Now across various boards and forums I've heard people jumping the boat for either Order or Chaos thinking they'll find a higher level of maturity within one of these factions, I thought I'd discuss that here in this forum.
Some people have said they'll find a higher level of maturity within the Chaos faction because everyone in order wants to "play the pretty races" therefor attracting a younger audience and resulting in an overall lower value of maturity.
Others think that Chaos will have a lower overall maturity as all the little kiddies and immature brats are attracted to the dark sinister races. They think it's cool as can be to hop onto a Chaos Warrior wielding two axes.
Now, I'd have to agree with the latter. I must admit that the former does apply to some extent but I believe that the more immature among us are drawn to the darker side simply because it's more cool to them. There was argument in another forum that the good pretty races only care about their appearance, thus only about themselves making them poor team players. I think that's far from the truth as even an orc cares about his appearance, he just doesn't care about being pretty, he cares about being purposely ugly. In WoW people chose races almost purely for visual purposes, so we must all care about our appearances to an extent, it makes games more enjoyable. I also believe that WoW is proof that the immature are drawn to the darker side, just look at the Undead population of WoW (though no doubt lots of immature people are drawn to night elves as well).
Your input is appreciated.
"Time.." I chuckled "I hold no secret to time, though it's mystery puzzles me. Deny it's existence and lie to myself not with hopes of a quickened pace."
Comments
About the undead in WoW, I'm not too sure what you base this on, the undead I met have mostly been "normal" players. Players are simply drawn to the undead side because they want to have the better racial stat. Alliance players are just as asshatty as the horde ones.
"Time.." I chuckled "I hold no secret to time, though it's mystery puzzles me. Deny it's existence and lie to myself not with hopes of a quickened pace."
I believe that, dispite the fact the forums are overflowing with "i'm going to go Chaos" i believe that the goody-goody races will have the lower level of compitetence and maturity for a simple reason which may have been overlooked by some; the people with lesser compitetence and maturity dont visit forums like these ones, they just buy the game and play it when it comes out.
Personally i don't care about the maturity levels of my peers as long as they're not COMPLETE idiots and let the Chaos capitol get pilleged every day.
I'm going Chaos because i want to be a chaos warrior and i'll have my friends to back me up.
I think your statement is like 100% wrong. Stating that visiting a forum makes you MORE mature and competent that people that don't is simply unbelievable.
I guess you meant something else and it just show different in your writing, if that is the case i will wait for a clear up
On the topic at hand, we forget that his is Warhammer and the distinction is not much between "pretty" and "ugly" like it is in WoW for example (where the two factions do not have much difference, politics wise). Dark Elves are one of the "prettiest" race of warhammer, especially their female putting them on par with the High elves. Dwarves and Orks are also more or less equivalent in their "not-so-pretty" levels, while Chaos are composed of humans like the Empire. if anything, norse are maybe a bit more pretty than imperial humans. True, probably later the Norse will degenerate in something uglier (or sexier, depends on the Chaos God), but at char creation, they will be probably as different as a north man is from a central european caucasian, that is: not much. fairer skin for the norse, a bit taller and tougher maybe, tendency to have fairer eyes and hairs, but that's about it.
In the end, here, I think the politics of the two factions, drastically different from each other, and personal like/dislike of the various races represented, will dictate the level of (im)maturity.
From the tabletop perspective, the Chaos force is very popular. to the young ones, yes, but also older. Empire and High Elves got a revival with their new releases a year or so ago, but now they are prolly declining. They are simply a bit too "vanilla" to attract throngs of fans. Dwarves have their own core fans that tends to be as dwarves are, though and stubborn. Once a dwarf, always a dwarf.
Have a nice day
"If you give a man a fish, you feed him for a day, if you teach him how to fish, you feed him for a lifetime"
My expirience in WoW was that Allinece got a bigger portion of kids (on my server at least). Because they would constantly complain that people will always screw up and they cant get anything done right. On the other hand Horde didnt have any problems (I played on Blackrock).
Well this is not a clear cut question with an easy answer, but my best reply would be that the forces of chaos will be the most immature. It has been my experience in both fantasy and 40k that the more immature players have gravitated more towards chaos, orcs (orks), and similarly geared armies.
