My main is lvl 57 by now. I do have a lot of quest in my log but I have become afraid to do them because there are only about 2 quests per level by now and they will gain me maybe 20% of a lvl. Rest is grinding repeatable kill quest.
So I have done crafting, gained me lvl 54 and 55 to complete tier 2. Done the repeatable villa quests and come to realize that the game in its current form is not really that fun anymore at those lvls.
I had thought that at lvl 60+ things would get better again as there are more zone to lvl in again but my guildies have already run out of lvl 60+ content including red quests and they are still lvl 60 . . .
People will know me as a stout defender of the game but right now there is a serious content problem past lvl 50 which is as bad as the lvl 30s in lotro before book 9. This has made me roll an alt hoping for better content once that char reach lvl 50.
If that havent happened by then then I dunno . . .
"You are the hero our legends have foretold will save our tribe, therefore please go kill 10 pigs."
The game does need more quests from 50-60 but i disagree with 40-50 as i didnt find that hard atall. Alot of people seem to just stay in 1 area and then complain when tehy run out of quests, one of the great things i have found about AoC is that there are mutliple areas that i can level in all the way from 20-50.
Really though anyone who says that it is hard to level in this game must be a terrible player. People where max level by the end of the first week and even more hit it in the second week.
Garrik
________________________________
"once upon a midnight dreary, while i porn surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of 'hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, "give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404."
I just hit 50. Took me about 48 hours to do the 10 levels between 40 and 50, in Fields of the Dead.
49 to 50 was the one that took the longest time, since i ran out of quests. So i had to grind my way all up to 50. And now i moved on to the next zone.. But it looks like i have to grind a lot more, since i only found 3 new quests so far. Which are all red to me, in my quest log. Either i cant find it, or else are there missing a lot of 49+ quests.
I am also 50. I have never run out of quests, although FoTD was more boring than others. Have you gone to Eigolon mountains? There are many quests there for you at level 50. And did you do the noble district quests?
Its funny how a lot of players are "spoiled" with quest request, actually AoC have lots and lots of those dummy repeatable quests so you can NEVER run out of quests.
They went even so far that all the Vila quests in noble district will always be for your level so if you take the quest at level 40 you will be killing lvl 40 mobs if you do it at lvl 79 you will be killing level 79 mobs etc..
( That type of quests and there are quite few are on timers so you cant do it like once per day )
The main problem was when they "balanced/lower" general XP ratio from beta to release several GAP's appeared.
The majority of those GAP's are past level 50. Some say 40 but thats not the truth as at lvl 40 you have bunch of quests in noble district (including vila's) and as well Fields of the dead, even if you skip all group quests you should be level 48/49 if you just did quests and did not kill any other mobs.
Example for those GAP+s past lvl 50. (zone: E. Mountains )
You get a quest at level 48 and once you do them you are like lvl 51 now you need to grind to level 52 to be able to get some new quests ( by grind i mean kill like 100mobs same level to gain a level ) after you finish level 52 quests you will be around 54 /50% and you will again need to grind to 56 to get some new quests.
In that time you ALWAYS have 2 repeatble quest avialable that are worth doing to lvl 53 and at lvl 54 you have 3 repeatble quests that you can do up to level 59 they are all in E. Mountains if you get bored with that zone you can also go to noble district and do Vila's quests.
The leveling is Age of Conan is really simple you can level up much much faster then in WoW ( mentioning WoW couse everyone knows it )
The that bad taste some players get past level 50 is that up till then you dont even notice you are doing anything and levels are just raising past that you need to put some effort in it.
uk.pc.ign.com/articles/878/878496p1.html "As for the content, things seem to start to tail off in terms of solid quest lines and more engaging content once you hit 40. In the Field of the Dead, the game's zone for those between 40 and 50, things start off at a decent clip with a few quests near the zone's beginning, but then seem to sputter to a slow crawl, offering only a few tasks and meager rewards. Compared to the polished level 1 through 20 experience in Tortage and large number of quest chains available in the 20 to 40 zones, Field of the Dead doesn't really stack up. Leveling is still entirely possible through grinding as downed mobs around your level give out pretty good experience bonuses, but opportunities to gain quest experience rewards that can so quickly propel you along the leveling curve seem to dry up. Without the strength of the narrative threads present in the 20 to 40 zones, the game turns into more of a chore to play."
or is IGN just trolling AoC too?
when a major gaming site described a game as a "chore to play", you can be sure there are issues.
let's see what the fanboys say about this one, should be amusing...
