ww3

blah40000

by the end of ww3 either japan, china, russia, america, or canada will rule the world

(go japan)





note: there will be a ww3 it's inevitable and DON'T correct me on anything stupid like some land will be uninhabitable or the world might be destroyed i know that but it's a blank statement please post your opinion/ thought on this matter thank you.



remember to vote when you view/ post here.

sheesh

Most likely there will be alliances. Like American and Canada, with Britian, and France. Wont just be one country. Unless a dictator pops up somewhere like Hitler.. Then he/she'll try to rule the world.

Edit: I saw that in your pole you said Europe. Theres more than one countryin Europe...

Rikimaru_X

Unless they got Gundams in Mt. Fuji, Japan isnt winning IMO.

Rreka'al

After WW3, I think wierd mutated cockroaches will win. With our huge arsenals of nuclear weapons, if we go to war, someone is going to use one, and spark a nuclear holocaust.

blah40000

I know what you mean butt europe is a continent and like i said it's just a blank statement and you can vote other if you think its an alliance.

baff

Originally posted by Rikimaru_X

Unless they got Gundams in Mt. Fuji, Japan isnt winning IMO.

 

MechaGodzilla FTW.

Rreka'al

Originally posted by Rikimaru_X

Unless they got Gundams in Mt. Fuji, Japan isnt winning IMO.

As posted on another thread, they do have a mech in development.

blah40000

japan is a very technologically advanced country they might have mechs/ mobile suits by ww3 but other countries will too and japan could use anime propaganda to control populations and spike rebellions in there favor.

sheesh

---

Originally posted by Rreka'al
Originally posted by Rikimaru_X
Unless they got Gundams in Mt. Fuji, Japan isnt winning IMO.

As posted on another thread, they do have a mech in development.

---

Heh, I've seen that thing. Its like 30ft high and it shoots tennis balls

Rreka'al

Originally posted by blah40000

japan is a very technologically advanced country they might have mechs/ mobile suits by ww3 but other countries will too and japan could use anime propaganda to control populations and spike rebellions in there favor.

I don't think armies of teenagers would really be all that helpful in an all-out war.

dhartz

If Japan develops a Gundam, the world is totaly screwed

blah40000

Originally posted by Rreka'al

Originally posted by blah40000

japan is a very technologically advanced country they might have mechs/ mobile suits by ww3 but other countries will too and japan could use anime propaganda to control populations and spike rebellions in there favor.

I don't think armies of teenagers would really be all that helpful in an all-out war.





rebellion is rebellion war is war but who said that just teens watch anime and who said that teens can't kill, riot, and fight.

Rreka'al

Originally posted by blah40000

Originally posted by Rreka'al

Originally posted by blah40000

japan is a very technologically advanced country they might have mechs/ mobile suits by ww3 but other countries will too and japan could use anime propaganda to control populations and spike rebellions in there favor.

I don't think armies of teenagers would really be all that helpful in an all-out war.





rebellion is rebellion war is war but who said that just teens watch anime and who said that teens can't kill, riot, and fight.

The majority of people who watch anime and would actually get involved in something because of anime would be teens, and rebellion usually leads to war. I never said they couldn't fight, they just wouldn't help much against the armies of the other countries.

blah40000

Originally posted by Rreka'al

Originally posted by blah40000

Originally posted by Rreka'al

Originally posted by blah40000

japan is a very technologically advanced country they might have mechs/ mobile suits by ww3 but other countries will too and japan could use anime propaganda to control populations and spike rebellions in there favor.

I don't think armies of teenagers would really be all that helpful in an all-out war.





rebellion is rebellion war is war but who said that just teens watch anime and who said that teens can't kill, riot, and fight.

The majority of people who watch anime and would actually get involved in something because of anime would be teens, and rebellion usually leads to war. I never said they couldn't fight, they just wouldn't help much against the armies of the other countries.

you are getting me annoyed on both of my threads but i'm not flipping out. 1. its propaganda(subliminal messages). 2. rebellion happens inside the country and forces the country to focus a  small to large percentage of it's resources to control it thus weakening it

blah40000

is anyone going to vote and post new stuff or is it just going to be arguing between me and Rreka'al arguing on both my poll threads.

Praetoriani

Originally posted by sheesh





Edit: I saw that in your pole you said Europe. Theres more than one countryin Europe...

I'm guessing he meant the European Union.



There will be no winners in World War 3, nor have there and will there be any in any major war.

MW2K

---

Originally posted by Praetoriani
Originally posted by sheesh Edit: I saw that in your pole you said Europe. Theres more than one countryin Europe...

I'm guessing he meant the European Union.

There will be no winners in World War 3, nor have there and will there be any in any major war.

---

There have been winners in many wars. The correct term is victor.

Unless, of course, you're talking metaphorically, comparing war combatants to people engaging in something where there's a winner.

