Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Exploded Star The Brightest Ever Seen

UploadUpload Member Posts: 679


Astronomers have spotted a cataclysmic explosion that marked the death of a huge, distant star in a blast five times as bright and powerful as any they had seen previously. They said Monday that a similar fate may be imminent for a star in Earth's galactic neighborhood.

The size and energy of the newly recorded blast, 240 million light-years away, have already begun to transform scientific understanding of how especially large stars explode, and have left awestruck researchers concerned - and a little excited - about what might happen to the similarly enormous and unstable star closer to home.

If that nearer star, named Eta Carinae, blows up like the one just discovered, they said, it could possibly spew dangerous radiation in Earth's direction. More likely, however, it would erupt into the most luminous star in our sky - visible during the day and bright enough to let people read unaided at night for weeks and perhaps months.

The new discovery of a massive star exploding in a runaway thermonuclear reaction is especially exciting for scientists, who said it gives them important clues to the nature of the early universe and the formation and destruction of the earliest stars.

"This was a truly monstrous explosion, a hundred times more energetic than a typical supernova," astronomer Nathan Smith of the University of California at Berkeleysaid of the exploded star, called SN 2006gy, which was believed to be as massive as a star can be.

"It's so powerful that it requires a new explanation of how massive stars explode," said Smith. Unlike most supernovas, which fade quickly, this exploded star has remained extremely bright since it was spotted in September.

Stars approaching this enormous size generally implode when they become unstable, leaving behind a black hole or a neutron star, a cold, extremely dense remnant. Astronomers considered it theoretically possible that such a massive star could instead explode and throw vast amounts of matter into space instead of collapsing, but they had never before witnessed it.

"Discoveries don't get more exciting than this for a theorist," said Mario Livio of the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, Maryland,who was not involved in the research but spoke at a NASA news conference Monday.

"The suggestion is that we may be seeing a new type of explosion mechanism, never seen before, and that the first stars in the universe exploded with this mechanism," he said. "At the same time, there may be a star in our own galaxy that could do the same thing - tomorrow."

Livio said the enormous Eta Carinae, which is only 7,500 light-years away in our own Milky Way galaxy, has many features similar to those of the newly discovered exploded star and has been showing signs of instability that could lead to a similar supernova.

The potential danger comes from the fact that explosions of massive stars generally emit jets of intense gamma radiation, among the most powerful and harmful forces in the universe. If Eta Carinae did explode and a jet was pointed in the general direction of the solar system, Livio said, Earth could be endangered. But because the gamma-ray jets tend to be relatively narrow, like the beam of a lighthouse, the odds are that the jet would miss Earth.

Far more likely, Livio said, is that an Eta Carinae explosion "could be the best star show in the history of modern civilization." That show, however, would be seen only in the Southern Hemisphere.

Stars as massive as Eta Carinae and the distant one that exploded have seldom been found - only a dozen or so have been detected among the 400 billion stars in the Milky Way. Eta Carinae was first observed as an especially bright star in 1843, when it was in the midst of a smaller surge in brightness. The extra luminosity faded around 1870, but the star began to brighten noticeably a century later.

Unlike Eta Carinae, the newly discovered exploding star is not prominent in the sky because it is so far away.

As astronomers peer to the farther reaches of the universe and back into time, they expect to find many more of the superlarge stars, which coalesced and were destroyed in a relatively short time after the Big Bang. These early stars are of enormous interest to astrophysicists because they can help explain how the original few elements of the universe - primarily hydrogen and helium - were fused together inside stars to form the heavier elements. Those stars also had to explode, rather than collapse into black holes, in order for the universe to become populated with the many elements it has.

The SN 2006gy supernova was first detected last September during a routine telescope sweep of the night skies by University of Texasgraduate student Robert Quimby.

The extraordinary brightness of the star attracted the interest of astronomers at Berkeley and the University of Texas at Austin. The supernova was also examined at the Lick Observatory in California, at the Keck Observatory in Mauna Kea, Hawaii, and, perhaps most important, by NASA's orbiting Chandra X-ray Observatory, operated by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Using the Chandra instruments, researchers were able to rule out the most likely alternative explanation for the huge supernova: that a white dwarf star with a mass about that of the sun exploded in a hydrogen-rich environment, leading to the unprecedented brightness.

The Chandra instruments, however, found that the exploded star was not producing the X-ray radiation expected under those conditions. With that established, Berkeley astrophysicist Dave Pooley said, the team became confident that SN 2006gy "was, in fact, the death of an extremely massive star."

Intellpuke: You can read this article by Washington Post staff writer Marc Kaufman, reporting from Washington, D.C., in context here: www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/07/AR2007050700752.html?hpid=topnews



FIP Free Internet Press

Comments

  • EnigmaEnigma Member UncommonPosts: 11,384
    The amazing thing is, that star exploded 250 million years ago.

