Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
OPINION: Should MMOs Scale To A Player's Level, Or Gate Content For Progression?
System
Member UncommonPosts: 12,599
OPINION: Should MMOs Scale To A Player's Level, Or Gate Content For Progression?
Should a game scale to the player’s level, or should areas of the world be gated off until a player reaches a certain level? This is another one of design choices perhaps best suited for game developers, but what the hell? I’ll throw my hat in the ring and provide my two cents.
Comments
There are also the rewards that come from progression. As a max level player I like being able to go places where Angels fear to tread.
EQ1, EQ2, SWG, SWTOR, GW, GW2 CoH, CoV, FFXI, WoW, CO, War,TSW and a slew of free trials and beta tests
Moreover, I think it's a more immersive approach. Just because you have gotten more experienced and capable of taking on new foes does not mean that old foes should suddenly become completely incapable of posing a threat. Strictly linear progression is out of touch with reality.
ESO everything scales globally: This allows you to bounce around the world if you get bored with being stuck in one zone.
FFXIV locks zone and dungeon content behind main story progression: This forces you along a narrow path, though the main objective of this game is the story. Advancing to the next area feels more like a true accomplishment.
Both have their pluses and minuses in my opinion. I really don't care as long as I enjoy the game as a whole.
yes like gw2 with means the scalling down still leave you stronger then someone on the same lvl, MMORPGs first thing is like always looking for power, all rpg base is developing your char with more power, by it by skill, lvls and/or gear.
I remember one game who had a invasion event who all mobs scaled based on they attacker, that mean the first dude to hit that mob would take the attacker lvl and then you can damage him, first hits was always null, but here is teh thing, in case the dude died, or just hit once the mob would retain his lvl, so if a high lvl hit the boss all lower peeps would die or never kill said mob.
or of course make the whole game instanced with means lvls have little weight.
part of bein in a RPG is knowing then tehre is things out there who can kill you, in a single players means little, the game is made to be worked alone, or with your group of npcs, but in a MMO that should never be in question.
Where high levels go to starter areas because there is "high level content" there.
I remember in Everquest 2 there was a sewer area in the starter city that had an additional part that was too high for low levels.
It would be great if low levels could get a small raid going to attempt higher level content.
gating a world is horrible. keeping everything at the same level for players is not my taste.
Godfred's Tomb Trailer: https://youtu.be/-nsXGddj_4w
Original Skyrim: https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/109547
Serph toze kindly has started a walk-through. https://youtu.be/UIelCK-lldo
Instead if for "reasons" you need to let peeps at level one play with with level 90's then the players themselves should scale to each other with the option of one or the other scaling up or down or not at all and this scaling should only be possible if you are actually in a party with those you are scaling with.
Brenics ~ Just to point out I do believe Chris Roberts is going down as the man who cheated backers and took down crowdfunding for gaming.
You were always getting mission in your safe city area. But once you hit level 30 missions were taking you to dangerous areas. Yes the mission was your level but getting to it was an adventure and dangerous but fun. You really felt great that you made it to the job. That's why everyone saved credits up for flying vehicles. Then getting to missions was easy.
ESO tries and they do indeed have a mix in each zone ranging from simple mob types > strong mobs > delves > public dungeons > group event locations > world bosses.
Their problem is not that they have level scaling but that the difficulty for all of those except the world bosses are just tuned to be too easy. Any half-way knowledgeable player built logically can trivialize all of that solo including the "group suggested" events and public dungeons.
But that's a balancing issue not a level gating vs. scaling issue.
I'm like you. I find level gating zones to be an old standard but horrible design that needs to die.
“Microtransactions? In a single player role-playing game? Are you nuts?”
― CD PROJEKT RED
Personally, I think a mix would be ideal.
Like Open World, is better served with a scaling in effect, because that keep the content viable, longer, for more players.
However, I am not a fan of up-scaling, as I believe that having level steps allows players to progress and explore and feel like they are progressing both upwards and outwards.
Equally so, if the game needs to "Upscale" they should just fully max level the character, as opposed to what amounts to just a blanket power boost.
To use an example.
