I was thinking with the WoW requirement update (and my own CPU is now under the minimum requirements, since its an i5 660)...there are many people that can afford games (since games themselves are cheap), but can't afford a PC. For example, if I want an i7 (and I'd want a good one) I'd also need to upgrade my CPU, motherboard, and I'd also need to upgrade my RAM. My motherboard is not compatible with an i7...so it be an easy 700+ dollar upgrade which I and many others can't do
This would also mean no one is at an advantage with better hardware, just because they have more money to give an edge over people with weaker PCs
Now, this goes far beyond gaming. Many artists (and Youtubers) NEED a good PC to make good quality rendered art (or videos)....many people can do so many things with a good computer. While many are sure not to utilize their government founded PCs to better their lives, many also however would.
Now I can hear everyone going "WTF is this stupid idea". And I gladly say..."but canada is giving everyone free money every month as an experiment"...so maybe that way is better than an outright PC. BUT here is why providing a free PC is in at least some ways better
Government pays for pre-made highend PCs. That means every piece of hardware in that PC is being bought, providing each company a large source of revenue...even more in fact because there is a huge amount of people who can't afford to buy that hardware. The company who provides the pre-made PC also gets a revenue source. So it isn't exactly free money like canada is doing (though that money still goes back into their country of course), but also accomplishes nearly the same thing. Everyone is provided with their own PC
For the homeless, or those who don't want a PC, can then instead opt for a mobile device which also can provide the person countless ways to earn an income or even keep in touch with family.
Now maybe free money is better like Canada is doing. You can use that free money to then upgrade your PC or buy a mobile device, or countless other ways. So free money of course is more useful in many ways...however lots of people are not good at managing money, so I feel in some ways it go to waste compared to a high-end free PC or mobile device which can then be used for art/youtube/work etc.
What are your guys thoughts?
My Skyrim, Fallout 4, Starbound and WoW + other game mods at MODDB:
https://www.moddb.com/mods/skyrim-anime-overhaul
Comments
I'd settle for the government just doing its current job right. If Trump is able to fix everything that's broken right now then we can always come back to the big-dream ideas later.
Air, Water, Food, Shelter... Life, Liberty, the Pursuit of Happiness... these are things that people and "The People" must secure first.
A computer is nothing, if you can't afford to eat.
A computer is nothing, if you're sick and can't go to the hospital.
A computer is nothing, if the US and Russia start a nuclear war.
A computer is nothing, if Iran builds a nuke and terrorists plant it in your town.
A computer is nothing, if a person deported 5 times kills you in San Francisco.
A computer is nothing, if a drunk driver deported 15 times kills your family.
I'm not sure your understanding of homeless people is current. I see them every day. They have zero interest (or in most cases ability) to lug a computer around. They would sell it at the first opportunity because it is useless to them otherwise. If they tried to keep one, someone else on the street would rob/kill them for it.
EQ1, EQ2, SWG, SWTOR, GW, GW2 CoH, CoV, FFXI, WoW, CO, War,TSW and a slew of free trials and beta tests
Regards,
Adrian Gates
Yeah probably a good trade to invest in people over physical objects, i can't really decide if i would pass that bill
I do not recall the requirements/specifics, though. I do not believe it is something that everyone can get, but it is something. I cannot recall if it was for disabled people or people who cannot afford it or what have you.
Well said. Free always means "gain at someone else's expense". Like trading stocks, or in order to have sunlight one part of the world has to be in the dark. Or any lottery. Our lovely dual world x)
First is essentially political/moral.
Some would say that public investment enterprises are essentially socialist concepts and this is bad because it encourages people to expect benefits for doing nothing.
On the flip side, you could argue that making certain resources open to everyone equally levels out opportunity — it's still a dog-eat-dog world regarding who eventually gets ahead, but the start point is essentially leveled up from ultra basic Survival of the Fittest because we now fight with tech and culture rather than sharpened flint.
Ultimately, you're looking at the return for your investment.
Any "free" or subsidised scheme risks losing money thanks to the essential nature of the transaction alone.
I give you a PC in return for ... nothing — uhm, yeah, that's a loss every time.
Factor in the potential for abuse of the system, and this is a recipe for burning money.
UNLESS ... the scheme unlocks benefits that power up the economy in ways that would not have been possible otherwise, like business startups, shortcuts to problem solving of all kinds, info exchange.
Public health schemes cost a fortune in countries where they operate — but the payback is considerable, and you only have to look at countries whose transport and sanitation systems aren't up to speed to figure how much a lack of these essentials stops other advances from happening.
Likely the Canadians — or whichever government is promoting this kind of scheme — have looked in on the figures and have some idea of the potential their initiative unlocks.
Will free computers work?
Maybe.
Another idea would be to subsidise internet connectivity in conjunction with a free phones scheme — that gets everyone connected & functional for a relatively low cost compared to supplying PC hardware.
Admittedly, not so good for YouTube video makers as a full-blown PC, but it pulls everyone into the creative loop at some level.
So maybe instead of everyone getting one, and homeless people who wouldn't use one...it can be for those on welfare, vets, and those that are disabled. Anyone that is a criminal or has a criminal record would NOT be eligible.
Now on the other hand...it makes sense just to give those in need money instead of anything else.
And actually that would work too and work better since then the money can be spent on anything. In Canada, there is a town that gives everyone a ton of money every month. Why can't the US do that to all those in need that truly do need it? That in turn benefits the economy in so many ways.
My Skyrim, Fallout 4, Starbound and WoW + other game mods at MODDB:
https://www.moddb.com/mods/skyrim-anime-overhaul