Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Why do LOTRo and Vanguard even have PvP?

Simple question.

This post is not a flame or rant on why VG pvp sux or why lotro pvmp is lame.



Just want to know why they even included pvp in these games?

Both games claim not to "focus" on pvp.

To the point where both dev teams are/were almost proud to announce it to everyone,and use it as a reason to ignore it.

It seems the devs really couldn't be bothered by me to answer some simple questions about pvp.



Pvp/Mpvp really isn't even important to the developers of vg and lotro and it really shows.

If they don't take it seriously ,then why should I?



So the devs ignore me and the "fanbois" tell me how it is:



"Well this is a pve game,if you don't like it play a pvp game."

"This game wasn't designed for pvp."

"Go play WoW then."

"Quit trolling."

"This is why I hate community boards."



blah blah blah





I hope future "pve" mmorp games that DO include pvp but "it isn't the focus"...

take it a little more seriously.

At least pretend like you care a little.










Comments

  • vajurasvajuras Member Posts: 2,860

    probably saw how bad pure PVE games do at launch so decided to spend a week to add a little PVP support to their game. PVP is at least a viable endgame however these devs tend to push it aside cause they know it doesnt fit so well into their vertical progression schemes. its more like a side activity for PVEers unfortunately

     

    thus I usually play Lost Planet,rainbow6,bf2142, or starport when I want some good PVP action. used to love guild wars too but got burned out on the arenas and GvG but might return at some point.

    guess there is always EVE

  • RoyspiRoyspi Member Posts: 202

    They try to appeal to as many audiences as they can. Any PvP fan knows the PvP in Vanguard was an afterthought and the PvMP in LOTRO isnt that great. But if they advertise they have PvP that can get a few thousand more boxes sold at release and hopefully some subs when the free month is over. Its all Marketing!

  • DevalonDevalon Member UncommonPosts: 496
    I think it just to sell more boxes. I won't even touch a mmorpg if it doesn't have PvP.



    Why do these PvE games have some sort of PvP? because maybe it creates more content that last a lot longer then a quest or instance. You can see that people would play for hours on multi-player fps like CS or some multi-player mods of other games like DoTA from Warcraft 3.



    Also from what i know  the PvP in  the games you listed don't affect players character progress.

    --
    "Any free people have the right to choose how it wants to be govern thats the essence of democracy. It's sad when America has chosen for the stability and consistency of a dictatorship and doing it democratically" -utnow

  • JADEDRAG0NJADEDRAG0N Member Posts: 733
    Im not sure if the 'PvP' in LOTRO can really be called PvP. After all they dont use there ingame avitars to fight the good guys. They use a spawned bad guy instead.
  • spankybusspankybus Member UncommonPosts: 1,367
    it is for these reasons that I am interested to see how Darkfall does at launch. It was built as a PvP game from day one. Not just mindless FFA, but realistic PvP, no arbitrary rules, guards protect their citezens, your actions follow you throughout the world (kind of like UO was when it first launched). Will be intersting to watch how it does. Sorry for the hijack, but this thread made me think of that.  So many games tack on PvP as an afterthought or some kind of side bar entertainment. Would be nice to see meaningful PvP gameplay for a change. Problem is, not everyone agrees on what "meaningful" PvP means.

    Frank 'Spankybus' Mignone
    www.spankybus.com
    -3d Artist & Compositor
    -Writer
    -Professional Amature

  • BigMangoBigMango Member UncommonPosts: 1,821


    Yes they just want to sell more boxes, so they make a half assed attempt at something and put a huge marketing sticker on it.
  • BigMangoBigMango Member UncommonPosts: 1,821
    Originally posted by JADEDRAG0N

    Im not sure if the 'PvP' in LOTRO can really be called PvP. After all they dont use there ingame avitars to fight the good guys. They use a spawned bad guy instead.
    Right, lotro has no pvp. When I am in Bree I can't fight with another player; there are no guild wars or orcs invasions.



    They could have done something great with fights between humans and orcs,...


  • AutemOxAutemOx Member Posts: 1,704
    Originally posted by Supernerd



    "Go play WoW then."