IGN is full of crap and reviews games based on payments from companies.
they are however completely right here. unfortunately
i like how the op took what he wanted to post from the article. while most of the article is giving it a really good review and overall ign is recommending the game for mmo gamers ....interesting.
Actually, you're wrong, and I'm wondering how many people here actually read the entire thing.
First of all, this thread's a repeat, since I posted the same thing here 4 Days Ago, and opinion-free, taking the good and bad spots in only quote form from the article:
Most of the review is lukewarm at best, and not much is outright complimenting it. Take a look through the entire review and you will see the same complaints post-40 that most people here are talking about. In fact, their bottom line says:
"Overall I'd say the game's worth checking out, though maybe it's best to wait a month or two at this point so more of the issues with higher level content can get worked out."
The Post-40 impressions speak badly of the content, the crafting and the harvesting, the lack of different armor styles and the bugs throughout the game.
uk.pc.ign.com/articles/878/878496p1.html "As for the content, things seem to start to tail off in terms of solid quest lines and more engaging content once you hit 40. In the Field of the Dead, the game's zone for those between 40 and 50, things start off at a decent clip with a few quests near the zone's beginning, but then seem to sputter to a slow crawl, offering only a few tasks and meager rewards. Compared to the polished level 1 through 20 experience in Tortage and large number of quest chains available in the 20 to 40 zones, Field of the Dead doesn't really stack up. Leveling is still entirely possible through grinding as downed mobs around your level give out pretty good experience bonuses, but opportunities to gain quest experience rewards that can so quickly propel you along the leveling curve seem to dry up. Without the strength of the narrative threads present in the 20 to 40 zones, the game turns into more of a chore to play."
or is IGN just trolling AoC too?
when a major gaming site described a game as a "chore to play", you can be sure there are issues.
let's see what the fanboys say about this one, should be amusing...
IGN is full of crap and reviews games based on payments from companies.
they are however completely right here. unfortunately
at least you're honest.
i too was shocked when i read how blatantly he slammed its faults. i commend his journalistic integrity however, since truthfulness is what i want from a gaming site, not hype.
i like how the op took what he wanted to post from the article. while most of the article is giving it a really good review and overall ign is recommending the game for mmo gamers ....interesting.
Actually, you're wrong, and I'm wondering how many people here actually read the entire thing.
First of all, this thread's a repeat, since I posted the same thing here 4 Days Ago, and opinion-free, taking the good and bad spots in only quote form from the article:
Most of the review is lukewarm at best, and not much is outright complimenting it. Take a look through the entire review and you will see the same complaints post-40 that most people here are talking about. In fact, their bottom line says:
"Overall I'd say the game's worth checking out, though maybe it's best to wait a month or two at this point so more of the issues with higher level content can get worked out."
The Post-40 impressions speak badly of the content, the crafting and the harvesting, the lack of different armor styles and the bugs throughout the game.
"Overall I'd say the game's worth checking out, though maybe it's best to wait a month or two at this point so more of the issues with higher level content can get worked out."
this means they are recomending the game. yes they say to wait a month or two and i agree. I did read the entire thing and overall it was a fair review, but this review is not in any way bashing the game as the OP was trying to make it seem which was my original point so no I'm not wrong and you are misunderstood
i like how the op took what he wanted to post from the article. while most of the article is giving it a really good review and overall ign is recommending the game for mmo gamers ....interesting.
Actually, you're wrong, and I'm wondering how many people here actually read the entire thing.
