Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

I gotta bad feeling...

Things that MIGHT bring this game down...

1.) M Rated

2.) High graphics ( and  people complained about VG)

3.) New , unused combat system

4.) 1 race

5.) Release near WAR( somewhat )

If you have anymore please do tell.

 

Not meant to be a flame

----------------------------
Time is a great teacher, but unfortunately it kills all its pupils ... - Louis Hector Berlioz

«1

Comments

  • kishekishe Member UncommonPosts: 2,012

     

    Originally posted by MrTumN3s


    Things that MIGHT bring this game down...
    1.) M Rated
    2.) High graphics ( and  people complained about VG)
    3.) New , unused combat system
    4.) 1 race
    5.) Release near WAR( somewhat )
    If you have anymore please do tell.
     
    Not meant to be a flame

     

    1) A rare chance there might be actually mature people in this game might actually encourage people to play.

    2) Yes, making game for latest hardware does limit it but not too much, those who cant afford a good PC will be playing through Xbox360

    3) True, this either makes it or breaks it...time will tell.

    4) All the fantasy races have been done to death anyway, and Conan world wouldn't really fit any other races than different ethnics of human...Conan isn't high fantasy game.

    5) WAR and AoC will appeal to completely different groups of people so both will have their own circle of fans...WAR might win on that round tough, with it tapping on the WoW fanbase...but i'm sure there will be enough following for both games to succeed

     

     

     

  • ZerofunZerofun Member Posts: 25

    I gotta bad feeling... but its because i had 3 cups of some very strong coffee....

    everything you mention in your list here is either ..

    1. why im excited  (m rating, less kiddies, severed limbs, nudity, cursing ?)

    2. you dont know 100% what your talking about (in realtion to the specs, check other posts)

    3. its how the game is intended. (i dont want elves and orcs and crap like that, and i cant be sure but i dont think they are a part of the conan lore.) (combat system... errors are expected , but if people dont try anythign new .. we would all still be playing pong, or nothing at all)

    So I would like to say .. i have a GOOD feeling.

  • AmazingAveryAmazingAvery Age of Conan AdvocateMember UncommonPosts: 7,188

    To the OP your 14 yrs old, best not to play this game you will have nightmares.

    No wonder you put No.1 as M rating.

    Basically you listed AoC's great points that have been known for some time now.

    Good luck in finding a new game to play 



  • MrTumN3sMrTumN3s Member Posts: 439

    Originally posted by Zerofun


    I gotta bad feeling... but its because i had 3 cups of some very strong coffee....
    everything you mention in your list here is either ..
    1. why im excited  (m rating, less kiddies, severed limbs, nudity, cursing ?)
    2. you dont know 100% what your talking about (in realtion to the specs, check other posts)
    3. its how the game is intended. (i dont want elves and orcs and crap like that, and i cant be sure but i dont think they are a part of the conan lore.) (combat system... errors are expected , but if people dont try anythign new .. we would all still be playing pong, or nothing at all)
    So I would like to say .. i have a GOOD feeling.
    Too back up what i say

    1.) M-rating would lower the player base, im not saying the less kiddies and nudity and all that is bad. Its just the m rating really does lower the player base as opposed to if it was a teen game.

    2.) i do know what i am talking about in relation to the specs. They said their requirements were close to those of Oblivion. Going back to Vanguards specs WHICH ARE LOWER THEN CONANS, people complained, for lack of better words, that their CPU's couldnt support that. So the high requirements for graphics will lower the player base even more.

    3.) I doubt you ever read any of the books for one. One thing that i would like to point out is that people like variety and difference. 1 race can lower the player base of this game. I for one can care less, but you see it in WoW forums and Vanguard forums, and other forums about race variety.

    4.) Combat system, indeed i feel comfortable with this new format, however we have never used it before and seen it before. So yes, risks will be taken with crossed fingers, hopefully the outcome is great.

