use in wondering if it's satire if the reasons for the thought are presented. That is, the user name, post count and account creation followed by a highly controversial topic. Given the nature of the situation, a username essentially calling him/herself clueless followed then by implying support for something that is controversial is funny at best, inciteful at worst.
I've not said a good or bad thing about the game since it's beta. Where I said it was garbage. The moment they released their first patch, I've not talked about it since it was no longer the game I tried out and many of improvements were likely made that had little knowledge of as a whole.
I am getting at a simple question..'would you still be so observant about account creation date and post count if his post was in favor of ESO and nothing but all praise for the game? would you still be more bothered about 'who' is posting it rather than 'what' he is posting?
No, because positive trolling is an unheard of phenomenom.
I don't know criteria you use to out those people who post 'positivly' about the game as a troll. But i am talking about your normal every day positive topics not exaggerated ones.
Everyone's first post is not always suspect, just the suspicious ones.
"Social media gives legions of idiots the right to speak when they once only spoke at a bar after a glass of wine, without harming the community ... but now they have the same right to speak as a Nobel Prize winner. It's the invasion of the idiots”
― Umberto Eco
“Microtransactions? In a single player role-playing game? Are you nuts?” ― CD PROJEKT RED
New accounts created by people who troll or promote a game is not a rare occurrence. If a topic is currently hot -- or beaten to death -- I do in fact always look at their post count. Most of the time it means nothing, even if it is their first. Though when sufficient evidence presents itself -- such as the account name, contents, post count, etc. -- and adds up, the mind becomes inquisitive as to the nature of the post.
In short, yes. I don't care if it's for or against the game. He could have made fun of people putting fingers in their ears and saying it will never change subscription plans with the same username and I'd wonder if it were a joke.
Both extremes are equally tiresome.
Not to mention this site has a history of duplicate accounts being created by disgruntled members. Until MikeB or the powers that be put some system in place to deter this, it will keep happening over and over again as it has been through the years.
Given the user name, post number / account creation date and the contents of the thread...
I can't tell if this is satire or not.
Good to read the thoughts of another article and it's comment section, though.
Why is it an issue only when posts are against and not in favor of MMOS?
I don't know what you're getting at with that. Mere observations followed by a statement and appreciation of a linked article.
There would be no use in wondering if it's satire if the reasons for the thought are presented. That is, the user name, post count and account creation followed by a highly controversial topic. Given the nature of the situation, a username essentially calling him/herself clueless followed then by implying support for something that is controversial is funny at best, inciteful at worst.
I've not said a good or bad thing about the game since it's beta. Where I said it was garbage. The moment they released their first patch, I've not talked about it since it was no longer the game I tried out and many of improvements were likely made that had little knowledge of as a whole.
I am getting at a simple question..'would you still be so observant about account creation date and post count if his post was in favor of ESO and nothing but all praise for the game? would you still be more bothered about 'who' is posting it rather than 'what' he is posting?
No, because positive trolling is an unheard of phenomenom.
Since when posting news articles is considered trolling?
Silly, silly fanboy.
And you explanation of how you made your screen name and "silly, silly fanboy" isn't? You must have some spectacularly stupid friends if they fall for that kind of shit.
IGN is the one trolling then. What I did was post their article, nothing more.
And here you are, in denial and getting mad because your bubble is bursting.
Sorry to burst your bubble, we know you are a die hard but have you actually tried to purchase it through bestbuy, go on try and actually buy it and see what the result is.
Game UK doesn't even have it as a PC game no more it only says PS4/XBOX1, you can't actually buy it for the PC from game UK.
The truth hurts but it's looking more and more that the game is going b2p and you have just paid to beta test a game that the devs care more about their console player base.
Thanks i'll be playing on my PS4, it was never worth a sub.
I don't know what being a fan has to do with common sense. Not only can I buy physical boxes from Best Buy, it's on the shelves there and you get time cards there as well as Amazon,
It doesn't take being a fan or a genius to use your fucking head and notice that all of this is happening only in Australia.
Truth hurts lol... F for trolling.
Hey don't get angry lol, nothing wrong with B2P.
Like i said you have paid to beta test a mmo to pave the way for a smooth release on Zenimax's main player base, console players.
Nothing wrong with that.
You really need to stop and use your skull for two secs.
