Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Al Gore really p*sses me off!

xpyrofuryxxpyrofuryx Member CommonPosts: 1,587
I'm watching a thing on global warming on the history channel right now and they had Al Gore spewing out worthless dribble. It really makes me mad because he was talking about how theres no debate to human cause of it, when in actuallity humans ARE NOT the cause...

image

«1345

Comments

  • SimmageSimmage Member Posts: 93
    That depends on your point of view. Gradually the world is getting warmer, it's trend. However, the has never gotten this warm this fast.



    Human CO2 emissions aren't helping the problem, neither are our mass cattle industry, or our commercial air travel. Being a citizen of Canada I can say my ecological footprint is smaller than even the most lean American or Chinese Person. It's no longer just Al Gore saying things about how the world is warming due to humans. Most of the people who say otherwise are just being payed by George Bush's little circle of Oil Tycoon friends.



    If you would care to elaborate your opinion I would gladly turn this into a nice, friendly, debate.
  • methane47methane47 Member UncommonPosts: 3,694
    Think of it this way.. The human body needs to stay at a specific temperature in order to function correctly.. The temperature in the body is regulated by sweating, hair standing up, goosebumps, faster heart beats, what ever...  If the body temperature goes one way or the other.. then that can cause really bad affects

    Temperature (C) Symptoms
    28 muscle failure
    30 loss of body temp. control
    33 loss of consciousness
    37 normal
    42 central nervous system breakdown
    44 death*

    All it takes is alittle change in temperature.. Just 4 degrees each way and you could cause longterm damage..



    Now.. If Your body was in a isolated ideal environment the temperature would never change..But just add a few fever inducing microscopic bacteria and that could very shortly skew the temperature upwards.. All it takes is a few micro-organisms to screw with the balance.....



    Now apply that to the earth... Where things that the world does to maintain its temperature are things like rain. volcanoes, blah blah blah... And humans are bacteria...



    It doesn't matter that humans produce less greenhouse gases then the earth does.. because all it takes is enough to throw off the balance/regulation.. which could lead to long term damage..

    image
    What's your Wu Name?
    Donovan --> Wu Name = Violent Knight
    Methane47 --> Wu Name = Thunderous Leader
    "Some people call me the walking plank, 'cuz any where you go... Death is right behind you.."
    <i>ME<i>

  • ZikielZikiel Member Posts: 1,138
    I hold the middle-ground. It's been documented reliably that the Earth warms and cools, however mankind certainly doesn't help things, I would say that we are making some amount of impac on global warming, but not a whole lot.
  • xpyrofuryxxpyrofuryx Member CommonPosts: 1,587
    Okay, Man-made global warming is not the big bad thing everyone thinks it is. i guess the man caused greenhouse gases are causing a very very slight portion of the global warming, but not nearly the main contributing factor, and not even close to what the average person thinks it is.



    There are quite a few reasons and way I can debate this so I will touch on a few subjects and bring out more as this debate calls for it.



    First off, lets say greenhouse gases are the cause of global warming (they really aren't the main cause, but are a cause) 90% of the total greenhouse gases are water vapor, not C02. Man does not cause water vapor! and then the next most abundant greenhouse gas out of the left 10% is C02. And us humans only cause roughly 5% of that. Volcanoes cause the majority of it.



    Second off the Sun is main cause of global warming. The sun has been at its most intense in the past 100 years than it has over the past few thousand years. The amount of sunspots determines the suns intensity. This is proven a few times over. Most notably in the Helocene Maximum, which was about 3,000 years during the bronze age that the earths temperatures were much much higher than it is now and from reading ice cores the sun has had the most sunspots. In the Medieval warm period there were more sunspots in the sun and the earths temperature was once again higher. And then a time called the "Little Ice Age" came around. During this time the sun went almost completely blank with sunspots... and what happened? the temperature fell. Now once again the sunspots are rising and so is the temperature.