     

    As you can see, player base population is my main concern. Dont ever tell me i dont know 100 % of what im talking about

     

     

    ----------------------------
    Time is a great teacher, but unfortunately it kills all its pupils ... - Louis Hector Berlioz

  • MrTumN3sMrTumN3s Member Posts: 439
    Originally posted by AmazingAvery


    To the OP your 14 yrs old, best not to play this game you will have nightmares.
    No wonder you put No.1 as M rating.
    Basically you listed AoC's great points that have been known for some time now.
    Good luck in finding a new game to play 

    No ,  my rents would let me play this game. Just because of my age doesn't make me less of authority to say something..

    ----------------------------
    Time is a great teacher, but unfortunately it kills all its pupils ... - Louis Hector Berlioz

  • AmazingAveryAmazingAvery Age of Conan AdvocateMember UncommonPosts: 7,188

    Originally posted by MrTumN3s


     
    Originally posted by Zerofun


    I gotta bad feeling... but its because i had 3 cups of some very strong coffee....
    everything you mention in your list here is either ..
    1. why im excited  (m rating, less kiddies, severed limbs, nudity, cursing ?)
    2. you dont know 100% what your talking about (in realtion to the specs, check other posts)
    3. its how the game is intended. (i dont want elves and orcs and crap like that, and i cant be sure but i dont think they are a part of the conan lore.) (combat system... errors are expected , but if people dont try anythign new .. we would all still be playing pong, or nothing at all)
    So I would like to say .. i have a GOOD feeling.
    Too back up what i say

     

    1.) M-rating would lower the player base, im not saying the less kiddies and nudity and all that is bad. Its just the m rating really does lower the player base as opposed to if it was a teen game.

    2.) i do know what i am talking about in relation to the specs. They said their requirements were close to those of Oblivion. Going back to Vanguards specs WHICH ARE LOWER THEN CONANS, people complained, for lack of better words, that their CPU's couldnt support that. So the high requirements for graphics will lower the player base even more.

    3.) I doubt you ever read any of the books for one. One thing that i would like to point out is that people like variety and difference. 1 race can lower the player base of this game. I for one can care less, but you see it in WoW forums and Vanguard forums, and other forums about race variety.

    4.) Combat system, indeed i feel comfortable with this new format, however we have never used it before and seen it before. So yes, risks will be taken with crossed fingers, hopefully the outcome is great.

     

    As you can see, player base population is my main concern. Dont ever tell me i dont know 100 % of what im talking about

     

     

    1. The average age of the official forums is 27 yrs old I believe, and in the mid 20's in the genre, a game rated 17+ would in essence not really affect any kinda of subscripton numbers, one way or another, as you put yourself as a 14 yr old, you will get mommy and daddy to pay for you. The whole game design and concept from the very start, sticking true to the lore meant Funcom were always aiming for a mature rating, possibly talked about when you were 10 yrs old then. Just because the game appeals to people at the higher end of the age spectrum as apposed to 14-16 yrs olds more doesn't mean the game won't sell well. Conan is 75yrs old after all how many people over all those years do you think will be interested in the game. Lest you forgot the game is also being release on Xbox 360 next year too, I think you will find a mature market there for this type of game. Oblivion rated M in many countries sold really well.

    2. Do a google search for total sales of Oblivion, also look up how many people said that VG's game engine was poorly put together resulting in puzzlings game experiences for people on decent machines. The game wasn't optimised enough. There are enough machines out there that people own that play mmo's that will be perfectly capable of playing AoC. The price has come down so much in technology that the masses can afford decent systems now. Well those with full time jobs and not some paper round at 14 yrs old, could do an easy upgrade to their 5 yr old machine. Bottom line there are enough people capable of running AoC to make it a sucess.

