Neat screen shot. Too bad you forgot to take the temps while P95 was still running, because the temps drop like a rock as soon as the test stops. And you have about a minute showing where the workers were stopped before the screen shot was snagged. A good air cooler will get back down nearly to ambient in that amount of time.
Then again, you knew that already and were just testing us to see if we were embarrassed. Like the tab with search results of "How to take screen shot".
And you continue your stupidity, thats tha MAX reading from HWMonitor....also something you have no clue about lol.
So you decided to continue with your embarassment lol
And yeah, thats W10, anything wrong in checking if theres something new with screenshoting in W10? rofl that was a year ago lol
I made that screenshot for the dimwits who spread missinformation....similar to you. "AMD CPUs run hot and w/e"....they kinda learned their lesson, but you didnt lol
Neat screen shot. Too bad you forgot to take the temps while P95 was still running, because the temps drop like a rock as soon as the test stops. And you have about a minute showing where the workers were stopped before the screen shot was snagged. A good air cooler will get back down nearly to ambient in that amount of time.
Then again, you knew that already and were just testing us to see if we were embarrassed. Like the tab with search results of "How to take screen shot".
There's something more seriously wrong with Malabooga's image, look at the min. temperatures.
It feels stupid: There are plenty of air-cooled FX8300 clocked that high, but for some reason Malabooga needed to fudge the truth by posting results achieved through some other method.
And another uneducated person who doesnt know AMD CPUs dont report correct temps in idle and have to be put in load. AND that 8350 has stock voltage of 1,35v while you can undervolt it (like most other FX83xx chips) to 1,25 -1,27v @ 4 GHz for much lower power consumption and heat. But hey, let uneducated rule, RIGHT lol
Anyway, another fresh batch with few changes since a year ago, GPU GTX970->RX480 and ive switched stock CM fan on HyperEVO to quieter (but a bit less powerful) LC AirRazor 120mm (7-8$) so my PC is as quiet as it gets with using fans, to get more quiet PC youd have to go 100% passive build lol
AirRazor is awsome fan BTW and quite affordable if you need 120mm PWM case/cooler fans
CPU at work after 13 minutes of prime. As you can see 39c after 13 minutes of Prime, on GPU tab you can see that ambient (case) temperateure went from 27c -> 28c )as well as TMPIN0 which is mobo reported case temperature). TMPIN1 is socket temperature BTW.
Should I get one? I mean I don't know that I really have a need. Same site says 1080 is about 50% better? There's a liquid cooled version for $320. I recall Quizzical buying a liquid cooled one. I think his reasoning was that these cards ran hot?
Should I get one? I mean I don't know that I really have a need. Same site says 1080 is about 50% better? There's a liquid cooled version for $320. I recall Quizzical buying a liquid cooled one. I think his reasoning was that these cards ran hot?
First, do you require one? Graphic card prices are always coming down, so that if you don't need one now then purchasing later is always the better option.
If you need a graphic card now, then that air cooled R9 fury would be good enough pick. It uses a hell lot of power, so you'll need to have good power supply, and you'll have to pay a bit extra in electricity costs over years. But even with all that, with rebates its cheap enough that it's good purchase.
I'd advice against liquid cooled version at $320. If you've got more than $300 to spend on GPU, then try to go for GTX 1070 which is faster, newer tech, and uses a lot less power.
Should I get one? I mean I don't know that I really have a need. Same site says 1080 is about 50% better? There's a liquid cooled version for $320. I recall Quizzical buying a liquid cooled one. I think his reasoning was that these cards ran hot?
First, do you require one? Graphic card prices are always coming down, so that if you don't need one now then purchasing later is always the better option.
If you need a graphic card now, then that air cooled R9 fury would be good enough pick. It uses a hell lot of power, so you'll need to have good power supply, and you'll have to pay a bit extra in electricity costs over years. But even with all that, with rebates its cheap enough that it's good purchase.
I'd advice against liquid cooled version at $320. If you've got more than $300 to spend on GPU, then try to go for GTX 1070 which is faster, newer tech, and uses a lot less power.
I have a Seasonic 660 platinum psu. I did see that gpu uses a lot of power. ALOT of power. I don't really have a need but the GTX 1070 is definitely way to much. The air cooled fury is what really sparked my interest. I have a full size case. I play at 1080p. But I'd assume that I would see really good fps gains even at that resolution on higher settings. Is there anything that the card lacks? New features?
