SK or Paladin?

Comments

• hercules Member UncommonPosts: 4,925

  May 2006

  Depends if you are pvp or pve server.

  If i was to pick one i say sk as they are more offensive though a paladin seems to tank better.

  Think of how you want your gameplay and decide.
• Takata5 Member Posts: 336

  May 2006

  Well deciding on which one is more fun will be up to you of course, which one is more useful? If you mean in terms of grouping, I'm playing an sk right now and he hasn't been able to get much groups going. But he's only lvl 19. The higher you get the more easier it'll be to find groups, least that what I was told. I can solo with my sk but I've always found soloing in any EQ games boring and slow. At least with me, soloing in EQ2 was fun between the first ten levels. Then it got a little boring. 
  
  
• Flem Member UncommonPosts: 2,870

  May 2006

  Also depends if you want to be Good or Evil so to speak.  You cant be a Shadowknight from Qeynos and you cant be a Paladin from Freeport. 
• Desu Member Posts: 60

  May 2006

  Im a pally. They're good solo/group but u dont get a good healing spell untill level 16.
• Smirch Member Posts: 163

  May 2006

  Please, on behalf of  PFAPFE, (People For a Paladin Free Earth), roll a tank or a healer and scrap the hybrids. You'll have more fun in the end game and never lack for a group.
  
  
• sparkatb Member UncommonPosts: 175

  May 2006

  Paladins are great utility for a group. They can:
  - tranfser mitigation to another player, like a main tank
  - heal self and/or others, aswell as warding
  - ranged dps, for raids
  - rez group/raid members (lvl44)
  - off tank
  - tank -- ideal at tanking mobs that deal alot of Divine damage
  - immune to fear effects (AA choice, of KoS expansion)

  Same goes for an SK:
  - tranfser mitigation to another player, like a main tank
  - heal self/group
  - ranged dps, for raids
  - evac
  - off tank
  - tank -- ideal at tanking mobs that deal alot of Disease damage
  - immune to fear effects (AA choice, of KoS expansion)