    3. Race variety will not affect the population AT ALL. Humans, its "Age" of Conan, Conan = Human btw. There are some 23 races of Humans in Hyborian Lore, the game will start off with 14 classes emcompassing the 3 main races of man in Hyboria, Cimmerian, Aquilonian and Stygian. Do you really think this is lacking? All other creatures in the lore are monsters (Demons, Sphix's, Golems, Frost Giant, man serpent, skeletons, grey apes, ice worms, ghouls, Wyverns etc) would it make sense to you to have one of these as a playable character or any of the 34 gods present in the lore, in a game that revolves around you as a human, in the "Age of Conan" ? Destiny Quests, character evolution and progression are all through areas of the game (some 185 SQUARE MILES = x2 the size of WoW)  that are massive full of life and relate to human area of some the races below. Then there are future race expansions to pick from below too:


    Aesir Golden-haired, blue-eyed, bearded barbarians, with chain hauberks, axes and wooden shields      
    Afghuli Tall and powerful, with broad shoulders, curly hair and long beards, brown skin wrinkled by harsh winds and sun      
    Aquilonian Tawny-haired, grey-eyed, fair-skinned people      
    Argossean Dark-skinned, with thick, curly dark hair and short, stocky bodies      
    Brythunian Stocky, but with fair skin and blond hair      
    Cimmerian Dark-haired, bronze-skinned hillsmen, bare-chested with steel shields and battle-axes      
    Corinthian Dark-skinned as Hyborians go, due to intermixing with the Zamorans, with stout build and tawny hair      
    Hyperborean Tall, unnaturally thin, fair-skinned folk with light brown-blonde hair and blue-green eyes      
    Hyrkanian Horsemen with hooked noses, black hair and eyes, and deeply tanned skin, riders wear steel and silk and gold      
    Iranistani Short, stout, broad-shouldered people with light brown skins, blue or brown eyes, and steely-blue hair (much like the Shemites, to whom they are distantly related)      
    Khitani Black-haired and yellow-skinned with slanted dark eyes, dressed in silk robes and oriental armor      
    Kothian Dark-haired, bronze-skinned folk with light to dark brown eyes      
    Kushite Light brown to deep black skin and savage eyes      
    Nemedian Tall, fair-skinned people with blue or grey eyes and light or blonde hair      
    Ophirian Tan, with dark hair and lean bodies      
    Pictish Short, stocky, dark skinned people with wild black hair confined by copper bands, decorated with feathers      
    Shemitish Generally of medium height, though sometimes when mixed with Stygian blood, gigantic, broadly and strongly built, with hook noses, dark eyes, and blue-black hair      
    Stygian The ruling class is tall, hawk-faced, bronze-skinned with dark hair and black eyes, the lower classes are a downtrodden, mongrel horde, a mixture of Kushite, Stygian, Shemitish, even Hyborian bloods      
    Turanian Turbaned men with hooked noses, veiled women with black hair      
    Vanir Red-haired ravagers and raiders in longships, with ring mail, horsehide shields, spears and swords      
    Vendhyan Black-haired, light brown skin, shaven-headed priests, turbaned warriors      
    Zamoran Deeply tanned with dark eyes, wearing loose-fitting robes      
    Zingaran

    Tanned, curly-haired sailors and princelings, an admixture of Zingg Valley folk (possibly of Shemite origin), invading Picts, and Hyborian tribes

     

         

    4. Been talked about enough, as are all the points your concerned about, all you have to do is search here.

    5. Two different games appealing on the whole to two different audiences, (see number 4)

    Your 14yrs old, your age shows that you haven't experienced everything, thats a fact, so get over yourself and understand that you dont know 100% of what your talking about in any category. You wanna make posts like you did and expect no come back? Minimal life experiences and your lack of them hold you back and theres nothing that can be done about that. No offence but your see what I mean when you leave school.



  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • HengistHengist Member RarePosts: 1,316


    Originally posted by Remali
    This is what i think
    1) The rating wont have the big effect ppl are talking about.It will neither ensure mature gamers will play nor that an army of kidies will rush to the game.There are more factors that decide the average age of players or their maturity level in a game than blood and boobs.. way more
    2)Vanguard didnt run like crap because of the great graffix but because of their poor optimization of their engine.Eq2 had better graffix than vg and it was released 2+ years before it.If the game engine is optimized and "flexible" it will be fine.
    3)The combat doesnt look too good in the vids as it does on paper ill give you that.
    4)Yes one race but id rather have one very high customizable race than the same usuall elfs dwarves etc other games have with 5 different hairstyles...and seriously im tired of the overused elfs,dwarves, orcs ,(insert animal race).
    5) It will not matter much imo.The 2 games have very big differences in just about everything from gamestyle and pvp mechanics to their artistic style.They do not draw from the same target group for their subs.