That PSU is more than enough for any single GPU setup. ANd if you want to further optimize (lower) power consumption (and heat in the process) you can do nice undervolting on Fury cards
Should I get one? I mean I don't know that I really have a need. Same site says 1080 is about 50% better? There's a liquid cooled version for $320. I recall Quizzical buying a liquid cooled one. I think his reasoning was that these cards ran hot?
First, do you require one? Graphic card prices are always coming down, so that if you don't need one now then purchasing later is always the better option.
If you need a graphic card now, then that air cooled R9 fury would be good enough pick. It uses a hell lot of power, so you'll need to have good power supply, and you'll have to pay a bit extra in electricity costs over years. But even with all that, with rebates its cheap enough that it's good purchase.
I'd advice against liquid cooled version at $320. If you've got more than $300 to spend on GPU, then try to go for GTX 1070 which is faster, newer tech, and uses a lot less power.
Ok after more consideration. I guess I am not going to. From what I gather a Fury is the same as a 1060. Both in the same price range. Hard to justify older generation when newer is available at the same price performance. I'll wait and just get more mileage out of my GTX 770.
Is there anything that the card lacks? New features?
No, it doesn't lack anything significant. New generation cards will always get a bit better driver support and optimization for new games for a bit longer time, but support for old cards is good enough that the difference only matters when you're comparing two cards that are otherwise very close to each other.
EDIT: Unless you're running CrossFire or SLI. With more than a single graphic card, the driver support is important enough that an inferior card with better driver support would be able to beat better card with worse CrossFire/SLI support. But that's only when you're running two graphic cards at once. As long as you've got only a single graphic card, the benefit of better driver support is small /EDIT
Ok after more consideration. I guess I am not going to. From what I gather a Fury is the same as a 1060. Both in the same price range. Hard to justify older generation when newer is available at the same price performance. I'll wait and just get more mileage out of my GTX 770.
Fury is better than GTX 1060 (or RX 480).
But if you can get more mileage out of your GTX 770, then by the time you upgrade you're sure to get something better than Fury at Fury's current price.
Should I get one? I mean I don't know that I really have a need. Same site says 1080 is about 50% better? There's a liquid cooled version for $320. I recall Quizzical buying a liquid cooled one. I think his reasoning was that these cards ran hot?
First, do you require one? Graphic card prices are always coming down, so that if you don't need one now then purchasing later is always the better option.
If you need a graphic card now, then that air cooled R9 fury would be good enough pick. It uses a hell lot of power, so you'll need to have good power supply, and you'll have to pay a bit extra in electricity costs over years. But even with all that, with rebates its cheap enough that it's good purchase.
I'd advice against liquid cooled version at $320. If you've got more than $300 to spend on GPU, then try to go for GTX 1070 which is faster, newer tech, and uses a lot less power.
Ok after more consideration. I guess I am not going to. From what I gather a Fury is the same as a 1060. Both in the same price range. Hard to justify older generation when newer is available at the same price performance. I'll wait and just get more mileage out of my GTX 770.
Fury is mach faster than 1060, is more than half way 1060-1070. Also, if you decide to buy new monitor youre covered with Freesync. As thngs stand now there wont be anything better to buy for the price in quite the while as Fury is last card from last gen thats still actively on the market.
Should I get one? I mean I don't know that I really have a need. Same site says 1080 is about 50% better? There's a liquid cooled version for $320. I recall Quizzical buying a liquid cooled one. I think his reasoning was that these cards ran hot?
First, do you require one? Graphic card prices are always coming down, so that if you don't need one now then purchasing later is always the better option.
If you need a graphic card now, then that air cooled R9 fury would be good enough pick. It uses a hell lot of power, so you'll need to have good power supply, and you'll have to pay a bit extra in electricity costs over years. But even with all that, with rebates its cheap enough that it's good purchase.
I'd advice against liquid cooled version at $320. If you've got more than $300 to spend on GPU, then try to go for GTX 1070 which is faster, newer tech, and uses a lot less power.
Ok after more consideration. I guess I am not going to. From what I gather a Fury is the same as a 1060. Both in the same price range. Hard to justify older generation when newer is available at the same price performance. I'll wait and just get more mileage out of my GTX 770.
