How is it that every conversation, usually not anything to do with politics. Gets turned into politics.
Even the gun topic got turned into politics! Which I think started with leftie...
"The greatest trick the devil played on humanity in the 20th century was convincing them that he didnt exist." (Paraphrasing) C.S. Lewis
"The greatest trick the devil played on humanity in the 20th century was convincing them that he didn't exist." (Paraphrasing) C.S. Lewis
"If a mother can kill her own child, what is left before I kill you and you kill me?" -Mother Teresa when talking about abortion after accepting the Nobel Peace Prize in 1979
The French crack? That's bigotry. And how typical of a neoconservative to get upset about something wrong when a Democrat does something, and be completely unconcerned about the exact same wrong when a Republican does it. More neo-conservative hypocrisy displayed for everyone to see. "...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
Actually, no. That isn't the comment. And the fact you don't know what comment I am talking about is proof of the liberal bias of democrats and the liberal media. Keep searching and maybe you can find what Dodd said that was basically the same as what Lott said and how different the reaction was when a democrat says it.
"I can tell you with no ego, this is my finest sword. If, on your journey, you should encounter God. . .. . . God will be cut." - Quentin Tarantino, Kill Bill
lol, exactly. this is the 3rd thread i've seen him (leftie) do that. he's good at it. he thinks life sucks.
サ ー ス ベ ン ----------- I see your reading skills are on the same level as your neo-con brethren. Before you insult someone, at least take the two seconds to click back on the thread to see who wrote what so that you don't look like a complete idiot for ranting insulting lies about them.
I posted early to the thread with a graphic of the genesis device, the line "Give me Genesis", and named r/l a 6 D cell maglite.
En1gma responded to that with the Anti-French bigotry and the huge Michael Moor/Saddam graphic BS.
So, as usual, look to your neo-con brethren for who is guilty for converting an innocent discussion into an outrageous insulting political rant.
I don't start political flame wars. I FINISH them.
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
"I think the neo-conservatives who think it's a fun prank to run high voltage through electrodes connected to someone's testicles should not be allowed to make any decisions on anything more lethal, including guns. Not only should neo-conservatives not be allowed to make decisions about guns, people should hide all sharp objects from them, too. Take away the pointy scissors and give neo-cons the rounded-tip scissors like all others with the emotional maturity of kindergardeners."
Originally posted by Leftie.
This was in the guns thread which had so far not stated anything about politics, but the pros and cons of using them. And a populace armed with them.
[Edit]
As well as....
"Originally posted by Finwe Wow. That was an interesting, yet moronic and immature statement to make.
No, it was incredibly astute. I'm sorry neo-conservatives aren't capable of understanding basic public policy discussions, but that's their baggage. It's not my job to continuously word things so those who's reading below is below 6th grade reading level don't have anything more mentally sophisticated than a fart joke go flying over their heads at Warp 9.
Do you want Charles Manson making decisions about gun policy? Of course not.
Therefore, if we wouldn't let that torturer make decisions about lethal weapons, we shouldn't allow Asscroft, Dumbsfeld, or Shrub to make decisions about lethal weapons.
The White House torture memos came out this week. Asscroft, Dumbsfeld and Shrub all knew about the torture and defended the right to torture prisoners.
Anyone who approves of torturing people is too mentally sick to make decisions about any important topic."
Originally posted by Leftie.
"The greatest trick the devil played on humanity in the 20th century was convincing them that he didnt exist." (Paraphrasing) C.S. Lewis
"The greatest trick the devil played on humanity in the 20th century was convincing them that he didn't exist." (Paraphrasing) C.S. Lewis
"If a mother can kill her own child, what is left before I kill you and you kill me?" -Mother Teresa when talking about abortion after accepting the Nobel Peace Prize in 1979
Originally posted by n2sooners Originally posted by leftie The French crack? That's bigotry. And how typical of a neoconservative to get upset about something wrong when a Democrat does something, and be completely unconcerned about the exact same wrong when a Republican does it. More neo-conservative hypocrisy displayed for everyone to see. "...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - SmoochyActually, no. That isn't the comment. And the fact you don't know what comment I am talking about is proof of the liberal bias of democrats and the liberal media. Keep searching and maybe you can find what Dodd said that was basically the same as what Lott said and how different the reaction was when a democrat says it.
WRONG! Chris Dodd praised Robert Byrd's career after renunciated the Klan and racism in the US Senate. Trent Lott wouldn't have been criticised at all if he had been praising Strom Thurmond's career in the Senate after he renunciated the politics of racism. Lott praised Thurmond for the positions he took WHILE THURMOND WAS A SEGREGATIONIST and said the country would have been better for electing a Segregationist.
LOTS of people, Republican and Democrats, have praised Thurmond's service to the country since he renunciated racism, especially shortly after Thurmond's recent death, just like lots of people praise Byrd's service to the country after Byrd renounced racism, as Sen. Dodd did.
Dodd is obviously NOT referring to Byrd's early political life when he still held racist views, because right here, Dodd mentions about Byrd, "I cannot think of a single moment in this nation's 220-plus year history where [Robert Byrd] would not have been a valuable asset to this country."
Robert Byrd is old, but not even Robert Byrd is 220 years old. Dodd is saying that the man Robert Byrd has evolved into as we know him now would be an asset at point in US history. What Byrd has become includes his renunciation of racism.
Lott was the only person who praised Thurmond career as a Segregationist, and paid the political price for doing so.