    Another main issue is that chart Al Gore is always struttin around about C02 levels and the earth temperature. Well, theres one major flaw there that he doesnt point out. And that is that the temperature parts goes up before the C02 part!

    image

  • SimmageSimmage Member Posts: 93
    I don't think you can get mad at Al Gore for preaching a message that is good. As other have pointed out, a small change can be a big problem in the long run. People who say that the Planet IS going to change are right, some people find it easy to cast the blame on Volcanoes (Which also release Sulfer into the atmosphere, cooling the planet slightly.), they think that if they something to do with it, they would have to change they're cozy lifestyle. Are we still on the sun thing? The sun isn't a problem, yes sunspots are more commonly occuring at certain times in history. They overall don't describe the suns intensity. I agree that the Planet makes it's own problems (I.E Ebola) However humans are not just a small part. They are a thing that is causing a major problem. And Water Vapour? Come on. Add it up, more vapour means more rain means flooding mean change in ocean currents mean possible Ice Age. Will Humans survive, yeah probably, but ask yourself, do you want your great grandchildren living in some ice cave???
  • JarlathJarlath Member Posts: 174
    Humans are not the main cause for CO2 emmisions and whatnot. Volcanoes alone emitt 100x more than what humans do every year, and thats not to count other living creatures (when they breathe), even cows emitt more when they fart than humans do.

    Infact, water vapour in the atmosphere is the highest single gas which contributes to global warming.  But these gases are vital to keeping our planet warm enough to sustain life. They are vital to our survival. We need to not deplete nor increase it too much.



    How global warming works:

    Radiation from the sun's rays comes into earth, but is too high a frequency to be absorbed by the gases in the atmosphere, so instead is absorbed by the earth's surface. When it's asborbed, it is turned from kinetic energy into heat energy. The heat is then radiated outwards towards space in waves, but most of these waves are low enough for the gases to absorb it and bounce it back towards the earth. Hence, the "greenhouse" effect.

    However, too much gases that can absorb these frequencies from the earth, and too much heat is kept in. Too little, and not enough is kept in.





    However, the world is at an equillibrium with all things natural. Water falls as quick as it rises. Over billions of years (so says science) the world has developed an eco system where one thing leads to a next and everything is in a balance. But as we emitt more CO2 than we're naturally "allowed" to as a segment of the global emissions, we are shifting this equillibrium and it might fall into an endless downward spiral that would see the end to life on this planet as we see it quite shockingly rapidly.

    1 or 2 degree rise in the world would mean enough of the polar icecaps are melted to sink 40% of britain into the sea, and many other costal countries and islands. It would mean that it is 1 or 2 degrees too hot to grow vegetation in parts of africa and asia.

    This could also go the other way and become really cold. The polar icecaps melting, leading to an increase in the amount of liquid water around the world, leading to more CO2 from the atmosphere being dissolved in the earth's oceans, therefore reducing the amount of heat kept inside the earth and we could spin into an ice age(ok exxagerration but who likes the cold - you get my point anyways). 1 or 2 degrees change in the sea's temperature would mean convection currents that carry warm air to countries like Britain (again) stop and then we have to rely on other countries to supply us food as it would be too cold to grow our own vegetation.



    What I'm trying to say is, that we are NOT to blame for the most CO2 emmissions on this world. However our reduction of mass forrests (plants use up CO2 from the atmosphere and give out oxygen as a "waste" product for those of you who didnt know), and our "over the limit" emissions do mean we are very close to tipping this equillibrium on our planet, which could only be fixed by a "reset". And so we have to do our part to make sure we're not over the limit.



    -I do chemistry btw, don't let anyone tell you any lies



    My two cents
  • xpyrofuryxxpyrofuryx Member CommonPosts: 1,587
    Originally posted by Simmage

    I don't think you can get mad at Al Gore for preaching a message that is good. As other have pointed out, a small change can be a big problem in the long run. People who say that the Planet IS going to change are right, some people find it easy to cast the blame on Volcanoes (Which also release Sulfer into the atmosphere, cooling the planet slightly.), they think that if they something to do with it, they would have to change they're cozy lifestyle. Are we still on the sun thing? The sun isn't a problem, yes sunspots are more commonly occuring at certain times in history. They overall don't describe the suns intensity. I agree that the Planet makes it's own problems (I.E Ebola) However humans are not just a small part. They are a thing that is causing a major problem. And Water Vapour? Come on. Add it up, more vapour means more rain means flooding mean change in ocean currents mean possible Ice Age. Will Humans survive, yeah probably, but ask yourself, do you want your great grandchildren living in some ice cave???
    Sunspots do determine the suns intensity. The Sun has an incredible magnetic field. Sunspots are when a spot in the sun starts to stretch and mess with a part of that magnetic field, it gets slightly cooler and then shoots a beam of electrons out into space. Some of these electrons hit the Earth and cause effects such as the aurora borealis. This effect also brings energy and heat.



