Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

AMD LIVE STREAM ON 16TH WITH PRICES!!!

ClassicstarClassicstar Member UncommonPosts: 2,697

They have alot of faith in the new HBM with new leaked specs today i think it will blow NVIDIA away.

https://twitter.com/amdradeon

image

Price AMD 290x is obviously from launch price because these days it cost around 350 dollars.
I know it's Wccf but these must be accurate this time.

Hope to build full AMD system RYZEN/VEGA/AM4!!!

MB:Asus V De Luxe z77
CPU:Intell Icore7 3770k
GPU: AMD Fury X(waiting for BIG VEGA 10 or 11 HBM2?(bit unclear now))
MEMORY:Corsair PLAT.DDR3 1866MHZ 16GB
PSU:Corsair AX1200i
OS:Windows 10 64bit

«13

Comments

  • HrimnirHrimnir Member RarePosts: 2,415

    Yep, just blowing Nvidia out of the water, totally...

     

    "The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently."

    - Friedrich Nietzsche

  • strawhat0981strawhat0981 Member RarePosts: 1,224
    I like AMD, does that make me a weirdo? 

    Originally posted by laokoko
    "if you want to be a game designer, you should sell your house and fund your game. Since if you won't even fund your own game, no one will".

  • RidelynnRidelynn Member EpicPosts: 7,383

    How come all of them have like a min/max thing going on, except the Fury X XF?

  • HrimnirHrimnir Member RarePosts: 2,415

    My guess is they're leaked benchmarks so they might not have all of the fury x CF data.

    Who knows.

    "The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently."

    - Friedrich Nietzsche

  • TurtleDGr8TurtleDGr8 Member Posts: 58
    Originally posted by Hrimnir

    Yep, just blowing Nvidia out of the water, totally...

     

     

    If the image is to be believed, AMD is pulling in numbers close to the Nvidia parts, but with less memory.  In some cases a third less memory than the Nvidia parts.  AMD doesn't need to be faster, though it would help.  If they can pull in close numbers for a more economical cost, they can make up a lot of ground on Nvidia.

     

    Personally more interested in AMD's APUs, but I'll probably have to wait for the 16th to get anything more definitive on those parts.

     

  • ClassicstarClassicstar Member UncommonPosts: 2,697


    Originally posted by Hrimnir
    Yep, just blowing Nvidia out of the water, totally...

     


    Nvidia fanboy shows a test thats to take with HUGE GRAIN OF SALT by some sketchie site at moment this bench pop up nobody in world but AMD REALY know what FURY X can do this fake test.

    Gratz on you Nvidia fanboi showing fake benches.

    But in few hours we know if this bench was accurate or not. Even this would be accurate if price is half titan x it's a win for AMD.

    Hope to build full AMD system RYZEN/VEGA/AM4!!!

    MB:Asus V De Luxe z77
    CPU:Intell Icore7 3770k
    GPU: AMD Fury X(waiting for BIG VEGA 10 or 11 HBM2?(bit unclear now))
    MEMORY:Corsair PLAT.DDR3 1866MHZ 16GB
    PSU:Corsair AX1200i
    OS:Windows 10 64bit

  • QuizzicalQuizzical Member LegendaryPosts: 25,499
    I would suggest that any pre-release "leaks" should be taken with a grain of salt or twelve.  The numbers are plausible, but could easily be way off in either direction.
  • ClassicstarClassicstar Member UncommonPosts: 2,697

    Hope to build full AMD system RYZEN/VEGA/AM4!!!

    MB:Asus V De Luxe z77
    CPU:Intell Icore7 3770k
    GPU: AMD Fury X(waiting for BIG VEGA 10 or 11 HBM2?(bit unclear now))
    MEMORY:Corsair PLAT.DDR3 1866MHZ 16GB
    PSU:Corsair AX1200i
    OS:Windows 10 64bit

  • DakeruDakeru Member EpicPosts: 3,803

    Nvidia and AMD will never kill each other's business because they cater to totally different people.

     

    Nvidia is for people who want the best of the best and don't care about prices.

    AMD is for a fair performance / costs ratio.

     

    This is as old as the PC vs Console struggle - there won't be a "winner" because they aren't fighting on the same battlefield.

    Harbinger of Fools
  • MargraveMargrave Member RarePosts: 1,371
    Dakeru has much Wisdom.
  • ClassicstarClassicstar Member UncommonPosts: 2,697

    Well if this not going to sell crazy super cards with friendly price as gamer shame on you.