Do you really think PS4/XB1 players are going to pay Sony and Microsoft and then pay ZeniMax a sub lmfao.
ZeniMax are not stupid
Hey, I'm not angry. I'm just laughing at you.
But you're right, Zenimax neither are nor is stupid,,,, ESO trolls, OTOH...
That's funny i was laughing at you, i had the picture of Gandalf tell Bilbo to leave the ring for frodo.
Anyway you should be happy you have given us console players a smooth transition from PC to console port. The game is worth B2P.
Given the user name, post number / account creation date and the contents of the thread...
I can't tell if this is satire or not.
Good to read the thoughts of another article and it's comment section, though.
Why is it an issue only when posts are against and not in favor of MMOS?
I don't know what you're getting at with that. Mere observations followed by a statement and appreciation of a linked article.
There would be no use in wondering if it's satire if the reasons for the thought are presented. That is, the user name, post count and account creation followed by a highly controversial topic. Given the nature of the situation, a username essentially calling him/herself clueless followed then by implying support for something that is controversial is funny at best, inciteful at worst.
I've not said a good or bad thing about the game since it's beta. Where I said it was garbage. The moment they released their first patch, I've not talked about it since it was no longer the game I tried out and many of improvements were likely made that had little knowledge of as a whole.
I am getting at a simple question..'would you still be so observant about account creation date and post count if his post was in favor of ESO and nothing but all praise for the game? would you still be more bothered about 'who' is posting it rather than 'what' he is posting?
No, because positive trolling is an unheard of phenomenom.
Since when posting news articles is considered trolling?
Silly, silly fanboy.
And you explanation of how you made your screen name and "silly, silly fanboy" isn't? You must have some spectacularly stupid friends if they fall for that kind of shit.
IGN is the one trolling then. What I did was post their article, nothing more.
And here you are, in denial and getting mad because your bubble is bursting.
Some people have very sad lives.
No. What you did was call yourself "delusionaltard" to poke fun at ESO "fanboys."
And sorry to break it to you, but your shit ain't worth anger. There are much better trolls here who are not so obvious with targeted screen names. That's just dumb.
"Social media gives legions of idiots the right to speak when they once only spoke at a bar after a glass of wine, without harming the community ... but now they have the same right to speak as a Nobel Prize winner. It's the invasion of the idiots”
― Umberto Eco
“Microtransactions? In a single player role-playing game? Are you nuts?” ― CD PROJEKT RED
That's funny i was laughing at you, i had the picture of Gandalf tell Bilbo to leave the ring for frodo.
Anyway you should be happy you have given us console players a smooth transition from PC to console port. The game is worth B2P.
Yeah you've said that twice now.
For the life of me I can't think of why anyone would play shit they don't much care for when the sub goes away. Does that all of a sudden make it worth your time?
"Sub worthiness" has to be one of the stupidest cliches your crowd likes to spew. I guess your own time must be pretty worthless in your game playing decision making process.
"Social media gives legions of idiots the right to speak when they once only spoke at a bar after a glass of wine, without harming the community ... but now they have the same right to speak as a Nobel Prize winner. It's the invasion of the idiots”
― Umberto Eco
“Microtransactions? In a single player role-playing game? Are you nuts?” ― CD PROJEKT RED
Given the user name, post number / account creation date and the contents of the thread...
I can't tell if this is satire or not.
Good to read the thoughts of another article and it's comment section, though.
Why is it an issue only when posts are against and not in favor of MMOS?
I don't know what you're getting at with that. Mere observations followed by a statement and appreciation of a linked article.
There would be no use in wondering if it's satire if the reasons for the thought are presented. That is, the user name, post count and account creation followed by a highly controversial topic. Given the nature of the situation, a username essentially calling him/herself clueless followed then by implying support for something that is controversial is funny at best, inciteful at worst.
I've not said a good or bad thing about the game since it's beta. Where I said it was garbage. The moment they released their first patch, I've not talked about it since it was no longer the game I tried out and many of improvements were likely made that had little knowledge of as a whole.
I am getting at a simple question..'would you still be so observant about account creation date and post count if his post was in favor of ESO and nothing but all praise for the game? would you still be more bothered about 'who' is posting it rather than 'what' he is posting?
No, because positive trolling is an unheard of phenomenom.