    And your saying water vapor doesnt matter? ha! ok so your dissing your own theory. water vapor acounts for 90% of the greenhouse gases that supposedly are causing the earth to warm.

    image

  • SimmageSimmage Member Posts: 93
    Cows...Hmm, why do we have so many cows? For Big Macs. Not that I'm complaining. Planet...Big Mac...I choose Big Mac.



    And if CO2 is SO bad that we need to wear masks (In China) and we need advisories to warn us to keep indoors. It's getting pretty rotten.
  • KorususKorusus Member UncommonPosts: 831
    I was watching the same show.  It was about the 7 biggest threats to humanity's survival.  It was excellent up until the last one...global warming.  Basically the entire first hour and half were an excuse to air a propaganda piece on global warming, complete with a faux staged interview between the hostess and Al Gore.



    Heh



    Personally this was the first time I had ever heard of the "black hole and gamma ray pulses destroying the solar system" theories which are pretty fascinating.

    ----------
    Life sucks, buy a helmet.

  • rsammyrsammy Member Posts: 72
    It was a decent program, but they always like to show these end of the world predictions on TV just to scare people into something or another. I agree that it was a total propaganda campaign at the end with the "Climate Change" theory, but it's not like that is a bad thing to discuss since it is such a prevalent topic on most peoples' minds. And while I do think that Al Gore is an obnoxious bore who is just riding his movie popularity until he can become president, I can't argue that there is alot we can do to improve the world around us. Why is it such a bad thing to regulate factories and refineries? Why do we have to grandfather them in to pass regulations? Why cut down millions of acres of forests for grazing?Why has it taken so long to get funding for alternative energies?

    I guess it's just alot of poor decisions that could potentially really screw something up that pisses me off, but that's just my opinion.
  • EnigmaEnigma Member UncommonPosts: 11,384
    Originally posted by xpyrofuryx

    I'm watching a thing on global warming on the history channel right now and they had Al Gore spewing out worthless dribble. It really makes me mad because he was talking about how theres no debate to human cause of it, when in actuallity humans ARE NOT the cause...



    It's the top ten potential things that could kill our planet wasn't it? Yeah, I nearly crapped myself when I saw it myself a few months ago.

    Al Gore's documentary on Global Warming is the biggest piece of crap ever filmed. It was truly a political move.  There are HUNDREDS of scientists who thinks his film is extremlely inaccurate and everytime he is requested a debate on it, he never shows up (despite the fact that he's said he'll welcome debates on the topic).

    If you guys believe his documentary, then there is some Nigerians who would love for you to help them with their millions of dollars...just as long as you provide them with your bank account number.

    People who have to create conspiracy and hate threads to further a cause lacks in intellectual comprehension of diversity.

  • rsammyrsammy Member Posts: 72
    If you guys believe his documentary, then there is some Nigerians who would love for you to help them with their millions of dollars...just as long as you provide them with your bank account number.
    Lol,sorry but I love seeing those emails. Even better when somebody actually answers one.
  • EnigmaEnigma Member UncommonPosts: 11,384
    Originally posted by rsammy

    If you guys believe his documentary, then there is some Nigerians who would love for you to help them with their millions of dollars...just as long as you provide them with your bank account number.
    Lol,sorry but I love seeing those emails. Even better when somebody actually answers one.

    ever seen the ones where a guy actually responds and makes the Nigerian do stupid things for his bank account number? lol, thats classisc!

     

    Best one of em all!!!

    People who have to create conspiracy and hate threads to further a cause lacks in intellectual comprehension of diversity.

