Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Good, bad, and ugly

Vanguard is a game that a lot of us have been waiting for, for a long time.  If you aren't familiar with it, or are trying to decide when or whether or not to get it, perhaps my experience so far can help you.

The Good: 

Graphics on the whole are amazing, much higher then I have seen from any other game.

The classes are well designed, and I haven't heard any complaints about any of them being irritating to play.

The world is freaking gigantic, and has a lot of content, and they plan on adding more.

Diplomacy and crafting spheres are well designed.  My friend won't stop friggin doing diplomacy.

The game isn't a hand holder.  It makes heavy use of groups, and the difficulty level of many encounters is pretty rough.  The death penalty is more severe then most current MMOs.  (if you are into this, like me)

 

The bad:

This is effectively beta 6.  Don't give me any crap about "its new".  I've played new MMOs with plenty less bugs then this.

You need a high end machine to run the graphics well.

The game isn't a hand-holder.  It makes heavy use of groups, and the difficulty level of many encounters is pretty rough.  The death penatly is more severe then in most current MMOS (if you don't like things to be that rough, its a turn off).

 

The ugly:

The world feels alive, but the towns feel dead.  They need to work on that big time.  Most NPCs feel like statues, while the outside world has critters crawling around all over the place.

Water hitting the shore.  I never see people comment on this.  While the water itself is very pretty, the way it connects to the shorelines is polygon-like and ugly. 

 

Should I buy Vandguard?

If you don't have a computer that can run it well (at LEAST recommended specs) , don't buy it yet.  Let computer costs come down, and the bugs get fixed at the same time. 

If you are a very casual gamer, I would probably stay away from this game.

If you like more hardcore games, and were a big fan of old EQ, this game is a must.  If you have a high end machine go for it.  Otherwise wait it out a bit.

«1

Comments

  • accessdeniedaccessdenied Member Posts: 6
    Very interesting points, and is something that I find thankful to hear.  So many of these recent posts put out many different views.  However, this one seems very well put together and thought out.  Although I do not have the game as of yet, I hope to get in to experience it myself.  Well done, and thank you for sharing more about what Vanguard is for the gamers that haven't jumped into it yet.
  • wrkeechwrkeech Member UncommonPosts: 116
    Yes... nice post.  I like the neutrality of it. 
  • EverithEverith Member CommonPosts: 482
    very nice post. It's nice to see someone give an objective review and not a troll flame fest. Also very informative. *clap*

    image

  • vylovylo Member Posts: 149

    Just to clarify, I do dearly enjoy this game, but I'm not blind to its faults.  The game has huge potential, and will (provided SOE keeps its grubby hands off it) be one of the best MMOs out there within a few weeks/months.  I'm having a blast in the game, but I'm getting ample usage of the /bug command.

    I know a lot of people are "watching and waiting", and i can't blame them for not wanting to drudge through the opening problems.  I just like being one of the first to look into things like this.

    Speaking of first, SOE actually made something worthwile, and that is station players for vanguard.  You can look up characters and it actually has an automatically produced blog with screenshots and highlights of that character (such as it has a screenshot of me being the first to discover an area of the world).  This is a really cool feature.

  • GooneyGooney Member Posts: 194
    I pretty much agree with the OP on all points. 



    Ive done some trixing and fixing to get the game to run well on my machine.

    -Pentium 4 2.40B, overclocked to 2.80Ghz

    -2 GB Ram

    -ATI 1950 Pro 256mb



    So, I exceed recommended on 2, and required on processor only by overclocking.



    Ive managed now to get a pretty decent frame rate, enough to enjoy the game.  Although...If Im using my headseat to play (Logitec USB) I have to run sound as "Generic Software" and that costs me 5-8 FPS, if I run through my speakers I gain 5-8 FPS, if I turn off sound I gain about 5-8 aswell.  So basically if Im running Vent to speak with guildies I run with no sound, and that sucks. 



    My machine is simply not up to snuff enough.  The graphics in this game are very good and very demanding, thankfully though you can mitigate the impact a bit at the cost of eye-candy.  The engine really could use more optimizing, but Im doubtful that that will happen before I just break down and build a new machine.  Im actually stuck with a bit of a dilema, I just bought a new vid card, AGP for my current MB, then noticed that AGP has been obsolete for about a year */slapsforehead*.  Long and short of it is that in order to get a value out of my new card I need to use it for about a year ...hehe... so Id love some more optimizing on the engine heh.