Since when posting news articles is considered trolling?
Silly, silly fanboy.
And you explanation of how you made your screen name and "silly, silly fanboy" isn't? You must have some spectacularly stupid friends if they fall for that kind of shit.
IGN is the one trolling then. What I did was post their article, nothing more.
And here you are, in denial and getting mad because your bubble is bursting.
Some people have very sad lives.
No. What you did was call yourself "delusionaltard" to poke fun at ESO "fanboys."
And sorry to break it to you, but your shit ain't worth anger. There are much better trolls here who are not so obvious with targeted screen names. That's just dumb.
I agree, it ain't worth anger. Yet here you are, getting mad because of a game.
I agree, it ain't worth anger. Yet here you are, getting mad because of a game.
How dumb is that?
Your confusing sarcasm and contempt for anger.
Some people do have a hard time identifying emotions. I understand.
"Social media gives legions of idiots the right to speak when they once only spoke at a bar after a glass of wine, without harming the community ... but now they have the same right to speak as a Nobel Prize winner. It's the invasion of the idiots”
― Umberto Eco
“Microtransactions? In a single player role-playing game? Are you nuts?” ― CD PROJEKT RED
That's funny i was laughing at you, i had the picture of Gandalf tell Bilbo to leave the ring for frodo.
Anyway you should be happy you have given us console players a smooth transition from PC to console port. The game is worth B2P.
Yeah you've said that twice now.
For the life of me I can't think of why anyone would play shit they don't much care for when the sub goes away. Does that all of a sudden make it worth your time?
"Sub worthiness" has to be one of the stupidest cliches your crowd likes to spew. I guess your own time must be pretty worthless in your game playing decision making process.
And for the life of me i can't think of why it would bother you, your having fun isn't that all what counts. Does ZeniMax need an knight in dull armour to champion their game.
Go play your game lol, when it goes B2P you can contact ZeniMax with all your concerns lol.
That's funny i was laughing at you, i had the picture of Gandalf tell Bilbo to leave the ring for frodo.
Anyway you should be happy you have given us console players a smooth transition from PC to console port. The game is worth B2P.
Yeah you've said that twice now.
For the life of me I can't think of why anyone would play shit they don't much care for when the sub goes away. Does that all of a sudden make it worth your time?
"Sub worthiness" has to be one of the stupidest cliches your crowd likes to spew. I guess your own time must be pretty worthless in your game playing decision making process.
And for the life of me i can't think of why it would bother you, your having fun isn't that all what counts. Does ZeniMax need an knight in dull armour to champion their game.
Go play your game lol, when it goes B2P you can contact ZeniMax with all your concerns lol.
LOL. B2P doesn't bother me in the least. I've been predicting a B2P switch with the console launch for quite a while and have said as much here many times. Long before the Australian rumors started flying around.
You're just misunderstanding which parts of what you've been saying I've been responding to... and somehow, that doesn't surprise me.
"Social media gives legions of idiots the right to speak when they once only spoke at a bar after a glass of wine, without harming the community ... but now they have the same right to speak as a Nobel Prize winner. It's the invasion of the idiots”
― Umberto Eco
“Microtransactions? In a single player role-playing game? Are you nuts?” ― CD PROJEKT RED
Comments
Indeed my username is a satire of ESO rabid fanboys.
But you're right anyway.
Nope. It's an issue with that too.
It was certainly an issue during the MMO face off.
Reports from where exactly?
Don't know. ,I have been lurking long enough to hardly see anyone question the account date as long as the topic is in 'favor' and 'all praise' for MMOS with huge fanbase around here.
Because you haven't been here long enough to see people make additional "alt" accounts to stir the pot and troll in general... it happens frequently.
“Microtransactions? In a single player role-playing game? Are you nuts?”
― CD PROJEKT RED
I don't know what you're getting at with that. Mere observations followed by a statement and appreciation of a linked article.
There would be no use in wondering if it's satire if the reasons for the thought aren't presented. That is, the user name, post count and account creation followed by a highly controversial topic. Given the nature of the situation, a username essentially calling him/herself clueless followed then by implying support for something that is controversial is funny at best, inciteful at worst.
I've not said a good or bad thing about the game since it's beta. Where I said it was garbage. The moment they released their first patch I've not talked about it since it was no longer the game I tried out and many improvements were likely made that had little knowledge of as a whole.
