Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

New Targetting Yet again...

WufaWufa Member Posts: 132
This is from a thread started by Helios: (http://forums.station.sony.com/swg/board/message?board.id=swggpdiscussion&message.id=909301#M909301)

Actually I wanted to discuss targeting. 
After reading your feedback and playtesting large scale battles,
considerations are being made that involve possibly, maybe improving
the attack "safety" feature of the targeting interface by having the
client automatically aim at your target for you (targeting reticle goes
away for "safety" mode & attacks just go off on your
intended target provided that you have line of sight).  Everything else
pretty much stays the same.  It's all just conjecture at this point and
this post is by no means a prediction or promise of any kind. 

 

Feedback?

-The Dread Lord Helios
_________________________________________________________________________________________

Seems a lot like the targeting the previously had to me. So if their NGE is soooo great why do they keep putting in parts of the old system? I mean don't they realize they are doing this? or do they really believe this is "new content." I mean the mass pvp thing in restuss is even bringing back some of the old, except in PRE-CU we didn't need a "event" it just happened. Mass PVP would spring up all the time.

Oh well it just kind of made me chuckle....


image

Comments

  • plongplong Member Posts: 71
    I tend to think it just shows the number of subs is still dropping and they are grabbing at straws to slow it down.  If the numbers were either stagnant or slowly increasing, the devs would be going full bore at their "Planetside, Star Wars edition" vision of the game.
  • DistilerDistiler Member Posts: 416
    If at least the combat was as good as Planetside (wich is a very very nice mmofps) ...

  • WufaWufa Member Posts: 132
    I agree. They are grasping at straws. Too bad they are not grasping at the right ones. All in all though noone is going to be happy with what they do. If they roll back the new players that like the NGE are pissed, if they keep the NGE all the people that left stay away. They have no time to correct it, and they have no consistent direction to head towards. "too many hands in the cookie jar" as my gran mother would have put it. You have too many people saying we're gonna do this to be able to make a competent decision.

    Oh well this game is doomed. Bring on SWG2 without SOE.


    image

  • majochmajoch Member Posts: 599

    The one thing that makes all the sense in the world ( at least to me ) which is the one thing that will sadly never hapen is incorporating multiple server sets.  Pre-CU, RP Pre-CU, full on PvP Pre-CU, NGE, ETC..  A little something for everyone. 

  • plongplong Member Posts: 71


    Originally posted by majoch

    The one thing that makes all the sense in the world ( at least to me ) which is the one thing that will sadly never hapen is incorporating multiple server sets.  Pre-CU, RP Pre-CU, full on PvP Pre-CU, NGE, ETC..  A little something for everyone. 



    The reason this hasn't happened is perfectly clear to me.  At some point in time, both Smedley and Jim Ward decided the NGE was the way to go and gave the green light to the devs to proceed.  If some pre-cu servers were to go up, what are the odds that they would be making more with subs than any NGE server?  How do you justify to the stockholders that the worst option is the one you continue to spend money on?  How do you justify to the stockholders that you are so clueless as to what the customers want and yet remain as CEO?

    They can continue to with the NGE, spending a little money here and there with their silly 3 month publish cycle, and then quietly announce they are closing it when nobody is left to care.  Smedley and Ward will brush it under the carpet, and we will have to hope the emu gets off it's feet.

  • bugzonlsdbugzonlsd Member Posts: 410


    Originally posted by plong

    Originally posted by majoch

    The one thing that makes all the sense in the world ( at least to me ) which is the one thing that will sadly never hapen is incorporating multiple server sets.  Pre-CU, RP Pre-CU, full on PvP Pre-CU, NGE, ETC..  A little something for everyone. 


    The reason this hasn't happened is perfectly clear to me.  At some point in time, both Smedley and Jim Ward decided the NGE was the way to go and gave the green light to the devs to proceed.  If some pre-cu servers were to go up, what are the odds that they would be making more with subs than any NGE server?  How do you justify to the stockholders that the worst option is the one you continue to spend money on?  How do you justify to the stockholders that you are so clueless as to what the customers want and yet remain as CEO?

    They can continue to with the NGE, spending a little money here and there with their silly 3 month publish cycle, and then quietly announce they are closing it when nobody is left to care.  Smedley and Ward will brush it under the carpet, and we will have to hope the emu gets off it's feet.