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
[quote]Originally posted by Finwe [b]"I think the neo-conservatives who think it's a fun prank to run high voltage through electrodes connected to someone's testicles should not be allowed to make any decisions on anything more lethal, including guns. Not only should neo-conservatives not be allowed to make decisions about guns, people should hide all sharp objects from them, too. Take away the pointy scissors and give neo-cons the rounded-tip scissors like all others with the emotional maturity of kindergardeners." Originally posted by Leftie.
This was in the guns thread which had so far not stated anything about politics, but the pros and cons of using them. And a populace armed with them. [Edit] As well as.... "Originally posted by Finwe Wow. That was an interesting, yet moronic and immature statement to make. No, it was incredibly astute. I'm sorry neo-conservatives aren't capable of understanding basic public policy discussions, but that's their baggage. It's not my job to continuously word things so those who's reading below is below 6th grade reading level don't have anything more mentally sophisticated than a fart joke go flying over their heads at Warp 9. Do you want Charles Manson making decisions about gun policy? Of course not. Therefore, if we wouldn't let that torturer make decisions about lethal weapons, we shouldn't allow Asscroft, Dumbsfeld, or Shrub to make decisions about lethal weapons. The White House torture memos came out this week. Asscroft, Dumbsfeld and Shrub all knew about the torture and defended the right to torture prisoners. Anyone who approves of torturing people is too mentally sick to make decisions about any important topic." Originally posted by Leftie.
------- The title of the thread was "Gun Control: No Go?
In the first post on the thread, Sven said, "We have to stop letting these damned groups like the NRA influence the government. This may have been a Bush fault."
Of course that thread was a political thread, dumbass. This shows how desperate neo-cons are to to make progressives look bad, no matter how much they have to lie to do it.
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
please post your "anti-american, everyone is an ass for owning a gun" in an appropriate thread other than this one as it doesnt belong. BTW, isn't there a thread like that on these forums? Post there.
Daggone...if I wanna hear this, I go to CNN.com or something
People who have to create conspiracy and hate threads to further a cause lacks in intellectual comprehension of diversity.
You can try and put words in people's mouth all you want, but no one is buying your spin. Let's see exactly what both Dodd and Lott had to say, and who they were saying it about.
Dodd on Byrd:
"I do not think it is an exaggeration at all to say to my friend from West Virginia that he would have been a great senator at any moment," Mr. Dodd, Connecticut Democrat, said while praising Mr. Byrd last week on the occasion of the eight-term Democrat's 17,000th Senate vote. Mr. Dodd continued: "He would have been right at the founding of this country. He would have been in the leadership crafting this Constitution. He would have been right during the great conflict of Civil War in this nation."
So, who is senator Byrd? He is an exKlan member, but not a regular member. He was a "kleagle" in the KKK. As a senator, Byrd filibustered the civil rights act for fourteen hours.
Lott on Thurmond:
I want to say this about my state: When Strom Thurmond ran for president we voted for him. We're proud of it. And if the rest of the country had of followed our lead we wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years, either.
So, who was senator Thurmond? He was a known segregationist, but never a klansman. He ran on the Dixiecrat ticket (a branch off of the democrat party) and captured four states in 1948. In 1954 he was the first and only write in candidate to win a seat in the Senate. As a democrat senator, he filibustered the civil rights act for twenty-four hours. He later switched to the republican party.
So, the question is, which was worse? Lott saying we might not have the problems we have today if Strom had been elected president as a segregationist, or Dodd saying Byrd would be a great senator at any time even when he spent much of that time he was a senator as a segregationist? I think both statements were stupid, but neither was meant to be an outright racist statement. They were both just heat of the moment statements meant to compliment the person being honored. The fact that one was blown out of proportion and not the other shows which side is petty and biased and using racism as a political tool.
In the first post on the thread, Sven said, "We have to stop letting these damned groups like the NRA influence the government. This may have been a Bush fault."
Of course that thread was a political thread, dumbass. This shows how desperate neo-cons are to to make progressives look bad, no matter how much they have to lie to do it."
Originally posted by Leftie.
Well, amusingly enough, no one made it into a political thread. One comment about bush, I'm sorry, but that doesnt give you the right to go on your hateful lib propagandic scream. No one was talking politics. No one mentioned anything else about bush, kerry, libs, cons, etc.
But then you come in. And like it seems always. You feel the need to spout your hateful liberal words and completely change the subject.
"The greatest trick the devil played on humanity in the 20th century was convincing them that he didnt exist." (Paraphrasing) C.S. Lewis
"The greatest trick the devil played on humanity in the 20th century was convincing them that he didn't exist." (Paraphrasing) C.S. Lewis
"If a mother can kill her own child, what is left before I kill you and you kill me?" -Mother Teresa when talking about abortion after accepting the Nobel Peace Prize in 1979
Originally posted by En1Gma dear gawd, read thepost subject
Its says "Favorite Weapons" please post your "anti-american, everyone is an ass for owning a gun" in an appropriate thread other than this one as it doesnt belong. BTW, isn't there a thread like that on these forums? Post there. Daggone...if I wanna hear this, I go to CNN.com or something
Exactly, dumbass. It says "Favorite Weapons" and you twisted that into an opportunity to promote your bigotted neo-con agenda. I didn't post political rants. I posted "Give Me Genesis!" YOU tried to turn an innocent non-political discussion into bullshit fascist flame-war. Neo-cons pull this shit all the time.
I simply called you on your bullshit, en1gma. I'm good at calling neo-cons on their bullshit.
