Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

15 EU Gambling Regulators & 1 US State Band Together to Tackle Loot Box Issues - MMORPG.com News

SBFordSBFord Former Associate EditorMember LegendaryPosts: 33,129
edited September 2018 in News & Features Discussion

image15 EU Gambling Regulators & 1 US State Band Together to Tackle Loot Box Issues - MMORPG.com News

A team of gambling regulators from fifteen European nations and one US state have signed on to "work together to address the risks created by the blurring of lines between gaming and gambling" according to the UK's Gambling Commission. EU nations include Latvia, Czech Republic, Isle of Man, France, Spain, Malta, Jersey, Gibraltar, Ireland, Portugal, Norway, The Netherlands, United Kingdom, Poland, and Austria. They are joined by a representative from the state of Washington.

Read the full story here



¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 


ceratop001
«1

Comments

  • reillanreillan Member UncommonPosts: 247
    Good. Lootboxes are the literal worst.
    gastovski1[Deleted User]Renoaku
  • nastilonnastilon Member UncommonPosts: 152
    And... I posted just last week that some politician in the US would make it part of his platform... and now it's starting. Hate loot boxes; they belong in Vegas.
  • TEKK3NTEKK3N Member RarePosts: 1,115
    About time.
    metareal[Deleted User]
  • laseritlaserit Member LegendaryPosts: 7,591
    Doesn't look like the issue is going away like the industry would like it to.
    Iselingastovski1AlBQuirkyceratop001TacticalZombeh[Deleted User]

    "Be water my friend" - Bruce Lee

  • CryomatrixCryomatrix Member EpicPosts: 3,223
    Here is my take on lootboxes.

    Have them. Make sure that every item possible in a lootbox is shown with their percentages.

    For example.

    You are expected to get item A once in 100 lootboxes
    You are expected to get item B once in 20 lootboxes
    You are expected to get item C once in 1000 lootboxes

    Etc.

    So people actually have an idea of how small their odds are. I'm okay with people gambling as long as they understand what their chances are. Forget over regulating lootboxes just make them put the actual chances and let people be people.
    Thuplikenguru23
    Catch me streaming at twitch.tv/cryomatrix
    You can see my sci-fi/WW2 book recommendations. 
  • laseritlaserit Member LegendaryPosts: 7,591
    Here is my take on lootboxes.

    Have them. Make sure that every item possible in a lootbox is shown with their percentages.

    For example.

    You are expected to get item A once in 100 lootboxes
    You are expected to get item B once in 20 lootboxes
    You are expected to get item C once in 1000 lootboxes

    Etc.

    So people actually have an idea of how small their odds are. I'm okay with people gambling as long as they understand what their chances are. Forget over regulating lootboxes just make them put the actual chances and let people be people.
    That's a start

    18+

    I say we also let kids be kids.
    ThupliWaan[Deleted User]rojoArcueid

    "Be water my friend" - Bruce Lee

  • Mad+DogMad+Dog Member UncommonPosts: 785
    Think most P2W MMO's that dont do loot boxes have systems with RNG that encourage users to spend more in the cash shop. So not as direct as loot boxes but more shady.
    SolancerAzaron_Nightblade

    image
  • KellerKeller Member UncommonPosts: 602


    Here is my take on lootboxes.



    Have them. Make sure that every item possible in a lootbox is shown with their percentages.



    For example.



    You are expected to get item A once in 100 lootboxes

    You are expected to get item B once in 20 lootboxes

    You are expected to get item C once in 1000 lootboxes



    Etc.



    So people actually have an idea of how small their odds are. I'm okay with people gambling as long as they understand what their chances are. Forget over regulating lootboxes just make them put the actual chances and let people be people.



    Still gambling. Why try to fix lootboxes? Lootboxes are a poor mechanic.

    A reward box at the end of a match, mission or dungeon run, I can open at no costs is fine. That's not different from RNG loot of a boss. Charge me money for being able to receive my reward after spending time as in playing the game is a terrible moneygrab.
    gastovski1metarealAlBQuirkyNirimetusSolancer[Deleted User]
  • hammarushammarus Member UncommonPosts: 196
    Be very careful what you wish for. While I despise loot boxes and want them gone, I get nervous when governments jump into the entertainment world and "try" to make changes. Think about it this way, would you play a game made by your government? Probably not. While this may be hyper fear on my part, we have seen it happen.
    SBFordKyleranIselinConstantineMerusSolar_ProphetGorwe
  • KyleranKyleran Member LegendaryPosts: 44,057
    hammarus said:
    Be very careful what you wish for. While I despise loot boxes and want them gone, I get nervous when governments jump into the entertainment world and "try" to make changes. Think about it this way, would you play a game made by your government? Probably not. While this may be hyper fear on my part, we have seen it happen.
    Right, a government solution might be to require any company using lootboxes to some how find a way to verify the age of the game account holder....all sorts of shenanigans involved with that.
    ConstantineMerusThupli