    I'm just quoting this simply because it does a great job of summing things up!

    Only part I'd even partly disagree with is the combat. Personally, I think it looks pretty solid, but then again, I've been wanting something other than whack-a-mole for years. While I like what I've seen, the LGC and the PvP demonstrated there will be where I really start to firm up my feelings. It's gotta look good, and work well in PvP, for me to be 100% sold on it. Concept yes...implementation...still need some selling.

  • ZerofunZerofun Member Posts: 25

    Originally posted by MrTumN3s


     
    Originally posted by Zerofun


    I gotta bad feeling... but its because i had 3 cups of some very strong coffee....
    everything you mention in your list here is either ..
    1. why im excited  (m rating, less kiddies, severed limbs, nudity, cursing ?)
    2. you dont know 100% what your talking about (in realtion to the specs, check other posts)
    3. its how the game is intended. (i dont want elves and orcs and crap like that, and i cant be sure but i dont think they are a part of the conan lore.) (combat system... errors are expected , but if people dont try anythign new .. we would all still be playing pong, or nothing at all)
    So I would like to say .. i have a GOOD feeling.
    Too back up what i say

     

    1.) M-rating would lower the player base, im not saying the less kiddies and nudity and all that is bad. Its just the m rating really does lower the player base as opposed to if it was a teen game.

    2.) i do know what i am talking about in relation to the specs. They said their requirements were close to those of Oblivion. Going back to Vanguards specs WHICH ARE LOWER THEN CONANS, people complained, for lack of better words, that their CPU's couldnt support that. So the high requirements for graphics will lower the player base even more.

    3.) I doubt you ever read any of the books for one. One thing that i would like to point out is that people like variety and difference. 1 race can lower the player base of this game. I for one can care less, but you see it in WoW forums and Vanguard forums, and other forums about race variety.

    4.) Combat system, indeed i feel comfortable with this new format, however we have never used it before and seen it before. So yes, risks will be taken with crossed fingers, hopefully the outcome is great.

     

    As you can see, player base population is my main concern. Dont ever tell me i dont know 100 % of what im talking about

     

     

    Your backup is baised on opinion... which is not a valid basis for factual argument, (yes i am also guilty of this on occasion)

    1. dont forget that alot of the best selling games are "M" rated.. I doubt that in October that will be any diffrent. (god i hope this game has a smaller base.. no imature punks)

    2. you dont know 100% what your talking because your speculating. The real specs havent been released.

    3. your right i havent read the books ... but i know the comics and the *cough *movies, but I can see what i think they are trying to do with the game, im suprised you dont or that you feel there should be other races. To each his own .. i cant imagin why VG or WoW needs to have any more races though.

    4. you list the combat system as "I got a bad feeling" materal ... then you say your ok with it ...... WTF

    While you know a little .. you stil dont know what your talking about.. Sorry but i will contiune to call people on BS posts like this. if the game has 10k players and 1k of them are kids then im fine with that.. as long as funcom manages the server pops and the game doesnt totally dive im not worried.

  • CalibanvovCalibanvov Member UncommonPosts: 192

    Originally posted by MrTumN3s


    Things that MIGHT bring this game down...
    1.) M Rated
    2.) High graphics ( and  people complained about VG)
    3.) New , unused combat system
    4.) 1 race
    5.) Release near WAR( somewhat )
    If you have anymore please do tell.
     
    Not meant to be a flame
    The more generic and wide open the options, the greater the player base.  Look at WOW.  low graphic requirement, any age, etc.

    AoC might not be the "WOW Killer", but that doesnt mean it wont be the best game out there.

    1) Rating allows for it to be real gritty and realistic. 