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
Exactly, dumbass. It says "Favorite Weapons" and you twisted that into an opportunity to promote your bigotted neo-con agenda. I didn't post political rants. I posted "Give Me Genesis!" YOU tried to turn an innocent non-political discussion into bullshit fascist flame-war. Neo-cons pull this shit all the time.
I simply called you on your bullshit, en1gma. I'm good at calling neo-cons on their bullshit.
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
I think we can all agree that your probably only nine so I wont go too much into detail except a few pointers:
A. No one likes a troll. If you can't handle posts without calling people dumb-ass or bullshit then you really have nothing to say whatsoever.
B. Resorting to name calling only makes you look bad and not the person you are trying to rebut. Matter of fact it only inches you clsoer to a ban as it is clearly stated in the forum rules that no trolling or language is to be used on these forums that attacks another's character.
C. Spouting out obscenities completely makes your argument not even worth looking at. When people debate thats fine. When it resorts to name calling that's another. It only tells me that you ran out of things to say and the only thing you can come up with now is calling people "dumbass" and "idiots" and so forth.
Like I said in my previous posts. It was titled "Favorite Weapons" not "Moore Convention" so if you dont want to post your favorite weapon then why post? Everyone's heard your little political stance its time to move on
People who have to create conspiracy and hate threads to further a cause lacks in intellectual comprehension of diversity.
Originally posted by n2sooners You can try and put words in people's mouth all you want, but no one is buying your spin. Let's see exactly what both Dodd and Lott had to say, and who they were saying it about. Dodd on Byrd:"I do not think it is an exaggeration at all to say to my friend from West Virginia that he would have been a great senator at any moment," Mr. Dodd, Connecticut Democrat, said while praising Mr. Byrd last week on the occasion of the eight-term Democrat's 17,000th Senate vote. Mr. Dodd continued: "He would have been right at the founding of this country. He would have been in the leadership crafting this Constitution. He would have been right during the great conflict of Civil War in this nation." So, who is senator Byrd? He is an exKlan member, but not a regular member. He was a "kleagle" in the KKK. As a senator, Byrd filibustered the civil rights act for fourteen hours. Lott on Thurmond:I want to say this about my state: When Strom Thurmond ran for president we voted for him. We're proud of it. And if the rest of the country had of followed our lead we wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years, either. So, who was senator Thurmond? He was a known segregationist, but never a klansman. He ran on the Dixiecrat ticket (a branch off of the democrat party) and captured four states in 1948. In 1954 he was the first and only write in candidate to win a seat in the Senate. As a democrat senator, he filibustered the civil rights act for twenty-four hours. He later switched to the republican party. So, the question is, which was worse? Lott saying we might not have the problems we have today if Strom had been elected president as a segregationist, or Dodd saying Byrd would be a great senator at any time even when he spent much of that time he was a senator as a segregationist? I think both statements were stupid, but neither was meant to be an outright racist statement. They were both just heat of the moment statements meant to compliment the person being honored. The fact that one was blown out of proportion and not the other shows which side is petty and biased and using racism as a political tool.
Nice try at cut-n-pasting out the line that provides the proper context for Chris Dodd's speech.
Here' what Chris Dodd REALLY said.
"I cannot think of a single moment in this nation's 220-plus year history where [Robert Byrd] would not have been a valuable asset to this country."
Robert Byrd WAS NOT ALIVE 220 years ago for his career to an asset to the nation 220 years ago. Robert Byrd is old, but not that old. Chris Dodd said the man he knows NOW would have been a asset to the country at any time in it's history.
Trent Lott said America would have been a better country if America have voteed for a segregationist for President.
That's a huge difference. That why Trent Lott lost his position of leadership, and nobody but neo-con extremists who are willing to cut-n-paste pieces-parts of speeches together to lie about Democrats to promote their bullshit agenda said a word about Dodd's speech.
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
Dodd said that Byrd "would have been a great senator at any moment." Nothing you do or say can change that. It is no different than what Lott said, and the fact you can't see it just proves your bias.
But I give up. You are too dense to argue with. So here you go....
Originally posted by En1Gma Originally posted by leftie
Exactly, dumbass. It says "Favorite Weapons" and you twisted that into an opportunity to promote your bigotted neo-con agenda. I didn't post political rants. I posted "Give Me Genesis!" YOU tried to turn an innocent non-political discussion into bullshit fascist flame-war. Neo-cons pull this shit all the time. I simply called you on your bullshit, en1gma. I'm good at calling neo-cons on their bullshit. "...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
I think we can all agree that your probably only nine so I wont go too much into detail except a few pointers: A. No one likes a troll. If you can't handle posts without calling people dumb-ass or bullshit then you really have nothing to say whatsoever. B. Resorting to name calling only makes you look bad and not the person you are trying to rebut. Matter of fact it only inches you clsoer to a ban as it is clearly stated in the forum rules that no trolling or language is to be used on these forums that attacks another's character. C. Spouting out obscenities completely makes your argument not even worth looking at. When people debate thats fine. When it resorts to name calling that's another. It only tells me that you ran out of things to say and the only thing you can come up with now is calling people "dumbass" and "idiots" and so forth. Like I said in my previous posts. It was titled "Favorite Weapons" not "Moore Convention" so if you dont want to post your favorite weapon then why post? Everyone's heard your little political stance its time to move on
A. I responded to the thread with the reply Genesis device w/ a genesis device graphic, and 6 D cell maglite. You replied to the thread with bigoted neo-con spew and a huge Micheal Moore/Saddam graphic. YOU were the troll, not me.