    "True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde 

    "I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant

    Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm

    Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV

    Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™

    "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon






  • winghaven1winghaven1 Member RarePosts: 745
    The government is meant to work for the people. If it isn't. The people kick them out and elect those who will serve them better. That's why if this Lootbox thing wasn't the people's enemy, the government wouldn't care. If the people hate it. The Government gets booted and a new one is installed.
    ConstantineMerusSal1GorweSolancerSandmanjw
  • DijonCyanideDijonCyanide Member UncommonPosts: 586


    Here is my take on lootboxes.



    Have them. Make sure that every item possible in a lootbox is shown with their percentages.



    For example.



    You are expected to get item A once in 100 lootboxes

    You are expected to get item B once in 20 lootboxes

    You are expected to get item C once in 1000 lootboxes



    Etc.



    So people actually have an idea of how small their odds are. I'm okay with people gambling as long as they understand what their chances are. Forget over regulating lootboxes just make them put the actual chances and let people be people.



    I like the idea. I also think, preferable but not mandatory, to add a progressive element to the mechanic. With your example for item (A) 1 out of 100 chance but if you lose then next would be 1 out of 99 till luck was in your favor. If this (A) was 1 item or a select group of items once you won it would reset back to 1 out of 100 chance.

    It's really about accountability & transparency. Till now this type of gambling/randomness has been unregulated & in most cases not even the odds have to be published so it is completely unknown hence a gamble. All the while these gaming companies knowing, enticing, & wanting kids to gamble. The companies have had multiple chances to regulate this themselves fairly for informed consumers to decide & they chose not to act so the government should do its job & hold it accountable via regulations. Too bad, in USA, our current administration favors companies being able to take advantage of the people though.
  • AeanderAeander Member LegendaryPosts: 8,060
    edited September 2018
    hammarus said:
    Be very careful what you wish for. While I despise loot boxes and want them gone, I get nervous when governments jump into the entertainment world and "try" to make changes. Think about it this way, would you play a game made by your government? Probably not. While this may be hyper fear on my part, we have seen it happen.
    Gotta love the goal post moving here. First its "Well it won't do any good" and then when it starts showing signs of doing some actual good the argument turns to "Oh no! look out for a dictatorship!"
    We in America have this irrational fear of government intervention in any form. Meanwhile, we are perfectly happy letting corruptions, which are every bit as corruptible (and not elected by us), dick us in the ass. You know, as if it's somehow less of an Orwelian nightmare for Facebook, Google, and Walmart to interfere in our daily lives than it is for our democratically elected governing bodies to do so.
    AlBQuirkyIselinWaankenguru23
  • SBFordSBFord Former Associate EditorMember LegendaryPosts: 33,129
    I love all of the skins, Zarya's in particular. I think, however, the devs need to start thinking outside the box and implement seasonal maps for Halloween, Christmas, etc. with new skins and so on added each year -- similar, I guess, to Overwatch. But the rework of Garden of Terror + the new stuff is good. Oh and a new comic too! :)
    MadFrenchieceratop001[Deleted User]


    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 


  • HorusraHorusra Member EpicPosts: 4,411
    I would not be too excited about Washington State here in the US...they were also against Sports betting and they lost on that fight.
  • MadFrenchieMadFrenchie Member LegendaryPosts: 8,505
    Here is my take on lootboxes.

    Have them. Make sure that every item possible in a lootbox is shown with their percentages.

    For example.

    You are expected to get item A once in 100 lootboxes
    You are expected to get item B once in 20 lootboxes
    You are expected to get item C once in 1000 lootboxes

    Etc.

    So people actually have an idea of how small their odds are. I'm okay with people gambling as long as they understand what their chances are. Forget over regulating lootboxes just make them put the actual chances and let people be people.
    Or, if you wanna give consumers the full picture, just do the math for them and tell them the expected cost in fulfilling the odds needed to get each item.

    $5 per box, odds are 1 in 100..  so tell the customer the truth: at those odds, folks should expect the item to cost them up to $500.

    It's funny how much smarter consumers can be when you place the deal right out in front of them, no marketing manipulation or hidden information attached.

    image
  • AlBQuirkyAlBQuirky Member EpicPosts: 7,432
    The government is meant to work for the people. If it isn't. The people kick them out and elect those who will serve them better. That's why if this Lootbox thing wasn't the people's enemy, the government wouldn't care. If the people hate it. The Government gets booted and a new one is installed.
    Looks great on paper, doesn't it? The reality here in the good ol' US of A is we still have career politicians in place that worry more about their own seats of power and special interest (minority) kickbacks than doing what's right, or best for their constituents (majority). It's not a right wing/left wing thing, it is all across the damn board. And "We the people" re-elect these [expletives] each campaign.

