Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Why PC players make good beta testers for consoles

markyturnipmarkyturnip Member UncommonPosts: 837

It is seems pretty clear that PC players are currently paying to test this game before it is released on XBox 360. It seems not such a bad idea - why?

 

a) because PC players are more tech savvy, so are more likely to be able to cope with difficulties and find solutions

b) PC players more patient about dealing with bugs (despite what you read in forums)

c) PC players probably have more disposable income, so don't mind paying to beta test so much

d) PC players are willing to pay for mid beta level quality, in return for playing before console players

e) there is less of a brand risk to bad PC games... if XBOx messes up, it hurts XBox as a whole; if a PC game messes up, the developer takes a bit of a knock but no-one else really bears any consequences

f) PC players will test out many configurations and craft their own mods and uis, which Funcom can adopt, and use to improve the game pre XBox

 

any other thoughts?

«1

Comments

  • UmbralUmbral Member Posts: 1,051

     

    1-Age of Conan in the 360 wont be the same, because combat need to be adapted to joystick and AOC need to be at least 2x smaller.

     

    2-360 is a closed system, very easy to test, you cant ( and you wont ) test a 360 game using a different and open system like a PC, so your theory make no sense, it in only based on the fact PC gamers thing Console gamers are a lesser kind of consumers. A xbox game will be tested in the xbox.

     

    3-Any bug fixed on the PC wont work in the 360, as I said it is much more easy to fix issues in a closed system.

     

    4-Anyone that support your theory just dont know the differences between PCs and Consoles.

     

    5-Age of Conan needed more tests on PCs before the official release, this has nothing to do with the 360.

     

    See, just be rational and you realize, your theory has no base.

     

     

    ....

     

  • brostynbrostyn Member, Newbie CommonPosts: 3,092

    g) PC players make cool threads about how they are better than console players

     

    Oh no, what if someone plays both? OMFG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • KirijiKiriji Member Posts: 340
    Originally posted by Umbral


     
    1-Age of Conan in the 360 wont be the same, because combat need to be adapted to joystick and AOC need to be at least 2x smaller.
     
    2-360 is a closed system, very easy to test, you cant ( and you wont ) test a 360 game using a different and open system like a PC, so your theory make no sense, it in only based on the fact PC gamers thing Console gamers are a lesser kind of consumers. A xbox game will be tested in the xbox.
     
    3-Any bug fixed on the PC wont work in the 360, as I said it is much more easy to fix issues in a closed system.
     
    4-Anyone that support your theory just dont know the differences between PCs and Consoles.
     
    5-Age of Conan needed more tests on PCs before the official release, this has nothing to do with the 360.
     
     
     
    ....
     



     

    Joystick?

    Look at FFXI identical on Playstation and PC. They will need to scale the graphics down a bit, lower file size, but I cant see why this wont work on the 360 box. With all the instancing and the style of the combat system this game screams console.

    image

  • MajinashMajinash Member Posts: 1,320
    Originally posted by Umbral


     
    1-Age of Conan in the 360 wont be the same, because combat need to be adapted to joystick and AOC need to be at least 2x smaller.
     Look at FFXI, its the same on the PC and PS2, it will be the same with AoC.
    2-360 is a closed system, very easy to test, you cant ( and you wont ) test a 360 game using a different and open system like a PC, so your theory make no sense, it in only based on the fact PC gamers thing Console gamers are a lesser kind of consumers. A xbox game will be tested in the xbox.
    the XBOX is a PC, you can test an XBOX game on a PC (no not your PC, the programmers can) and the software being tested is the same.
    3-Any bug fixed on the PC wont work in the 360, as I said it is much more easy to fix issues in a closed system.
     LOTS of bug fixes on the PC will work on the 360.  this is an MMO, most of the bugs you see are server side.  any server side bug fixed carries over to the console version.  you know those bosses that just stood there and let you kill them? yeah, I'm sure they'll have to fix that again for the 360.
    4-Anyone that support your theory just dont know the differences between PCs and Consoles.
     
    5-Age of Conan needed more tests on PCs before the official release, this has nothing to do with the 360.
     
     yes, it needed lots more testing.  this thread went WAY over your head.
     