B. There comes a point when a troll like you keep repeating the same lies over an over again that can be easily disproven by look back a few posts on the thread that you get pissed off and start cussing at the troll.
C. I post lost of evidence and links. You don't respond to that. You ignore it and start ranting your anti-American troll spew over and over and over again.
Your right, the post title was Favorite Weapons, not Moore Convention. SO WHY DID YOU START TROLLING THE THREAD WITH A HUGE MOORE/SADDAM graphic.
By the way... I'm not leaving. You want me banned because I stand up to all the neo-con bellowing and screaming and point out the truth in the rubbish. You trolled the thread with neo-con rubbish, I called you on it, and you're pissed off for being exposed for being a troll.
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
A. No one likes a troll. If you can't handle posts without calling people dumb-ass or bullshit then you really have nothing to say whatsoever.
B. Resorting to name calling only makes you look bad and not the person you are trying to rebut. Matter of fact it only inches you clsoer to a ban as it is clearly stated in the forum rules that no trolling or language is to be used on these forums that attacks another's character.
C. Spouting out obscenities completely makes your argument not even worth looking at. When people debate thats fine. When it resorts to name calling that's another. It only tells me that you ran out of things to say and the only thing you can come up with now is calling people "dumbass" and "idiots" and so forth.
Like I said in my previous posts. It was titled "Favorite Weapons" not "Moore Convention" so if you dont want to post your favorite weapon then why post? Everyone's heard your little political stance its time to move on
People who have to create conspiracy and hate threads to further a cause lacks in intellectual comprehension of diversity.
Originally posted by n2sooners Dodd said that Byrd "would have been a great senator at any moment." Nothing you do or say can change that. It is no different than what Lott said, and the fact you can't see it just proves your bias. But I give up. You are too dense to argue with. So here you go....
Here' what Chris Dodd REALLY said.
"I cannot think of a single moment in this nation's 220-plus year history where [Robert Byrd] would not have been a valuable asset to this country."
Your just pissed off at being busted in the act while cuttting and pasting together rubbish charges against innocent Democrats in order to promote your neo-con agenda.
I exposed you in mid-fabrication, and you're mad at me for doing it. That's human nature. I'll survive.
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
Why cant you email each other or at least start a new thread or something as this thread pretty much got hijacked pages ago and pages ago this thread should have been locked
People who have to create conspiracy and hate threads to further a cause lacks in intellectual comprehension of diversity.
Originally posted by En1Gma A. No one likes a troll. If you can't handle posts without calling people dumb-ass or bullshit then you really have nothing to say whatsoever. B. Resorting to name calling only makes you look bad and not the person you are trying to rebut. Matter of fact it only inches you clsoer to a ban as it is clearly stated in the forum rules that no trolling or language is to be used on these forums that attacks another's character. C. Spouting out obscenities completely makes your argument not even worth looking at. When people debate thats fine. When it resorts to name calling that's another. It only tells me that you ran out of things to say and the only thing you can come up with now is calling people "dumbass" and "idiots" and so forth. Like I said in my previous posts. It was titled "Favorite Weapons" not "Moore Convention" so if you dont want to post your favorite weapon then why post? Everyone's heard your little political stance its time to move on
A. I responded to the thread with the reply Genesis device w/ a genesis device graphic, and 6 D cell maglite. You replied to the thread with bigoted neo-con spew and a huge Micheal Moore/Saddam graphic. YOU were the troll, not me.
B. There comes a point when a troll like you keep repeating the same lies over an over again that can be easily disproven by look back a few posts on the thread that you get pissed off and start cussing at the troll.
C. I post lost of evidence and links. You don't respond to that. You ignore it and start ranting your anti-American troll spew over and over and over again.
Your right, the post title was Favorite Weapons, not Moore Convention. SO WHY DID YOU START TROLLING THE THREAD WITH A HUGE MOORE/SADDAM graphic.
By the way... I'm not leaving. You want me banned because I stand up to all the neo-con bellowing and screaming and point out the truth in the rubbish. You trolled the thread with neo-con rubbish, I called you on it, and you're pissed off for being exposed for being as the REAL troll on this thread.
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
A. No one likes a troll. If you can't handle posts without calling people dumb-ass or bullshit then you really have nothing to say whatsoever.
B. Resorting to name calling only makes you look bad and not the person you are trying to rebut. Matter of fact it only inches you clsoer to a ban as it is clearly stated in the forum rules that no trolling or language is to be used on these forums that attacks another's character.
C. Spouting out obscenities completely makes your argument not even worth looking at. When people debate thats fine. When it resorts to name calling that's another. It only tells me that you ran out of things to say and the only thing you can come up with now is calling people "dumbass" and "idiots" and so forth.
Like I said in my previous posts. It was titled "Favorite Weapons" not "Moore Convention" so if you dont want to post your favorite weapon then why post? Everyone's heard your little political stance its time to move on
People who have to create conspiracy and hate threads to further a cause lacks in intellectual comprehension of diversity.
Originally posted by En1Gma you guys have emails right? Why cant you email each other or at least start a new thread or something as this thread pretty much got hijacked pages ago and pages ago this thread should have been locked
You should know. YOU HIJACKED THE THREAD.
I wouldn't have a problem with the forum not allowing political threads. However, if the forum is going to have political threads, it's not going to have one-sided, reactionary neo-conservative Republican spew anymore. That rubbish will now get answered with some truth proven by real, solid evidence, and the spew will be revealed as the trollbait it really is.