    Nano i predict will be super hit.

    Fury X 650 dollars wow!!!

    Hope to build full AMD system RYZEN/VEGA/AM4!!!

    MB:Asus V De Luxe z77
    CPU:Intell Icore7 3770k
    GPU: AMD Fury X(waiting for BIG VEGA 10 or 11 HBM2?(bit unclear now))
    MEMORY:Corsair PLAT.DDR3 1866MHZ 16GB
    PSU:Corsair AX1200i
    OS:Windows 10 64bit

  • ClassicstarClassicstar Member UncommonPosts: 2,697


    Originally posted by Dakeru
    Nvidia and AMD will never kill each other's business because they cater to totally different people. Nvidia is for people who want the best of the best and don't care about prices.AMD is for a fair performance / costs ratio. This is as old as the PC vs Console struggle - there won't be a "winner" because they aren't fighting on the same battlefield.

    This E3 SHOW PROOFS you wrong these new fiji products are top notch for still fair price

    Hope to build full AMD system RYZEN/VEGA/AM4!!!

    MB:Asus V De Luxe z77
    CPU:Intell Icore7 3770k
    GPU: AMD Fury X(waiting for BIG VEGA 10 or 11 HBM2?(bit unclear now))
    MEMORY:Corsair PLAT.DDR3 1866MHZ 16GB
    PSU:Corsair AX1200i
    OS:Windows 10 64bit

  • angerbeaverangerbeaver Member UncommonPosts: 1,273
    yay! My current card is at 98%. No point shopping since it does fine. Thanks!
  • KyleranKyleran Member LegendaryPosts: 44,059
    People get excited about new hardware releasing?

    "True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde 

    "I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant

    Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm

    Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV

    Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™

    "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon






  • QuizzicalQuizzical Member LegendaryPosts: 25,499

    From the specs, I'd expect Fury X performance to be in the ballpark of a Titan X.  Really, though, you're paying for the liquid cooler; if the air-cooled Fury is up there, too, then that's going to leave the GTX 980, GTX 980 Ti, and Titan X seriously overpriced.

    As for the Nano, that looks like it could be a killer part for ultra small form factors, but probably not useful anywhere else.  If Kaveri and Carrizo are any guide, Global Foundries' 28 nm SHP process node does better with GCN at about 500-600 MHz rather than in the 1 GHz range.  Would you be interested in $500 for a card with half the performance of a Titan X, but a TDP of 75 W?  In a desktop, no, but in a laptop or all-in-one, that becomes a more intriguing part.

    Still, this is just one chip.  AMD can be competitive in performance per dollar for the rest of their lineup with suitable prices, but not in performance per watt outside of the low end that Maxwell doesn't touch.  I've long held that performance per watt isn't that important in a desktop, especially outside of the high end.  But it sure is in a laptop, and this leaves Fiji as the only potentially interesting AMD chip for discrete laptop video cards--and it's no guarantee that it will even have a laptop version.

  • JohnP0100JohnP0100 Member UncommonPosts: 401
    As leaked previously all rebrands except the fury.

    It shows what PvP games are really all about, and no, it's not about more realism and immersion. It's about cowards hiding behind a screen to they can bully other defenseless players without any risk of direct retaliation like there would be if they acted like asshats in "real life". -Jean-Luc_Picard

    Life itself is a game. So why shouldn't your game be ruined? - justmemyselfandi

  • ClassicstarClassicstar Member UncommonPosts: 2,697

    Not sure if this is already tested with latest driver released today?
    image

    Normally i would say grain of salt from these guys but i think this time it's very accurate this bench is close to truth.

    Hope to build full AMD system RYZEN/VEGA/AM4!!!

    MB:Asus V De Luxe z77
    CPU:Intell Icore7 3770k
    GPU: AMD Fury X(waiting for BIG VEGA 10 or 11 HBM2?(bit unclear now))
    MEMORY:Corsair PLAT.DDR3 1866MHZ 16GB
    PSU:Corsair AX1200i
    OS:Windows 10 64bit

  • 13lake13lake Member UncommonPosts: 719
    Originally posted by JohnP0100
    As leaked previously all rebrands except the fury.

    Except there's 4 fury cards and not just one, and not to mention the most awesome thing ever, project quantum : 

    http://wccftech.com/amd-intros-project-quantum-powered-dual-fiji-chip/

     

    2x Fury X 17.2 teraflops of computing power, 8GB usable in DX12, 200(230)mm watercooling radiator, in an insanely small case. And it can run anything on 4k@60fps 

     

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CHpIGKYWsAA2_GZ.jpg

     

    The pcb is a thing of beauty.