    ....
     

     

    Everything creates huge amounts of negativity on the internet, that's what the internet is for: Negativity, porn and lolcats.

  • UmbralUmbral Member Posts: 1,051
    Originally posted by Bladeinhand




     
    Joystick?
    Look at FFXI identical on Playstation and PC. They will need to scale the graphics down a bit, lower file size, but I cant see why this wont work on the 360 box. With all the instancing and the style of the combat system this game screams console.



     

    With all the combos and potions after level 50 it would need more buttons, so it will need at least a couple of changes.

    HD is not default in the 360 so the game will need to be reduced for sure and  not just only a bit.

    But my point is, it is very easy to test and check a game in a totally closed system, the issue is with PCs where we have tons of different configurations.

    A patch made for PC wont work for the 360, can you see now why I say no one is testing it for the XBOX?

    The game has been tested for PC only, it would need much more time of beta, but who think it has something to do with the 360 is wrong.

     

    ...

  • UmbralUmbral Member Posts: 1,051
    Originally posted by Majinash

    Originally posted by Umbral


     
    1-Age of Conan in the 360 wont be the same, because combat need to be adapted to joystick and AOC need to be at least 2x smaller.
     Look at FFXI, its the same on the PC and PS2, it will be the same with AoC.
     FFXI is a totally different game that came before on Console.
    2-360 is a closed system, very easy to test, you cant ( and you wont ) test a 360 game using a different and open system like a PC, so your theory make no sense, it in only based on the fact PC gamers thing Console gamers are a lesser kind of consumers. A xbox game will be tested in the xbox.
    the XBOX is a PC, you can test an XBOX game on a PC (no not your PC, the programmers can) and the software being tested is the same.
    No, the major issue is we have tons of different hardwares on PCs, we have only one 360 system, they dont need to test the game in a complex and full of issues system like a PC to make it work in  the 360, it is much more easier to make it work on the 360
    3-Any bug fixed on the PC wont work in the 360, as I said it is much more easy to fix issues in a closed system.
     LOTS of bug fixes on the PC will work on the 360.  this is an MMO, most of the bugs you see are server side.  any server side bug fixed carries over to the console version.  you know those bosses that just stood there and let you kill them? yeah, I'm sure they'll have to fix that again for the 360.
    Most of bugs are performance and gameplay issues, not pure server issues, this fixed have nothing to do with a different version of the game, most of AOC issues are client issues not server issues.
    4-Anyone that support your theory just dont know the differences between PCs and Consoles.
     
    5-Age of Conan needed more tests on PCs before the official release, this has nothing to do with the 360.
     
     yes, it needed lots more testing.  this thread went WAY over your head.
    Way over my heas? Just because I know AOC need more testing but this Console vs PC isse is pure nonsense?
    Explain this "way over your head", expressing my opinion using rational arguments is like going over my head?
     
    ....
     

     



     

  • KirijiKiriji Member Posts: 340
    Originally posted by Umbral

    Originally posted by Bladeinhand




     
    Joystick?
    Look at FFXI identical on Playstation and PC. They will need to scale the graphics down a bit, lower file size, but I cant see why this wont work on the 360 box. With all the instancing and the style of the combat system this game screams console.



     

    With all the combos and potions after level 50 it would need more buttons, so it will need at least a couple of changes.

    HD is not default in the 360 so the game will need to be reduced for sure and  not just only a bit.

    But my point is, it is very easy to test and check a game in a totally closed system, the issue is with PCs where we have tons of different configurations.

    A patch made for PC wont work for the 360, can you see now why I say no one is testing it for the XBOX?

    The game has been tested for PC only, it would need much more time of beta, but who think it has something to do with the 360 is wrong.

     

    ...



     

    It wont need more buttons, if you had played FF XI you would relise this. HD has nothing to do with graphic capibilties, it will run the same speed regardless if its on a normal TV or HD.

    All XBOX games are developed on a PC, they will have patches like a PC does as well they wont be the same patches, but they will have them.

