› ›

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links

Will the StarMarine(exTM) Gamemode have this quality?

Turrican187Turrican187 Member UncommonPosts: 787
edited March 2016 in Star Citizen
Just to show what's possible in the unity engine, very good shaders and looks quite impressive

Escape from Tarkov(indie), programmed in Unity5



When you have cake, it is not the cake that creates the most magnificent of experiences, but it is the emotions attached to it.
The cake is a lie.

Comments

  • Adjuvant1Adjuvant1 Member RarePosts: 2,100
    It's not possible because the netcode must allow for all the 50-90 "parts" of each average spaceship. It's cool, the premise of having both first person perspective and flight mode seamless. That's like, the driving factor behind the novelty of SC and no one can, or I think even intends to, "take that from them". Indeed, NMS has similar format, but with less detail (fidelity!).

    Saying , however , CIG can take that architecture and do much more with it, that is the real challenge, and while they've admittedly pushed boundaries, there are very real limitations, limitations they're not prepared to admit while people are still throwing money into the pot for spaceship jpegs, LTI or otherwise.

    CIG really needs to come clean about what's in the realm of possibility with these dreamer followers. If it's today or a year from now, there are going to be alot of broken hearts over the project. Wouldn't it be better to come today? I think so.
  • Adjuvant1Adjuvant1 Member RarePosts: 2,100
    Xodic said:

    If the FPS side of SC is anything close to this I would be happy. Unfortunately, at this rate it would take another $100 million just to get the tactical door manipulation implemented.
    No. I don't believe for one moment throwing more money fixes that. It's another entire generation, if not two, of netcode technology. If "that" is what one means, the number isn't "hundreds of millions", but "billions", and it ain't coming from CIG.
  • TalonsinTalonsin Member EpicPosts: 3,619
    I guess we wont know since Star Marine has been postponed indefinitely after Chris promoted it for an entire year.
    "Sean (Murray) saying MP will be in the game is not remotely close to evidence that at the point of purchase people thought there was MP in the game."  - SEANMCAD

  • Adjuvant1Adjuvant1 Member RarePosts: 2,100
    edited March 2016
    Xodic said:
    Adjuvant1 said:
    Xodic said:

    If the FPS side of SC is anything close to this I would be happy. Unfortunately, at this rate it would take another $100 million just to get the tactical door manipulation implemented.
    No. I don't believe for one moment throwing more money fixes that. It's another entire generation, if not two, of netcode technology. If "that" is what one means, the number isn't "hundreds of millions", but "billions", and it ain't coming from CIG.
    I'm not tracking. Are you saying that the technology isn't good enough to handle door control on the back-end?
    If the character "zones" to a particular instance which is "solely fps", then sure, much is possible. I don't believe, for example, you could use a ship's gun to "blow open" said door in that instance, because it's entirely a contained fps environment to which the character has transitioned. This is wholly different than, say, the environment on Port Olisar, which includes aspects both of fps and vehicle interface.

    edit: That latter environment, I really believe, will be stripped of any extraneous effect or feature.
Sign In or Register to comment.