    People who have to create conspiracy and hate threads to further a cause lacks in intellectual comprehension of diversity.

  • TechleoTechleo Member Posts: 1,984
     Were not exactly safe. There was a supernova that struck earth once lonnnnng ago. The scars can be found where the superheated plasma literally toasted a hundreds mile long strip of primeval forest. The amazing thing is our magnetosphere is powerful enough to deflect alot of that energy. At least if the star explodes further then 2.5 lightyears away. The one which did damage to us was probably around 5 Lightyears away. If perchance we were hit but a supernova from one of the Triad of Alpha Centari stars we could be in for a bit of a serious hurt.



    All in all though earth and Sol are in a pretty peaceful neighborhood
  • ColdmeatColdmeat Member UncommonPosts: 3,409

    Just tells me we need to focus on getting off this damned rock sooner, rather than later.

    Even if it's just in giant space faring colonies a la Titan AE.

    Eventually, something is gonna come along and bring about the end of our little tribe of quibbling nimwits if we don't do something to spread out beyond this planet.

  • noname12345noname12345 Member Posts: 2,267

    Who's to say that getting off this rock and getting onto another will make us safer? Aren't all rocks open to attack?

    ______________________________
    "When Saddam flew that plane into those buildings, I knew it was time to kick some Iranian ass!"
    -cheer leading, flag waving American

  • malak118malak118 Member Posts: 221
    I  agree its time to move on. However other than mars the only option is in a neighboring red dwarf that would take an infant up to the end of its life to make it. shucks. maybe we shoud spend less money on finding ways to maim each other and focus on something important for a change. Lots of room out there in space if you want to get away from the infidels well heres your new planet pyscho enjoy.  Another threatening issue is the theory of the megnetic field weakening. I guess every so many years it needs to recharge by flipping poles  and during its weak point more radiation hits the planet which may explain higher cancer rates and global warming. Of course those are all theories and there is no need to call me an ignorant jerk if you know better because im not an expert just a guy who reads about space once in awhile.  en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_field
  • petrickopetricko Member Posts: 84
    Very fascinating.   I remember learning about a Supernova that was visible for a few weeks thousands (or maybe hundreds) of years ago that was documented in China.  It lit up the sky even at night.  Is that the one you were talking about?  I love learning about this stuff, very interesting.

    image

  • PunkMonkPunkMonk Member Posts: 483

    Actually, NASA is thinking about space colonies. More speicifically, the moon of Mars, Fobos. The whole rock is about the size of Dallas, Texas and because of the gravity, atmosphere, whatever, they think that it's the perfect place to make the first space city.

     

    The video I was watching on it said that actually, space colonies should be around in our lifetime, (Unless someone on this forum is like 70.)

    image

    image

  • gpettgpett Member Posts: 1,105
    Well, we dont have to wait for a star to explode, a meteor or commet to strike.  Our earth will become unhabitiable.  Not because of global warming.



    It is proven that moon is moving away from the earth in its orbit.  Every year the moon is roughly one inch further from the earth.  The significance of this fact is that the moons orbit around the earth is what keeps the earth rotating on axis.  There will be a day that the moon travels far enough from the earth that the earth will not spin on axis. 



    The other planets of our solar system have no central axis as they travel around the sun.  Having no axis means that there is no predictable weather.  Ice sheets which were once restricted to the north and south poles will now randomly travel the earth.  You kno what glaciers do as they scour the earth.  They level mountains and anything in their way.  The whole climate of the earth would be thrown into dramatic chaos.



    Sure, that event is a long ways off.  But it is just one example of how limited the human lease for residency is on this planet.
  • malak118malak118 Member Posts: 221
    Originally posted by gpett

    Well, we dont have to wait for a star to explode, a meteor or commet to strike.  Our earth will become unhabitiable.  Not because of global warming.



    It is proven that moon is moving away from the earth in its orbit.  Every year the moon is roughly one inch further from the earth.  The significance of this fact is that the moons orbit around the earth is what keeps the earth rotating on axis.  There will be a day that the moon travels far enough from the earth that the earth will not spin on axis. 



    The other planets of our solar system have no central axis as they travel around the sun.  Having no axis means that there is no predictable weather.  Ice sheets which were once restricted to the north and south poles will now randomly travel the earth.  You kno what glaciers do as they scour the earth.  They level mountains and anything in their way.  The whole climate of the earth would be thrown into dramatic chaos.



    Sure, that event is a long ways off.  But it is just one example of how limited the human lease for residency is on this planet.
    It is quite a ways like several thousands of years, but still a good point. Theroist believe that they can predict earthquakes based on position of the sun and moon. Volcanic eruptions also tend to follow some type of pattern due to the gravataitonal pull. worth checking out for sure.
Sign In or Register to comment.