    This will be the foundations for the XBOX version, to think there doing a completly different version for the XBOX is crazy, this version will be ported over, thats if they can do it. Which I doubt.

    image

  • UmbralUmbral Member Posts: 1,051
    Originally posted by Bladeinhand

    Originally posted by Umbral

    Originally posted by Bladeinhand




     
    Joystick?
    Look at FFXI identical on Playstation and PC. They will need to scale the graphics down a bit, lower file size, but I cant see why this wont work on the 360 box. With all the instancing and the style of the combat system this game screams console.



     

    With all the combos and potions after level 50 it would need more buttons, so it will need at least a couple of changes.

    HD is not default in the 360 so the game will need to be reduced for sure and  not just only a bit.

    But my point is, it is very easy to test and check a game in a totally closed system, the issue is with PCs where we have tons of different configurations.

    A patch made for PC wont work for the 360, can you see now why I say no one is testing it for the XBOX?

    The game has been tested for PC only, it would need much more time of beta, but who think it has something to do with the 360 is wrong.

     

    ...



     

    It wont need more buttons, if you had played FF XI you would relise this. HD has nothing to do with graphic capibilties, it will run the same speed regardless if its on a normal TV or HD.

    Normal TV or HD? What are you talking about?

    Im talking about storage, 360 wont be able to handle almost 30 gigas.

    By the way, about buttons, funcom already said the game will not be the same on the 360 regarding gameplay.

    All XBOX games are developed on a PC, they will have patches like a PC does as well they wont be the same patches, but they will have them.

    Ofcourse it is developed on a PC this has nothing to do with the fact a performance or client issue patch for a open system like a pc just wont work in the same way for the 360, as I said it is much, much more easier to patch a game for the 360, getting patches for the PC player base to use on a closed system is stupidity.

    This will be the foundations for the XBOX version, to think there doing a completly different version for the XBOX is crazy, this version will be ported over, thats if they can do it. Which I doubt.

    Most of games ported from XBOX to PC or from PC to XBOX usually have issues on the PC side, a ported version is not the same version and as I said a PC version will always need much more tests and remember, AOC is not a console port on the PC is a PC port that may come to the 360.

    Just to be clear, Im not saying AOC will not work on the 360, it will for sure with a well made port,( if Funcom can make it, Im not sure ) but the "we are testing it for a console" theory is just non sense.



     

  • KirijiKiriji Member Posts: 340
    Originally posted by Umbral

    Originally posted by Bladeinhand

    Originally posted by Umbral

    Originally posted by Bladeinhand




     
    Joystick?
    Look at FFXI identical on Playstation and PC. They will need to scale the graphics down a bit, lower file size, but I cant see why this wont work on the 360 box. With all the instancing and the style of the combat system this game screams console.



     

    With all the combos and potions after level 50 it would need more buttons, so it will need at least a couple of changes.

    HD is not default in the 360 so the game will need to be reduced for sure and  not just only a bit.

    But my point is, it is very easy to test and check a game in a totally closed system, the issue is with PCs where we have tons of different configurations.

    A patch made for PC wont work for the 360, can you see now why I say no one is testing it for the XBOX?

    The game has been tested for PC only, it would need much more time of beta, but who think it has something to do with the 360 is wrong.

     

    ...



     

    It wont need more buttons, if you had played FF XI you would relise this. HD has nothing to do with graphic capibilties, it will run the same speed regardless if its on a normal TV or HD.

    Normal TV or HD? What are you talking about?

    Im talking about storage, 360 wont be able to handle almost 30 gigas.

    By the way, about buttons, funcom already said the game will not be the same on the 360 regarding gameplay.

    All XBOX games are developed on a PC, they will have patches like a PC does as well they wont be the same patches, but they will have them.

    Ofcourse it is developed on a PC this has nothing to do with the fact a performance or client issue patch for a open system like a pc just wont work in the same way for the 360, as I said it is much, much more easier to patch a game for the 360, getting patches forthe PC player base to use on a closed system is stupidity.

    This will be the foundations for the XBOX version, to think there doing a completly different version for the XBOX is crazy, this version will be ported over, thats if they can do it. Which I doubt.

    Most of games ported from XBOX to PC or from PC to XBOX usually have issues on the PC side, a ported version is not the same version and as I said a PC version will always need much more tests and remember, AOC is not a console port on the PC is a PC port that may come to the 360.