  • xpyrofuryxxpyrofuryx Member CommonPosts: 1,587
    I do like the fact that since people do believe that all that pollution is going to destroy us they then want to reduce pollution, which I am 100% for. City pollution may not cause the earth's warming but it sure does cause other things such as cancer.

    image

  • SimmageSimmage Member Posts: 93
    Electrons hitting the atmosphere only cause small spikes in temperature, mainly in the Arctic Circle and Antarctica. Most of the Electrons are deflected by earths magnetosphere anyway. Humans may not be the only cause of Global Warming, but we aren't helping. Can you honestly look at all the smog being pumped into the atmosphere and say 'That doesn't do anything'? When there are warnings about going outside because the air is bad for you, there must be problem.



    You've clearly gotten an idea in your head about something, denying any involvement in the process of Climate change. I can't change that opinion, just like nobody can change my opinion that facism is the best form of government. Pardon if this post is odd, my comp just reset and then I eat supper (With beef)
  • TertiusTertius Member UncommonPosts: 62
    Originally posted by xpyrofuryx

    Okay, Man-made global warming is not the big bad thing everyone thinks it is. i guess the man caused greenhouse gases are causing a very very slight portion of the global warming, but not nearly the main contributing factor, and not even close to what the average person thinks it is.



    There are quite a few reasons and way I can debate this so I will touch on a few subjects and bring out more as this debate calls for it.



    First off, lets say greenhouse gases are the cause of global warming (they really aren't the main cause, but are a cause) 90% of the total greenhouse gases are water vapor, not C02. Man does not cause water vapor! and then the next most abundant greenhouse gas out of the left 10% is C02. And us humans only cause roughly 5% of that. Volcanoes cause the majority of it.



    Second off the Sun is main cause of global warming. The sun has been at its most intense in the past 100 years than it has over the past few thousand years. The amount of sunspots determines the suns intensity. This is proven a few times over. Most notably in the Helocene Maximum, which was about 3,000 years during the bronze age that the earths temperatures were much much higher than it is now and from reading ice cores the sun has had the most sunspots. In the Medieval warm period there were more sunspots in the sun and the earths temperature was once again higher. And then a time called the "Little Ice Age" came around. During this time the sun went almost completely blank with sunspots... and what happened? the temperature fell. Now once again the sunspots are rising and so is the temperature.



    Another main issue is that chart Al Gore is always struttin around about C02 levels and the earth temperature. Well, theres one major flaw there that he doesnt point out. And that is that the temperature parts goes up before the C02 part!




    Virtually everything you wrote here is incorrect.



    For starters, your claim that 90% of greenhouses gases are water vapor is not true. You don't seem to realize that there is a difference in the total amount of a greenhouse gas, and the amount that it in turn affects the Greenhouse Effect. In either case, water vapor does not approach 90%. Furthermore CO2 levels have increased over 30% since the Industrial Revolution, all of which has been caused by human activity.



    You apparently completely misunderstood the section on sunspots. By section of course I am referring to a section of the argument put forth in "The Great Global Warming Swindle", a so-called documentary that aired in Great Britain not too long ago. It is their arguments you are using, though I don't know whether you actually viewed it or just read one of the many web sites and blog entries it inspired. Did you know that the people responsible for that program did a similar "documentary" that claimed silicon breast implants DECREASED the risk of cancer? These people are shills for hire, willing to make any argument they get paid to make. Facts are not part of their arsenal.



    I could give a more detailed analysis for you, but I strongly suspect that it would accomplish nothing as you have your mind made up and set in concrete. I will suggest to you that doing your own research will serve you better than rehashing someone else's arguments, particularly if those arguments have already been debunked. If however you are interested in learning for yourself the facts about "The Great Global Warming Swindle" and who paid for the propaganda piece and why, you could start here. http://www.medialens.org/alerts/07/0313pure_propaganda_the.php .  Or Google up some information for yourself.
  • methane47methane47 Member UncommonPosts: 3,694
    Originally posted by xpyrofuryx

    I do like the fact that since people do believe that all that pollution is going to destroy us they then want to reduce pollution, which I am 100% for. City pollution may not cause the earth's warming but it sure does cause other things such as cancer.
    So you don't believe one unproved theory but you believe another....



    I haven't seen al gore's movie yet... so i dont understand what is upsetting you all so much..