    Having said that Im so impressed by the rest of the game that Im staying.  And I want to make it perfectly clear, *most* of the time I have perfectly acceptable framerates on my system, but it does bog down from time to time.



    I also get the feeling that the client DOES have a memory leak somewhere, Im not alone in this, but every say...40 minutes or so the client bogs down and is relieved by a "tab out".  That should really be addressed by Sigil.





    -Gooney
  • EverithEverith Member CommonPosts: 482
    Yea i notice that alot of people have been finding the game completely acceptable in the fram rate issue. Alot of people had problems with this early on but i'm really glad to see it's been alleviated. I'm gonna pick up 1 more gig of ram boosting me to 2 gigs which should completely null out all frame rate issues i'm having. And i CAN see an isse with memory leak i don't remember a game being released with out a memory leak or two but i'm enjoying the complexity and the sheer number of things to do in the game enough to hang around and try and achieve high lvl. ALso i have a membership but when i go to the vanguard players page it doesn't let me select any of my chars why do you think that is?

    image

  • vylovylo Member Posts: 149

    Yeah, I should also add I'm on a new machine.  A quad core with 2 gig of ram and a 8800 GTX.  My old computer was so far behind, vanguard gave me a convenient excuse to upgrade. 

    Thus you can see why I'm impressed with the graphics.....I can actually see them :P.

    My friend on a 4600+ AMD X2 with a 7950 GT can run an highest quality, but the best balance for him his high quality.  So if your computer is around that range, you will do well.

  • metalcoremetalcore Member Posts: 798


    Originally posted by vylo
    The bad:
    This is effectively beta 6.  Don't give me any crap about "its new".  I've played new MMOs with plenty less bugs then this.

    WoW is about the only game I can say had virtually no bugs. All other games I have played, EQ1, SWG, EQ2, Horizons have been much more buggy than this game and ten times more frustrating with client crashes and performance.



    Originally posted by vylo

    Water hitting the shore.  I never see people comment on this.  While the water itself is very pretty, the way it connects to the shorelines is polygon-like and ugly. 

    No offense to the OP but people expect amazing graphics that are completely smooth and run really well on their ZX81 machine or their Spectrum calculator.

    Just doesn't happen.

    Now playing: VG (after a long break from MMORPGS)
    Played for more than a month: Darkfall online, Vanguard SOH, Everquest, Horizons, WoW, SWG, Everquest II, Eve

  • altairzqaltairzq Member Posts: 3,811
    I'd put graphics into ugly and diplomacy into bad, but this is just me.
  • EverithEverith Member CommonPosts: 482
    Why would you do that. The graphics are technically speaking amazing and most of the zones are truely breathtaking from an artistic standpoint.



    And diplomacy is a fun way for people who want a break from combat to spend their time or for RPers who don't want a pvp oriented character. If you don't like these features it doesn't make them bad.

    image

  • metalcoremetalcore Member Posts: 798


    Originally posted by Everith
    Why would you do that. The graphics are technically speaking amazing and most of the zones are truely breathtaking from an artistic standpoint. And diplomacy is a fun way for people who want a break from combat to spend their time or for RPers who don't want a pvp oriented character. If you don't like these features it doesn't make them bad.

    Is true, I don't think I will be doing any Diplomacy (may change my mind) as its just something I don't like, I think the system is pretty neat but I would rather kill stuff.

    Now playing: VG (after a long break from MMORPGS)
    Played for more than a month: Darkfall online, Vanguard SOH, Everquest, Horizons, WoW, SWG, Everquest II, Eve

  • LukainLukain Member UncommonPosts: 591
    Originally posted by vylo


    Vanguard is a game that a lot of us have been waiting for, for a long time.  If you aren't familiar with it, or are trying to decide when or whether or not to get it, perhaps my experience so far can help you.
    The Good: 
    Graphics on the whole are amazing, much higher then I have seen from any other game.



    You wan't to see a really Great Graphics engine  then head on over to Gothic 3 it make Vanguard look like UO , But considering Vanguard is based on a 5 year old engine I think Sigil have done an amazing job ..