    2) I personally want awesome graphics.  Vanguard has this too, but the code and performance was herrendous on even great machines.

    3) Combat system is a gamble.  It will be either great or tedious.

    4)The race thing I understand, I love variety.  But the variety is made up for with the unique classes.  The races being some type of human, will add to realism though.

    5) I wouldnt be concerned about the release of another game, theres always games coming out.  If a game is great, it will stand on its own.  Besides, the first few months of an MMO can be a struggle in the begining.

     

     

  • ElgarethElgareth Member Posts: 588

    Originally posted by Baikal


     

     While I like what I've seen, the LGC and the PvP demonstrated there will be where I really start to firm up my feelings.

    ? PvP demonstrated there? Sure about that? Because I've yet to see any info apart from "It'll be revolutionary and great", and especially Videos of People PvPing. Not Devs with trained choreographies, Convention Visitors, Press People who PvP a bit. (Oh and please some Spell Weaving in PvP as well, to see how/if it works)

    Apart from that:

    I don't want to play a Human. I am a Human in RL, I don't want to be one in the Game as well.

    But well, if it works, if it feels good...I'll give it a shot, but every week going by without any PvP Footage out strenghens my concerns that AoC's PvP won't be fun for too long...

  • AmazingAveryAmazingAvery Age of Conan AdvocateMember UncommonPosts: 7,188

    Originally posted by Elgareth


     
     
    Apart from that:

    I don't want to play a Human. I am a Human in RL, I don't want to be one in the Game as well.

    Have a read thru these and tell me where you think a playable race type other than Human would come into the Conan Universe...

    Short Stories





    Conan the Barbarian

    No offence but green skinned Orcs are in another game, not Age of Conan. Can you atleast except the possibility that their internal testers are better that average joe public? and that those testers are under NDA...

    LotRO had open Beta where average joe public got a chance to see for themselves 1 month prior to launch. Before that last month people were NDA, specifically on my server there were only a handfull of people who had got pretty far into the game in closed beta, but still they were NDA. Here in this situation AoC has 3 months to go till release, realistically when you think about it expect an open beta and more release of information about PvP points you brought up to come in September.



  • area84area84 Member Posts: 335
    Originally posted by MrTumN3s


    Things that MIGHT bring this game down...
    1.) M Rated
    Alot of people are actually looking forward to this, and it will encourage more mature players to play it.
    2.) High graphics ( and  people complained about VG)
    VG had a poorly designed engine where even if you had a high end computer it ran like crap, Funcom has mentioned that the graphics can be toned down so that it runs on a regular computer.
    3.) New , unused combat system
    This is actually why alot of people want to play this game, because its something different from your regular queue your attacks MMO.
    4.) 1 race
    Thats how it is in the lore of Conan and even though there is only humans (since it takes place on earth 10,000 BC) there are 3 different cultures with different features and abilities. I wouldnt want to see Orcs and Elves in AoC that would be retarded, I like a mix of different races but this game is based on the world of Conan and takes place in Hyboria where theres only Humans and different cultures, I dont want to play other races.


    5.) Release near WAR( somewhat )
    WAR won't effect this game at all since they both seem to have different fan bases, as I'm sure you can see from all the fighting and "my game is better than yours" threads that go on in this website.
    If you have anymore please do tell.
     
    Not meant to be a flame

     

    A man dies daily, only to be reborn in the morning, bigger, better and wiser.

    -Playing AoC
    -Playing WoW
    -Retired- SWG
    -Retired- EVE
    -Retired- LotR

    Computer (- Phenom 9600 Black Edition @ 2.81 Ghz (Quad Core CPU)- Gigabyte MA790FX-DS5 - 4 Gigs of PC 8500 ram (1066)- EVGA GeForce 8800 GTS PCI Express 2.0 - WD 500GB 7500RPM - Zalman CPU cooler (air cooled)
    - 24" Widescreen 1080P HD display).