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
leftie..ive read all of your posts....most of them being in the SIMs online area before you resurfaced here and about 98% of your posts are all bashing posts. Good lord. Can you step off your soapbox for one day and try not to post highly flammable political controversal statements in every post you made.
We all know your stand....give it a rest. MODs please lock this thread as it currently has nothing to do whatsoever to the original post at hand ....please? lol
People who have to create conspiracy and hate threads to further a cause lacks in intellectual comprehension of diversity.
Originally posted by En1Gma A. No one likes a troll. If you can't handle posts without calling people dumb-ass or bullshit then you really have nothing to say whatsoever. B. Resorting to name calling only makes you look bad and not the person you are trying to rebut. Matter of fact it only inches you clsoer to a ban as it is clearly stated in the forum rules that no trolling or language is to be used on these forums that attacks another's character. C. Spouting out obscenities completely makes your argument not even worth looking at. When people debate thats fine. When it resorts to name calling that's another. It only tells me that you ran out of things to say and the only thing you can come up with now is calling people "dumbass" and "idiots" and so forth. Like I said in my previous posts. It was titled "Favorite Weapons" not "Moore Convention" so if you dont want to post your favorite weapon then why post? Everyone's heard your little political stance its time to move on
I can keep this up all night, too. Your troll spew will be seen responded to with truth.
A. I responded to the thread with the reply Genesis device w/ a genesis device graphic, and 6 D cell maglite. You replied to the thread with bigoted neo-con spew and a huge Micheal Moore/Saddam graphic. YOU were the troll, not me.
B. There comes a point when a troll like you keep repeating the same lies over an over again that can be easily disproven by look back a few posts on the thread that you get pissed off and start cussing at the troll.
C. I post lost of evidence and links. You don't respond to that. You ignore it and start ranting your anti-American troll spew over and over and over again.
Your right, the post title was Favorite Weapons, not Moore Convention. SO WHY DID YOU START TROLLING THE THREAD WITH A HUGE MOORE/SADDAM graphic.
By the way... I'm not leaving. You want me banned because I stand up to all the neo-con bellowing and screaming and point out the truth in the rubbish. You trolled the thread with neo-con rubbish, I called you on it, and you're pissed off for being exposed for being as the REAL troll on this thread.
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
We all know your stand....give it a rest. MODs please lock this thread as it currently has nothing to do whatsoever to the original post at hand ....please? lol
People who have to create conspiracy and hate threads to further a cause lacks in intellectual comprehension of diversity.
Comments
How is it that every conversation, usually not anything to do with politics. Gets turned into politics.
Even the gun topic got turned into politics! Which I think started with leftie...
"The greatest trick the devil played on humanity in the 20th century was convincing them that he didnt exist." (Paraphrasing) C.S. Lewis
"The greatest trick the devil played on humanity in the 20th century was convincing them that he didn't exist." (Paraphrasing) C.S. Lewis
"If a mother can kill her own child, what is left before I kill you and you kill me?" -Mother Teresa when talking about abortion after accepting the Nobel Peace Prize in 1979
Funny that you mention a compact. I am getting a Kahr PM9 tonight. Can't wait to take it to the range on Sunday.
Like this one:
Kahr PM 9
except I am getting the all black.
that's a sweet gun. How much is it going for? I got for 150 bucks after a trade in.
There's nothing like the smell of gun powder at a range to make you smile lol
People who have to create conspiracy and hate threads to further a cause lacks in intellectual comprehension of diversity.
People who have to create conspiracy and hate threads to further a cause lacks in intellectual comprehension of diversity.
Originally posted by Sir-Sven
Originally posted by Gnarled
off topic
"I can tell you with no ego, this is my finest sword. If, on your journey, you should encounter God. . .. . . God will be cut." - Quentin Tarantino, Kill Bill
lol, exactly. this is the 3rd thread i've seen him (leftie) do that. he's good at it. he thinks life sucks.
サ ー ス ベ ン
-----------
I see your reading skills are on the same level as your neo-con brethren. Before you insult someone, at least take the two seconds to click back on the thread to see who wrote what so that you don't look like a complete idiot for ranting insulting lies about them.
I posted early to the thread with a graphic of the genesis device, the line "Give me Genesis", and named r/l a 6 D cell maglite.
En1gma responded to that with the Anti-French bigotry and the huge Michael Moor/Saddam graphic BS.
So, as usual, look to your neo-con brethren for who is guilty for converting an innocent discussion into an outrageous insulting political rant.
I don't start political flame wars. I FINISH them.
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
"I think the neo-conservatives who think it's a fun prank to run high voltage through electrodes connected to someone's testicles should not be allowed to make any decisions on anything more lethal, including guns. Not only should neo-conservatives not be allowed to make decisions about guns, people should hide all sharp objects from them, too. Take away the pointy scissors and give neo-cons the rounded-tip scissors like all others with the emotional maturity of kindergardeners."
Originally posted by Leftie.
This was in the guns thread which had so far not stated anything about politics, but the pros and cons of using them. And a populace armed with them.
[Edit]
As well as....
"Originally posted by Finwe Wow. That was an interesting, yet moronic and immature statement to make.
No, it was incredibly astute. I'm sorry neo-conservatives aren't capable of understanding basic public policy discussions, but that's their baggage. It's not my job to continuously word things so those who's reading below is below 6th grade reading level don't have anything more mentally sophisticated than a fart joke go flying over their heads at Warp 9.
Do you want Charles Manson making decisions about gun policy? Of course not.