     



     

    Sorry but that made absolutely no sense.

    image

  • UmbralUmbral Member Posts: 1,051
    Originally posted by Bladeinhand




     
    Sorry but that made absolutely no sense.



     

    What exacly Bladeinhand?

    I confess I was not able to find any sense in your argumment about hd too. ( what a TV has to do with the fact not all 360 versions come with HD?)

    Really, if you belive all PC testing  will work ( and are for ) the 360 version, I cant find much sense in that too.

     

    ...

  • gurugeorgegurugeorge Member UncommonPosts: 481
    Originally posted by Umbral

    Originally posted by Bladeinhand




     
    Sorry but that made absolutely no sense.



     

    What exacly Bladeinhand?

    I confess I was not able to find any sense in your argumment about hd too. ( what a TV has to do with the fact not all 360 versions come with HD?)

    Really, if you belive all PC testing  will work ( and are for ) the 360 version, I cant find much sense in that too.

     

    ...

     

    Don't worry, logic and common sense never got in the way of a good whine meme.  "We are testing the 360 version" is just something somebody stupid said on the forums and the whiners picked up on it because they thought it made them sound like they knew what they were talking about.

  • KirijiKiriji Member Posts: 340
    Originally posted by Umbral

    Originally posted by Bladeinhand




     
    Sorry but that made absolutely no sense.



     

    What exacly Bladeinhand?

    I confess I was not able to find any sense in your argumment about hd too. ( what a TV has to do with the fact not all 360 versions come with HD?)

    Really, if you belive all PC testing  will work ( and are for ) the 360 version, I cant find much sense in that too.

     

    ...

    I took HD as High Definition not hardrive, you worded it poorly. I take it English is not your main language? I know you cant just port over a PC game to a console like magic, what I am saying is that they will base the XBOX version on the PC version people are playing now, hence PC players are playing beta for XBOX users.

     

    image

  • UmbralUmbral Member Posts: 1,051
    Originally posted by Bladeinhand

    Originally posted by Umbral




     
    What exacly Bladeinhand?
    I confess I was not able to find any sense in your argumment about hd too. ( what a TV has to do with the fact not all 360 versions come with HD?)
    Really, if you belive all PC testing  will work ( and are for ) the 360 version, I cant find much sense in that too.
     
    ...

    I took HD as High Definition not hardrive, you worded it poorly. I take it English is not your main language? I know you cant just port over a PC game to a console like magic, what I am saying is that they will base the XBOX version on the PC version people are playing now, hence PC players are playing beta for XBOX users.

     



     

    No, english is not my main language ( not even my second ) but I didnt word it poorly, you took it as High Definition not based in the way I used, dont blame me if you made a mistake, but I think  you are probably not used to the 360, as everyone use the term "hd default" on the XBOX based on the different console versions.

    But I see now you dont have an argument about the real HD issue.

    I already said why you cant call the PC version a 360 beta, you may call it a PC beta if you want.

     

    ...

  • UmbralUmbral Member Posts: 1,051
    Originally posted by gurugeorge

    Originally posted by Umbral

    Originally posted by Bladeinhand




     
    Sorry but that made absolutely no sense.



     

    What exacly Bladeinhand?

    I confess I was not able to find any sense in your argumment about hd too. ( what a TV has to do with the fact not all 360 versions come with HD?)

    Really, if you belive all PC testing  will work ( and are for ) the 360 version, I cant find much sense in that too.

     

    ...

     

    Don't worry, logic and common sense never got in the way of a good whine meme.  "We are testing the 360 version" is just something somebody stupid said on the forums and the whiners picked up on it because they thought it made them sound like they knew what they were talking about.



     

    I think you are right Gurugeorge

     

    ...

  • KirijiKiriji Member Posts: 340
    Originally posted by Umbral

    Originally posted by Bladeinhand

    Originally posted by Umbral




     
    What exacly Bladeinhand?
    I confess I was not able to find any sense in your argumment about hd too. ( what a TV has to do with the fact not all 360 versions come with HD?)
    Really, if you belive all PC testing  will work ( and are for ) the 360 version, I cant find much sense in that too.
     
