Can't stand Geralts character so sadly I disagree with W3 being GOTY, certainly not for me.
As mediocre and buggy Fallout 4 is, I am enjoying it immensely more than W3.
I agree and disagree. I am also enjoying Fallout 4 more than TW3 YES.. but considering what else came out in 2015 before Fallout 4.. the witcher 3 was the only choice for GOTY there. I mean Fallout isn't even a month old yet.. TW3 was one of the most polished games this year, even with the launch bugs they quickly fixed.. They also had a ton of free DLC. TW1 wasn't good IMO TW2 was a huge leap from that, and TW3 was another leap. Well deserved by CDPR. Bethesda will have to wait until Elder Scrolls 6 to compete for GOTY. Wait we will...
"Beliefs don't change facts. Facts, if you're reasonable, should change your beliefs."
"The Society that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting by fools."
Currently: Games Audio Engineer, you didn't hear what I heard, you heard what I wanted you to hear.
Glitchy, unoptimized (for consoles) game, with clunky inventory and unresponsive combat and movement. I'm not even going to talk about dragged out main story, horse AI and Ubisoft style map with POIs everywhere. At least side quests were cool, I'll give it that. Yep, GOTY if I've ever seen one. (Yes, I've played and finished the game after 70 hours TYVM).
I have not played many of these games, but if W3 is the best I guess I wouldn't have liked the others :-/
The story, details, graphics are very good but I hate the default controls (I know, I can personalize them, but it is a great barrier for the first hours you spend learning the game) and the graphics performance is erratic (sometimes good, sometimes bad) in my desktop PC. Maybe on consoles does it better.
Bloodborne??You can't be serious,i would rate BB a 2/10 nothing good to say about the quality or VERY linear design.
Witcher3 does have some problems but it is also doing a heck of a lot more than any other game.I said it a hundred times and will repeat it,you don't get any credit for polishing a pile of crap game ,but attempting an aggressive effort like W3 is really tough to pull off without some hitches.
FO i see gets some positives but again to me,that is a game doing very little and to me at least very boring.
I am by no means a huge W3 fan but if i had to rate games based on everything i know about game design,i definitely would easily pick W3 far above the pack.
Never forget 3 mile Island and never trust a government official or company spokesman.
Comments
"The Society that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting by fools."
Currently: Games Audio Engineer, you didn't hear what I heard, you heard what I wanted you to hear.
Yep, GOTY if I've ever seen one. (Yes, I've played and finished the game after 70 hours TYVM).
GOTY goes to Bloodborne, if you ask me.
The story, details, graphics are very good but I hate the default controls (I know, I can personalize them, but it is a great barrier for the first hours you spend learning the game) and the graphics performance is erratic (sometimes good, sometimes bad) in my desktop PC. Maybe on consoles does it better.
^.^'
Witcher3 does have some problems but it is also doing a heck of a lot more than any other game.I said it a hundred times and will repeat it,you don't get any credit for polishing a pile of crap game ,but attempting an aggressive effort like W3 is really tough to pull off without some hitches.
FO i see gets some positives but again to me,that is a game doing very little and to me at least very boring.
I am by no means a huge W3 fan but if i had to rate games based on everything i know about game design,i definitely would easily pick W3 far above the pack.
Never forget 3 mile Island and never trust a government official or company spokesman.