     

     

     

  • EverithEverith Member CommonPosts: 482
    Theyr're 2 TOTALLY different rendering systems you cant compare them. 1 is a jpeg bitmap texture rendering system where you paint a texture and then lay it over an invisible 3dmap. This however is a fully 3d render engine. Thats like comparing a 2d side scroller with a 3d counterpart of the same game.

    image

  • EverithEverith Member CommonPosts: 482
    http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2002/pc/reviews/grandtheftauto3/gta3_screen003.jpg

    Theres a pic of a large univeresed graphics engine from 5 years ago like you said SOMEHOW i think theres 5 years worth of technilogical improvment in Vanguard. I'm by no means a fanboi but i KNOW the graphics are at least good. You must be playing it on a commodore 64 or something

    image

  • Turtleneck37Turtleneck37 Member Posts: 91
    Originally posted by vylo


    Vanguard is a game that a lot of us have been waiting for, for a long time.  If you aren't familiar with it, or are trying to decide when or whether or not to get it, perhaps my experience so far can help you.
    The Good: 
    Graphics on the whole are amazing, much higher then I have seen from any other game.
    The classes are well designed, and I haven't heard any complaints about any of them being irritating to play.
    The world is freaking gigantic, and has a lot of content, and they plan on adding more.
    Diplomacy and crafting spheres are well designed.  My friend won't stop friggin doing diplomacy.
    The game isn't a hand holder.  It makes heavy use of groups, and the difficulty level of many encounters is pretty rough.  The death penalty is more severe then most current MMOs.  (if you are into this, like me)
     
    The bad:
    This is effectively beta 6.  Don't give me any crap about "its new".  I've played new MMOs with plenty less bugs then this.
    You need a high end machine to run the graphics well.
    The game isn't a hand-holder.  It makes heavy use of groups, and the difficulty level of many encounters is pretty rough.  The death penatly is more severe then in most current MMOS (if you don't like things to be that rough, its a turn off).
     
    The ugly:
    The world feels alive, but the towns feel dead.  They need to work on that big time.  Most NPCs feel like statues, while the outside world has critters crawling around all over the place.
    Water hitting the shore.  I never see people comment on this.  While the water itself is very pretty, the way it connects to the shorelines is polygon-like and ugly. 
     
    Should I buy Vandguard?
    If you don't have a computer that can run it well (at LEAST recommended specs) , don't buy it yet.  Let computer costs come down, and the bugs get fixed at the same time. 
    If you are a very casual gamer, I would probably stay away from this game.
    If you like more hardcore games, and were a big fan of old EQ, this game is a must.  If you have a high end machine go for it.  Otherwise wait it out a bit.
    Very well said i plan on getting this game in the morning :]
  • vylovylo Member Posts: 149
    Originally posted by metalcore


     

    Originally posted by vylo

    The bad:

    This is effectively beta 6.  Don't give me any crap about "its new".  I've played new MMOs with plenty less bugs then this.


     

    WoW is about the only game I can say had virtually no bugs. All other games I have played, EQ1, SWG, EQ2, Horizons have been much more buggy than this game and ten times more frustrating with client crashes and performance.





    Originally posted by vylo



    Water hitting the shore.  I never see people comment on this.  While the water itself is very pretty, the way it connects to the shorelines is polygon-like and ugly. 



     

    No offense to the OP but people expect amazing graphics that are completely smooth and run really well on their ZX81 machine or their Spectrum calculator.

    Just doesn't happen.

     

     



    As I said before I'm running on a good machine (quad core with GTX 8800).  The water just doesn't connect well to land.

     

    Wow had plent of bugs, but mainly mechanics, I can't recall many if any crashing bugs.  WoW was indeed though a pretty bug free release.

  • EverithEverith Member CommonPosts: 482
    I agree though the water land connect is polygonal in comparison to other games AND the rest of vanguard graphics itself. Doesn't bother my much don't spend much time on the shore... not a beach person lol

    image

  • EliasThorneEliasThorne Member UncommonPosts: 338
    Originally posted by vylo



    If you are a very casual gamer, I would probably stay away from this game.
    For the most part you're spot on - but I disagree with this part, I'm a casual gamer and am enjoying it (so far).