  • ElgarethElgareth Member Posts: 588

    Originally posted by AmazingAvery


     
     
    Have a read thru these and tell me where you think a playable race type other than Human would come into the Conan Universe...
    Short Stories





    Conan the Barbarian


    The Hyborian Age (First published in The Phantagraph, February-November 1936)
    The Phoenix on the Sword (First Published in Weird Tales, December 1932)
    The Scarlet Citadel (First Published in Weird Tales, January 1933)
    The Tower of the Elephant (First Published in Weird Tales, March 1933)
    Black Colossus (First Published in Weird Tales, June 1933)
    The Slithering Shadow (First published in Weird Tales, September 1933. Alternate title: Xuthal of the Dusk)
    The Pool of the Black One (First published in Weird Tales, October 1933)
    Rogues in the House (First Published in Weird Tales, January 1934)
    Gods of the North (First Published in Fantasy Fan, March 1934. Alternate titles: The Frost Giant's Daughter, The Frost King's Daughter)
    Shadows in the Moonlight (First published in Weird Tales, April 1934. Alternate title: Iron Shadows in the Moon)
    Queen of the Black Coast (First published in Weird Tales, May 1934)
    The Devil in Iron (First Published in Weird Tales, August 1934)
    The People of the Black Circle (First published in Weird Tales, September, October and November 1934)
    A Witch Shall Be Born (First published in Wierd Tales, December 1934)
    Jewels of Gwahlur (First Published in Weird Tales, March 1935. Alternate titles: Teeth of Gwahlur, The Servants of Bit-Yakin)
    Beyond the Black River (First Published in Weird Tales, May and June 1935)
    Shadows in Zamboula (First Published in Weird Tales, November 1935. Alternate title: The Man-Eaters of Zamboula)
    Red Nails (First Published in Weird Tales, July, August-September, October 1936) 

    No offence but green skinned Orcs are in another game, not Age of Conan. Can you atleast except the possibility that their internal testers are better that average joe public? and that those testers are under NDA..


    No offence, but what has that to do with my Post? I still don't want to play a Human.

  • AmazingAveryAmazingAvery Age of Conan AdvocateMember UncommonPosts: 7,188

    Originally posted by Elgareth


     
    Originally posted by AmazingAvery


     
     
    Have a read thru these and tell me where you think a playable race type other than Human would come into the Conan Universe...
    Short Stories





    Conan the Barbarian


    The Hyborian Age (First published in The Phantagraph, February-November 1936)
    The Phoenix on the Sword (First Published in Weird Tales, December 1932)
    The Scarlet Citadel (First Published in Weird Tales, January 1933)
    The Tower of the Elephant (First Published in Weird Tales, March 1933)
    Black Colossus (First Published in Weird Tales, June 1933)
    The Slithering Shadow (First published in Weird Tales, September 1933. Alternate title: Xuthal of the Dusk)
    The Pool of the Black One (First published in Weird Tales, October 1933)
    Rogues in the House (First Published in Weird Tales, January 1934)
    Gods of the North (First Published in Fantasy Fan, March 1934. Alternate titles: The Frost Giant's Daughter, The Frost King's Daughter)
    Shadows in the Moonlight (First published in Weird Tales, April 1934. Alternate title: Iron Shadows in the Moon)
    Queen of the Black Coast (First published in Weird Tales, May 1934)
    The Devil in Iron (First Published in Weird Tales, August 1934)
    The People of the Black Circle (First published in Weird Tales, September, October and November 1934)
    A Witch Shall Be Born (First published in Wierd Tales, December 1934)
    Jewels of Gwahlur (First Published in Weird Tales, March 1935. Alternate titles: Teeth of Gwahlur, The Servants of Bit-Yakin)
    Beyond the Black River (First Published in Weird Tales, May and June 1935)
    Shadows in Zamboula (First Published in Weird Tales, November 1935. Alternate title: The Man-Eaters of Zamboula)
    Red Nails (First Published in Weird Tales, July, August-September, October 1936) 

    No offence but green skinned Orcs are in another game, not Age of Conan. Can you atleast except the possibility that their internal testers are better that average joe public? and that those testers are under NDA..


