Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
Pending Funds Acquisition, New Ownership Coming Soon
System
Member UncommonPosts: 12,599
Pending Funds Acquisition, New Ownership Coming Soon
Goblinworks acting CEO Lisa Stevens has sent out an update to inform backers and fans of Pathfinder Online that a letter of intent has been received that, if funding is acquired, will see transfer of ownership handed to a company headed by a longtime Pathfinder Online player. Once funding is attained, the company making the offer will take over PO beginning on March 1, 2016.
Comments
Signed or not, a "letter of intent" is worthless without the funds to carry through that intent.
A mysterious company has announced that they will rescue the game IF they can raise enough money. Nothing is revealed about the prospective new owners. Do they have any experience with MMO development ?
거북이는 목을 내밀 때 안 움직입니다
If this turns out to be true, I feel sorry for all parties involved. And, I hope it falls through in their best interest.
'Sandbox MMO' is a PTSD trigger word for anyone who has the experience to know that anonymous players invariably use a 'sandbox' in the same manner a housecat does.
When your head is stuck in the sand, your ass becomes the only recognizable part of you.
No game is more fun than the one you can't play, and no game is more boring than one which you've become familiar.
How to become a millionaire:
Start with a billion dollars and make an MMO.
Something doesn't sound right there.. why/how would they get more money 'after' the dam thing failed? Surely if there was some big investor they would have done so before the game and name got trumped in the mud.
Sounds like a fishing exercise like those 2 Darkfall projects to try show 'the right people' there is enough interest in the project.
"This funding will give Pathfinder Online more money to invest in the game than has been spent in over 4 years of development."
Something doesn't sound right there.. why/how would they get more money 'after' the dam thing failed? Surely if there was some big investor they would have done so before the game and name got trumped in the mud.
Sounds like a fishing exercise like those 2 Darkfall projects to try show 'the right people' there is enough interest in the project.
This is worse, Aventurine (yeah, I might not have spelled that right) did have a government defense contract that earned them money as well as some EU sponsorship. Goblinworks have no other revenue besides the paid alpha testers of PFO. I can understand that a fan would be willing to invest some time and money into something he or she like but it wont be enough.
If a larger company would buy them out it would be to get the IP, all progress would be scrapped because larger companies are not particularly interested in really small niche products but the IP is very popular among pen and paper players.
To me it sounds more like they are trying to let the game slowly fade away without it being really their fault....
Not very likely but it would be fun.
But if it is a private investor without at least some knowledge of creative project management or game design... this will make some very sad headlines.
This have been a good conversation
what it sounds like to me is goblin works will basically cease to exist as of march
1st and paizo will sell GW's exclusive licensing and art assets to this new company.
-Which means any previous crowdfunding promises don't technically have to be honored (remember Paizo and GW were originally set up as 2 seperate entities even though they are owned and run by the same group of people)
-any kind of crowdforging(not that this was ever really a thing) is basically out the window.
-if the new companiy is smart when assuming control...paizo will have very little say in what is done with the licensing(other then the option to not renew)
but from a business standpoint there isn't really a down side....because in all honesty PFO is probably a waste of pazio's tangible resources in the best case scenario....and at worst it is a black hole of wasted money. If the new company can make money great!..... if not...well pazio no longer has the to cover the financial burden and has the option of selling the license to someone else when it expires.
Funding well yeah,games need it,you can't make a great game without them,so what is likely happening is a longtime Pathfinder fan just banking on taking over the current assets.
I personally do not think it possible to turn the game around but that does not mean it is not possible either,maybe this guy has some smarts and come up with some nice ideas to entice players.
Never forget 3 mile Island and never trust a government official or company spokesman.
This is a FFA PvP Full Loot game based around territory control.
Nobody is going to even look at this unless they do a full wipe, which they already claimed they are not planning.
* Note I said ONE of their issues
All time classic MY NEW FAVORITE POST! (Keep laying those bricks)
"I should point out that no other company has shipped out a beta on a disc before this." - Official Mortal Online Lead Community Moderator
Proudly wearing the Harbinger badge since Dec 23, 2017.
Coined the phrase "Role-Playing a Development Team" January 2018
"Oddly Slap is the main reason I stay in these forums." - Mystichaze April 9th 2018
It'll be interesting to see who the White Knight is - an ex-developer at their own startup? An uber-Fanperson with great business connections? An idle millionaire/billionaire? Who WANTS to save this game? Chasing the IP makes far more sense.
Avatars are people too
I guess that's one way of prettying up the fact that you only have 3 active developers.
Several past EVE players have moved on to the development side of the team. A couple of them have been great, and a couple of them seem hellbent on turning EVE into the game that they wanted to play when they were players; whether it's good for the overall game or not.
Lisa could announce next week that the funding could not be raised, and that would be that. The mystery buyer would never be revealed, and things would carry on as normal.
Perhaps it's an attempt to generate interest amongst prospective buyers ?
Something along the lines of: "Get it now, before it's too late ! We already have one offer on the table, etc. etc."
It could still be all made up though. I know they are looking at passing a law in Ontario that Real Estate Agents are not allowed to say that there is an offer unless they can provide proof in writing etc. Too many. . yeah there are 3 offers so you had better act quickly crap.
Wa min God! Se æx on min heafod is!
This is interesting. We saw the saw a similar thing take place earlier this year with "Greed Monger".
The producer said they ran out of their crowd funded money, then began the process of transferring the right to the game to someone else, thus releasing the producer from any liability. Many believed that both parties (producer and buyer) were in on it together, and what they were doing was just a scheme to avoid any possible liability.
Another thing you mentioned about the forming of several companies, possible to absolve one from liability while the other maintains some rights?
This may or may not have anything to do with PFO, but I see a pattern emerging. It's sad to say, but crowd funding everyday looks more and more like a scam.
I wouldn't pay a roofer before he roofed my house. I wouldn't pay my car mechanic before he fixed my car. I sure as hell wouldn't pay a game developer before he made the game.
I ignored my own rule for this with Mechwarrior Online and I've regretted that decision ever since. They made promise after promise, and then proceeded to break nearly every single promise they made us after we got ourselves $120 USD deep into the game.
I don't think people started out with the intention of scamming (with some exceptions of course).
I funded Wasteland 2 at a basic level and got the game. Mostly I will buy the lowest package that gets me the game. I thought I was saving money. I won't do it again though. It is like buying extended warranties for products. Just say no and buy the product when you need / want it (and its finished) and save yourself money.
Wa min God! Se æx on min heafod is!
It's too bad, I had really high hopes when they announced, but those are quite gone now.
So unless the unnamed buyer is Bill Gates or somebody like that, I don't see this project being completed, much less being completed with a good final product.
Lost my mind, now trying to lose yours...