      WoW isnt a PvP game either.  VG, LOTRo, and WoW all have some PvP because most PvE players like to dabble in PvP sometimes.  When WoW was first released, without battlegrounds and arenas, its PvP was much worse than both LOTRo and VG.  WoW PvP is still definitely lacking IMO...  The problem with their added battlegrounds and arenas is, the gameplay is bad for PvP, so putting some neat rulesets in still doesnt make WoWs PvP more fun than other mmorpgs.  The battlefields and arenas are especially comparable to GW, and both battlefields (much like GW's alliance battles) and arenas (much like GW's team arena) are pretty pathetic compared to their GW counterparts.



    And OP, saying that you arent trying to troll doesnt give you troll-label immunity   The OP here seems pretty biased and I think he definitely just wanted to bash a couple games for no reason.

    Play as your fav retro characters: cnd-online.net. My site: www.lysle.net. Blog: creatingaworld.blogspot.com.

  • AutemOxAutemOx Member Posts: 1,704
    Originally posted by BigMango



    Right, lotro has no pvp. When I am in Bree I can't fight with another player; there are no guild wars or orcs invasions.



    They could have done something great with fights between humans and orcs,...



    They do have PvP fights between orcs and humans, in consented areas.  Most mmorpgs that focus on PvE still have consented areas where PvP is allowed.  Orcs arent allowed to go into Bree, I think... It is not consented.

    Play as your fav retro characters: cnd-online.net. My site: www.lysle.net. Blog: creatingaworld.blogspot.com.

  • SlytheSlythe Member UncommonPosts: 952
    Originally posted by wormywyrm



    They do have PvP fights between orcs and humans, in consented areas.  Most mmorpgs that focus on PvE still have consented areas where PvP is allowed.  Orcs arent allowed to go into Bree, I think... It is not consented.
    They have 1 area, thats all. And no, monsters cannot go into Bree, the MPvP in LOTR is not PvP because the monsters are effectively stuck in 1 area. They cant go anywhere else. IMO thats not PvP, they should have let you start as a monster player and level them up the same way. It was a huge opportunity for some great PvP battles but they blew it.
  • LilianeLiliane Member Posts: 591
    Why they have PvP in PvE games and they don't really care about it, answer is very simple.



    Because it's very easy game play to add in minimal cost of development. Same with griding levels by doing repeatable content, kill 5000 rat to get next level. It's also marketing BS as saying we have that in our game.

    MMORPG.COM has worst forum editor ever exists

  • PyritePyrite Member Posts: 309
    Originally posted by Supernerd

    Simple question.

    This post is not a flame or rant on why VG pvp sux or why lotro pvmp is lame.



    Just want to know why they even included pvp in these games?



    To appease whiney players who need to flex their e-peens and won't shut up about PvP being the only reason games, computers, and the good old U. S. of A. exist.



    This reply is not a flame or rant on silly little teenage griefers.

    The most important part of reading is reading between the lines.

  • red_enfernored_enferno Member Posts: 13
    Dude, first off this thread is a flame. So, I'm just going to stop their and point out your stupidity.
  • pompey606pompey606 Member UncommonPosts: 439
    well my view is they knew there wasent enough release content in my eyes to keep everyone on edge in LOTRO, so they shove PVP on the box and that trys to keep people beyond the free 30 days... didnt work for me! i might of stayed if they had spent more time on quests etc rather than a not so great pvp section...and i am usually a pvp gamer but in the LOTRO univerese i want to do things with LOTR...

    image

  • KyleranKyleran Member LegendaryPosts: 44,064
    Originally posted by Slythe

    Originally posted by wormywyrm



    They do have PvP fights between orcs and humans, in consented areas.  Most mmorpgs that focus on PvE still have consented areas where PvP is allowed.  Orcs arent allowed to go into Bree, I think... It is not consented.
    They have 1 area, thats all. And no, monsters cannot go into Bree, the MPvP in LOTR is not PvP because the monsters are effectively stuck in 1 area. They cant go anywhere else. IMO thats not PvP, they should have let you start as a monster player and level them up the same way. It was a huge opportunity for some great PvP battles but they blew it. Let's see.... players can fight other players, they are called duels.