I am getting at a simple question..'would you still be so observant about account creation date and post count if his post was in favor of ESO and nothing but all praise for the game? would you still be more bothered about 'who' is posting it rather than 'what' he is posting?
It depends on what version of the game is being sold.
I bought it on launch day. After installing the game from the dvd's I still had to download around 20GB of updates. How many GB of updates will it be when 1.6 releases?
Did Zenimax issue new box versions with each new update to retailers, or was it version 1?
I'm sure a lot of people don't expect to buy a game and then install 20GB+ of updates. A recall probably makes sence in that regard.
I just can't see Zenimax releasing the game as a F2P product on console. 80%+ of Skyrim sales were on console alone so launching as F2P is not an option.
No, because positive trolling is an unheard of phenomenom.
“Microtransactions? In a single player role-playing game? Are you nuts?”
― CD PROJEKT RED
Since when posting news articles is considered trolling?
Silly, silly fanboy.
New accounts created by people who troll or promote a game is not a rare occurrence. If a topic is currently hot -- or beaten to death -- I do in fact always look at their post count. Most of the time it means nothing, even if it is their first. Though when sufficient evidence presents itself -- such as the account name, contents, post count, etc. -- and adds up, the mind becomes inquisitive as to the nature of the post.
In short, yes. I don't care if it's for or against the game. He could have made fun of people putting fingers in their ears and saying it will never change subscription plans with the same username and I'd wonder if it were a joke.
Both extremes are equally tiresome.
I don't know criteria you use to out those people who post 'positivly' about the game as a troll. But i am talking about your normal every day positive topics not exaggerated ones.
And you explanation of how you made your screen name and "silly, silly fanboy" isn't? You must have some spectacularly stupid friends if they fall for that kind of shit.
“Microtransactions? In a single player role-playing game? Are you nuts?”
― CD PROJEKT RED
Everyone's first post is not always suspect, just the suspicious ones.
“Microtransactions? In a single player role-playing game? Are you nuts?”
― CD PROJEKT RED
Not to mention this site has a history of duplicate accounts being created by disgruntled members. Until MikeB or the powers that be put some system in place to deter this, it will keep happening over and over again as it has been through the years.
IGN is the one trolling then. What I did was post their article, nothing more.
And here you are, in denial and getting mad because your bubble is bursting.
Some people have very sad lives.
That's funny i was laughing at you, i had the picture of Gandalf tell Bilbo to leave the ring for frodo.
Anyway you should be happy you have given us console players a smooth transition from PC to console port. The game is worth B2P.
No. What you did was call yourself "delusionaltard" to poke fun at ESO "fanboys."
And sorry to break it to you, but your shit ain't worth anger. There are much better trolls here who are not so obvious with targeted screen names. That's just dumb.
“Microtransactions? In a single player role-playing game? Are you nuts?”
― CD PROJEKT RED
Yeah you've said that twice now.
For the life of me I can't think of why anyone would play shit they don't much care for when the sub goes away. Does that all of a sudden make it worth your time?
"Sub worthiness" has to be one of the stupidest cliches your crowd likes to spew. I guess your own time must be pretty worthless in your game playing decision making process.
“Microtransactions? In a single player role-playing game? Are you nuts?”
― CD PROJEKT RED
I agree, it ain't worth anger. Yet here you are, getting mad because of a game.
How dumb is that?
Your confusing sarcasm and contempt for anger.
Some people do have a hard time identifying emotions. I understand.
“Microtransactions? In a single player role-playing game? Are you nuts?”
― CD PROJEKT RED
I see.
And for the life of me i can't think of why it would bother you, your having fun isn't that all what counts. Does ZeniMax need an knight in dull armour to champion their game.
Go play your game lol, when it goes B2P you can contact ZeniMax with all your concerns lol.
LOL. B2P doesn't bother me in the least. I've been predicting a B2P switch with the console launch for quite a while and have said as much here many times. Long before the Australian rumors started flying around.
Here you go. Just the last time I said it less than a week ago: http://www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/post/6551121#6551121
You're just misunderstanding which parts of what you've been saying I've been responding to... and somehow, that doesn't surprise me.
“Microtransactions? In a single player role-playing game? Are you nuts?”
― CD PROJEKT RED