    If you're a casual gamer you;re pretty used to taking things are your own pace and don't get all het up because other people maxed out, so it really isn't an issue.



    In fact in total opposition to this there are two things that will attract the causal gamer - the fellowship system (when its back online again and I wish they'd hurry as I may be moving house soon and may not be able to play for a couple of months ) and the caravan system - both very causal friendly.

    Currently Playing: GW2
    Currently Following: Elder Scrolls Online
    Games in my wake: Anarchy Online, Archlord (beta), Asheron’s Call, Asheron’s Call 2, City of Heroes, Dark Age of Camelot (SI to Catacombs), DDO, EVE Online, EverQuest II (beta), Guild Wars, Horizons, Lineage II,LORTO, Rift, RF Online (beta), RYL, Saga of Ryzon, Shadowbane, Star Wars Galaxies, Vanguard, WAR, WoW

  • EliasThorneEliasThorne Member UncommonPosts: 338
    Originally posted by Gooney

    ...If Im using my headseat to play (Logitec USB) I have to run sound as "Generic Software" and that costs me 5-8 FPS
    I'm in the same boat here (different make but the same issue), do you know if this has been flagged as an issue yet?

    Currently Playing: GW2
    Currently Following: Elder Scrolls Online
    Games in my wake: Anarchy Online, Archlord (beta), Asheron’s Call, Asheron’s Call 2, City of Heroes, Dark Age of Camelot (SI to Catacombs), DDO, EVE Online, EverQuest II (beta), Guild Wars, Horizons, Lineage II,LORTO, Rift, RF Online (beta), RYL, Saga of Ryzon, Shadowbane, Star Wars Galaxies, Vanguard, WAR, WoW

  • EverithEverith Member CommonPosts: 482
    It has it's a known issue that Software sound is a leak of Memory they're working on it... They had the same problem with WoW and Eq2 i remember having the problem personally

    image

  • ValorusValorus Member Posts: 235

    While your post is well thought out and your points stay on focus I've got to disagree on a few of them.  The fact that the game is geared more towards groups should not be a surprise to someone who has been following it so close for so long.  It's been stated over and over that it's the main focus of Vanguard.  So to me it should not be listed as a minus to the game, but rather stated to thoughs who hate grouping to look for something different.

    The graphics are really nice.  The environment and the characters.  When I play I love looking at the details of my armor and weapons.

    The big issue for a lot of people, and a false one at that, is you need a mega PC in order to play.  It's simply not true.  As long as you meet the min reqs set forth by Sigil you can play and have a good time.  Will it look the very best it can?  On a lower end machine the answer would be no.  I'm running on what I deem a middle of the line PC and can run pretty much 100% of the time on the highest quality setting.  If I enter an area where there are a ton of people and my frames slow down it takes me all of 15 seconds to notch the setting down.

    For me it's not a big deal.  I'm 98% of the time out doing quests and hunting where it's not uncommon for me to encounter a other human players for quite some time.  People just expect the word to be custome made for them.  They expect that just because they pay for something it should act exactly as they would have it and if this doesnt happen, well... no need to go into all that.  I'm sure you all have read plenty of hater posts here.

  • casharcashar Member Posts: 20

    plus;

    Bad :

    Spell fxs wow(2004) < vanguard (2007) < EQ2 ( 2004)

    Ugly:

    All animations and physic sux too much. running/left right speed/cross running/casting while running/jumping/swimmg....

  • swede2swede2 Member Posts: 975
    Originally posted by altairzq

    I'd put graphics into ugly and diplomacy into bad, but this is just me.
    Get a new computer my machine will play vanguard with every setting maxed at 1920x 1200 and on a dell 24inch wide screen the game is stunning blows anything ive ever seen out of the water
  • combustion8combustion8 Member Posts: 14
    Anyone who says the graphics are bad obviously has an outdated vid card...  The snakes slithering through the grass looks AMAZING.
  • olddaddyolddaddy Member Posts: 3,356
    Originally posted by combustion8

    Anyone who says the graphics are bad obviously has an outdated vid card...  The snakes slithering through the grass looks AMAZING.
    Yes, but my character just bought a longsword that really looks oversized, and far to thick. I am more used to the thin, streamline, longswords, rather than a machete style longsword. There are room for improvements.
Sign In or Register to comment.