    ...

    I took HD as High Definition not hardrive, you worded it poorly. I take it English is not your main language? I know you cant just port over a PC game to a console like magic, what I am saying is that they will base the XBOX version on the PC version people are playing now, hence PC players are playing beta for XBOX users.

     



     

    No, english is not my main language ( not even my second ) but I didnt word it poorly, you took it as High Definition not based in the way I used, dont blame me if you made a mistake, but I think  you are probably not used to the 360, as everyone use the term hd default on the XBOX based on the different console versions.

    But I see now you dont have an argument about the real HD issue.

    I already said why you cant call the PC version a 360 beta, you may call it a PC beta if you want.

     

    ...



     

    Obviously Not. I work in the computer industry, when I hear HD I think of High Definition not hardrives, I made no mistake you worded it poorly ; -

    "HD is not default in the 360 so the game will need to be reduced for sure and  not just only a bit. "

    What was I meant to take from that?

    " The HD does not come with all versions of the XBOX, also the games file size will need to be reduced allot more than a bit, to fit the limited storagecapacity it has."

    Would of made more sense.

    So if they are not using the PC version of Conan for the XBOX, you think they have some sort of special version? Seeing they have ploughed millions of dollars and five years making this I doubt it.

    image

  • UmbralUmbral Member Posts: 1,051
    Originally posted by Bladeinhand

    Originally posted by Umbral

    Originally posted by Bladeinhand

    Originally posted by Umbral




     
    What exacly Bladeinhand?
    I confess I was not able to find any sense in your argumment about hd too. ( what a TV has to do with the fact not all 360 versions come with HD?)
    Really, if you belive all PC testing  will work ( and are for ) the 360 version, I cant find much sense in that too.
     
    ...

    I took HD as High Definition not hardrive, you worded it poorly. I take it English is not your main language? I know you cant just port over a PC game to a console like magic, what I am saying is that they will base the XBOX version on the PC version people are playing now, hence PC players are playing beta for XBOX users.

     



     

    No, english is not my main language ( not even my second ) but I didnt word it poorly, you took it as High Definition not based in the way I used, dont blame me if you made a mistake, but I think  you are probably not used to the 360, as everyone use the term hd default on the XBOX based on the different console versions.

    But I see now you dont have an argument about the real HD issue.

    I already said why you cant call the PC version a 360 beta, you may call it a PC beta if you want.

     

    ...



     

    Obviously Not. I work in the computer industry, when I hear HD I think of High Definition not hardrives, I made no mistake you worded it poorly ; -

    "HD is not default in the 360 so the game will need to be reduced for sure and  not just only a bit. "

    What was I meant to take from that?

    " The HD does not come with all versions of the XBOX, also the games file size will need to be reduced allot more than a bit, to fit the limited storagecapacity it has."

    Would of made more sense.

    So if they are not using the PC version of Conan for the XBOX, you think they have some sort of special version? Seeing they have ploughed millions of dollars and five years making this I doubt it.



    As I said you took it by high definition even after I said the game would need to be reduced because you are not familiar with the 360 and this is why it will be hard for you to understand anything I say between 360 versus PCs.

    Again, you have no arguments about that, because you realized the 360 version need to be a smaller modified version of AOC, you can see now it is not exacly a common port, so you cant call the PC version a console beta.

    They are using the same base version and porting it, but this doesnt mean the PC patches and fixes are for the 360 aswell, it is common knowledge Funcom has a different team for the XBOX version.

    With the same base but with separated patches and testing, you just cant say Age of Conan on PC is a beta version for the 360 upcoming release.

    As I said, it is much more easy to test and fix a game for a system like the 360, no one would use a PC player base with so many different hardwares for that.

     

    ...

  • KirijiKiriji Member Posts: 340
    Originally posted by Umbral

    Originally posted by Bladeinhand

    Originally posted by Umbral

    Originally posted by Bladeinhand

    Originally posted by Umbral




     
    What exacly Bladeinhand?
    I confess I was not able to find any sense in your argumment about hd too. ( what a TV has to do with the fact not all 360 versions come with HD?)
    Really, if you belive all PC testing  will work ( and are for ) the 360 version, I cant find much sense in that too.
     