Now some may argue that a lot of immature players have Empire or Imperium (Space Marine mostly) armies. While that is true, I suspect that there is a large degree of players feeling more comfortable with the human armies when they first delve into the hobby. I suspect this is because a human army simply seems more familar to them. Plus certain armies, ie: space marines, are targeted more towards newer players which tend to be younger people and thus less mature.
Other MMO gaming such as in WoW has pretty much left me with similar thoughts on the issue. It has been my experience in WoW that the Horde by far tend to be much more immature than the alliance.
"Time.." I chuckled "I hold no secret to time, though it's mystery puzzles me. Deny it's existence and lie to myself not with hopes of a quickened pace."
Games I've played/tried out:WAR, LOTRO, Tabula Rasa, AoC, EQ1, EQ2, WoW, Vangaurd, FFXI, D&DO, Lineage 2, Saga Of Ryzom, EvE Online, DAoC, Guild Wars,Star Wars Galaxies, Hell Gate London, Auto Assault, Grando Espada ( AKA SoTNW ), Archlord, CoV/H, Star Trek Online, APB, Champions Online, FFXIV, Rift Online, GW2.
Game(s) I Am Currently Playing:
GW2 (+LoL and BF3)
Complete and utter exaggeration.
Games I've played/tried out:WAR, LOTRO, Tabula Rasa, AoC, EQ1, EQ2, WoW, Vangaurd, FFXI, D&DO, Lineage 2, Saga Of Ryzom, EvE Online, DAoC, Guild Wars,Star Wars Galaxies, Hell Gate London, Auto Assault, Grando Espada ( AKA SoTNW ), Archlord, CoV/H, Star Trek Online, APB, Champions Online, FFXIV, Rift Online, GW2.
Game(s) I Am Currently Playing:
GW2 (+LoL and BF3)
---------------------------------------------
I live to fight, and fight to live.
Whichever side has the most chainmail bikinis will be the less mature side. That's the reason why WoW's kiddie race is night elves, and the reason why they have to add elves to the Horde in the expansion. It's not being "good" that attracts little kids, it's bounching boobs and be-thonged bottoms. If WAR balances the Hoochie Factor, then the Realms will be balanced in both population and in childishness. Owing to the fact that both realms have one human, one elf, and one ugly race, there's no reason to expect a T&A imbalance at this point.
I would like to cite Alliance from WoW release.
And
Ablions from DAoC release.
More people go to the pretty place, since more people go there it is easier. Easier plus more people = more immature people. If you are talking about proportions that may be different.
Wait a second?
Do you mean kids... or just rude people?
Kids (aka immature people, aka less experienced gamers) will go to wherever it is easier for them to play and group.
Rude people will be spread pretty even imo.
AKA if some servers gave a 15% EXP bonus all the kiddies would rush to that server, where-as more vet gamers would be fine going to normal server simply because they figure the kiddies will take the easier road.
Truth be told that Orcs already use ebonics.
"Time.." I chuckled "I hold no secret to time, though it's mystery puzzles me. Deny it's existence and lie to myself not with hopes of a quickened pace."
I think the nature of warhammer orkz is gona produce some the biggest crowd of immature players. So will high elves, kids like pretty, and the whole murdereous blood worshiping dark elves is probably going to turn the kids away imo. Chaos on the other hand probably gets the most players in the tabletop because they're the biggest and the badest, easy to play, get in melee and crush. Not hard to use a bloodthirster, takes a lot more skill to handle one. I don't think you'll see that in WAR. Honestly I think the poll shows things right, pretty even dispercement of mature players. If you want maturity as Good I'd go with dwarves then empire, elves will get the most kids. Evil prolly dark elf will get the most mature imo (odd as that seems, them being pretty and all), then chaos, and orks will get the most kids.
I just want to have a guildie that roleplays Orkz really well, i think every1 should have one, they're just to awesome.
In Wow, I've seen what we call in french 'Kevins' in both factions, in all the servers (I went on four different servers during the year I played this game). But I voted Chaos, It seems to me that in the beginning, chaos will probably get more kiddies wanting to play Baaad
General rule of thumb for PvP centric games: It's always the "other side" that has more immature players, griefers, idiots, zerglings, no-skill losers, whatever... you name it, the "other side" has got plenty of them...