    They have one PVP area at the moment (one more than WOW started with on normal servers) and plan to add more.  No monsters cannot go into Bree, nor could MIdgard players go into Camelot, nor can the Horde go into Stormwind (on a normal server) and no villain player ever saw the inside of Freedom City (or whatever its called) in COH.   Controlling PVP access is a very common thing to do.  LotRO is no different in this regard.



    It is just your opinion that controlled PVP isn't "real PVP"......  you prefer ganking, that's cool, but that's not what LotRO and most other games are about...stick with all the other popular games that allow unrestricted  FFA PVP... oh wait... that's right... there aren't any. Maybe when Darkfall is released next year...



    Monster players start out at a low level.  They gain levels, abilities by completing both PVE and PVP objectives, they earn reputation that provides bragging right, and they are more or less unique to each player.  They are quite playable, however they require zerg tactics when fighting against player characters, as Freeps are much more powerful (just like in the books/movies,  Frodo and his allies were always able to over come about 100 to 1 odds in any fight.....it's not quite this severe in LOtRO)



    Most of those who slam LotRO's monster play usually "do not play the game", or certainly are not any good at monster play.  The people I've met who do play/and are skilled seem to really enjoy it.....

    "True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde 

    "I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant

    Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm

    Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV

    Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™

    "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon






  • EridanixEridanix Member Posts: 426

    They want to sell more boxes. They are not pvp games. VG, LoTRO and WoW just have some pvp added, no need to tell how bad WoW pvp is; only an addon to have more customers. VG could be a great PvP game with the guild wars running there; LoTRO is just for pve and background, it didnt need pvp at all and it has not (or at least anything i could name as PvP).

    Where this assumption we want to just gank come from?

    We want real & good PvP, not 'an added feature for PvE players to have where to improve their uber gear'. That's the point.

     

    It is a question of fangs.

  • BigMangoBigMango Member UncommonPosts: 1,821
    Originally posted by Kyleran



    It is just your opinion that controlled PVP isn't "real PVP"......  you prefer ganking, that's cool, but that's not what LotRO and most other games are about...stick with all the other popular games that allow unrestricted  FFA PVP... oh wait... that's right... there aren't any.



    No, monster play is not real open pvp. There is no freedom to fight. After you have tried it out once, where is the fun to return to a confined area that is not connected to the world and where you can't play your character ?



    And good pvp is not ganking. From you comment it is obvious that you have never played a good pvp game.



    Most of the pvp games are very poorly implemented. WOW, VG, EQ2,... all have ffa, they are gankfests rewarding and encouraging ganking.



    In good pvp games, like Lineage 2 for example, you face negative consequences  for ganking. It makes cleaning your bad karma enough of a pain so you will refrain from pking other players. PKers can do it, but they also know that they have something to lose; the result is that you only very rarely see ganking. The balance is just right. What you will however see is sane pvp: people who want to pickup some fights will start to hit on you, but then leave it be if you don't fight back as they don't want to kill you (but if you do fight back they won't face any consequences and will kill you). This removes the frustration and makes pvp fun and enjoyable for everyone. Add to this clan alliances and clan wars (here killing the enemy is rewarded) and you have a great pvp game.
  • ArawonArawon Member Posts: 1,108
    For marketing reasons.... to say they have it.......since they know its popular with a certain segment of gamers.
  • CroseCrose Member Posts: 209
    Even if it's not balanced, PvP adds a whole new element to the game.  This post on the VG boards caught my attention.  Some people like PvP not for the actual battle (which is horribly unbalanced in Vanguard), but for other reasons.  Before I read that I'd never considered an FFA server, but I might actually try it now.
  • SoraellionSoraellion Member UncommonPosts: 558

    I can very much understand the sentiment of the OP and I must agree with him, I was there when in LOTRO beta the cry for PVP was there, you could just see the devs having the following conversation;

     

    D1 - dude, we've been told from upstairs that we have to include PVP

    D2 - shut up, I'm RPing with my Hobbit, he's smoking a pipe now

    D1 - really, we HAVE to, we can't leave it out, the game will just sell more if we can boast about having PVP

    D2 - but we're all carebears, PVP is for evil PKers who steal your lunch money!

    D1 still we need to come up with idea on how to do it

    D2 but pvp means attacking eachother, you can't have Hobbits attack eachother, that's BLASPHEMY!