Either way, I'll call you out on that one and tell you that someone will win in any future major war.

blah40000

Originally posted by Ulujain


 

Originally posted by Praetoriani


Originally posted by sheesh
 
Edit: I saw that in your pole you said Europe. Theres more than one countryin Europe...

I'm guessing he meant the European Union.

There will be no winners in World War 3, nor have there and will there be any in any major war.

---

There have been winners in many wars. The correct term is victor.

Unless, of course, you're talking metaphorically, comparing war combatants to people engaging in something where there's a winner.

Either way, I'll call you out on that one and tell you that someone will win in any future major war.

none of the above i said that someone would rule the world not win/ gain victory of the war

WhosFat

---

Originally posted by Rreka'al
Originally posted by blah40000
japan is a very technologically advanced country they might have mechs/ mobile suits by ww3 but other countries will too and japan could use anime propaganda to control populations and spike rebellions in there favor.

I don't think armies of teenagers would really be all that helpful in an all-out war.

---

Wow. Everything you say on this topic from this post forward is officially null and void.

Since the first battles were fought, to the high tech mechanical battles we fight today. Every single war has been won, fought, and lost by armies of "teenagers". The whole idea of becoming an adult at 18 is a very recent idea. All the armies of the world are almost completely comprised of teenagers. My grandfather fought in WWII at 13. He was in the most vital battle in Japan at 15. This wasn't uncommon, many kids lied about their age.

For further reference, watch "Lord of War". The African General says "A bullet from a 14yr old is just as deadly"

blah40000

Originally posted by WhosFat


 

Originally posted by Rreka'al


Originally posted by blah40000

japan is a very technologically advanced country they might have mechs/ mobile suits by ww3 but other countries will too and japan could use anime propaganda to control populations and spike rebellions in there favor.

I don't think armies of teenagers would really be all that helpful in an all-out war.

---

Wow. Everything you say on this topic from this post forward is officially null and void.

Since the first battles were fought, to the high tech mechanical battles we fight today. Every single war has been won, fought, and lost by armies of "teenagers". The whole idea of becoming an adult at 18 is a very recent idea. All the armies of the world are almost completely comprised of teenagers. My grandfather fought in WWII at 13. He was in the most vital battle in Japan at 15. This wasn't uncommon, many kids lied about their age.

For further reference, watch "Lord of War". The African General says "A bullet from a 14yr old is just as deadly"

thank you for supporting me in this argument and explaining what i said before you. you deserve a gold star and a salute same to your grandfather i hope he still has all his limbs.

Praetoriani

Originally posted by Ulujain


 

Originally posted by Praetoriani


Originally posted by sheesh
 
Edit: I saw that in your pole you said Europe. Theres more than one countryin Europe...

I'm guessing he meant the European Union.

There will be no winners in World War 3, nor have there and will there be any in any major war.

---

There have been winners in many wars. The correct term is victor.

Unless, of course, you're talking metaphorically, comparing war combatants to people engaging in something where there's a winner.

Either way, I'll call you out on that one and tell you that someone will win in any future major war.

I think you knew what I meant. :-) I meant it in "It's not about who's right, it's about who is left" way, the "there are no winners in war, only varying degrees of losers" way, and the "you can no more win a war than you can win an earthquake" way.



What do I know though, I'm just a random pacifist.

Unknown

Americans don't have the will to fight. Too many liberals and other sissys. Europe just makes me giggle.

I vote China.

Adam4408

I voted China

Reason is because china has the largest milatary force

they would outnumber america and europe

and china is becoming very rich which may be the worlds new supernation

 

Ankua

You can have all the people in the world as an army and accomplish nothing, its the will to use that force that counts.

MadAce

WW3 has been raging for almost 2 decades now. It's mainly an economical war with great consequences for each country/alliance.



Wars (the old version) are just too expensive/resouce consuming to be profitable. Remember the world is practically ruled by capitalism. No, not the free masons, jews, elvis impersonators or the roswell aliens. Just the concept/ideology.



It's much, much more rewarding to wage war in the economic spectrum. This also causes financial losses and even more loss in lives than the cold war caused.



At the moment we have a few sides:



-US

-NAFTA (not the same side as the US)

-EU

-China

-India

-Japan



and possibly upcoming sides:



-South-Africa

-Brazil

-South-America





Losing sides:

-US

-NAFTA

Japan



stagnating side:

-EU



slightly winning sides:

-China

-India

Keebs1984

Originally posted by Adam4408


I voted China
Reason is because china has the largest milatary force
they would outnumber america and europe
and china is becoming very rich which may be the worlds new supernation
 

I doubt it, China has historically shown very little interest in any sort of expansion. Some major excursions aside, i.e. Tibet and Taiwan, they have seemed to show no interest in expanding their borders as opposed to just maintaining them, for example the Pakistani/China confrontation.



Not to say that can't change but if I had to put money on it, China would be one of the countries at the bottom of my list despite their large military force.