Well, those who still claims graphics will improve when the game launches, are now proven wrong. Personally, I was expecting lots of options for adjustments, though nothing extreme. Behind that link: We've got some great plans for improved graphics options as we continue through launch. They have PLANS through launch, nothing conclusive, and appearently nothing ready. Except for a FIX that MAY improve stuff on high-end computers.
Mmmm.
Lets just say this.. What kind of graphics are you looking for?
We all know its better than WoW graphics and it doesnt compare to AoC?
So what kind of graphics are you looking for anyways?
O really ? Watrhammer doesnt even come close to WoW´s graphics, in fact not a single MMO does yet. It´s sad really, maybe you just look at the polygon count of models but that doesnt make good graphics. The art, the style look at wow its amazing what Blizzard do there. AoC ? sorry AoC doesnt have good graphics. Alot of polygons doesnt mean good graphics.
And cmon there is no reason why the graphics must be that bad like in Warhammer in year 2008. I dont even mean only the models but look for example when you talking to a NPC, the little box where your quest text stays in etc... it looks just plain, no reason for it to be that bad really ....
Especially spell graphics are MEGA lame, they really look like from 1999 .... sorry wtf ?
And no Iam not a WoW lover -.- actually I hoped that Warhammer will be good like I did with AoC and other games .. o well another disapointment.
Will people ever learn the difference between Graphics and Art ?
No, they will not. To most gamers graphics are graphics and if they don't fit how they view it should be, the graphics will automaticly be crap.
It's a Jeep thing. . . _______ |___| \_______/ = |||||| = |X| \*........*/ |X| |X|_________|X| You wouldn't understand
I do love sarcasm as well, very funy post, the guy mocking those pointlessly making absurd complaints about the graphics of Warhammer (which are of course, on par with alot of games in the market, and are far improved from Warcraft )
Well, those who still claims graphics will improve when the game launches, are now proven wrong. Personally, I was expecting lots of options for adjustments, though nothing extreme. Behind that link: We've got some great plans for improved graphics options as we continue through launch. They have PLANS through launch, nothing conclusive, and appearently nothing ready. Except for a FIX that MAY improve stuff on high-end computers.
Mmmm.
Lets just say this.. What kind of graphics are you looking for?
We all know its better than WoW graphics and it doesnt compare to AoC?
So what kind of graphics are you looking for anyways?
O really ? Watrhammer doesnt even come close to WoW´s graphics, in fact not a single MMO does yet. It´s sad really, maybe you just look at the polygon count of models but that doesnt make good graphics. The art, the style look at wow its amazing what Blizzard do there. AoC ? sorry AoC doesnt have good graphics. Alot of polygons doesnt mean good graphics.
And cmon there is no reason why the graphics must be that bad like in Warhammer in year 2008. I dont even mean only the models but look for example when you talking to a NPC, the little box where your quest text stays in etc... it looks just plain, no reason for it to be that bad really ....
Especially spell graphics are MEGA lame, they really look like from 1999 .... sorry wtf ?
And no Iam not a WoW lover -.- actually I hoped that Warhammer will be good like I did with AoC and other games .. o well another disapointment.
Will people ever learn the difference between Graphics and Art ?
This coming from the guy who doesn't seem to know much about either.
is character selection screen in game rendered? i imagined it is.
and than it became apparent that they shipped without npc shadows(just blobs) and lower rez character textures to limit the noise that forums would make about playability(with some machines, high rez char. and shadows etc)crashes and the like.
to appeal to more potential customers. which i believe is the case as opposed to the fewer of us that have uber rigs and can handle the load of higher graphics.
Comments
Mmmm.
Lets just say this.. What kind of graphics are you looking for?
We all know its better than WoW graphics and it doesnt compare to AoC?
So what kind of graphics are you looking for anyways?
O really ? Watrhammer doesnt even come close to WoW´s graphics, in fact not a single MMO does yet. It´s sad really, maybe you just look at the polygon count of models but that doesnt make good graphics. The art, the style look at wow its amazing what Blizzard do there. AoC ? sorry AoC doesnt have good graphics. Alot of polygons doesnt mean good graphics.
And cmon there is no reason why the graphics must be that bad like in Warhammer in year 2008. I dont even mean only the models but look for example when you talking to a NPC, the little box where your quest text stays in etc... it looks just plain, no reason for it to be that bad really ....
Especially spell graphics are MEGA lame, they really look like from 1999 .... sorry wtf ?
And no Iam not a WoW lover -.- actually I hoped that Warhammer will be good like I did with AoC and other games .. o well another disapointment.
Will people ever learn the difference between Graphics and Art ?
No, they will not. To most gamers graphics are graphics and if they don't fit how they view it should be, the graphics will automaticly be crap.
_______
|___
\_______/
=
|X| \*........*/ |X|
|X|_________|X|
You wouldn't understand
No, they will not. To most gamers graphics are graphics and if they don't fit how they view it should be, the graphics will automaticly be crap.
And so we end up with beautiful graphics that are playing disasters like AoC.
I do love sarcasm as well, very funy post, the guy mocking those pointlessly making absurd complaints about the graphics of Warhammer (which are of course, on par with alot of games in the market, and are far improved from Warcraft )
------------------------------
'Cry Havoc, and Let Loose the Dogs of WARRRRR!!!'
Well not everyone loves Straight Chocolate Ice Cream.
I am more of a Rocky Road type of person.
The OP is definetly in the minority anyways when it comes to hating the graphics.
I have yet to find any MMORPG that 100% of the people agree upon, whether graphics or gameplay.
Mmmm.
Lets just say this.. What kind of graphics are you looking for?
We all know its better than WoW graphics and it doesnt compare to AoC?
So what kind of graphics are you looking for anyways?
O really ? Watrhammer doesnt even come close to WoW´s graphics, in fact not a single MMO does yet. It´s sad really, maybe you just look at the polygon count of models but that doesnt make good graphics. The art, the style look at wow its amazing what Blizzard do there. AoC ? sorry AoC doesnt have good graphics. Alot of polygons doesnt mean good graphics.
And cmon there is no reason why the graphics must be that bad like in Warhammer in year 2008. I dont even mean only the models but look for example when you talking to a NPC, the little box where your quest text stays in etc... it looks just plain, no reason for it to be that bad really ....
Especially spell graphics are MEGA lame, they really look like from 1999 .... sorry wtf ?
And no Iam not a WoW lover -.- actually I hoped that Warhammer will be good like I did with AoC and other games .. o well another disapointment.
Will people ever learn the difference between Graphics and Art ?
This coming from the guy who doesn't seem to know much about either.
http://www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/post/2262016#2262016
is character selection screen in game rendered? i imagined it is.
and than it became apparent that they shipped without npc shadows(just blobs) and lower rez character textures to limit the noise that forums would make about playability(with some machines, high rez char. and shadows etc)crashes and the like.
to appeal to more potential customers. which i believe is the case as opposed to the fewer of us that have uber rigs and can handle the load of higher graphics.
-I will subtlety invade your psyche-