    3 month publish cycle? This is how they are doing the pubs now? releasing one every three months?
  • ObraikObraik Member, Newbie CommonPosts: 7,261


    Originally posted by bugzonlsd

    Originally posted by plong

    Originally posted by majoch

    The one thing that makes all the sense in the world ( at least to me ) which is the one thing that will sadly never hapen is incorporating multiple server sets.  Pre-CU, RP Pre-CU, full on PvP Pre-CU, NGE, ETC..  A little something for everyone. 


    The reason this hasn't happened is perfectly clear to me.  At some point in time, both Smedley and Jim Ward decided the NGE was the way to go and gave the green light to the devs to proceed.  If some pre-cu servers were to go up, what are the odds that they would be making more with subs than any NGE server?  How do you justify to the stockholders that the worst option is the one you continue to spend money on?  How do you justify to the stockholders that you are so clueless as to what the customers want and yet remain as CEO?

    They can continue to with the NGE, spending a little money here and there with their silly 3 month publish cycle, and then quietly announce they are closing it when nobody is left to care.  Smedley and Ward will brush it under the carpet, and we will have to hope the emu gets off it's feet.


    3 month publish cycle? This is how they are doing the pubs now? releasing one every three months?


    Half that figure and you're getting closer.

    image

    image

  • kaibigan34kaibigan34 Member Posts: 1,508
    Publish 25 - November 15th 2005
    Publish 26 - December 13th 2005
    Publish 27 - Feburary 15th 2006
    Publish 28 - April 26th 2006
    Publish 29 - June 8th 2006

    Last 3 every 2 months. This looks like how they will be coming out for now on.

    Kai


  • DistilerDistiler Member Posts: 416
    When they announced the new chapter designation for publishes, also stated that the cycle will be 6 weeks.

    http://www.mmorpg.com/gamelist.cfm/setView/news/gameID/6/showArticle/5439

    Chapter 6 was around 8 june, so chapter 2 will be around middle-end july I suppose.


  • JohnFranzJohnFranz Member Posts: 44
    Carrot

    "President Smedley, if you seek fame, if you seek prosperity for the SOE and LA, if you seek subscriptions: Come here to the players! Mr. Smedly, listen to the players! Mr. Smedley, roll back these servers!" - Ronald Reagan

    Star Wars NGE (New Guiled Economics)

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8687227922034118883
    Sums up my feelings about SWG pretty well :(

  • kaibigan34kaibigan34 Member Posts: 1,508


    Originally posted by Distiler
    When they announced the new chapter designation for publishes, also stated that the cycle will be 6 weeks.

    http://www.mmorpg.com/gamelist.cfm/setView/news/gameID/6/showArticle/5439

    Chapter 6 was around 8 june, so chapter 2 will be around middle-end july I suppose.




    Yeah.....SOE says alot of things. Doesnt make any of them true. IMO they are really only good at a few things. One of those is lying to the player base.

    Kai
  • ObraikObraik Member, Newbie CommonPosts: 7,261


    Originally posted by kaibigan34
    Publish 25 - November 15th 2005
    Publish 26 - December 13th 2005
    Publish 27 - Feburary 15th 2006
    Publish 28 - April 26th 2006
    Publish 29 - June 8th 2006

    Last 3 every 2 months. This looks like how they will be coming out for now on.

    Kai


    I was still just as close as he was :P

    Besides, who wants to go back to the days where a publish was on TC for a week at most, was only nerfs and then crashed the servers for over a day?

    image

    image

  • kaibigan34kaibigan34 Member Posts: 1,508


    Originally posted by Obraik

    Originally posted by kaibigan34
    Publish 25 - November 15th 2005
    Publish 26 - December 13th 2005
    Publish 27 - Feburary 15th 2006
    Publish 28 - April 26th 2006
    Publish 29 - June 8th 2006

    Last 3 every 2 months. This looks like how they will be coming out for now on.

    Kai

    I was still just as close as he was :P

    Besides, who wants to go back to the days where a publish was on TC for a week at most, was only nerfs and then crashed the servers for over a day?


    From what I have been reading its worse. People get on TC, report serious issues, get ignored by the Devs, and then it goes live with all the problems still there. To me, SOE is just using TC as an interest generating thing to keep people playing.

    It looks like the Restuss Event is totally messed up. Yes some were able to figth through the lag or could deal with it but everything I have seen on it, it still needs alot of work. Who wants to bet it goes live "as is" or with minimal bug fixes????

    Kai
Sign In or Register to comment.