Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
MMO Friday Fight Round 5: It's A Monetization Model Free For All | MMORPG.com
System
Member UncommonPosts: 12,599
MMO Friday Fight Round 5: It's A Monetization Model Free For All | MMORPG.com
For this week's Friday Fight, we are changing the format slightly. Mitch pits the three major monetization models against each other in a no-holds-barred cage match.
Comments
All time classic MY NEW FAVORITE POST! (Keep laying those bricks)
"I should point out that no other company has shipped out a beta on a disc before this." - Official Mortal Online Lead Community Moderator
Proudly wearing the Harbinger badge since Dec 23, 2017.
Coined the phrase "Role-Playing a Development Team" January 2018
"Oddly Slap is the main reason I stay in these forums." - Mystichaze April 9th 2018
Although other factors are at play, it also fosters a closer server community which is an almost entirely lost concept in some mmos.
You stay sassy!
The big problem is that lots of game and greedy companies do not follow these 3 monetizations but want to use all three to lesser or greater degrees and call it... GAAS and far too many gamers defend the stupid practices so...what to do.
Now maybe this has changed but I do think that the road Pax Dei is going for isnt it?
https://playpaxdei.com/en-us/news/information/where-we-stand-on-monetization
Game purchase B2P ~ a one-off initial purchase of the game.
Sub ~ a regular fee for maintaining active player status and in-game plot(s).
f2p cash shop ~ fully optional additional services added down the line. we’re also considering a Token (WoW) or PLEX (Eve Online) -like system.
Brenics ~ Just to point out I do believe Chris Roberts is going down as the man who cheated backers and took down crowdfunding for gaming.
Today MMOs are F2P or B2p games with an "optional" sub and cash shop. This is the most important point, that monetarization is constantly evolving and will continue to do so. We can see NFT's and crypto on the horizon, studios are milking players every which way they can.
The reasons why I prefer sub-only:
1) Predictable costs - I like knowing exactly how much my game is gonna cost me.
2) Player Filter - a subscription acts like a filter on the community. Generally, only those players who genuinely want to be there are willing to pay the subscrption, so the community tends to be higher quality. Not always the case of course, there are always some bad apples, but overall it seems to be better.
3) Predictable income for devs - I expect the devs to continually update the game, and this seems like a predictable way to pay them for that work.
I liked the original promise of F2P - offering the start of the gaem for free, then cutting up the rest of the game into small chunks to sell to the players piece-meal, so that they could play and pay on their own timescale without the feeling of missing out if they couldn't play much. But, that original promise never seemed to materialise, it quickly turned into cash-shop nightmares.
As soon as earning revenue was distanced from that by placing it in a cash shop the focus will drift toward making game decisions that will boost cash shop revenue, eventually to the point it will start to compromise the game experience without such purchases.