     

    No offence, but what has that to do with my Post? I still don't want to play a Human.

    None taken. I thought you might get a better perspective by reading some of the lore, in regards that none are wrote with a character other than a human in mind fromt he lead perspective. That the world is predominantly made up of over a dozen human races showing more than enough content to take on for a game, especially an mmorpg. There will never be another race other than human to be played in this game.



  • HengistHengist Member RarePosts: 1,316



    ? PvP demonstrated there? Sure about that? Because I've yet to see any info apart from "It'll be revolutionary and great",

    100% sure about it, since you think the game will fail and chug along with 500 or so subscribers, it's no real surprise that you would be unaware of that.




    But well, if it works, if it feels good...I'll give it a shot, but every week going by without any PvP Footage out strenghens my concerns that AoC's PvP won't be fun for too long...

    Sorry, that's just one of the most amusing things I've seen in quite some time. To say that "if I dont see it each week, then I know it's not going to be good" allow me to translate... "If I dont get what I want, then I mad, so nothing that I'm mad at can possibly be good, and I'm not patient enough to wait for the demonstrations and accompanying video's to be shown."

    That being said, you've decided to wait for WAR and PoTBS, so either or, I'm sure you'll have fun with what you like!

  • HengistHengist Member RarePosts: 1,316



    No offence, but what has that to do with my Post? I still don't want to play a Human.


    No offense, but you've already said that AoC will fail horribly, the combat will suck, and it'll go around with 500 or so subscribers, so why would you even imply that playing as a human even matters? Truth is, you dont even want to play.

  • The user and all related content has been deleted.

    image

  • OrphesOrphes Member UncommonPosts: 3,039

     

    Originally posted by MrTumN3s


    Things that MIGHT bring this game down...
    1.) M Rated
    2.) High graphics ( and  people complained about VG)
    3.) New , unused combat system
    4.) 1 race
    5.) Release near WAR( somewhat )
    If you have anymore please do tell.
     
    Not meant to be a flame

     

    You forgot. Don't think a list like this would be complete without putting WoW into it. But I'd be nice and put it last.

    6. WoW - Expansion

    Don't know when the announcement was made but when it was it replaced and jump into NO:1 position on my store over moste preordered games. That in competition to games that they have had preorder lists on many months before. Oh yea ofcourse  they keep their own preorder list way before an official releasedate is announced.

    I'm so broke. I can't even pay attention.
    "You have the right not to be killed"

  • LordcrapalotLordcrapalot Member Posts: 191

    The WoW expansion isnt going to have any impact on AoC what so ever, uh Blizzard are putting in siege equipment....who cares, its Blizzard so its bound to be very limited and focused on grinding something to use them. In AoC you can build your own cities...enough said. Its two totally different games period.

    "I cherish the memories of a question my grandson asked me the other day when he said..Grandpa, were you a hero in the war?...No, but i served in a company of heroes"
    Sgt. Mike Ranney E-company 506PIR 101'st airborn

  • ElgarethElgareth Member Posts: 588

    Originally posted by Baikal


     



    No offence, but what has that to do with my Post? I still don't want to play a Human.

     



    No offense, but you've already said that AoC will fail horribly, the combat will suck, and it'll go around with 500 or so subscribers, so why would you even imply that playing as a human even matters? Truth is, you dont even want to play.

    Hey, I take that one personally hahah!

    No seriously, my Post you mentioned really wasn't meant seriously, and I even noted that beneath it. In said Post I wrote that AoC will suck, that WAR will suck, that Tabula Rasa will suck, that basically every MMORPG coming out will be horrible.



    However, again, that wasn't meant seriously. I want AoC to be good, I want the Combat system to work well, I want the PvP to be thrilling and new. If AoC pulls it off properly, new MMOs might very well copy the system, and improve on it. I dunno if you ever played Rakion, but it's a free game which already features a rather similar system, and it's amongst my all time favourite games, always new fun when I log in and smash some noobs I love such controls, and I'll love a MMO which can implement this well.