    ...

    I took HD as High Definition not hardrive, you worded it poorly. I take it English is not your main language? I know you cant just port over a PC game to a console like magic, what I am saying is that they will base the XBOX version on the PC version people are playing now, hence PC players are playing beta for XBOX users.

     



     

    No, english is not my main language ( not even my second ) but I didnt word it poorly, you took it as High Definition not based in the way I used, dont blame me if you made a mistake, but I think  you are probably not used to the 360, as everyone use the term hd default on the XBOX based on the different console versions.

    But I see now you dont have an argument about the real HD issue.

    I already said why you cant call the PC version a 360 beta, you may call it a PC beta if you want.

     

    ...



     

    Obviously Not. I work in the computer industry, when I hear HD I think of High Definition not hardrives, I made no mistake you worded it poorly ; -

    "HD is not default in the 360 so the game will need to be reduced for sure and  not just only a bit. "

    What was I meant to take from that?

    " The HD does not come with all versions of the XBOX, also the games file size will need to be reduced allot more than a bit, to fit the limited storagecapacity it has."

    Would of made more sense.

    So if they are not using the PC version of Conan for the XBOX, you think they have some sort of special version? Seeing they have ploughed millions of dollars and five years making this I doubt it.



    As I said you took it by high definition even after I said the game would need to be reduced because you are not familiar with the 360 and this is why it will be hard for you to understand anything I say between 360 versus PCs.

    Again I misunderstood you because your english is poor. You worded it poorly, there is no way around it. I have a XBOX 360, don't presume.

    Again, you have no arguments about that, because you realized the 360 version need to be a smaller modified version of AOC, you can see now it is not exacly a common port, so you cant call the PC version a console beta.

    I never said it was a straight port, they will chop bits out to make it smaller, doesnt mean it won't be more or less the same as the PC version.

    They are using the same base version and porting it, but this doesnt mean the PC patches and fixes are for the 360 aswell, it is common knowledge Funcom has a different team for the XBOX version.

    You really think they will use the base version they used at launch, haha. They will use the patched more fixed version, that is on the PC now.

    With the same base but with separated patches and testing, you just cant say Age of Conan on PC is a beta version for the 360 upcoming release.

    The things they are patching now will be in the XBOX version, when the game is released on the XBOX you will get patches for it then on the XBOX. So it is a XBOX beta.

    As I said, it is much more easy to test and fix a game for a system like the 360, no one would use a PC player base with so many different hardwares for that.

    They don't test and fix games on the XBOX they use PC's, you just don't get it. I guess we must just agree to disagree.

     

    ...



     

    image

  • UmbralUmbral Member Posts: 1,051
    Originally posted by Bladeinhand

    Originally posted by Umbral

    Originally posted by Bladeinhand

    Originally posted by Umbral

    Originally posted by Bladeinhand

    Originally posted by Umbral




     
    What exacly Bladeinhand?
    I confess I was not able to find any sense in your argumment about hd too. ( what a TV has to do with the fact not all 360 versions come with HD?)
    Really, if you belive all PC testing  will work ( and are for ) the 360 version, I cant find much sense in that too.
     
    ...

    I took HD as High Definition not hardrive, you worded it poorly. I take it English is not your main language? I know you cant just port over a PC game to a console like magic, what I am saying is that they will base the XBOX version on the PC version people are playing now, hence PC players are playing beta for XBOX users.

     



     

    No, english is not my main language ( not even my second ) but I didnt word it poorly, you took it as High Definition not based in the way I used, dont blame me if you made a mistake, but I think  you are probably not used to the 360, as everyone use the term hd default on the XBOX based on the different console versions.

    But I see now you dont have an argument about the real HD issue.

    I already said why you cant call the PC version a 360 beta, you may call it a PC beta if you want.

     

    ...



     

    Obviously Not. I work in the computer industry, when I hear HD I think of High Definition not hardrives, I made no mistake you worded it poorly ; -

    "HD is not default in the 360 so the game will need to be reduced for sure and  not just only a bit. "

    What was I meant to take from that?