First of all, this thread's a repeat, since I posted the same thing here 4 Days Ago, and opinion-free, taking the good and bad spots in only quote form from the article:
Most of the review is lukewarm at best, and not much is outright complimenting it. Take a look through the entire review and you will see the same complaints post-40 that most people here are talking about. In fact, their bottom line says:
"Overall I'd say the game's worth checking out, though maybe it's best to wait a month or two at this point so more of the issues with higher level content can get worked out."
The Post-40 impressions speak badly of the content, the crafting and the harvesting, the lack of different armor styles and the bugs throughout the game.
"Overall I'd say the game's worth checking out, though maybe it's best to wait a month or two at this point so more of the issues with higher level content can get worked out."
this means they are recomending the game. yes they say to wait a month or two and i agree. I did read the entire thing and overall it was a fair review, but this review is not in any way bashing the game as the OP was trying to make it seem which was my original point so no I'm not wrong and you are misunderstood
Aye, the article just stated facts and some of them may not be what fans of the game want others to hear, but it still got a GOOD rating in the overall review that was posted later. I mean its not like they are saying "OMFG RUN AWAY THIS GAME SUCKS!!"
There are 3 types of people in the world. 1.) Those who make things happen 2.) Those who watch things happen 3.) And those who wonder "What the %#*& just happened?!"
Comments
My main is lvl 57 by now. I do have a lot of quest in my log but I have become afraid to do them because there are only about 2 quests per level by now and they will gain me maybe 20% of a lvl. Rest is grinding repeatable kill quest.
So I have done crafting, gained me lvl 54 and 55 to complete tier 2. Done the repeatable villa quests and come to realize that the game in its current form is not really that fun anymore at those lvls.
I had thought that at lvl 60+ things would get better again as there are more zone to lvl in again but my guildies have already run out of lvl 60+ content including red quests and they are still lvl 60 . . .
People will know me as a stout defender of the game but right now there is a serious content problem past lvl 50 which is as bad as the lvl 30s in lotro before book 9. This has made me roll an alt hoping for better content once that char reach lvl 50.
If that havent happened by then then I dunno . . .
"You are the hero our legends have foretold will save our tribe, therefore please go kill 10 pigs."
The game does need more quests from 50-60 but i disagree with 40-50 as i didnt find that hard atall. Alot of people seem to just stay in 1 area and then complain when tehy run out of quests, one of the great things i have found about AoC is that there are mutliple areas that i can level in all the way from 20-50.
Really though anyone who says that it is hard to level in this game must be a terrible player. People where max level by the end of the first week and even more hit it in the second week.
Garrik
________________________________
"once upon a midnight dreary, while i porn surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of 'hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, "give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404."
I am also 50. I have never run out of quests, although FoTD was more boring than others. Have you gone to Eigolon mountains? There are many quests there for you at level 50. And did you do the noble district quests?
Its funny how a lot of players are "spoiled" with quest request, actually AoC have lots and lots of those dummy repeatable quests so you can NEVER run out of quests.
They went even so far that all the Vila quests in noble district will always be for your level so if you take the quest at level 40 you will be killing lvl 40 mobs if you do it at lvl 79 you will be killing level 79 mobs etc..
( That type of quests and there are quite few are on timers so you cant do it like once per day )
The main problem was when they "balanced/lower" general XP ratio from beta to release several GAP's appeared.
The majority of those GAP's are past level 50. Some say 40 but thats not the truth as at lvl 40 you have bunch of quests in noble district (including vila's) and as well Fields of the dead, even if you skip all group quests you should be level 48/49 if you just did quests and did not kill any other mobs.
Example for those GAP+s past lvl 50. (zone: E. Mountains )
You get a quest at level 48 and once you do them you are like lvl 51 now you need to grind to level 52 to be able to get some new quests ( by grind i mean kill like 100mobs same level to gain a level ) after you finish level 52 quests you will be around 54 /50% and you will again need to grind to 56 to get some new quests.