    However, yes, I doubt that I'll ever subscribe to AoC. I'll probably trial it, and even if the combat is implemented well, only being able to play as Human, the wannabe-realisitc graphics, and the really sloooooow looking combos will probably turn me off the game.

    Maybe THQs W40k MMO will copy the controls, maybe Blizzards new MMO, maybe the next WAR. I like high Fantasy/Magic worlds more than low ones, if you already have Wyvern, Golems, and all sorts of creepy stuff, why not have some mutated humanoids like Lizardmen in a Swamp, or Ratmen in Tunnels, or or or. I like Faction vs. Faction more than Guild vs. Guild combat.

    WAR with AoCs controls, now that would've been my dream MMO *g* But in order to see it, AoC has to pave the way for more MMOs with similar controls.

    I doubt that AoC will work too well, though, but we'll see.

  • OrphesOrphes Member UncommonPosts: 3,039

    Originally posted by Lordcrapalot


    The WoW expansion isnt going to have any impact on AoC what so ever,

    Nope... and neither will any of those other things on the list be a cause of failure for AoC. Those set to play AoC will be there doing it despite of these things. If it fails it does it on it's own account, surely.

    So I could add a random nonsense thing at 7 aswell. But the meaning is that I actually do not agree with the OP it is just that I didn't put it in plain text.

    But still it took place no1 in a few days on the preorder list that shows that calling a game succes/failure because it doesn't dethrone WoW is false and ignorant. WoW will still be WoW and a succes even when/if it declines to 500k subs. Enough of that.

     

    Why even worry over AoC?

    I'm so broke. I can't even pay attention.
    "You have the right not to be killed"

  • MongooseMongoose Member UncommonPosts: 86


    1.) M Rated------So what, its for a more mature audiance. Finally a game with some gore in an mmorpg

    2.) High graphics ( and  people complained about VG)------People don't complain about high graphics, people complain about the low ones. Ask all the people who left AC for another game with better graphics.

    3.) New , unused combat system------Just because they don't copy every other mmo out there doesn't mean its bad. I'm tired of the same thing, were in need of something new, and this combat system which is actually skill based is just what we need.

    4.) 1 race------How many games can be produced that contain Elves and Dwarfs, like I said, not everyone wants to play one game and go to another one completely identical because there bored with the first but end up basically playing the exact same thing. New is good, new ideas are good.

    5.) Release near WAR( somewhat )-----HEY why don't we all get together and make a game that looks exactly like WOW because it was so successful and just give it a different name! In my opinion, WAR has nothing on Conan, nothing at all. I've played alot of mmorpgs in my time and I don't see anything about WAR that would interest me in the least bit.

    ~Mongoose

  • ArawonArawon Member Posts: 1,108

    Is that a Troll I see ?

  • CyclopsSlayerCyclopsSlayer Member UncommonPosts: 532

    The M-rating is a problem from a marketing point of view. Many(most?) major stores won't carry M titles. EB/Gamestop won't, BestBuy won't, Target and Walmart sure won't. OK, so you just have to mail-order and hope for a timely delivery, just don't expect to grab it at your local mall store.

    As to the System specs, I am confused, , you build and publicize a product as a DX10 release, yet claim it is no more system intensive than Oblivion. Umm, okay, right...  I play Oblivion with most of the options near High, yet Vanguard I could barely squeek out 20fps at Medium quality, and lets not speak about raid situations...

    The combat system, meh... 5 attacks, sure you can mix and match for special effects but DAoC did that years ago and had a hell of a lot more than 5 attacks. So what is so 'new and innovative'? The lack of targetting and auto-targets is all I can think of.

    Who cares about the different races, as long as char customization provides for near unique toons I could care less that they are Cimmerians and Aquilonians and not Orcs and Elves.

    Do I want AoC, oh YEAH!  Go Stygian Ranja!

    But! Am I seeing an incipient Train wreck fast approaching? Sadly yes. And I have a fair amount of experience having beta'd Horizons, DDO and Vanguard. Crash and burns all.

Sign In or Register to comment.