    " The HD does not come with all versions of the XBOX, also the games file size will need to be reduced allot more than a bit, to fit the limited storagecapacity it has."

    Would of made more sense.

    So if they are not using the PC version of Conan for the XBOX, you think they have some sort of special version? Seeing they have ploughed millions of dollars and five years making this I doubt it.



    As I said you took it by high definition even after I said the game would need to be reduced because you are not familiar with the 360 and this is why it will be hard for you to understand anything I say between 360 versus PCs.

    Again I misunderstood you because your english is poor. You worded it poorly, there is no way around it. I have a XBOX 360, don't presume.

    Again, you have no arguments about that, because you realized the 360 version need to be a smaller modified version of AOC, you can see now it is not exacly a common port, so you cant call the PC version a console beta.

    I never said it was a straight port, they will chop bits out to make it smaller, doesnt mean it won't be more or less the same as the PC version.

    They are using the same base version and porting it, but this doesnt mean the PC patches and fixes are for the 360 aswell, it is common knowledge Funcom has a different team for the XBOX version.

    You really think they will use the base version they used at launch, haha. They will use the patched more fixed version, that is on the PC now.

    With the same base but with separated patches and testing, you just cant say Age of Conan on PC is a beta version for the 360 upcoming release.

    The things they are patching now will be in the XBOX version, when the game is released on the XBOX you will get patches for it then on the XBOX. So it is a XBOX beta.

    As I said, it is much more easy to test and fix a game for a system like the 360, no one would use a PC player base with so many different hardwares for that.

    They don't test and fix games on the XBOX they use PC's, you just don't get it. I guess we must just agree to disagree.

     

    ...



     



     

     

    You realize you still dont have any argument about the storage issue and you prefer to claim my english is poor to use it as a counter argument... well, dont you think it is a bit silly? Really, when you claim my english is poor the fact you had no idea about the storage issue doesnt go away.

     

    You prefer to act with arrogance and say I dont get it , but you should realize at this point the fixes are for PC issues and not the upcoming reduced 360 version.

     

    If you think they need typical PC fixes like performance fixes and hardware incompatibility fixes to test the 360 version, well, I have nothing more to say and Im happy to say, I disagree with you.

     

    It seems you are not familiar with the 360 and the real Age of Conan issues and patches, but I bet you will say you have both and my english is poor, so you can feel you are right, anyway, this started to be pointless.

     

     

    ...

  • ThradarThradar Member Posts: 949

    Why do you people feel the need to quote people just above you and quote replies 5 deep?  WTF?

  • mrdoublerrmrdoublerr Member Posts: 269
    Originally posted by Umbral

    Originally posted by Bladeinhand

    Originally posted by Umbral

    Originally posted by Bladeinhand

    Originally posted by Umbral

    Originally posted by Bladeinhand

    Originally posted by Umbral




     
    What exacly Bladeinhand?
    I confess I was not able to find any sense in your argumment about hd too. ( what a TV has to do with the fact not all 360 versions come with HD?)
    Really, if you belive all PC testing  will work ( and are for ) the 360 version, I cant find much sense in that too.
     
    ...

    I took HD as High Definition not hardrive, you worded it poorly. I take it English is not your main language? I know you cant just port over a PC game to a console like magic, what I am saying is that they will base the XBOX version on the PC version people are playing now, hence PC players are playing beta for XBOX users.

     



     

    No, english is not my main language ( not even my second ) but I didnt word it poorly, you took it as High Definition not based in the way I used, dont blame me if you made a mistake, but I think  you are probably not used to the 360, as everyone use the term hd default on the XBOX based on the different console versions.

    But I see now you dont have an argument about the real HD issue.

    I already said why you cant call the PC version a 360 beta, you may call it a PC beta if you want.

     

    ...



     

    Obviously Not. I work in the computer industry, when I hear HD I think of High Definition not hardrives, I made no mistake you worded it poorly ; -

    "HD is not default in the 360 so the game will need to be reduced for sure and  not just only a bit. "

    What was I meant to take from that?

    " The HD does not come with all versions of the XBOX, also the games file size will need to be reduced allot more than a bit, to fit the limited storagecapacity it has."