Fury is mauch faster than 1060, is more than half way 1060-1070. Also, if you decide to buy new monitor youre covered with Freesync. As thngs stand now there wont be anything better to buy for the price in quite the while as Fury is last card from last gen thats still actively on the market.
I I don't know that I would say much faster= Looking at stuff online. I have no clue about real world. But definitely seems to be anywhere from slightly faster to a large margin better depending on game. Anway, I took it to pm's. I really didn't expect this convo to go on this long or I would have started my own thread. Definitely didn't intend to hijack your thread. You've got a clear bias. I say that with the utmost respect. I don't have one either way. My only concern is price per value when it comes to hardware. What I saw this morning that turned me off is that it was only slightly better than the 1060 6gb version. Which is $270 but current generation. I doubt I'll have money for a 490 if it's going to be priced like a 1080 or even a 1070. I don't have money for a GTX 1070 at $400. But then again when the 490 releases it could really shake up pricing. That said I sincerely apologize for doing this in your thread. I hope you had a Merry Christmas.
Undecided what I will do. Leaning back towards pulling the trigger. I really wasn't on the market for a GPU until I noticed Cleffy's post.
Comments
benn quite a few sales lately lol. Its implies clearing the channels.
Then again, you knew that already and were just testing us to see if we were embarrassed. Like the tab with search results of "How to take screen shot".
So you decided to continue with your embarassment lol
And yeah, thats W10, anything wrong in checking if theres something new with screenshoting in W10? rofl that was a year ago lol
I made that screenshot for the dimwits who spread missinformation....similar to you. "AMD CPUs run hot and w/e"....they kinda learned their lesson, but you didnt lol
It feels stupid: There are plenty of air-cooled FX8300 clocked that high, but for some reason Malabooga needed to fudge the truth by posting results achieved through some other method.
Anyway, another fresh batch with few changes since a year ago, GPU GTX970->RX480 and ive switched stock CM fan on HyperEVO to quieter (but a bit less powerful) LC AirRazor 120mm (7-8$) so my PC is as quiet as it gets with using fans, to get more quiet PC youd have to go 100% passive build lol
AirRazor is awsome fan BTW and quite affordable if you need 120mm PWM case/cooler fans
http://www.lc-power.com/en/product/case-fans/lc-cf-120-pro-airazor/
2SS taken one after another, 1st CPU working and 2nd immediately after Prime stopped @ 4GHz, same voltage as last one.
http://imgur.com/a/I9Peb
CPU at work after 13 minutes of prime. As you can see 39c after 13 minutes of Prime, on GPU tab you can see that ambient (case) temperateure went from 27c -> 28c )as well as TMPIN0 which is mobo reported case temperature). TMPIN1 is socket temperature BTW.
and prime stopped.
so you can start appologizing now lol
Should I get one? I mean I don't know that I really have a need. Same site says 1080 is about 50% better? There's a liquid cooled version for $320. I recall Quizzical buying a liquid cooled one. I think his reasoning was that these cards ran hot?
If you need a graphic card now, then that air cooled R9 fury would be good enough pick. It uses a hell lot of power, so you'll need to have good power supply, and you'll have to pay a bit extra in electricity costs over years. But even with all that, with rebates its cheap enough that it's good purchase.
I'd advice against liquid cooled version at $320. If you've got more than $300 to spend on GPU, then try to go for GTX 1070 which is faster, newer tech, and uses a lot less power.
Fury non X (cutdown Fury X) are air cooled and that Nitro is the best Fury and is hands down best buy atm for that price
Thers even PCB breakdown for those interested
Cleffy dam you and your post.. lmao
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/msi-afterburner-undervolt-radeon-r9-fury,4425.html
and you see that its almost as efficient as most efficient NVidia Maxwell card GTX980.
EDIT: Unless you're running CrossFire or SLI. With more than a single graphic card, the driver support is important enough that an inferior card with better driver support would be able to beat better card with worse CrossFire/SLI support. But that's only when you're running two graphic cards at once. As long as you've got only a single graphic card, the benefit of better driver support is small /EDIT
But if you can get more mileage out of your GTX 770, then by the time you upgrade you're sure to get something better than Fury at Fury's current price.
Undecided what I will do. Leaning back towards pulling the trigger. I really wasn't on the market for a GPU until I noticed Cleffy's post.