  • KiyorisKiyoris Member RarePosts: 2,130
    I really don't care, I have no intention of playing 4k anytime soon.
  • 13lake13lake Member UncommonPosts: 719
    Originally posted by Kiyoris
    I really don't care, I have no intention of playing 4k anytime soon.

    You should care that Fury X Nano is 50% more power efficient than maxwell, and that all other fiji cards are roughly the same performance/watt, which is something everybody said wouldn't happen.

    i think there a lot of happy people that it can do 4k@60fps 100% of the time and 2k@120/144 fps also.

     

    You should also care that if it becomes a steam machine, project quantum is gonna destroy with steam os, it's gonna be the best console on the market.

     

    Just imagine Fury X has almost 2x more cores than 290x, and it's rated @ 275w, 15w less than the 290x, just let that sink it, if amd can do this on 28nm, imagine what they will do on 14nm/16nm with HBM 2, it will be almost impossible for their counterpart to Nvidia's Pascal to be weaker than Pascal.

  • KiyorisKiyoris Member RarePosts: 2,130
    Originally posted by 13lake
    Originally posted by Kiyoris
    I really don't care, I have no intention of playing 4k anytime soon.

    You should care that Fury X Nano is 50% more power efficient than maxwell, and that all other fiji cards are roughly the same performance/watt, which is something everybody said wouldn't happen.

    i think there a lot of happy people that it can do 4k@60fps 100% of the time and 2k@120/144 fps also.

     

    You should also care that if it becomes a steam machine, project quantum is gonna destroy with steam os, it's gonna be the best console on the market.

    Why should I care. I don't play on 4k so all this processing power is wasted on me.

    As far as Steam OS goes, that's never going to become mainstream.

  • 13lake13lake Member UncommonPosts: 719
    Originally posted by Kiyoris
    Originally posted by 13lake
    Originally posted by Kiyoris
    I really don't care, I have no intention of playing 4k anytime soon.

    You should care that Fury X Nano is 50% more power efficient than maxwell, and that all other fiji cards are roughly the same performance/watt, which is something everybody said wouldn't happen.

    i think there a lot of happy people that it can do 4k@60fps 100% of the time and 2k@120/144 fps also.

     

    You should also care that if it becomes a steam machine, project quantum is gonna destroy with steam os, it's gonna be the best console on the market.

    Why should I care. I don't play on 4k so all this processing power is wasted on me.

    As far as Steam OS goes, that's never going to become mainstream.

    Again, you should care about the power efficiency.

    As for steam os, at least you're not trolling anymore, and simply expressing your opinion.

  • EnikEnik Member UncommonPosts: 99
    I never had any issues with the performance of the one AMD card I've owned (an HD 5870 when it was the only card that could do DirectX 11). My issue was with the fact that it took them several weeks after a game was released to provide stable drivers. These GPUs could beat my GTX 980 at half the price and I still would never buy one.
  • 13lake13lake Member UncommonPosts: 719
    Originally posted by Enik
    I never had any issues with the performance of the one AMD card I've owned (an HD 5870 when it was the only card that could do DirectX 11). My issue was with the fact that it took them several weeks after a game was released to provide stable drivers. These GPUs could beat my GTX 980 at half the price and I still would never buy one.

    Drivers for the new cards are already out today, days before Fiji even arrives, so another win for AMD :)

     

    Originally posted by Kyleran
    People get excited about new hardware releasing?

    The only thing that gets me more excited than hardware releases is virtual reality :) and kickstarter is a close 3rd. Shenmue III got $2 million on kickstarter in 90 minutes because sony advertised them live at the conference :)

  • QuizzicalQuizzical Member LegendaryPosts: 25,499
    Fiji will do fine at lower resolutions, too.  The reason AMD pushes stuff like 4K, Eyefinity, and VR while Nvidia recommends reviewing games at 1080p only is that both companies know that higher resolutions will make AMD's cards look relatively better as compared to Nvidia's, while lower resolutions make Nvidia look better.  We're talking a few percentage points one way or the other, but if you work in marketing, getting those last few percentage points into "unbiased" reviews is your job.  GCN needs more threads to properly utilize the hardware than Maxwell, and higher resolutions make that easier to do.
Sign In or Register to comment.