    Would of made more sense.

    So if they are not using the PC version of Conan for the XBOX, you think they have some sort of special version? Seeing they have ploughed millions of dollars and five years making this I doubt it.



    As I said you took it by high definition even after I said the game would need to be reduced because you are not familiar with the 360 and this is why it will be hard for you to understand anything I say between 360 versus PCs.

    Again I misunderstood you because your english is poor. You worded it poorly, there is no way around it. I have a XBOX 360, don't presume.

    Again, you have no arguments about that, because you realized the 360 version need to be a smaller modified version of AOC, you can see now it is not exacly a common port, so you cant call the PC version a console beta.

    I never said it was a straight port, they will chop bits out to make it smaller, doesnt mean it won't be more or less the same as the PC version.

    They are using the same base version and porting it, but this doesnt mean the PC patches and fixes are for the 360 aswell, it is common knowledge Funcom has a different team for the XBOX version.

    You really think they will use the base version they used at launch, haha. They will use the patched more fixed version, that is on the PC now.

    With the same base but with separated patches and testing, you just cant say Age of Conan on PC is a beta version for the 360 upcoming release.

    The things they are patching now will be in the XBOX version, when the game is released on the XBOX you will get patches for it then on the XBOX. So it is a XBOX beta.

    As I said, it is much more easy to test and fix a game for a system like the 360, no one would use a PC player base with so many different hardwares for that.

    They don't test and fix games on the XBOX they use PC's, you just don't get it. I guess we must just agree to disagree.

     

    ...



     



     

     

    You realize you still dont have any argument about the storage issue and you prefer to claim my english is poor to use it as a counter argument... well, dont you think it is a bit silly? Really, when you claim my english is poor the fact you had no idea about the storage issue doesnt go away.

     

    You prefer to act with arrogance and say I dont get it , but you should realize at this point the fixes are for PC issues and not the upcoming reduced 360 version.

     

    If you think they need typical PC fixes like performance fixes and hardware incompatibility fixes to test the 360 version, well, I have nothing more to say and Im happy to say, I disagree with you.

     

    It seems you are not familiar with the 360 and the real Age of Conan issues and patches, but I bet you will say you have both and my english is poor, so you can feel you are right, anyway, this started to be pointless.

     

     

    ...

    I like pie

     

    and hdd is hard drive

  • UmbralUmbral Member Posts: 1,051

    Mrdoublerr

    In South America hd is hard drive.

    Does this change the fact AOC would need to be smaller (different version) in the 360?

     

     

    ....

  • fennec12fennec12 Member Posts: 52

    As for file size, then this will have a relative easy fix, since the xbox version wont have low/medium/high setting, and therefore not include irrelevant graphics/effects/models.

    It will most likely NOT be the high setting (that takeup most space) they are aiming for but a low/medium setting, and since they also dont need all the fixes to different hardware (only one here), the total filessize will be easy to degrees...

  • Death1942Death1942 Member UncommonPosts: 2,587
    Originally posted by brostyn


    g) PC players make cool threads about how they are better than console players
     
    Oh no, what if someone plays both? OMFG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

     

    WHAT?

     

    it cant possibly happen.  no one is allowed to play both...or like both...or dont give a toss about either.

    this is the modern world damnit and everyone MUST choose a side.

    MMO wish list:

    -Changeable worlds
    -Solid non level based game
    -Sharks with lasers attached to their heads

  • thorwoodthorwood Member Posts: 485

    PC players review after beta testing a console, "I was expecting naked bodies on screen.  The instructions said you need a joystick ..."

  • gracefieldgracefield Member UncommonPosts: 279

    I think Bladeinhand had it right about a million posts ago, you think they re-write the thing totally for the XBOX360? Of course they don't. It's bound to be essentially the same software and consequently, any major difficulties that have emerged during the PC phase are going to be addressed - it wouldn't make good business sense not to do that, would it?

     

    So whoever said that PC owners were essentially beta-testing the game for console release was probably right. I'm no developer, but if a major bug became obvious on the PC, would you not fix it before it went to console? That's beta testing...

     

     

Sign In or Register to comment.