The way sPvP works in GW2, is a solid and good way to balance PvP, where everyone is given a fully maxed level character, with all abilities, and top stats, so they are at least, on equal availability footing. This means, no matter what level their Character is in PvE, in sPvP, they have a fully maxed out max level character to run with.
The way GW2 does WvW is poor system, where you just get a blanket power boost to make you comparable to a max level character, but still do not have access to all the abilities, or even the exotic/ascended stat combos.
Equally so, I think GW2 did the same thing with Fractals, where they would up-level you, but again, I never liked this plan.
I like Dungeons to be level caped, and in GW2, I even liked their Agony system, TBH, where you needed to not only have max level gear, you also needed to augment that gear with infusions that came from the content itself, forcing players to start at the beginning and earn/learn their way up through the fractals.
That was a Smart plan IMHO.
Which is why I think Dungeons/Raids should be hard level caped, require flagging, and other systems to ensure that people are in fact ready for that content, and have this flagging content function as a preliminary challenge runs to see if they are ready to even try the raid, and provide gear to help them with the raid itself.
DDO did this the absolute best! They had Flagging Quests for Raids, where the flagging quests needed to be done, before you could even access the Raid itself (you could not bypass this in any way, and every character, individually needed to flag, just to make sure you didn't try to bring a gimped toon into the raid), and these quests gave you a feel on how ready you might be to handle the raid. If you were struggling with the flagging, there was no way you were ready for the raid.
Which is how I think MMO's should be. It should be a process, something to work towards and through.
Brenics ~ Just to point out I do believe Chris Roberts is going down as the man who cheated backers and took down crowdfunding for gaming.
Logic, my dear, merely enables one to be wrong with great authority.
This was one of the things that pushed me away from ESO for a while. I wasn't able to really see improvement in new builds because I would level an it could actually take longer to kill things than it did before I leveled. They did add the leveling back with CP which makes a huge difference when you get it to 300, which is kind of ridiculous when you think about it.
The biggest problem that comes from level gating is xpacs. To many developers don't realize that they don't have to add levels every time they do an expansion. Maybe add a couple levels here or there every other expansion to break the player base up to those who are up to the new xpac an those that are not.
Overall this is all just personal preferences.
I had fun once, it was terrible.
My favorite games had a mixture of mob levels, so that even at low levels, some areas contained much higher mobs. You could level up and go back to take those on. Every zone has a range to match the player, and then a sprinkling of higher mobs too.
------------
2024: 47 years on the Net.
Being a progression junkie I have been more fond of gated content but will confess to favoring a more EVE like setup the past 10 years.
Meaning as much as possible every area of the game should hold challenge for every player regardless of progression to date.
I'm not interested in it being completely scaled to the point the risk is nearly the same everywhere which sounds boring, at least to me.
"True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde
"I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant
Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm
Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV
Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™
"This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon
I am also primarily an explorer.
It sounds good to have the whole world available to you from the start. Being able to go wherever you want and see all the diversity built into the world sounds like it should be ideal for me. However, in actuality, it ends up lacking the feeling of going where few of my character's ability go, or should go. The feeling of exploring and seeing things my character should not at their ability level is gone.
In the end the challenge is missing and it just turns exploring into simply wandering.
That said if we have to have scaling the ESO version would be my choice. I despise what World of Warcraft is doing now with the new areas. Mobs that scale, but also mobs that are higher level than you. Oh and here's a quest to kill an elite mob, but you're going to have to group up because that mob is always going to be too strong for you to kill alone because he scales with you.
Heck, 2 or 3 together might even be able to prevail over a veteran.
Can't let that sort of nonsense idea gain any traction.
"True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde
"I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant
Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm
Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV
Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™
"This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon
Hi, I'm level 20, and this mangy wolf pup is kinda tough, but I can kill it.
Does that seem realistic or immersive? Not to me. Not at all.
And if you like to explore (as I do), then level up and explore.
Also, I agree with some of the other posters that leveling down for content (and especially to play with low level players) is okay, but I think that the reverse should never be permitted.
personally that just means i ignore them because they pose no threat.
I had fun once, it was terrible.