It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
They have alot of faith in the new HBM with new leaked specs today i think it will blow NVIDIA away.
Price AMD 290x is obviously from launch price because these days it cost around 350 dollars.
I know it's Wccf but these must be accurate this time.
Hope to build full AMD system RYZEN/VEGA/AM4!!!
MB:Asus V De Luxe z77
CPU:Intell Icore7 3770k
GPU: AMD Fury X(waiting for BIG VEGA 10 or 11 HBM2?(bit unclear now))
MEMORY:Corsair PLAT.DDR3 1866MHZ 16GB
PSU:Corsair AX1200i
OS:Windows 10 64bit
Comments
Yep, just blowing Nvidia out of the water, totally...
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently."
- Friedrich Nietzsche
Originally posted by laokoko
"if you want to be a game designer, you should sell your house and fund your game. Since if you won't even fund your own game, no one will".
How come all of them have like a min/max thing going on, except the Fury X XF?
My guess is they're leaked benchmarks so they might not have all of the fury x CF data.
Who knows.
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently."
- Friedrich Nietzsche
If the image is to be believed, AMD is pulling in numbers close to the Nvidia parts, but with less memory. In some cases a third less memory than the Nvidia parts. AMD doesn't need to be faster, though it would help. If they can pull in close numbers for a more economical cost, they can make up a lot of ground on Nvidia.
Personally more interested in AMD's APUs, but I'll probably have to wait for the 16th to get anything more definitive on those parts.
Nvidia fanboy shows a test thats to take with HUGE GRAIN OF SALT by some sketchie site at moment this bench pop up nobody in world but AMD REALY know what FURY X can do this fake test.
Gratz on you Nvidia fanboi showing fake benches.
But in few hours we know if this bench was accurate or not. Even this would be accurate if price is half titan x it's a win for AMD.
Hope to build full AMD system RYZEN/VEGA/AM4!!!
MB:Asus V De Luxe z77
CPU:Intell Icore7 3770k
GPU: AMD Fury X(waiting for BIG VEGA 10 or 11 HBM2?(bit unclear now))
MEMORY:Corsair PLAT.DDR3 1866MHZ 16GB
PSU:Corsair AX1200i
OS:Windows 10 64bit
http://www.twitch.tv/amd
live now AMD
Hope to build full AMD system RYZEN/VEGA/AM4!!!
MB:Asus V De Luxe z77
CPU:Intell Icore7 3770k
GPU: AMD Fury X(waiting for BIG VEGA 10 or 11 HBM2?(bit unclear now))
MEMORY:Corsair PLAT.DDR3 1866MHZ 16GB
PSU:Corsair AX1200i
OS:Windows 10 64bit
Nvidia and AMD will never kill each other's business because they cater to totally different people.
Nvidia is for people who want the best of the best and don't care about prices.
AMD is for a fair performance / costs ratio.
This is as old as the PC vs Console struggle - there won't be a "winner" because they aren't fighting on the same battlefield.
Well if this not going to sell crazy super cards with friendly price as gamer shame on you.
Nano i predict will be super hit.
Fury X 650 dollars wow!!!
Hope to build full AMD system RYZEN/VEGA/AM4!!!
MB:Asus V De Luxe z77
CPU:Intell Icore7 3770k
GPU: AMD Fury X(waiting for BIG VEGA 10 or 11 HBM2?(bit unclear now))
MEMORY:Corsair PLAT.DDR3 1866MHZ 16GB
PSU:Corsair AX1200i
OS:Windows 10 64bit
This E3 SHOW PROOFS you wrong these new fiji products are top notch for still fair price
Hope to build full AMD system RYZEN/VEGA/AM4!!!
MB:Asus V De Luxe z77
CPU:Intell Icore7 3770k
GPU: AMD Fury X(waiting for BIG VEGA 10 or 11 HBM2?(bit unclear now))
MEMORY:Corsair PLAT.DDR3 1866MHZ 16GB
PSU:Corsair AX1200i
OS:Windows 10 64bit
"True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde
"I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant
Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm
Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV
Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™
"This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon
From the specs, I'd expect Fury X performance to be in the ballpark of a Titan X. Really, though, you're paying for the liquid cooler; if the air-cooled Fury is up there, too, then that's going to leave the GTX 980, GTX 980 Ti, and Titan X seriously overpriced.
As for the Nano, that looks like it could be a killer part for ultra small form factors, but probably not useful anywhere else. If Kaveri and Carrizo are any guide, Global Foundries' 28 nm SHP process node does better with GCN at about 500-600 MHz rather than in the 1 GHz range. Would you be interested in $500 for a card with half the performance of a Titan X, but a TDP of 75 W? In a desktop, no, but in a laptop or all-in-one, that becomes a more intriguing part.
Still, this is just one chip. AMD can be competitive in performance per dollar for the rest of their lineup with suitable prices, but not in performance per watt outside of the low end that Maxwell doesn't touch. I've long held that performance per watt isn't that important in a desktop, especially outside of the high end. But it sure is in a laptop, and this leaves Fiji as the only potentially interesting AMD chip for discrete laptop video cards--and it's no guarantee that it will even have a laptop version.
It shows what PvP games are really all about, and no, it's not about more realism and immersion. It's about cowards hiding behind a screen to they can bully other defenseless players without any risk of direct retaliation like there would be if they acted like asshats in "real life". -Jean-Luc_Picard
Life itself is a game. So why shouldn't your game be ruined? - justmemyselfandi
Not sure if this is already tested with latest driver released today?
Normally i would say grain of salt from these guys but i think this time it's very accurate this bench is close to truth.
Hope to build full AMD system RYZEN/VEGA/AM4!!!
MB:Asus V De Luxe z77
CPU:Intell Icore7 3770k
GPU: AMD Fury X(waiting for BIG VEGA 10 or 11 HBM2?(bit unclear now))
MEMORY:Corsair PLAT.DDR3 1866MHZ 16GB
PSU:Corsair AX1200i
OS:Windows 10 64bit
Except there's 4 fury cards and not just one, and not to mention the most awesome thing ever, project quantum :
http://wccftech.com/amd-intros-project-quantum-powered-dual-fiji-chip/
2x Fury X 17.2 teraflops of computing power, 8GB usable in DX12, 200(230)mm watercooling radiator, in an insanely small case. And it can run anything on 4k@60fps
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CHpIGKYWsAA2_GZ.jpg
The pcb is a thing of beauty.
You should care that Fury X Nano is 50% more power efficient than maxwell, and that all other fiji cards are roughly the same performance/watt, which is something everybody said wouldn't happen.
i think there a lot of happy people that it can do 4k@60fps 100% of the time and 2k@120/144 fps also.
You should also care that if it becomes a steam machine, project quantum is gonna destroy with steam os, it's gonna be the best console on the market.
Just imagine Fury X has almost 2x more cores than 290x, and it's rated @ 275w, 15w less than the 290x, just let that sink it, if amd can do this on 28nm, imagine what they will do on 14nm/16nm with HBM 2, it will be almost impossible for their counterpart to Nvidia's Pascal to be weaker than Pascal.
Why should I care. I don't play on 4k so all this processing power is wasted on me.
As far as Steam OS goes, that's never going to become mainstream.
Again, you should care about the power efficiency.
As for steam os, at least you're not trolling anymore, and simply expressing your opinion.
Drivers for the new cards are already out today, days before Fiji even arrives, so another win for AMD
The only thing that gets me more excited than hardware releases is virtual reality and kickstarter is a close 3rd. Shenmue III got $2 million on kickstarter in 90 minutes because sony advertised them live at the conference