In that time you ALWAYS have 2 repeatble quest avialable that are worth doing to lvl 53 and at lvl 54 you have 3 repeatble quests that you can do up to level 59 they are all in E. Mountains if you get bored with that zone you can also go to noble district and do Vila's quests.
The leveling is Age of Conan is really simple you can level up much much faster then in WoW ( mentioning WoW couse everyone knows it )
The that bad taste some players get past level 50 is that up till then you dont even notice you are doing anything and levels are just raising past that you need to put some effort in it.
Futilez[Do You Have What It Takes ?]
IGN is full of crap and reviews games based on payments from companies.
they are however completely right here. unfortunately
Actually, you're wrong, and I'm wondering how many people here actually read the entire thing.
First of all, this thread's a repeat, since I posted the same thing here 4 Days Ago, and opinion-free, taking the good and bad spots in only quote form from the article:
http://www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/post/2056566#2056566
Most of the review is lukewarm at best, and not much is outright complimenting it. Take a look through the entire review and you will see the same complaints post-40 that most people here are talking about. In fact, their bottom line says:
"Overall I'd say the game's worth checking out, though maybe it's best to wait a month or two at this point so more of the issues with higher level content can get worked out."
The Post-40 impressions speak badly of the content, the crafting and the harvesting, the lack of different armor styles and the bugs throughout the game.
IGN is full of crap and reviews games based on payments from companies.
they are however completely right here. unfortunately
at least you're honest.
i too was shocked when i read how blatantly he slammed its faults. i commend his journalistic integrity however, since truthfulness is what i want from a gaming site, not hype.
Actually, you're wrong, and I'm wondering how many people here actually read the entire thing.
First of all, this thread's a repeat, since I posted the same thing here 4 Days Ago, and opinion-free, taking the good and bad spots in only quote form from the article:
http://www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/post/2056566#2056566
Most of the review is lukewarm at best, and not much is outright complimenting it. Take a look through the entire review and you will see the same complaints post-40 that most people here are talking about. In fact, their bottom line says:
"Overall I'd say the game's worth checking out, though maybe it's best to wait a month or two at this point so more of the issues with higher level content can get worked out."
The Post-40 impressions speak badly of the content, the crafting and the harvesting, the lack of different armor styles and the bugs throughout the game.
"Overall I'd say the game's worth checking out, though maybe it's best to wait a month or two at this point so more of the issues with higher level content can get worked out."this means they are recomending the game. yes they say to wait a month or two and i agree. I did read the entire thing and overall it was a fair review, but this review is not in any way bashing the game as the OP was trying to make it seem which was my original point so no I'm not wrong and you are misunderstood
Actually, you're wrong, and I'm wondering how many people here actually read the entire thing.
First of all, this thread's a repeat, since I posted the same thing here 4 Days Ago, and opinion-free, taking the good and bad spots in only quote form from the article:
http://www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/post/2056566#2056566
Most of the review is lukewarm at best, and not much is outright complimenting it. Take a look through the entire review and you will see the same complaints post-40 that most people here are talking about. In fact, their bottom line says:
"Overall I'd say the game's worth checking out, though maybe it's best to wait a month or two at this point so more of the issues with higher level content can get worked out."
The Post-40 impressions speak badly of the content, the crafting and the harvesting, the lack of different armor styles and the bugs throughout the game.
"Overall I'd say the game's worth checking out, though maybe it's best to wait a month or two at this point so more of the issues with higher level content can get worked out."this means they are recomending the game. yes they say to wait a month or two and i agree. I did read the entire thing and overall it was a fair review, but this review is not in any way bashing the game as the OP was trying to make it seem which was my original point so no I'm not wrong and you are misunderstood
Aye, the article just stated facts and some of them may not be what fans of the game want others to hear, but it still got a GOOD rating in the overall review that was posted later. I mean its not like they are saying "OMFG RUN AWAY THIS GAME SUCKS!!"
There are 3 types of people in the world.
1.) Those who make things happen
2.) Those who watch things happen
3.) And those who wonder "What the %#*& just happened?!"