Therefore, if we wouldn't let that torturer make decisions about lethal weapons, we shouldn't allow Asscroft, Dumbsfeld, or Shrub to make decisions about lethal weapons.
The White House torture memos came out this week. Asscroft, Dumbsfeld and Shrub all knew about the torture and defended the right to torture prisoners.
Anyone who approves of torturing people is too mentally sick to make decisions about any important topic."
Originally posted by Leftie.
"The greatest trick the devil played on humanity in the 20th century was convincing them that he didnt exist." (Paraphrasing) C.S. Lewis
"The greatest trick the devil played on humanity in the 20th century was convincing them that he didn't exist." (Paraphrasing) C.S. Lewis
"If a mother can kill her own child, what is left before I kill you and you kill me?" -Mother Teresa when talking about abortion after accepting the Nobel Peace Prize in 1979
WRONG! Chris Dodd praised Robert Byrd's career after renunciated the Klan and racism in the US Senate. Trent Lott wouldn't have been criticised at all if he had been praising Strom Thurmond's career in the Senate after he renunciated the politics of racism. Lott praised Thurmond for the positions he took WHILE THURMOND WAS A SEGREGATIONIST and said the country would have been better for electing a Segregationist.
LOTS of people, Republican and Democrats, have praised Thurmond's service to the country since he renunciated racism, especially shortly after Thurmond's recent death, just like lots of people praise Byrd's service to the country after Byrd renounced racism, as Sen. Dodd did.
Dodd is obviously NOT referring to Byrd's early political life when he still held racist views, because right here, Dodd mentions about Byrd, "I cannot think of a single moment in this nation's 220-plus year history where [Robert Byrd] would not have been a valuable asset to this country."
Robert Byrd is old, but not even Robert Byrd is 220 years old. Dodd is saying that the man Robert Byrd has evolved into as we know him now would be an asset at point in US history. What Byrd has become includes his renunciation of racism.
Lott was the only person who praised Thurmond career as a Segregationist, and paid the political price for doing so.
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
[quote]Originally posted by Finwe
[b]"I think the neo-conservatives who think it's a fun prank to run high voltage through electrodes connected to someone's testicles should not be allowed to make any decisions on anything more lethal, including guns. Not only should neo-conservatives not be allowed to make decisions about guns, people should hide all sharp objects from them, too. Take away the pointy scissors and give neo-cons the rounded-tip scissors like all others with the emotional maturity of kindergardeners."
Originally posted by Leftie.
This was in the guns thread which had so far not stated anything about politics, but the pros and cons of using them. And a populace armed with them.
[Edit]
As well as....
"Originally posted by Finwe Wow. That was an interesting, yet moronic and immature statement to make.
No, it was incredibly astute. I'm sorry neo-conservatives aren't capable of understanding basic public policy discussions, but that's their baggage. It's not my job to continuously word things so those who's reading below is below 6th grade reading level don't have anything more mentally sophisticated than a fart joke go flying over their heads at Warp 9.
Do you want Charles Manson making decisions about gun policy? Of course not.
Therefore, if we wouldn't let that torturer make decisions about lethal weapons, we shouldn't allow Asscroft, Dumbsfeld, or Shrub to make decisions about lethal weapons.
The White House torture memos came out this week. Asscroft, Dumbsfeld and Shrub all knew about the torture and defended the right to torture prisoners.
Anyone who approves of torturing people is too mentally sick to make decisions about any important topic."
Originally posted by Leftie.
-------
The title of the thread was "Gun Control: No Go?
In the first post on the thread, Sven said, "We have to stop letting these damned groups like the NRA influence the government. This may have been a Bush fault."
Of course that thread was a political thread, dumbass. This shows how desperate neo-cons are to to make progressives look bad, no matter how much they have to lie to do it.
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
dear gawd, read thepost subject
Its says "Favorite Weapons"
please post your "anti-american, everyone is an ass for owning a gun" in an appropriate thread other than this one as it doesnt belong. BTW, isn't there a thread like that on these forums? Post there.
Daggone...if I wanna hear this, I go to CNN.com or something
People who have to create conspiracy and hate threads to further a cause lacks in intellectual comprehension of diversity.
You can try and put words in people's mouth all you want, but no one is buying your spin. Let's see exactly what both Dodd and Lott had to say, and who they were saying it about.
Dodd on Byrd:
So, who is senator Byrd? He is an exKlan member, but not a regular member. He was a "kleagle" in the KKK. As a senator, Byrd filibustered the civil rights act for fourteen hours.
Lott on Thurmond:
So, who was senator Thurmond? He was a known segregationist, but never a klansman. He ran on the Dixiecrat ticket (a branch off of the democrat party) and captured four states in 1948. In 1954 he was the first and only write in candidate to win a seat in the Senate. As a democrat senator, he filibustered the civil rights act for twenty-four hours. He later switched to the republican party.
So, the question is, which was worse? Lott saying we might not have the problems we have today if Strom had been elected president as a segregationist, or Dodd saying Byrd would be a great senator at any time even when he spent much of that time he was a senator as a segregationist? I think both statements were stupid, but neither was meant to be an outright racist statement. They were both just heat of the moment statements meant to compliment the person being honored. The fact that one was blown out of proportion and not the other shows which side is petty and biased and using racism as a political tool.
In the first post on the thread, Sven said, "We have to stop letting these damned groups like the NRA influence the government. This may have been a Bush fault."
Of course that thread was a political thread, dumbass. This shows how desperate neo-cons are to to make progressives look bad, no matter how much they have to lie to do it."
Originally posted by Leftie.
