Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
Have we Witnessed the Death of Blizzard?
Izkimar
Member UncommonPosts: 568
Is the Blizzard of old dead? I certainly believe so, and I feel that they have been dead/dying for a long time now. Imo, it was a slow rot that could be noticed starting to take place a decade or so ago. Since the acquisition of Blizzard by Activision in 2008, we have seen a steady shift in company philosophy. This shift also made it's way into their development principles, and the intended goals of gameplay mechanics.
I made a video covering the topic in depth:
What do you think?
I made a video covering the topic in depth:
What do you think?
Comments
Is there any scenario where it would not be "dead".
The gaming sphere has changed... A LOT since the Blizzard of old... Change that has forced many companies to either conform or scale down.
There is really no way to avoid it. Blizzard has always been a company that thrived on change and adaptation.
So.. do tell... Why a company who made their entire MO to adapt and improve... Should stay conservative and monolithic just to appease a subset of CUSTOMERS...?
So yeah.. Blizzard of old is dead.. but so is everything else of old... So.. why is water wet?
This have been a good conversation
We will see about next year's Blizzcon. Should be interesting.
Hearthstone is one of the top CCGs for the same reason, there's barely anything else.
Diablo franchise going strong......were you stuck in a bunker these past few months?
Overwatch? Ah yes, that game that has been bleeding so many players that Blizzard felt the need to give it constant discounts, free weekends, free weeks and even throw it in the Humble Bundle in a desperate attempt to get more players. Need i also mention the fact a LOT of the top streamers have been leaving? Going super strong indeed my friend.
Really, have you been under a rock lately or are you simply one of the drones that thinks Blizzard can do no wrong? Humor me and say the former because the fact you legit think Diablo is still going strong after the gigantic controversy with Diablo Immortals points at the latter.
If the OP's "Blizzard of old" question was about how Blizzard operated under Vivendi - which suggested some level of autonomy from Activision and comments like "it will release when its finished" then dead? …….. yes.
Blizzard today is a part of Activision Blizzard. Name on the door, very much involved in setting policy, profit margins and release dates. This (modern) Blizzard does what it is told, probably to a fixed budget and releases game when told - ready or not.
2: There is a metric ton of card games out there with Gwent being one of the strongest. Not to mention that Pokemon ha shad a online app for a very long time.
3: True.. People are hissy.. But if it did not have such a strong community, nobody would have cared. And like it or not most of that strong community will pick up D4.
4: Bleeding players.. Probably.. But it also have the worlds most established e-league. So i think they will be doing fine on that front. Also even if the are bleeding players time to get in to a game during prime time is still counted in seconds, mostly sub minute even at off-peak.
So i´d say theo´s claims stand... Unless you have actual proof that is.
This have been a good conversation
- A severely disappointing D3, large departure from it's predecessors.
- Hearthstone "A me too game"
- HoTS although I play it casually from time to time, "another me too game"
- Overwatch, which was definitely successful. However, I feel it is still kind of blemished by the fact that it is the pivot of the ashes of Project Titan.
- Handful of mediocre WoW expansions, with Legion arguably being the best of them.
- Am I missing something?
Looks like a long list of mediocrity, especially if you're judging by Blizzard standards.And EA was like "NO ONE IS WORSE THAN ME! I AM THE GREATEST EVIL OF THE LAND"
And EA ruled with an ironfist, buying out and shutting down many companies with their evil acts
After years of turmoil...
Blizzard was like "HELLLLLL NO! I AM THE GREATEST EVIL! DONT YOU HAVE A PHONE?"
EA went "YOU THINK YOU WANT THAT BUT YOU DONT"...but wait that was blizzard pretending to be EA
And then bethesda came from out of the blue and went
"GUYS SORRY TO DISAPPOINT BUT I'M THE GREATEST EVIL!"
EA and Blizzard laughed at the tiny scrawny bethesda compared to them
bethesda released fallout 76
ea and blizzard went "YOU ARE THE KING OF US ALL!"
And that is how the companies vied to be the #1 most evil company.
But then obsidian came and slaughtered the evil bethesda, with cheers across the land. Leaving but EA as king of evil.
My Skyrim, Fallout 4, Starbound and WoW + other game mods at MODDB:
https://www.moddb.com/mods/skyrim-anime-overhaul
Both HS and HotS very much follow Blizzards core idea of making fun and easy to access games based on popular genres. That has not changed as far as i am concerned. Overwatch, apart from lacking a solid story mode is actually pretty brilliant.
This have been a good conversation