    What is so wrong with the ounce of prevention if it will save life as we know it?




    image
    What's your Wu Name?
    Donovan --> Wu Name = Violent Knight
    Methane47 --> Wu Name = Thunderous Leader
    "Some people call me the walking plank, 'cuz any where you go... Death is right behind you.."
    <i>ME<i>

  • coldfire1234coldfire1234 Member Posts: 89
    Im gunna have to go with Gore on this one. I think he hit the nail on the head. Besides most of the world scientists agree with Gore, well the ones not being paid by the oil companys anyway.
  • EnigmaEnigma Member UncommonPosts: 11,384

    research for yourselves guys

    Al Gore's documentary just doesnt add up. Dont believe me but I implore you to do the research on your own.  I did and I found so much stuff from that film that just didnt make a hell of sense'

    Sorta like when he said he invented the internet.

     

    I mean...if George Bush did a film on global warming would you believe him? No? why? Cause he's a blumbering idiot. Same goes for Gore. That man can't even color without going out of the lines.  Trust me... look

     

    People who have to create conspiracy and hate threads to further a cause lacks in intellectual comprehension of diversity.

  • SimmageSimmage Member Posts: 93
    Things like the Oil Companies buying the patent for the Ballard Fuel cell, that pisses me off! They buy people with weak morals off so that THEY can make an extra buck into their already stuffed pockets. If I could make one wish, it would be that they all were cained in public then spent 12 weeks in the stockades!!!
  • lomillerlomiller Member Posts: 1,810
    Originally posted by xpyrofuryx

    I'm watching a thing on global warming on the history channel right now and they had Al Gore spewing out worthless dribble. It really makes me mad because he was talking about how theres no debate to human cause of it, when in actuallity humans ARE NOT the cause...
    Humans are the cause of global warming and there is no longer any debate about this in scientific circles. Denialits stick strictly to press releases and mediums where they don’t actuly have to back their positions with evidence. They avoid publishing papers like they are the plague, most likely because they don’t know the difference between degrees and radians. 
  • lomillerlomiller Member Posts: 1,810
    Originally posted by xpyrofuryx

    Okay, Man-made global warming is not the big bad thing everyone thinks it is. i guess the man caused greenhouse gases are causing a very very slight portion of the global warming, but not nearly the main contributing factor, and not even close to what the average person thinks it is.



    There are quite a few reasons and way I can debate this so I will touch on a few subjects and bring out more as this debate calls for it.



    First off, lets say greenhouse gases are the cause of global warming (they really aren't the main cause, but are a cause) 90% of the total greenhouse gases are water vapor, not C02. Man does not cause water vapor! and then the next most abundant greenhouse gas out of the left 10% is C02. And us humans only cause roughly 5% of that. Volcanoes cause the majority of it.



    Second off the Sun is main cause of global warming. The sun has been at its most intense in the past 100 years than it has over the past few thousand years. The amount of sunspots determines the suns intensity. This is proven a few times over. Most notably in the Helocene Maximum, which was about 3,000 years during the bronze age that the earths temperatures were much much higher than it is now and from reading ice cores the sun has had the most sunspots. In the Medieval warm period there were more sunspots in the sun and the earths temperature was once again higher. And then a time called the "Little Ice Age" came around. During this time the sun went almost completely blank with sunspots... and what happened? the temperature fell. Now once again the sunspots are rising and so is the temperature.



    Another main issue is that chart Al Gore is always struttin around about C02 levels and the earth temperature. Well, theres one major flaw there that he doesnt point out. And that is that the temperature parts goes up before the C02 part!
    Water vapor doesn’t last long enough in the atmosphere to serve as a forcing effect. If a large volume of water vapor were to be released it would fall as rain within weeks. This means for water vapor to change the worlds climate you would need to vaporize insanely huge amounts of water on a continual bases.

     

    We have been able to accurately measure the suns output for about 40 years. In that time there has been no noticeable increase in it’s output. In that time the earth has undergone it’s most rapid warming in the last 8500 years. Proxy indicators for solar output suggest there may have a small increase in solar output early this century, but it’s approximately 1/10 the forcing effect due to CO2 released by human activity.