Well, amusingly enough, no one made it into a political thread. One comment about bush, I'm sorry, but that doesnt give you the right to go on your hateful lib propagandic scream. No one was talking politics. No one mentioned anything else about bush, kerry, libs, cons, etc.
But then you come in. And like it seems always. You feel the need to spout your hateful liberal words and completely change the subject.
"The greatest trick the devil played on humanity in the 20th century was convincing them that he didnt exist." (Paraphrasing) C.S. Lewis
"The greatest trick the devil played on humanity in the 20th century was convincing them that he didn't exist." (Paraphrasing) C.S. Lewis
"If a mother can kill her own child, what is left before I kill you and you kill me?" -Mother Teresa when talking about abortion after accepting the Nobel Peace Prize in 1979
Exactly, dumbass. It says "Favorite Weapons" and you twisted that into an opportunity to promote your bigotted neo-con agenda. I didn't post political rants. I posted "Give Me Genesis!" YOU tried to turn an innocent non-political discussion into bullshit fascist flame-war. Neo-cons pull this shit all the time.
I simply called you on your bullshit, en1gma. I'm good at calling neo-cons on their bullshit.
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
Exactly, dumbass. It says "Favorite Weapons" and you twisted that into an opportunity to promote your bigotted neo-con agenda. I didn't post political rants. I posted "Give Me Genesis!" YOU tried to turn an innocent non-political discussion into bullshit fascist flame-war. Neo-cons pull this shit all the time.
I simply called you on your bullshit, en1gma. I'm good at calling neo-cons on their bullshit.
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
I think we can all agree that your probably only nine so I wont go too much into detail except a few pointers:
A. No one likes a troll. If you can't handle posts without calling people dumb-ass or bullshit then you really have nothing to say whatsoever.
B. Resorting to name calling only makes you look bad and not the person you are trying to rebut. Matter of fact it only inches you clsoer to a ban as it is clearly stated in the forum rules that no trolling or language is to be used on these forums that attacks another's character.
C. Spouting out obscenities completely makes your argument not even worth looking at. When people debate thats fine. When it resorts to name calling that's another. It only tells me that you ran out of things to say and the only thing you can come up with now is calling people "dumbass" and "idiots" and so forth.
Like I said in my previous posts. It was titled "Favorite Weapons" not "Moore Convention" so if you dont want to post your favorite weapon then why post? Everyone's heard your little political stance its time to move on
People who have to create conspiracy and hate threads to further a cause lacks in intellectual comprehension of diversity.
Nice try at cut-n-pasting out the line that provides the proper context for Chris Dodd's speech.
Here' what Chris Dodd REALLY said.
"I cannot think of a single moment in this nation's 220-plus year history where [Robert Byrd] would not have been a valuable asset to this country."
Robert Byrd WAS NOT ALIVE 220 years ago for his career to an asset to the nation 220 years ago. Robert Byrd is old, but not that old. Chris Dodd said the man he knows NOW would have been a asset to the country at any time in it's history.
Trent Lott said America would have been a better country if America have voteed for a segregationist for President.
That's a huge difference. That why Trent Lott lost his position of leadership, and nobody but neo-con extremists who are willing to cut-n-paste pieces-parts of speeches together to lie about Democrats to promote their bullshit agenda said a word about Dodd's speech.
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
Dodd said that Byrd "would have been a great senator at any moment." Nothing you do or say can change that. It is no different than what Lott said, and the fact you can't see it just proves your bias.
But I give up. You are too dense to argue with. So here you go....
Exactly, dumbass. It says "Favorite Weapons" and you twisted that into an opportunity to promote your bigotted neo-con agenda. I didn't post political rants. I posted "Give Me Genesis!" YOU tried to turn an innocent non-political discussion into bullshit fascist flame-war. Neo-cons pull this shit all the time.
I simply called you on your bullshit, en1gma. I'm good at calling neo-cons on their bullshit.
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
I think we can all agree that your probably only nine so I wont go too much into detail except a few pointers:
A. No one likes a troll. If you can't handle posts without calling people dumb-ass or bullshit then you really have nothing to say whatsoever.
B. Resorting to name calling only makes you look bad and not the person you are trying to rebut. Matter of fact it only inches you clsoer to a ban as it is clearly stated in the forum rules that no trolling or language is to be used on these forums that attacks another's character.
C. Spouting out obscenities completely makes your argument not even worth looking at. When people debate thats fine. When it resorts to name calling that's another. It only tells me that you ran out of things to say and the only thing you can come up with now is calling people "dumbass" and "idiots" and so forth.
Like I said in my previous posts. It was titled "Favorite Weapons" not "Moore Convention" so if you dont want to post your favorite weapon then why post? Everyone's heard your little political stance its time to move on
A. I responded to the thread with the reply Genesis device w/ a genesis device graphic, and 6 D cell maglite. You replied to the thread with bigoted neo-con spew and a huge Micheal Moore/Saddam graphic. YOU were the troll, not me.
B. There comes a point when a troll like you keep repeating the same lies over an over again that can be easily disproven by look back a few posts on the thread that you get pissed off and start cussing at the troll.
C. I post lost of evidence and links. You don't respond to that. You ignore it and start ranting your anti-American troll spew over and over and over again.
Your right, the post title was Favorite Weapons, not Moore Convention. SO WHY DID YOU START TROLLING THE THREAD WITH A HUGE MOORE/SADDAM graphic.
