What the heck is going on?
First ABCNews.com leaves Ron Paul out of their Presidential debate polls. Now MSNBC alters the reporting of the results of their poll?!?!?!
If the television networks are this worried about a Ron Paul influence then just wait until the major parties get hold of this whole thing with their influence. Does anyone actually think that even though Ron Paul may be desired to run by a majority of Republican's, the Republican party would actually let him run on their ticket? NO WAY! I would even be so bold as to say they would forfeit the win by putting a substandard candidate on just to not let Ron Paul alter their status quo stance on issues. Which, by the way, is just as big government and interventionist as the Democrats stance. Don't ever be fooled by them to think otherwise.
Comments
This is an extremely complex issue, so I'll keep it simple:
That's a shame.
Your argument is like a two legged dog with an eating disorder...weak and unbalanced.
It's a shame, but ultimately a moot point. He'll never win the GOP nomination. Karl Rove, and the rest of the Neocon attack dogs will fire up a smear campaign that makes what they did to McCain in 2000 look like preschool hijinx by comparison.
Yahoo campaign page Has NOOOOOOO mention of Ron Paul anywhere on the page yet displays every other candidate with pictures and links. Don't get the assumption that maybe they just don't consider him a candidate, or not know of him or anything like that because if you scroll to the bottom and click on "OFFICIAL CAMPAIGN WEBSITES" then "Select a candidate", you will see Ron Paul is in there...basically hidden from view.
______________________________
"When Saddam flew that plane into those buildings, I knew it was time to kick some Iranian ass!"
-cheer leading, flag waving American
http://www.thespoof.com/news/spoof.cfm?headline=s2i18411
Fair? Balanced? Nyah.
Planned that way? Most likely!
----------------------------------------------------------
Republican Presidential Candidates
John McCain 11:31
Mitt Romney 9:04
Rudy Giuliani 7:10
Sam Brownback 6:33
Mike Huckabee 5:24
Tom Tancredo 5:17
Jim Gilmore 5:17
Ron Paul 4:46
Duncan Hunter 4:42
Tommy Thompson 4:36
http://www.thespoof.com/news/spoof.cfm?headline=s2i18411
Sadly, it makes me want to cry, rather than laugh, because, despite being parody, it's pretty much also the truth.
______________________________
"When Saddam flew that plane into those buildings, I knew it was time to kick some Iranian ass!"
-cheer leading, flag waving American
According to Google Fights here are results of the campaign battle:
Ron Paul vs John McCain
Ron Paul vs Rudy Giuliani
Ron Paul vs Mitt Romney
Ron Paul vs Hillary Clinton
Ron Paul vs Barack Obama
______________________________
"When Saddam flew that plane into those buildings, I knew it was time to kick some Iranian ass!"
-cheer leading, flag waving American
The bilderbergers call the shots...they decide who becomes president. It will be that way until the American sheeple see them for what they are and move to strike them down...lol, so, in other words, they will most likely be in power for decades upon decades to come.
Of all the 2008 presidential candidates Hilary Clinton is the only one I know who has been to a Bilderberg meeting...Bill Clinton attended his first Bilderberg meeting the year before he was elected president.
...therefore Hilary Clinton will be president.
Edit: also Edwards went to a meeting.
______________________________
"When Saddam flew that plane into those buildings, I knew it was time to kick some Iranian ass!"
-cheer leading, flag waving American
Edit: also Edwards went to a meeting.
I didn't know about Edwards...that's prolly why he was picked as Kerry's VP. Just so long as the Bilderberg Group has it's hooks in'em they'll have a green light for a leadership roll of one kind or another. Here's a list of the participants of the 2004 (the year John Edwards was invited) Bilderberg meeting.
At any rate, Ron Paul hasn't been vetted by the BG...therefore he will not be president.