     

    In a natural climate change it’s 100% expected that temperature rises before CO2 levels do. Oceans release CO2 as they warm, this CO2 in turn causes further warming and results in the rapid warming temperatures we see at the end of ice ages. This CO2 change obviously can’t occur until after the earth starts to warm for some other reasons. Human released CO2 has the same effect, but doesn’t need to wait until something warms the ocean before occurring. 

     

    Do you have any more long debunked theories you want to roll out?
  • JarlathJarlath Member Posts: 174
    At this rate we're gonna run out of fossil fuels in about 30-40 years so by then our CO2 contributions will have depleted by huge amounts ^_^

    Either we burn out or fade away.
  • DraenorDraenor Member UncommonPosts: 7,918
    Originally posted by lomiller

    Originally posted by xpyrofuryx

    I'm watching a thing on global warming on the history channel right now and they had Al Gore spewing out worthless dribble. It really makes me mad because he was talking about how theres no debate to human cause of it, when in actuallity humans ARE NOT the cause...
    Humans are the cause of global warming and there is no longer any debate about this in scientific circles. Denialits stick strictly to press releases and mediums where they don’t actuly have to back their positions with evidence. They avoid publishing papers like they are the plague, most likely because they don’t know the difference between degrees and radians. 



    Denialists?  Now were a cult?



    Did you know that the current global warming scare was actually started by Margaret Thatcher back in the 1970's and there have been no less than FOUR climate change "oh no we're all going to die" scares in the last century?

     

    We also should really start thinking of cutting our emmisions on the planet mars...it has been getting hotter lately too, perhaps a more environmentally friendly mars rover?

    Your argument is like a two legged dog with an eating disorder...weak and unbalanced.

  • PyritePyrite Member Posts: 309
    Last year on "60 Minutes," James Hansen, who is NASA's leading expert on the science of climate delivered the world's most important message. He said, "We have to, in the next ten years, begin to decrease the rate of carbon dioxide emissions and then flatten it out. If that doesn't happen in ten years, we're going to be passing certain tipping points. If the ice sheets begin to disintegrate, what can you do about it? You can't tie a rope around an ice sheet." Although I know a certain cowboy from Crawford who might think you could.



    And that cowboy and his corporate goons at the White House tried to censor Mr. Hansen from delivering that message, claiming such warnings were speculative. This from the crowd that rushed into a war based on an article in the Weekly Standard. This  from the guy who thinks Kyoto is that Japanese emperor dude his dad threw up on.



    Global warming is not speculative. It threatens us enough so that it should be considered a national security issue. Failing to warn the citizens of a looming weapon of mass destruction - and that's what global warming is - in order to protect oil company profits, well, that fits, for me, the definition of treason. And codified treason.



    Please, wait a second. The guy in the White House who made the edits was Phil Cooney, who had been an oil industry lobbyist before given this job as head of the White House Council on Environmental Quality. That's the office that is supposed to be watching out for us. But that's where Phil busied himself crossing stuff out in scientists' reports, because apparently in Phil's mind, he hadn't switched jobs. He was just doing his old job - oil industry lobbyist - from a different office. You know, in the "people's house."



    Republicans have succeeded in making the environment about some tie-dyed dude from Seattle who lives in a solar-powered yurt and eats twigs. It's not. This issue should be driven by something conservatives are much more familiar with: utter selfishness. That's my motivation. I don't want to live my golden years having to put on a hazmat suit just to go down and get the mail. Those are my Viagra years. When I'll be thinking about having children.



    But I wouldn't know what to tell a kid about our world in 20 years. "Dad, tell me about the birds and bees." "They're all gone. Now, eat your Soylent Green." We are letting dying men kill our planet for cash, and they're counting on us being too greedy or distracted, or just plain lazy, to stop them.



    So, on  the 17th anniversary of the Exxon Valdez oil spill, let us pause to consider how close we are to making ourselves fossils from the fossil fuels we extract. In the next 20 years, almost a billion Chinese people will be trading in their bicycles for the automobile. Folks, we either get our shit together on this quickly, or we're going to have to go to Plan B: inventing a car that runs on Chinese people.

    The most important part of reading is reading between the lines.

Sign In or Register to comment.