By the way... I'm not leaving. You want me banned because I stand up to all the neo-con bellowing and screaming and point out the truth in the rubbish. You trolled the thread with neo-con rubbish, I called you on it, and you're pissed off for being exposed for being a troll.
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
A. No one likes a troll. If you can't handle posts without calling people dumb-ass or bullshit then you really have nothing to say whatsoever.
B. Resorting to name calling only makes you look bad and not the person you are trying to rebut. Matter of fact it only inches you clsoer to a ban as it is clearly stated in the forum rules that no trolling or language is to be used on these forums that attacks another's character.
C. Spouting out obscenities completely makes your argument not even worth looking at. When people debate thats fine. When it resorts to name calling that's another. It only tells me that you ran out of things to say and the only thing you can come up with now is calling people "dumbass" and "idiots" and so forth.
Like I said in my previous posts. It was titled "Favorite Weapons" not "Moore Convention" so if you dont want to post your favorite weapon then why post? Everyone's heard your little political stance its time to move on
People who have to create conspiracy and hate threads to further a cause lacks in intellectual comprehension of diversity.
Here' what Chris Dodd REALLY said.
"I cannot think of a single moment in this nation's 220-plus year history where [Robert Byrd] would not have been a valuable asset to this country."
Your just pissed off at being busted in the act while cuttting and pasting together rubbish charges against innocent Democrats in order to promote your neo-con agenda.
I exposed you in mid-fabrication, and you're mad at me for doing it. That's human nature. I'll survive.
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
you guys have emails right?
Why cant you email each other or at least start a new thread or something as this thread pretty much got hijacked pages ago and pages ago this thread should have been locked
People who have to create conspiracy and hate threads to further a cause lacks in intellectual comprehension of diversity.
A. I responded to the thread with the reply Genesis device w/ a genesis device graphic, and 6 D cell maglite. You replied to the thread with bigoted neo-con spew and a huge Micheal Moore/Saddam graphic. YOU were the troll, not me.
B. There comes a point when a troll like you keep repeating the same lies over an over again that can be easily disproven by look back a few posts on the thread that you get pissed off and start cussing at the troll.
C. I post lost of evidence and links. You don't respond to that. You ignore it and start ranting your anti-American troll spew over and over and over again.
Your right, the post title was Favorite Weapons, not Moore Convention. SO WHY DID YOU START TROLLING THE THREAD WITH A HUGE MOORE/SADDAM graphic.
By the way... I'm not leaving. You want me banned because I stand up to all the neo-con bellowing and screaming and point out the truth in the rubbish. You trolled the thread with neo-con rubbish, I called you on it, and you're pissed off for being exposed for being as the REAL troll on this thread.
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
A. No one likes a troll. If you can't handle posts without calling people dumb-ass or bullshit then you really have nothing to say whatsoever.
B. Resorting to name calling only makes you look bad and not the person you are trying to rebut. Matter of fact it only inches you clsoer to a ban as it is clearly stated in the forum rules that no trolling or language is to be used on these forums that attacks another's character.
C. Spouting out obscenities completely makes your argument not even worth looking at. When people debate thats fine. When it resorts to name calling that's another. It only tells me that you ran out of things to say and the only thing you can come up with now is calling people "dumbass" and "idiots" and so forth.
Like I said in my previous posts. It was titled "Favorite Weapons" not "Moore Convention" so if you dont want to post your favorite weapon then why post? Everyone's heard your little political stance its time to move on
People who have to create conspiracy and hate threads to further a cause lacks in intellectual comprehension of diversity.
You should know. YOU HIJACKED THE THREAD.
I wouldn't have a problem with the forum not allowing political threads. However, if the forum is going to have political threads, it's not going to have one-sided, reactionary neo-conservative Republican spew anymore. That rubbish will now get answered with some truth proven by real, solid evidence, and the spew will be revealed as the trollbait it really is.
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
leftie..ive read all of your posts....most of them being in the SIMs online area before you resurfaced here and about 98% of your posts are all bashing posts. Good lord. Can you step off your soapbox for one day and try not to post highly flammable political controversal statements in every post you made.
We all know your stand....give it a rest. MODs please lock this thread as it currently has nothing to do whatsoever to the original post at hand ....please? lol
People who have to create conspiracy and hate threads to further a cause lacks in intellectual comprehension of diversity.
I can keep this up all night, too. Your troll spew will be seen responded to with truth.
A. I responded to the thread with the reply Genesis device w/ a genesis device graphic, and 6 D cell maglite. You replied to the thread with bigoted neo-con spew and a huge Micheal Moore/Saddam graphic. YOU were the troll, not me.
B. There comes a point when a troll like you keep repeating the same lies over an over again that can be easily disproven by look back a few posts on the thread that you get pissed off and start cussing at the troll.
C. I post lost of evidence and links. You don't respond to that. You ignore it and start ranting your anti-American troll spew over and over and over again.
Your right, the post title was Favorite Weapons, not Moore Convention. SO WHY DID YOU START TROLLING THE THREAD WITH A HUGE MOORE/SADDAM graphic.
By the way... I'm not leaving. You want me banned because I stand up to all the neo-con bellowing and screaming and point out the truth in the rubbish. You trolled the thread with neo-con rubbish, I called you on it, and you're pissed off for being exposed for being as the REAL troll on this thread.
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
"...you just #@*&$% with the wrong rhino, pal!" - Smoochy
We all know your stand....give it a rest. MODs please lock this thread as it currently has nothing to do whatsoever to the original post at hand ....please? lol
People who have to create conspiracy and hate threads to further a cause lacks in intellectual comprehension of diversity.