Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Everquest 2 server population

EvilsproEvilspro Member Posts: 6

Here is the number of characters by server :

Guk : 54 125

Najena : 72 040

Blackburrow : 56 477

Antoinia Bayle : 74 582

Unrest : 68 883

Kithicor : 52 691

Nektulos : 55 128

Butcherblock : 55 385

Lucan DLere : 72 060

Everforst : 59 777

The Bazaar : 48 062

Nagafen : 90 017

Vox : 80 745

Venekor : 62 564

Befallen : 55 211

Permafrost : 76 322

Crushbone : 61 959

Runnyeye : 49 230

Mistmoore : 64 420

Oasis : 60 626

Innovation : 32 381

Darathar : 31 426

Gorenaire : 11 636

Talendor : 22 881

Valor : 36 080

Storms : 32 560

Splitpaw : 52 150

Sebilis : 41 631



Total : 1 531 049 characters



Most populated : Nagafen (90 017)

Less populated : Gorenaire (11 636)

BTW -> This is not the number of subscribers ...

But if each subribers have in average :



2 characters :  765 525 subscribers

3 characters :  510 350 subscribers

4 characters :  382 762 subscribers

5 characters :  306 210 subscribers



Those numbers have been taken from : http://eq2players.station.sony.com

Comments

  • RedwoodSapRedwoodSap Member Posts: 1,235

    You do realize they don't wipe characters from closed accounts don't you?

    Last count by mmogchart.com  was about 170k subscribers.

    image

  • NiberNiber Member Posts: 203
    HAHAHAH.



     Uhm,  yeah.. those numbers mean nothing.  I'd imagine more than half quit anywhere between a year and two years ago.  Hell, I have buddies who quit the first week of the game that you'll find on EQ2players.
  • lomillerlomiller Member Posts: 1,810
    Originally posted by RedwoodSap


    You do realize they don't wipe characters from closed accounts don't you?
    Last count by mmogchart.com  was about 170k subscribers.
    That was old even when it was put up, probably from around the time of the DoF expansion. It’s certainly higher then that now. SOE has 680 000 subscriptions total and EQ2 is the most popular of the three games that make up most of that number. The other two are EQ1 and SWG both of which are well under 200K at this point.  
  • WARCRYtmWARCRYtm Member Posts: 875

    EQ1 - 200k (probably less)

    SWG - 110k (probably less)

    PS - 20k

    MxO - 30k

    total - 360k

    Total SOE subs - 680k

    360k - 680k = 320k EQ2 subs

  • lomillerlomiller Member Posts: 1,810
    Originally posted by WARCRYtm


    EQ1 - 200k (probably less)
    SWG - 110k (probably less)
    PS - 20k
    MxO - 30k
    total - 360k
    Total SOE subs - 680k
    360k - 680k = 320k EQ2 subs
    I’m guessing there is some double counting due to all access.  I.E. someone who has EQ1, EQ2 and SWG on their all access account is counted as 3 separate subscriptions.  

     

    This would tend to inflate the numbers for EQ1 and SWG my WAG is that they are a little higher then we normally think of them, so it would look more like:

    EQ2: 150K base + 90K all access = 240K

    EQ1: 100K base + 90K all access = 190K

    SWG:100K base + 90K all access = 190K

     

    Total = 620K with other games making up the difference either on all access or separately.  This number was reported pre Vanguard which is why it's not included.
  • WARCRYtmWARCRYtm Member Posts: 875
    Originally posted by lomiller

    Originally posted by WARCRYtm


    EQ1 - 200k (probably less)
    SWG - 110k (probably less)
    PS - 20k
    MxO - 30k
    total - 360k
    Total SOE subs - 680k
    360k - 680k = 320k EQ2 subs
    I’m guessing there is some double counting due to all access.  I.E. someone who has EQ1, EQ2 and SWG on their all access account is counted as 3 separate subscriptions.  

     

    This would tend to inflate the numbers for EQ1 and SWG my WAG is that they are a little higher then we normally think of them, so it would look more like:

    EQ2: 150K base + 90K all access = 240K

    EQ1: 100K base + 90K all access = 190K

    SWG:100K base + 90K all access = 190K

     

    Total = 620K with other games making up the difference either on all access or separately.  This number was reported pre Vanguard which is why it's not included.



    It was SOE official report, a companie like Sony cant lie about numbers
  • SWGLoverSWGLover Member, Newbie CommonPosts: 539
    Originally posted by WARCRYtm

    Originally posted by lomiller

    Originally posted by WARCRYtm


    EQ1 - 200k (probably less)
    SWG - 110k (probably less)
    PS - 20k
    MxO - 30k
    total - 360k
    Total SOE subs - 680k
    360k - 680k = 320k EQ2 subs
    I’m guessing there is some double counting due to all access.  I.E. someone who has EQ1, EQ2 and SWG on their all access account is counted as 3 separate subscriptions.  

     

    This would tend to inflate the numbers for EQ1 and SWG my WAG is that they are a little higher then we normally think of them, so it would look more like:

    EQ2: 150K base + 90K all access = 240K

    EQ1: 100K base + 90K all access = 190K

    SWG:100K base + 90K all access = 190K

     

    Total = 620K with other games making up the difference either on all access or separately.  This number was reported pre Vanguard which is why it's not included.



    It was SOE official report, a companie like Sony cant lie about numbers



     

    Suuuure they can't! 

     

    If EQ2 had over 300k subscribers like the op was leading us to believe, that fact would be mentioned by SOE/ Sony on a daily basis - they'd love to have that many subscribers for an individual game.

     

     

  • YeeboYeebo Member UncommonPosts: 1,361
    Actually the 300K estimate is pretty close to the low end estimate given by the OP.  Both numbers arrived at by very different methods.  Until someone can show me something recent and pretty compelling to the contrary, I'm buying the "roughly 300K subs."  EoF was a pretty popular expansion, I don't think 300 K is unreasonable. 



    In addition, the sheer number of new MMO players that WoW has brought in recently  is probably a bit of a windfall for EQ II.  Some proportion of players that leave WoW will want something similar, but with perhaps a bit more depth.  EQ II is really the only game out right now that fit's that bill and has much visibility (An aside: Vanguard has pretty good visibility now....but doesn't have a bit more depth...it's like going from arthmatic to calculus.  In addition it currently runs like feces on most PCs....not very appealing to most former WoWers).  Hell, they ought to give a free client and a month sub to anyone that can prove they played WoW recently if they really want to grow their player base.



    All in all, I don't think 300K players is an unreasonable number.   It's still pretty meager compared to what these cames are capable of.  Less than EQ had at it's peak.  Why all the vehement insistence that it's only 150k?

    I don't want to write this, and you don't want to read it. But now it's too late for both of us.

Sign In or Register to comment.