    Kind of like lootboxes in gaming. Madden NFL, as an example, has been shit for the past decade because EA cares MORE about their P2W online MUT (buy trading card players to make a team) feature than putting out a good game each and every year. I quit Star Trek Online the first time I got a "reward" and had to have a "key" (bought in the cash shop, of course) in order to claim it. Sure, people will say, "But you can get those keys in the game!" My limited experience showed me about a 3:1 box to key ratio. Sorry, not my kind of fun.

    Players know lootboxes are bad. And every single day, some player with too much disposable income racks up humongous bills that make publishers' eye start rolling in dollar signs. The only way to stop it is to purge it. We players can't regulate ourselves. We show that time and time again. Paid Beta testing. Paid early access. Pre-Orders by the millions. Paid ship's in the thousands of dallars to a game not even released yet. We players are far from responsible in any way, shape, or form.

    Sorry...
    /Rant Off

    - Al

    Personally the only modern MMORPG trend that annoys me is the idea that MMOs need to be designed in a way to attract people who don't actually like MMOs. Which to me makes about as much sense as someone trying to figure out a way to get vegetarians to eat at their steakhouse.
    - FARGIN_WAR


  • MendelMendel Member LegendaryPosts: 5,609
    Not to be all doom and gloom, but did anyone else read Latvia as Latveria?



    Gorwe[Deleted User]Iselin

    Logic, my dear, merely enables one to be wrong with great authority.

  • WizardryWizardry Member LegendaryPosts: 19,332
    Since several US states allow people to walk around with guns,i highly doubt those states would care about ANY deceptive practices by any business.

    Just like smoking or drinking,there are actually a lot of people that are very naive to anything and everything.I have seen people claim water is safe that i know is not safe just because they can't SEE the bacteria with their own eyes..oh it looks ok..lol.
    A whole ton of people out there severely lacking in common sense,so yeah we NEED authorities to regulate bad ideas,illegal ideas,well forms of gambling are only illegal when the authorities have common sense to stop it....see sentences prior,common sense...where?

    Never forget 3 mile Island and never trust a government official or company spokesman.

  • Asch126Asch126 Member RarePosts: 543


    Here is my take on lootboxes.



    Have them. Make sure that every item possible in a lootbox is shown with their percentages.



    For example.



    You are expected to get item A once in 100 lootboxes

    You are expected to get item B once in 20 lootboxes

    You are expected to get item C once in 1000 lootboxes



    Etc.



    So people actually have an idea of how small their odds are. I'm okay with people gambling as long as they understand what their chances are. Forget over regulating lootboxes just make them put the actual chances and let people be people.



    So your "fix" is simply to allow the gambling, but they'll give you a number they can easily fake to tell you the odds.

    :/ Come on dude.
    PhryKyleran
  • CryomatrixCryomatrix Member EpicPosts: 3,223
    @Asch126

    Just make it mandatory and to show you the code. I trust them to be legit with the math. I am okay with lootboxes in general, i think they would be more tolerable with transparency.
    Catch me streaming at twitch.tv/cryomatrix
    You can see my sci-fi/WW2 book recommendations. 
  • GeezerGamerGeezerGamer Member EpicPosts: 8,857
    I remember the days when everyone paid $15 bucks and everyone got 30 days.
    MMO business models used to be so simple.
    PhrySBFordMensurTyranusPrimelaseritAlBQuirky
  • LiquidRiderLiquidRider Member UncommonPosts: 20
    edited September 2018
    hahaah I can already see ANET, EA & Blizzard/Activision freaking out.
  • PemminPemmin Member UncommonPosts: 623
    We all know how this is going to end

    1. lootboxes will stay
    2. slap on loose transparency that no one will actually enforce
    3. add a lootbox tax
    4. developers will pass tax onto the players
  • SandmanjwSandmanjw Member RarePosts: 531

    Pemmin said:

    We all know how this is going to end

    1. lootboxes will stay
    2. slap on loose transparency that no one will actually enforce
    3. add a lootbox tax
    4. developers will pass tax onto the players



    I would say that the companies will wait till the last moment then place a warning on all games with the odds listed in the EULA (end-user license agreement).

    They have trained everyone to just skip past the things anyhow...end of issue, they hope. And mostly it will be till some kid's somewhere offs themselves after spending thousands for the boxes and really gets the media's attention or a politician's during re-election time.
Sign In or Register to comment.