    D1 what if we introduced some other being which isn't part of the folkore and use that to PVP with, it doesn't really CHANGE anything but at least we won't upset all the happyhappy carebears much

    D2 we might just do that but we can't have people just fighting everywhere, other Hobbits shouldn't be forced to watch people going at eachother! /starts crying

    D1 ok so we agree; we make some odd being to PVP with and it can only be done in special places, lets uhm... lets call it Monster PVP. People have no problems with killing monsters so that kinda softens up the idea of bashing eachother's heads in, agreed?

    D2 oooh, if we really HAVE to... :(

     

    And thus they came to the politically correct decision; they HAVE PVP but it's half arsed, meaningless and completely boring. When I posted on the beta forums about my thoughts on this I got booed away by the carebears in ways I never thought a true carebear would be able to out.

    So yeah, I know where the OP is coming from. Either have PVP and make it meaningful, or just be a big guy and state that no; you won't have PVP. Half arsed, politically correct attempts only end in tears.

     

     

     

     

  • flakesflakes Member Posts: 575
    Originally posted by Soraellion


    I can very much understand the sentiment of the OP and I must agree with him, I was there when in LOTRO beta the cry for PVP was there, you could just see the devs having the following conversation;
     
    D1 - dude, we've been told from upstairs that we have to include PVP
    D2 - shut up, I'm RPing with my Hobbit, he's smoking a pipe now
    D1 - really, we HAVE to, we can't leave it out, the game will just sell more if we can boast about having PVP
    D2 - but we're all carebears, PVP is for evil PKers who steal your lunch money!
    D1 still we need to come up with idea on how to do it
    D2 but pvp means attacking eachother, you can't have Hobbits attack eachother, that's BLASPHEMY!
    D1 what if we introduced some other being which isn't part of the folkore and use that to PVP with, it doesn't really CHANGE anything but at least we won't upset all the happyhappy carebears much
    D2 we might just do that but we can't have people just fighting everywhere, other Hobbits shouldn't be forced to watch people going at eachother! /starts crying
    D1 ok so we agree; we make some odd being to PVP with and it can only be done in special places, lets uhm... lets call it Monster PVP. People have no problems with killing monsters so that kinda softens up the idea of bashing eachother's heads in, agreed?
    D2 oooh, if we really HAVE to... :(
     
    And thus they came to the politically correct decision; they HAVE PVP but it's half arsed, meaningless and completely boring. When I posted on the beta forums about my thoughts on this I got booed away by the carebears in ways I never thought a true carebear would be able to out.
    So yeah, I know where the OP is coming from. Either have PVP and make it meaningful, or just be a big guy and state that no; you won't have PVP. Half arsed, politically correct attempts only end in tears.
     
     
     
     
    Agree fully.I enjoyed the pve in lotro when i played it but the pvp aspect is meaningless....shouldn't be in there in this form.Either leave it out or create meaningfull pvp.This just looks like you say :  they had the "need" to implement pvp because otherwise some people wouldn't buy the game , but this is not what pvp can/should be.
  • Pappy13Pappy13 Member Posts: 2,138
    Originally posted by Kyleran



    They have one PVP area at the moment (one more than WOW started with on normal servers) and plan to add more.  No monsters cannot go into Bree, nor could MIdgard players go into Camelot, nor can the Horde go into Stormwind (on a normal server) and no villain player ever saw the inside of Freedom City (or whatever its called) in COH.   Controlling PVP access is a very common thing to do.  LotRO is no different in this regard.

    Please don't talk about WoW when you don't know what you are talking about.  Every zone in WoW allowed PvP at release even on PvE servers, the only difference between the PvE servers and PvP servers were how your PvP flag was set.  On PvE servers you had to either set it yourself(in a variety of ways) or enter an enemy capital city whereas on PvP servers you could do it the same way as PvE servers or simply enter a contested zone.

    Actually the Horde can go into Stormwind on normal servers.  They'll be attacked and killed by the guards, but they can go there.  In fact it's quite common for the Horde to go into alliance controlled areas and pick a fight with an NPC hoping that some low level Alliance player will try to help and set their PvP flag so they can then kill them.

    image

Sign In or Register to comment.